To introduce the jury to the case, and help them get an under standing of whats going on.

Similar documents
What were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?

Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities

Case 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

DIRECT, CROSS, REDIRECT& RECROSS

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

Who s who in a Criminal Trial

[The following paragraph should be given when the court gives the final instructions after the closing arguments:

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

YOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW

A Guide to Your First Mock Trial

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

A Survivor s Guide. to Sexual Assault Prosecution. Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service

Defense: Your goal is to convince as many members of the jury as possible that Abigail Williams is innocent of murder. 4 Attorneys

A Guide to Giving Evidence in Court

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION

PRESERVING THE RECORD AND MAKING OBJECTIONS AT TRIAL: A Win-Win Proposition for Client and Lawyer

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit VII Courtroom Professionalism and Personnel

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal. accusation or indictment, no defense attorney shall be allowed to represent

DESIGNING OUR POLITICAL AND LEGAL SYSTEM YEAR 7 STUDENT POST-VISIT RESOURCE

THE OPENING STATEMENT - THE PREVIEW TO VICTORY OR THE BEGINNING OF DEFEAT? THE CLOSING ARGUMENT IN AN EMPLOYMENT CASE - HOW TO FINALIZE THE VICTORY

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Psychology and Law. I. How are jurors influenced by witnesses, the defendant, and the judge? A. How are jurors influenced by eyewitness testimony?

trial preparation packet

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Historic Courthouse 430 E Street, NW Washington, DC (202)

THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE

INSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN

14. HEARSAY A. INTRODUCTION

The Problem of SpongeBob RoundPants

Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.

HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

Sylvia Andresantos -

The Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven

"Tell-Tale Heart" Mock Trial

The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution

United States District Court

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

PROVIDING PROCEDURAL CONTEXT: A BRIEF OUTLINE OF THE CIVIL TRIAL PROCESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENT S PROPOSED GUILT-PHASE PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS

NOTE WELL: See provisions pertaining to convening an investigative grand jury noted in N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-622(h).

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine

Mock Trial: People of the World v. the Mongols

American Government Jury Duty

Empire Mock Trial Educate. Connect. Empower. A Guide for Competitors from Canada

Directions: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N

Court of Appeals of Ohio

WHERE EVERYONE DESERVES A

WRITING FOR TRIALS 1

JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

Chapter 02 THE COURT SYSTEM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

English as a Second Language Podcast ESL Podcast Legal Problems

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test

C O U R T S O L I D A R I T Y I N T R O D U C T I O N

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied April 27, 1984 COUNSEL

HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA

AN INMATES GUIDE TO. Habeas Corpus. Includes the 11 things you must know about the habeas system

EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2016 DONNELL CANDY STATE OF MARYLAND

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Mark Borello, Judge. April 18, 2018

Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System

1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)?

Dynamic Opening Statements How to Establish Credibility and Persuade From the Beginning

Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2005

>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH

Youth Criminal Court Process

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS FOR CIVIL TRIALS

You are summoned for jury duty

The Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S.

Case of the Missing Puppy

The jury panel is selected by lot from all the names of registered voters or from persons having a valid driver s license.

COURT IN SESSION TEACHER PACK CONTEMPORARY COURTROOM WORKSHOP CYBERBULLYING

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

Case 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# Exhibit D

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

Mock Trial Practice Law Test

BENCH TRIAL HANDBOOK

Video Course Evaluation Form. My Name is: Name of Course: My Street address: Address:

STATE OF OHIO DAVANA SINGH

Pennsylvania Bar Association 100 South Street P.O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA (800)

Introduction. Deciding to report abuse. Reporting to police

Case 1:08-cv LPS Document 601 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT HANDBOOK

v No Ingham Circuit Court v No Ingham Circuit Court ON REMAND

Prisoner Appeals: A Guide

Transcription:

Quiz name: Mock Trial Warm Up - (1-26-2016) Date: 01/26/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 4 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What is the purpose of opening arguments? the purpose of opening arguments is to give your opening statement of the case and explain the key points. To introduce the jury to the case, and help them get an under standing of whats going on. the purpose of the opening argument is to let the jury know what is the case about and to prove if the defendant is guilty or innocent Maria Elias The purpose of a opening argument is to start a count case. To persuade the jury. Opening statements are not evidence, only expectations of what each side expects the evidence to prove. It is to state all the evidence that both prosecution side and the defense side have. To prove one side's innocence. The purpose of an opening argument is to state what the the prosecution/defense side is presenting to the judge and the jury. That is the time to grab the persons attention and have them side with you. to make everyone and the jury believe your side of the argument To get the jury familiar with the case. To explain what is going on and to try to persuade the court one way or the other The purpose of opening argument is to get informations for all the witnesses in the court. he purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. State the facts of the case and to try to get them to your side (prosecution or defense). Page 1 of 7

The purpose of open arguments is so that everyone can get involved. to get the jury in your favor The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements must be confined to facts that will be proved by the evidence, and cannot be argumentative. To establish your point of view when it comes to the case. You establish the individuals involved and you morph how the jury perceives them. A opening argument is something that will help you to argue when you want to prove tat somebody is right or wrong. state facts of case and try to get jury on your side I think its to tell the jury about what they will be hearing about and to state the facts. miguel aguilar my believe about the purpose of opening arguments is to see who has the right and who is the good person. to try and get the jury on your side The purpose is to persuade the jury, trying to get them on your side I think the purpose of opening arguments is to tell the jurors about the case from both prosecution and defendant sides. To get the responses of knowing what they're going to say to let people in the court know what to expect during the trial. To tell the jury about the case and give them information. Also to persuade the jury to side with you. to lay out the case to everyone and pretty much tell the jury what you want them to do (in your favor) 2. What is the purpose of direct examination? the questioning of a witness to support a case Direct examination, is for the jury to hear the witnesses point of view. the direct examination is to see all the facts Page 2 of 7

Maria Elias A direct examination to get evidence from the witness from the court law. The presentation of evidence begins when the attorney for the plaintiff begins calling witnesses. The plaintiff's attorney does the initial questioning of the witness The purpose of a direct examination is to see where the witnesses have their weakness and strengths. To get an witness's testimony. The purpose of Direct examination is to question the witness in trial. to ask the person you want any questions you have and try to get them to say something different then what they meant to get the witness to support a case The direct examination is to break down the case The purpose of direct examination is to call all the witnnessess to submlt all evidenses for the acused the questioning of a witness by the party that has called that witness to give evidence, in order to support the case that is being made. Direct examination is to question the witness of the opposite side or your side and try to gather as much information as possible to use it against the one being accused. the purpose of direct examination is that so that they can examinate the case directly the questioning of a witness by the party that has called that witness to give evidence, in order to support the case that is being made. The only purpose of direct examination is to present to the jury evidence that supports each lawyer's theory of a case. To get facts and details from the witnesses and establish certain details from their point of view and get them to answer questions that help depict them a certain way for the jury. Direct examination is one stage in the process of adducing evidence from witnesses in a court of law or calling a witnesses to come up in a trial and will question him or her when he or her come up to the stand. to ask witness questions To let the witness recreate a event. Page 3 of 7

miguel aguilar the purpose of examination is to present the evidence. i dont know to call up witness building up your side, you are strengthening your case The purpose of direct examination is for the plaintiff's attorney to do the initial questioning of the witness. To be straight forward about the case give what you seen heard for yourself. the questioning of a witness by the party that has called that witness to give evidence. To question the witnesses to present your evidence and somewhat tell a story 3. What is the purpose of re-direct? explain any damaging or accusing testimony. So, the other side can ask the questions to the same witness. That helps create doubt. re direct it to say what you have to say before you go to closing argument Maria Elias To know the different place or purpose. is the trial process by which the party who offered the witness has a chance to explain or otherwise qualify any damaging or accusing testimony brought out by the opponent during cross-examination The purpose of re-direct is to call up any other witnesses from either the prosecution side or the defense side to interrogate them again. The witness has an opportunity to clarify the testimony of the witness. The purpose of re-direct is for the witness to have a chance to explain what she/he has said. dont remember explain any damaging or accusing testimony Page 4 of 7

To undo the case and persuade and create doubt The purpose of redirect is to start the argument of the trial between prosecution and the defense witnesses. to direct something to a new purpose Re-direct is to call up the witness The purpose of redirect is so that the lawyer can ask questions or new questions to the witness the witness has a chance to explain or otherwise qualify any damaging or accusing testimony brought out The general purpose of redirect is to rehabilitate the witness and to explain or brought out on direct. The purpose is so that one side doesn't get totally shut out during that phase of the court process. Redirect is the trial process by which the party who offered the witnesses has a chance to explain or otherwise qualify any damaging or accusing testimony brought out by the opponent during cross-examination. to ask more questions to enable the witness to explain and clarify any relevant matters in his or her testimony miguel aguilar expained like if it was in text i dont know To call up the same witness but you want them to break down, trying to find a loop hole The purpose of the re-direct is the trial process by which whatever side offered the witness has a chance to explain or otherwise qualify any damage or accusing testimony brought by the opponent. To see if the person have a different statement of what they said before. it is the trial process by which the party who offered the witness has a chance to explain. To pull the jury to your side after the other side has made their point. the party who calls the witness now has a chance to reply to the testimony Page 5 of 7

4. What is the purpose of closing arguments? the purpose of the closing argument is to represent your final statement to convince a jury Closing arguments are for each side to "sell the case, and buy the jury". the purpose of the closing argument is to prove the innocence of the defendant and to see what the jury will pick Maria Elias The closing argument is to agree what the court agrees with. Lay out evidence and try to sell the jury. It is to persuade the jury one last time. To end/close the case with an ending argument. The purpose of closing arguments is to close of and as a final time to get people to side with them and what they want to happen with in the trial. to give the jury a very strong summary of the case so that you assure them that they are going to be on your side conclude the statement of each party closing arguments are there to explain the case and try to persuade the court The purpose of closing argument is when all the witnessess submitted evidenses and final decision have been done with the jury. A closing argument is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case Closing arguments is to conclude the case as a whole with all the information gathered in the end. The purpose of closing argument is that they go over the entire case in a short summary and then finish. the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the presentation of evidence. Page 6 of 7

The purpose of closing arguments is to give your final perception or what you wan the court to perceive when it comes to the court case and have a final sway of the jury to their side. Closing argument are a argument that will not be argue about it anymore. to sum up your side of the case To summing up the concluding statement of each party. miguel aguilar The purpose for closing arguments is important because you need to give lots of evidence and info of the argument. the closing argument is like the last chance for the prosecutor or defense to get the jury on their side It is the final argument, you are closing the case trying to persuade the jury for the last time The purpose of closing arguments occurs after the presentation of evidence. It sums up the concluding statement and try to persuade the jury to be on their side. To give all your facts,and have a settlement.of getting the judge to be on your side.to overrule the people in court. a closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement. To conclude your statement saying you have nothing else to add on. to rack up everything that happened in court and get one last time to persuade the jury to choose the verdict that you want Page 7 of 7