Similar documents
Disclaimer of Warranty & (and) Limitation of Remedy in Consumer Sales: A Comparison of the Approach in Nigeria and the United States

United States District Court Central District of California Western Division

Problem question David v Photoprint - advise David

NEGATIVE TEN COURSE POINTS

MODEL ESSAY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD

Recent Case: Sales - Limitation of Remedies - Failure of Essential Purpose [Adams v. J.I. Case Co., 125 Ill. App. 2d 368, 261 N.E.

Torts - Liability for the Endorser of a Product - Hanberry v. Hearst Corp., Cal. App. 3rd, 81 Cal. Rptr. 519 (1969)

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

Effect of modifying clauses in standard-form contracts and the impact that this may have on their interpretation.

Contract Law. Contract law. Kacper Szkalej 1. Structure. Law and regulation. Media Law, KTH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil Case No.: 18-cv (WMW/SER)

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. ---o0o--

Stratus Technologies ftserver Products LIMITED RETURN-TO-FACTORY HARDWARE WARRANTY. Warranty Period (From date of Stratus Shipment)

DRAFTING AND ANALYZING CONTRACTS

ENGLISH FOR LAW - International Commercial Contracts EXERCISES

SKRINE BREACH OF CONTRACT: TERMINATION AND OTHER OPTIONS. 10 December LEE SHIH ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS

Products Liability Effect of Advertising on Warning Given Love v. Wolf, 226 Cal. App. 2d 378, 38 Cal. Rptr. 183 (Ct. App. 1964)

Fred Tromberg, James A. Kowalski, Jr., and Adam J. Kohl of the Law Offices of Tromberg & Kowalski, Jacksonville, for Appellee Commonwealth Bank.

A Name some people who have had a great influence on the development of the law.

a. The Act is effective July 4, 1975 and applies to goods manufactured after that date.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The Sales Statute of Limitations in the Uniform Commercial Code-Does It Preclude Prospective Implied Warranties?

IMPORTANT EXPLANATORY NOTE:

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO

Case3:12-cv SI Document44 Filed10/03/12 Page1 of 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6. Defendant. /

Vorlesung / Course Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Introduction to Comparative Law

OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No January 11, 2002

CASE 0:17-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Everett Banks

No. 116,307 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CORVIAS MILITARY LIVING, LLC, and CORVIAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellants,

CIPS Exam Report for Learner Community:

CONSUMER PROTECTION ON UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS: LEGAL ANALYSIS OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES IN B2C TRANSACTIONS IN MALAYSIA

The Application of the Doctrine of Unconscionability to Warranties: A Move Toward Strict Liability Within the U.C.C.

MICROSOFT DEVICE SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Purchasing Terms and Conditions

Enforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. For the Northern District of California 11. No.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Argued and Submitted March 31, 2003 Filed May 5, 2003

United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods

THE CONSTRUCTION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES UPON AFFIRMATION OF A FUNDAMENTAL BREACH

Sales--Actions for Breach of Implied Warranty-- Privity Not Required [,i>lonzrtck v. Republic Steel Corp., 6 Ohio St. 2d 277, 217 N.E.

Volume Index - Table of Statutes

DEFINING YOUR LIABILITY IN ADVANCE:

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

Law of International Contracting

TITLE 15 COMMERCE AND TRADE. equipment that has been recertified by an authorized

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, Judge. The Defendant, Schumacher Properties, Inc.

Musings on Modern Products Liability Law: A Foreward

Economics Loss in Products Liability: Strict Liability or the Uniform Commercial Code? Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENT, FIRST DISTRICT

E INK PUBLIC SOURCE LICENSE

IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Molnar v. BMW Canada Inc., 2017 NSSM 24 REASONS FOR DECISION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

S A BILL. Calendar No To encourage the disclosure and exchange of information 105TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

The Contractor s building defects liability in England and Wales

Unconscionability in Canadian Contract Law

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,

One Hundred Fifth Congress of the United States of America

MILTON SCHROEDER Emeritus Professor of Law

SKRINE BREACH OF CONTRACT: TERMINATION AND OTHER OPTIONS. 10 December LEE SHIH ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS

2 Trade Secret A Subject Ma er 1 Secrecy 2 Economic Value B Ownership 1 Collaborations 2 Priority C Procedures D Infringement: Similarity

These notes refer to the Defamation Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 10 May 2012 [Bill 5] DEFAMATION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

LIMITED WARRANTY STATEMENT

Application for open Account Company Information. Principal Owners or Stockholders

918 (1966) quoted with approval in Washington Water Power Company v. Graybar Electric Company, 112 Wn.2d 847, 774 P.2d 119 (1989).

A look at UCC 1-103(b) through the lens of Article 2: A practice of liberal supplementation or exclusion?

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010).

Merchants Automotive Group, Inc. Alpine Limousine Service, Inc., et al. BMW of N. Am., LLC and BMW of Manhattan, Inc. No.

KENNETH WAYNE AUSTIN OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No June 5, 1998

APPENDIX C Citation Guide

Unconscionability and Article 2 Implied Warranty Disclaimers

MARKING GUIDE. Subject Name: Commercial Law 1. Exam Date: June Number of pages: 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017

COMPOSITE WOOD EXTENDED WARRANTY. This Warranty applies to all and any Goods (as defined below) manufactured by the Supplier.

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Contract Law for Paralegals: Chapter 1 Chapter 1

Reprinted in part from Volume 21, Number 5, May 2011 (Article starting on page 459 in the actual issue)

IONICS, INC. v. ELMWOOD SENSORS, INC. 110 F.3d 184 (1st Cir. 1997)

PETER and TANYA ROTHING, d/b/a DIAMOND R ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ARNOLD KALLESTAD, Defendant and Respondent.

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

The doctrine of judicial precedent with special reference to the cases concerning seriously ill new born infants.

SCOPE AND EXTENT OF ENGINEERS LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DEFECTS AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON SITE

Consumer contracts Q&A: United States

Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. Lobach*

Boston College Law Review

Using A Contractual Consequential Damage Limitation

Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer and La Forest JJ. in effect when accident occurred--statutes barring action repealed before action

Sales. A Context and Practice Casebook. Edith R. Warkentine. Carolina Academic Press. Durham, North Carolina WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIMITED WARRANTY (PLAYBOOK)

Jurisdiction, Choice of Law and Dispute Resolution in

Exclusion and Limitation of Liability for Non-conformity of Goods: A Comparative Study on CISG, UCC and UK Law. Nan Kham Mai

PREFERENCE FOR A REFERENCE? Owain Thomas

Special Topics in Small Claims

Property Damage Caused by Defective Products: Strict Tort Recovery: Hawkins Construction Co. v. Matthews Co., 190 Neb. 546, 209 N.W.

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION DARREN VICTORIA. Argued: February 22, 2006 Opinion Issued: June 14, 2006

Transcription:

1396 ** *... -. simaee_s@yahoo.com * ** ( ) jaber.esfandi@mids.ch 1394/4/21 : 1392/1/14 :

1396 / 206. :..1 1.(151:1375 ).. - 2..»» «.(Treitel, 2003: 237). «....

207.... - - -.. - -.......2.

1396 / 208.(573 :1387 ). 3 (1343 54 8 )..... ( ).(173 :1387 ). - -..(580-579 :1387 )......

209.......(175 :1387 )...(577 :1387 ).(Kelleher, 1984: 153).......

1396 / 210. Forlini and ). 10.(Martineau: 4....3..(Dechaine, 1967: 1). 4.3.1 -

211... - - -... Restatement Third of ) (Tort on Product Liability, 2007 18. EU Directive on Liability For Defective )» : 12 (Products, 1999.«Consumer Protection Act, ) -.(1987, Sec. 7 1386-15 -» :..( Code Civile, 1998, Article 1386-15.)«7

1396 / 212 7. Trade Practices Act, 1974, ) 5 (Sec. 150-1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, ) «-» (Inc., 27 Cal. Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897 (1962)....(Steenson, 1998: 104)..

213....3.2 6.. -. ) 7.(..

1396 / 214.4 8.4.1. - - -...4.2..(Stone, 2002: 220) 9..

215...... - :.4.2.1 Sale ). (Of Goods Act, 1979, Sec. 55-1. (UCC, 2011 :Sec. 2-719).. 10 - - : :..... (UCC, 2011: Sec. 2-719-3).1

1396 / 216.. : 10 2 1».«: 3 2 :. - - 7 2 6 2. 2308. Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, Sec. 2308 ) ((a)...2

217... 11. 13 12 14.. Chanter v ).(Hopkins,1838.(Treitel, 2003: 227). Harbutt s Plasticine ). (Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd., 1970.. : -. - (UCC, 2011: Section 2-15.. :316 and unfair contract terms act, Section 7-2.) :.3

1396 / 218. 5 1.» :.«:.4.2.2 :. :( ). Unfair Contract ). (Terms Act, Sections 2 (2), 6 (3) and 7 (3)... 16 719-2

219......(UCC, 2011: Sec. 2-302)...(Unfair Contract Terms Act, 1977: Sec. 11)... Stone, 2002: ) :.(241 - - -

1396 / 220 - - -. : Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA : ).(Civ 361 and Smith v Eric Bush [1989] 2 All ER 514. :( ).... 17.(995 :2004Garner,)... ( )..(Utah Code, Section 70A-2-316(2))

221... (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking)..... 18. :.. (Forlini and MARTINEAU 2003: 6 )......

1396 / 222 (Pickin v. Hesk).... :.. : -. -.. - -.. - - Magnuson Moss ).(Warranty Act, sec. 2308 (B).5

223... - -. - - -... - -.....

1396 / 224. 1. Limitation or Exclusion Clauses 2 Kelleher, Leslie, :.. "Exclusion Clause in Contract", Manitoba Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1984... 3. 5 et seq. Forlini and Martineau: 4 :.. 4... (Breach Of Warranty) 6 7.. 7... 46. 46. : :...1390 9. For more Information about Rules of Common Law for Restriction of Exemption Elauses See: Treitel, 2003: 216 till 244... 8

225... 10. Unfair Contract Terms Act 11. Conditions 12. Warranties 13. Intermediate Terms 14. Fundamental Terms 15. Durability 16. Consequential Damages 17. Contra Proferendem Rule 18. Lord Denning. : (1390). : (1375). (1387). : : 1 (1387).. Chanter v. Hopkins (1838), 4M. & W. 399. Code Civile (1998), En Vigueur Depuis Le 21 Mai, (Francais). Consumer Protection Act (1987), (UK). Dechaine, Dean D (1967), "Products Liability and The Disclaimer", Willamette Law Journal, Vol. 4. EU Directive on Liability for Defective Products (1985), Last Revised 1999. Forlini, Enrico and Martineau, Fasken (2003), "Clauses Limiting or Excluding a Manufacturer's or Seller's Liability: Their Validity and Applicability Under the Quebec Civil Code and

1396 / 226 The Consumer Protection Act". Available at:http://www.fasken.com/files/publication/74c515ce- aa05-4497-83d9-0727c77e56c8/presentation/publicationattachment/bf62 6c4b-1827-4196-bcf2-32b1e6517054/CLAUSES_LIMITING_OR_EXCLUDI NG_A_MANUFACTUERER_S_OR_SELLER_S_LIAB I.PDF. Garner, Bryan A. (editor in chief) (2004), Blacks Law Dictionary, West Publishing Limited, Eighth Edition. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1962), 27 Cal. Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897. Harbutt s Plasticine Ltd v. Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd. (1970) 1 QB 447; [1970] 1 All ER 225. Kelleher, Leslie (1984), "Exclusion Clause in Contract", Manitoba Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1. Magnuson Moss Warranty Act (1985), (USA). Pickin v. Hesk. 1195414 D.L.R. (2d) 90 (Ont. C.A.). Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361. Restatement Third of Tort on Product Liability, 2007, (USA). Sale of Goods Act (1979), (UK). Smith v Eric Bush [1989] 2 All ER 514. Steenson, Mike (1998), "A Comparative Analysis of Minnesota Products Liability Law and the Restatement Third of Torts: Products Liability", William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 24. Stone, Richard (2002), The Modern Law of Contract, Cavendish Publishing Limited, Fifth Edition. Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking (1971), 1 All ER 686. Trade Practices Act, 1974, Last Modified, (Australia). Treitel, Sir (2003) Guenter, The Law of Contract, Thomson Sweet & Maxwell Limited, Eleventh Editio. Unfair Contract Terms Act (1977), (UK). Uniform Commercial Code, {UCC} (1999), Last Modified 2011, (USA). Utah Code, (USA).

2024 © lawsdocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback