UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 18 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Complaint for Patent Infringement

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Transcription:

1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP Allan Gabriel (SBN 777) agabriel@dykema.com S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (21) 7-170 Facsimile: (21) 7-180 Aaron D. Charfoos (IL 27722, pro hac vice pending) acharfoosgdykema.com 10 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 200 Chicago, IL 00 Telephone: (12) 87-1700 Facsimile: (12) 87-11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LINAK A/S and LINAK U.S., INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 17 18 19 LINAK A/S, and LINAK U.S., INC., v. Plaintiffs, CHANGZHOU KAIDI ELECTRICAL CO., LTD., and KAIDI, LLC, Defendants. Case No. 2:1-cv-0881 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 20 21 22 2 2 2 2 27 28 For its Complaint against Defendants Changzhou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. and Kaidi, LLC (collectively, "Kaidi"), Plaintiffs Linak A/S and Linak U.S., Inc. (collectively, "Linak") allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, Title, United States Code, that arises out of the manufacturing, use, importation, sale and offer for sale by defendant, Kaidi, of certain linear actuator models which infringe upon U.S. Patent No. 7,71,020 ("the '020 Patent").

THE PARTIES 2. Linak A/S is a Danish corporation with its principal place of business at Smedevaenget 8, Guderup DK-0 Nordborg, Denmark.. Linak U.S., Inc., is a Delaware corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Linak A/S and the exclusive United States licensee of the '020 Patent, with its principal place of business at 2200 Stanley Gault Parkway, Louisville, Kentucky 022.. Linak is a global company that started as a small Danish family-run business in 1907, founded by current company director Bent Jensen's grandfather. In 197, Bent's father passed the business to him, and Bent conceived of the idea of a linear actuator, revolutionizing bed lifts with a better, smaller motor.. Linak invested significant resources in the development of the technologies that go into its linear actuator products. Today, Linak employs more than 100 people worldwide and is a leading provider of innovative electric linear actuator systems for use in many product sectors, including hospital and healthcare equipment.. Upon information and belief, Changzhou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd., is a Chinese limited partnership with its principal place of business at No. Jiangcun East Road, Hengllin Town, Changzhou 21101, China. Upon information and belief, Changzhou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. makes, uses, imports, and sells or offers to sell linear actuators in the United States. 7. Upon information and belief, Kaidi, LLC is a Michigan limited liability corporation with its principal place of business at 228 S. Michigan Road, Eaton Rapids, Michigan, 8827 and is the U.S. subsidiary of Changzhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Upon information and belief, Kaidi, LLC makes, uses, imports, and sells or offers to sell linear actuators in the United States. 2

1 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 1 1 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 2 2 2 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Linak's patent infringement claims under 28 U.S.C. 11 and 18(a). 9. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Changzhou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. and Kaidi, LLC, which have established minimum contacts with this District. Upon information and belief, Kaidi has imported and sold infringing linear actuator products at least in 201 through an established distribution channel to one of Kaidi's customers in Ontario, California, and purposefully imported its products through a port in Long Beach, CA. Therefore, the exercise of jurisdiction over Kaidi would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 10. Venue properly lies in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 191(b), (c), and (d), as well as 100(b). FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 11. On December 0, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,71,020 entitled "Linear Actuator." The '020 Patent was assigned to Linak A/S, which holds all right, title and interest in and to the '020 Patent. Linak U.S., Inc. is the exclusive licensee of the '020 Patent in the United States. A copy of the '020 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 12. Upon information and belief, Kaidi infringes the '020 Patent by making, using, importing, promoting, selling, and offering for sale in the United States certain linear actuator products, including at least model numbers KDFSJ001, KDHCT001, and DKQT001. On, November 1, 201, Linak sent a letter to Kaidi notifying it of its infringement of the '020 Patent. 1. Linak's long-term financial success, sales and market share depends on its ability to establish, maintain, and protect its proprietary technologies, including, 27 28

when necessary, through enforcement of its patent rights. Kaidi's infringement presents significant and ongoing damages to Linak's business. COUNT 1: INFRINGEMENT OF THE PATENT 1. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-1 above as if fully set forth herein. 1. Linak owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest to the '020 Patent, including the right to bring this suit for injunctive relief and damages. 1. The '020 Patent is valid and enforceable under United States patent laws. 17. Kaidi, in violation of U.S.C. 271(a), has directly and is directly infringing the '020 Patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing linear actuators in the United States, including at least models KDFSJ001, KDHTC001, and DKQT001, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. 18. Kaidi had and has actual notice of the '020 patent at least as early as November 1, 201, when Linak sent a letter to Kaidi detailing its infringement. Kaidi's acts of infringement have been and are willful and deliberate. Such notice justifies an increase in damages of up the three times under U.S.C. 28, as well as an exceptional case providing for the award of reasonable attorneys' fees. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Linak prays for the following judgment and relief against Kaidi, by and through itself or its subsidiaries: 19. That Kaidi has infringed the '020 Patent as alleged herein; 20. That the asserted '020 Patent is valid and enforceable; 21. That Kaidi, its officers, agents, employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with Kaidi, and its successors and assigns, be permanently enjoined from infringing the '020 Patent;

1 22. That Linak be awarded damages for Kaidi's infringement of Linak's patent, together with interest (both pre- and post-judgment), costs and disbursements as fixed by this Court under U.S.C. 28; 2. That Kaidi's infringement be determined as willful, and that an award of treble the amount of damages and losses sustained by Linak as a result of Kaidi's infringement be awarded, under U.S.C. 28; 2. That this case be declared an exceptional case within the meaning of U.S.C. 28, and that Linak be awarded attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with this action; and 2. That Linak be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper in law or in equity. Dated: November 1, 201 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP B Alan Gabel Aaron D. Charfoos Attorneys for Plaintiffs LINAK, A/S and LINAK U.S., Inc.

1 2 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff Linak demands a trial by jury of any and all issues triable of right before a jury. a. w a 2' ts, 7 8 9 10 11 12 LT.J o ;D, 0 1 c) 1 C) wrn 1 rn) 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 2 2 2 27 28 Dated: November 1, 201 DYKEMA GOSSET L By: an abriel Aaron D. Charfoos Attorneys for Plaintiffs LINAK, A/S and LINAK U.S., Inc.