Conflict of Laws KU Winter 2008/09 Tuesday, from 11.00 to 12.30 am 8, 14, 21, 28 October 4, 11, 18 November (there is no course on 25 November!) 2, 9, 16 December 13, 20 January Material Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ 2001 L 12/1 (Brussels I) Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 1968 (consolidated version), OJ 1998 C 27/1 (Brussels Convention) Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) OJ 2008 L 177/6 Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations (consolidated version), OJ 1998 C 27/34 (Rome Convention) Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) OJ 2001 L 199/40 Program I. International contracts and introduction to international jurisdiction Part 1 Relevant provisions: article 1, 2 and 5 Brussels I Regulation (Brussels Convention, for the 1 st part differences between the two instruments are not important) ECJ-case: Group Josi vs UGIC ECJ 13-7-2000, Case C-412/98, Group Josi Reinsurance Company SA v Universal General Insurance Company (UGIC), European Court reports 2000, I-05925 Brussels I Regulation Scope of application of Brussels I relation between Brussels I and national law Article 2 and 5 (1) Brussels I Concentrate on the first preliminary question ECJ-case: Handte vs TMCS ECJ 17-6-1992, Case C-26/91, Jakob Handt & Co GmbH v Traitements Mécano-chimiques des Surfaces SA, European Court reports 1992, I-03967 General rule of article 2 Brussels I motivation for article 2 Brussels I exceptions from article 2 and their justification
Ku Conflict of Laws - 2 Part 2 Relevant Provisions: article 5 (1) Brussels Convention and article 5 (1) Brussels I ECJ-case: Tessili vs Dunlop ECJ 6-10-1976, Case 12/76, Industrie Tessili Italiana Como v Dunlop, European Court reports 1976, 1473 Determination of the place of performance in accordance with article 5 (1) Brussels Convention ECJ-case: Leathertex vs Bodetex ECJ 5-10-1999, Case C-420/97, Leathertex Divisione Sintetici SpA v Bodetex BVBA, European Court reports 1999, I-06747 Determining the obligation in question under article 5 (1) Brussels Convention II. International contracts and introduction to choice of law Relevant provisions: article 4 Rome Convention, article 4 Rome I UK-case: Print Concept v GEW Print Concept GmbH v GEW (EC) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 351 (Court of Appeal), summary in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 127 Concept of characteristic performance determination of the characteristic performance in agency contracts UK-case: Land Rover v Samcrete Land Rover Exports Ltd v Samcrete Egypt Engineers and Contractors SAE, Court of Appeal, 21st December 2001, see the summary regarding article 4 (5) Rome Convention in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 152 Question whether there is a closer relationship to another state than the state determined by article 4 (2) Rome Convention Interpretation of article 4 (5) Rome Convention interpretation in accordance with article 18 Rome Convention III. Party s autonomy Part I: jurisdiction agreements Relevant provisions: article 23 Brussels I (article 17 Brussels Convention) ECJ-case: Salotti v Ruewa ECJ 14-12-1976, Case 24/76, Estasis Salotti ua v Ruewa Polstereimaschinen GmbH, European Court reports 1976, 01831 Jurisdiction agreement in standard terms on the backside of a contract question whether the agreement is valid formal requirements in accordance with article 17 Brussels Convention (= article 23 Brussels I) ECJ-case: MSG v Les Gravieres ECJ 20-2-1997, Case C-106/95, Mainschiffahrts-Genossenschaft eg (MSG) v Les Gravières Rhénanes SARL, European Court reports 1997 I-00911 Jurisdiction clause on bills and letters of confirmation, no contradiction by recipient question whether jurisdiction clause is valid formal requirements in accordance with article 17 Brussels Convention (= article 23 Brussels I)
Ku Conflict of Laws - 3 Part II: Choice of law clauses Relevant provisions: article 3 Rome Convention; article 3 Rome I UK-case: Land Rover v Samcrete Land Rover Exports Ltd v Samcrete Egypt Engineers and Contractors SAE, Court of Appeal, 21st December 2001, see the summary regarding the choice of law clause in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 101 Choice of law clause in a standard contract clause crossed out by the other party question whether parties have actually made a choice of law agreement interpretation of article 3 (1) Rome Convention German case: BGH XI ZR 42/93 BGH 26-10-1993, XI ZR 42/93, IPRax 1994, 449 Choice of law clause in standard form contracts question whether they are valid UK-case: Shamil Bank of Ahreain EC v Beximco Pharamaceuticals Shamil Bank of Bahrain EC v Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd and others [2004] EWCA Civ 19, [2004] 4 All ER 1072 (Court of Appeal), see the summary regarding the choice of law clause in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 109 Choice of law clause: subject to the principles of Glorious Sharia a this agreement shall fall under English law question whether it is possible to choose non state law IV. International Tort Law Part I: international jurisdiction ECJ-case: Bier v Mines de potasse ECJ 30-11-1976, Case 21-76, Handelskwekerij G. J. Bier BV v Mines de potasse d'alsace SA, European Court reports 1976 Page 01735 Place where the harmful event occurred in accordance with article 5 (3) Brussels Convention high salt content in a river is caused in one country and damages horticulture in another country place of the event which causes the damage is different from the place where the damage occurs article 5 (3) Brussels Convention covers both places ECJ-case: Dumez France v Hessische Landesbank ECJ 11-1-1990, Case C-220/88, Dumez France SA and Tracoba SARL v Hessische Landesbank et. al., European Court reports 1990, I-00049 Place where the harmful event occurred place where the damage occurred damage suffered by a third party ECJ-case: Marinari v Lloyds Bank ECJ 19-9-1995, Case C-364/93, Antonio Marinari v Lloyds Bank plc, European Court reports 1995, I-02719 Place where the harmful event occurred place where the damage occurred place where financial damage was suffered in consequence of initial damage ECJ-case: Kronhofer v Maier et. al. ECJ 10-6-2004, Case C-168/02, Rudolf Kronhofer v Marianne Maier et. al., European Court reports 2004, I-06009, see summary (in German) in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 265 Place where the harmful event occurred Financial loss arising from capital investments in another Contracting State
Ku Conflict of Laws - 4 ECJ-case: Shevill v Presse Alliance SA ECJ 7-3-1995, Case C-68/93, Fiona Shevill, Oxora Trading Inc. et. al. v Presse Alliance SA, European Court reports 1995, I-00415 Place where the harmful event occurred cross-border defamation by the press several countries of distribution jurisdiction limited to the harm caused in the state of the court seised Part II: choice of law Relevant provisions: paragraph 48 Austrian Act on International Private Law; see also article 40 Introductory Act to the German Civil Code (EGBGB); article 4 Rome II; article 7 Rome II Austrian case: Austrian Supreme Court 1 Ob 41/80 Austrian Supreme Court 29-4-1981, 1 Ob 41/80 Place where the harmful event occurred place of the event which gave rise to the damage occurred in another country than where the damage occurred (transnational river) environmental damage Compare this case with Bier v Mines de potasse; compare Paragraph 48 of the Austrian Act on International Private Law and article 4 Rome II Austrian case: Austrian Supreme Court 6 Ob 283/01p ( Marcus Omofuma ) Austrian Supreme Court 29-8-2002, 6 Ob 283/01p, see summary of the case in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 298 Violation of rights relating to the personality by interview given in Austria defamation of M. Omofuma, murdered by the police claim of the victim s daughter whose residence is in Germany Application of Austrian law UK-case: Harding v Wealands Harding v Wealands [2006] UKHL 32 (House of Lords) Car accident in Australia application of Australian law quantification of damage governed by the law of the forum procedural qualification The case shall be discussed with reference to articles 4, 15 lit c and 28 Rome II as well as the Hague Convention on car accidents V. International Company Law Relevant provisions: Article 43 and 48 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community (consolidated version), OJ 2006 Nr C 321 E/37; see also paragraph 10 and 12 of the Austrian Act on Private International Law ECJ-case: Daily Mail ECJ 27-9-1987, Case 81/87, The Queen vs H. M. Treasury und Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Ex Parte Daily Mail and General Trust PLC, European Court reports 1988, 05483 Free movement of persons Freedom of establishment Company incorporated under the legislation of a Member State and having its registered office there Right to transfer the central management and control of a company to another Member State ECJ-case: Centros ECJ 9-3-1999, Case C-212/97, Centros Ltd vs Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen, European Court reports 1999, I-01459 (summary in German in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 339) Freedom of establishment Company formed in accordance with the law of a Member State in which it has its registered office but in which it conducts no business Establishment of a branch in another Member State Registration refused
Ku Conflict of Laws - 5 ECJ-case: Überseering ECJ 5-11-2002, Case C-208/00, Überseering BV vs Nordic Construction Company Baumangement GmbH (NCC), European Court reports 2002, I-09919 (summary in German in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 340) Company exercising its freedom of establishment in another Member State Company deemed to have transferred its actual centre of administration to the host Member State under the law of that State Non-recognition by the host Member State of the company's legal capacity and its capacity to be a party to legal proceedings Restriction on freedom of establishment ECJ-case: Inspire Art ECJ 30-9-2003, Case C-167/01, Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken vor Amsterdam vs Inspire Art Ltd, European Court reports 2003, I-10155 (summary in German in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 341) Articles 43 EC, 46 EC and 48 EC Company formed in one Member State and carrying on its activities in another Member State Application of the company law of the Member State of establishment intended to protect the interests of others ECJ-case: Cartesio Oktató Opinion of the Advocate General of 22-5-2008, Case C-210/06, Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató bt, concentrate on the fourth preliminary question Hungarian Law does not allow for a Hungarian Company to move its seat to another country Question whether this constitutes an infringement of Articles 43, 48 EC VI. The problem of characterization ECJ-case: Handte vs TMCS ECJ 17-6-1992, Case C-26/91, Jakob Handt & Co GmbH v Traitements Mécano-chimiques des Surfaces SA, European Court reports 1992, I-03967 Interpretation of matters relating to a contract in accordance with article 5 (1) Brussels Convention autonomous interpretation ECJ-case: Kalfelis v Schröder ECJ 27-9-1988, Case 189/87, Athanasios Kalfelis v Bankhaus Schröder et. al., European Court reports 1988, 05565 (concentrate on the second preliminary question) Interpretation of matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict autonomous interpretation ECJ-case: Tacconi v Wagner ECJ 17-9-2002, Case C-334/00, Fonderie Officine Meccaniche Tacconi SpA v Heinrich Wagner Sinto Maschinenfabrik GmbH, European Court reports 2002, I-07357 Characterization of claims based on culpa in contrahendo matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict autonomous interpretation See also article 12 Rome II and article 1 (2) lit I Rome I UK-case: Re Maldonado Court of Appeal: Re Maldonado (deceased), State of Spain v. Treasury Solicitor [1954] P 223, [1953] 2 All ER 1579, [1954] 2 WLR 64, CA (summary in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 1) Succession of a state if somebody dies without heirs characterization of the state s claim ius regale or claim of a true heir lex causae characterization UK-case: Re Barnett s Trust Re Barnett s Trusts [1900-1903] All ER Rep 515 Succession of a state if somebody dies without heirs characterization of the state s claim ius regale or claim of a true heir lex causae characterization
Ku Conflict of Laws - 6 UK-case: Adams v. National Bank National Bank of Greece and Athens v. Metliss [1958] A.C. 509 und Adams v. National Bank of Greece and Athens S.A. [1958] 2 Q.B. 59 Characterization of a foreign rule looking at its substance and not merely at its form VII. Ordre Public Relevant provisions: article Part I: Infringement of ordre public and family law German case: Amtsgericht Frankfurt/Main 35 F 4153/87 Amtsgericht Frankfurt/Main 9-8-1988, 35 F 4153/87, see the summary regarding the choice of law clause in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 50 Talaq divorce as an infringement of public order German case: OLG München 2 UF 1696/86 OLG München 19-9-1988, 2 UF 1696/86, IPRax 1989, 238, see the summary regarding the choice of law clause in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions, number 53 Talaq divorce does not constitute an infringement of public order Part II: Infringement of ordre public and (public) international law UK-case: Kuwait Airways v Iraqui Airways Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5), [2002] UKHL 19 [2000] 2 AC 883 (House of Lords) Nationalisation of airplanes of Kuwait Airways Corporation by Iraq property rights based on this nationalisation infringe public policy VIII. Overriding mandatory rules Relevant provisions: article 7 Rome Convention, article 9 Rome I ECJ-case: Ingmar v Eaton Leonard ECJ 9-11-2000, Case C-381/98, Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc, European Court reports 2000, I-09305 International agency contract between English agent and Californian enterprise choice of law agreement: Californian law question whether mandatory European rules protecting agents shall apply in spite of the choice of law agreement German case: OLG München 7 U 1781/06 OLG München 17-5-2006, 7 U 1781/06, IPRax 2007, 322 International agency contract between German agent and Californian enterprise jurisdiction agreement and choice of law clause: Californian courts and law question whether by jurisdiction and choice of law clause European rules protecting the agent may be derogated Austrian case: Austrian Supreme Court 2 Ob 573/92 Austrian Supreme Court OGH 30-9-1992, 2 Ob 573/92; summary of the case referring to national mandatory rules in Schacherreiter, Leading Decisions number 67 Loan agreement between Austrian citizen and German bank no official permission in accordance with Austrian law on foreign exchange agreement is governed by German law question whether Austrian law on foreign exchange applies