Filing # E-Filed 10/24/ :07:49 PM

Similar documents
Filing # E-Filed 06/14/ :33:44 PM

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO FRANK AVELLINO S NOTICE OF PRODUCTION TO NON-PARTY UNDER RULE 1.351

Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM

Filing # E-Filed 03/11/ :10:57 PM

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

Defendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental

Filing # E-Filed 04/04/ :49:40 PM

Filing # E-Filed 11/23/ :59:27 PM

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA UNDER RULE FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WITHOUT DEPOSITION

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND MEMORANDA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO S AND MICHAEL BIENES MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEFENDANTS FRANK AVELLINO AND MICHAEL BIENES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs P & S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), S & P Associates, General

Filing # E-Filed 10/09/ :39:26 PM

DEFENDANT JAMES JUDD S NOTICE OF SERVING OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Filing # E-Filed 02/15/ :43:13 PM

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO PARAGON VENTURES LIMITED MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEFENDANT, ROBERT A. UCHIN REVOCABLE TRUST'S, AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION

DEFENDANTS JUDD S MOTION TO COMPEL AND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Preliminary Statement

DEFENDANT ERSICA P. GIANNA S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION FOR DEFINITE STATEMENT, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION. Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P , Plaintiffs P&S Associates, General Partnership

Defendants DALORES BARONE, CARL BOSCHETTI, DENISE B. BRYAN, and ETTOH, LTD. (collectively the Boschetti Defendants 1 ) through the

PLAINTIFFS AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT CONGREGATION OF THE HOLY GHOST WESTERN PROVINCE. Deponent Date Time

Defendants. / DEFENDANT, ERSICA P. GIANNA S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO (07) COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of

RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC , SC & SC PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA JUDGE ALEMAN S AMENDED WITNESS LIST (PLEASE SEE PAGE 6.

Case EPK Doc 1019 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 16

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALEX BISTRICER, as limited partner of GULF ISLAND RESORT, L.P., and GULF ISLAND RESORT, L.P.

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P (a), Plaintiffs P & S Associates, General Partnership

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

Case 0:13-cr JIC Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2013 Page 1 of 5

2. Green Tree is without knowledge of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2013 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,

NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NONPARTY. YOU ARE NOTIFIED that, after ten (10) days from the date of service of this notice, if

Plaintiffs, P&S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), S&P Associates, General

Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Plaintiffs, MATTHEW CALDWELL and THE CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT

Case LMI Doc 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NOS. 3D D (Consolidated)

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,

MARGARET J. SMITH, CASE NO.: (07)

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA. INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, : No , CHERYL ALEMAN : CASE NO.

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

Case 0:18-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8

BEFORE THE INVESTIGATIVE PANEL OF THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. v. Case No.: CI

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND MEMORANDA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ETTOH, LTD s MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Case 1:97-cv DLG Document 243 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2001 Page 1 of 12

Filing # E-Filed 01/22/ :54:09 PM

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMSHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court

FROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM. Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA (AW)

~'

MARGARET J. SMITH, CASE NO.: (07)

If you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement.

Case 0:09-cv WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 4D

Filing # E-Filed 09/24/ :52:23 PM

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES SUMMARY FINAL ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

~/

CASE NO DIVISION: 03

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) ALBERTO ELIAKIM, Petitioner, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.

Case 0:16-cv WJZ Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. Case No. 89,432

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Plaintiffs, P & S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), and S & P Associates,

Case AJC Doc 28 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Case AJC Doc 250 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 3. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC., Petitioner, IRWIN POTASH, ET AL., Respondents.

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 8

IN THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 3D LT CASE NO.: CA 25

Case No. 3D Case No. 3D (consolidated under Case No. 3D ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Transcription:

Filing # 48020376 E-Filed 10/24/2016 05:07:49 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator of CASE NO.: 12-034123 (07) P&S Associates, General Partnership and S&P Associates, General Partnership v. Plaintiffs, MICHAEL D. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. / PLAINTIFFS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REOPEN AND EXTEND DISCOVERY FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE TO DEPOSE INCARCERATED, NON-PARTY, ANNETTE BONGIORNO AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE INCARCERATED, NON-PARTY, ANNETTE BONGIORNO P&S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), S&P Associates, General Partnership ( S&P) (S&P and P&S are collectively the Partnerships ), and Philip J. Von Kahle, as Conservator for P&S and S&P (the Conservator, and together with the Partnerships, the Plaintiffs ), pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310, hereby file this reply in support of its motion to reopen and extend discovery for the limited purpose of deposing incarcerated, non-party Annette Bongiorno and motion for leave to depose incarcerated, non-party Annette Bongiorno (the Motion ), and in support state: 1. On September 16, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to depose Annette Bongiorno ( Bongiorno ), an incarcerated person located in Sumterville, FL. 2. As set forth in the Motion, Bongiorno s deposition is necessary because it is believed

she has knowledge directly related to Plaintiffs investment in BLMIS and Plaintiffs claims against Avellino and Bienes (the Defendants ). 3. On October 18, 2016, the Defendants filed a response to the Motion which contends, essentially, that Bongiorno does not have any knowledge of the Plaintiffs or the Defendants involvement with the Partnerships investment. Response at p. 2-3. Defendants attach an unsworn email from Bongiorno s lawyer as support, which only reveals that Bongiorno may not be able to recall issues relating to the Partnerships. However, there is documentary evidence establishing that the Partnerships communicated with Madoff through Bongiorno and her recollection can be refreshed. 4. The unverified contentions in the Response conflict with, among other things, documentary evidence and sworn testimony which reflect the need to depose Ms. Bongiorno 5. For example, attached hereto as Exhibit A is correspondence from the Partnerships directed to Bongiorno. This document reflects that Bongiorno was involved in the transactions between the Plaintiffs and Madoff. These transactions were encouraged by the Defendants as addressed in the Fifth Amended Complaint ( FAC ). 6. Further, Frank Dipascali ( Dipascali ) testified a during Bongiorno s criminal trial that following the S.E.C. injunction against the Defendants, Bongiorno was involved in the process of bringing back the Defendants clients, such as the Partnerships former manager Michael D. Sullivan ( Sullivan ), to Madoff. 1 Specifically, the Dipascali testified as follows: Q. Again, who were the people that were speaking to these A&B clients that were coming back in? A. Bernie, myself, Jodi, Annette [Bongiorno], members of Annette s staff. Q. These people were asking you questions about the trading that was going to occur at Madoff Securities? A. Yes. Q. Did you lie to these folks? A. Yes. 1 Attached hereto as Exhibit B is an excerpt from the Dipascali Testimony. 2

Dipascali Testimony at 34:3-10. 7. Additionally, Dipascali testified that certain clients, such as the Defendants, received special benefits, in the form of commissions, for bringing clients. Dipascali Testimony at p. 34. Further, Dipascali testified that Frank Avellino coordinated with Madoff to set up a system to reward Defendants middlemen: Q. As part of these people coming back in, did folks like we see here bring in additional customers to Madoff Securities. A. These entities were clients of A&B. A&B, being closed down by the SEC, had no vehicle to pay them any longer. The purpose of this was illustrated to me and explained to me that since Frank can't pay these guys anymore for the money they originally brought in to A&B and now those very same clients are going to be transferred, if you will, to Madoff, if you will, and have direct accounts, the only vehicle that Frank and therefore now Bernie would have to pay these managers of other people's money would be to shtup their personal accounts with extra P&L. Q. Just so the record is clear, when you say Frank, were you referring to Frank Avellino? A. I was. Dipascali Testimony at 34:11-25. 8. The Dipascali Testimony regarding Avellino s use of front men is consistent with the allegations in the Plaintiffs FAC that Avellino and Bienes facilitated the creation of a network of front men feeder fund partnerships and charitable foundations throughout the United States to invest in BLMIS. FAC at p. 4 20. 9. Therefore, the Dipascali Testimony reflects that: (i) Avellino, as an agent for Defendants, utilized Madoff, Dipascali, and Bongiorno to bring in Defendants customers after the S.E.C. injunction, such as Sullivan; and (ii) Avellino used front men to bring in customers for Madoff. The Dipascali Testimony, together with other evidence, was used to convict Madoff employees during their criminal trial. 10. Accordingly, the documents and Dipascali Testimony establishes that the deposition of Bongiorno is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence because 3

Bongiorno was part of the team which recruited Defendants former customers, such as Sullivan, back into Madoff. Further, Bongiorno s testimony will advance prosecution of the case because it relates to allegations raised in the FAC and whether Avellino and Bienes were entitled to receive the kickbacks at issue. 11. Further, Defendants will not be prejudiced by having to take a single deposition, from a prison in north Florida, and they have not presented any evidence to support any claims that it would be unduly burdensome to do so. Moreover, trial is not scheduled to occur until March, 2017. 12. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court grant them leave take the deposition of Bongiorno. WHEREFORE Plaintiffs respectfully request the entry of an Order: (i) reopening discovery for the limited purpose of allowing the deposition of Annette Bongiorno; (ii) granting Plaintiffs leave to take the deposition of Annette Bongiorno; (iii) for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. Dated: October 24, 2016. By: /s/ Leonard K. Samuels Leonard K. Samuels Florida Bar No. 501610 Steven D. Weber Florida Bar No. 47543 Zachary P. Hyman Florida Bar No. 98581 Attorneys for Plaintiffs BERGER SINGERMAN LLP 350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Fax: (954) 523-2872 lsamuels@bergersingerman.com sweber@bergersingerman.com zhyman@bergersingerman.com and By: /s/ Thomas M. Messana 4

Thomas M. Messana, Esq. Florida Bar No. 991422 Thomas G. Zeichman, Esq. Florida Bar No. 99239 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MESSANA, P.A. 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1400 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 712-7400 Facsimile: (954) 712-7401 Email: tmessana@messana-law.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this October 24, 2016, the foregoing was filed using the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal, which sent notification to the following parties: Peter G. Herman, Esq. The Herman Law Group, P.A. 1401 E. Broward Blvd., Ste 206 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel.: 954-762-2555 Fax.: 954-762-2554 pgh@trippscott.com Attorneys for Steven Jacob; Steven F. Jacob CPA & Associates, Inc. Thomas M. Messana, Esq. Messana, P.A. 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1400 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel.: 954-712-7400 Fax: 954-712-7401 tmessana@messana-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Gary A. Woodfield, Esq. Haile, Shaw & Pfaffenberger, P.A. 660 U.S. Highway One, Third Floor North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Tel.: 561-627-8100 Fax.: 561-622-7603 gwoodfiled@haileshaw.com bpetroni@haileshaw.com eservices@haileshaw.com Attorneys for Frank Avellino and Michael Bienes By: s/leonard K. Samuels Leonard K. Samuels 5

Exhibit A 6

Exhibit B 7