AP Comparative Government and Politics

Similar documents
AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP United States Government and Politics

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP Comparative Government and Politics 2016 Free-Response Questions

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP World History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: R Long Essay Question 3. R Scoring Guideline.

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP European History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Short Answer Question 3. Scoring Guideline.

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP United States Government and Politics

AP United States History

AP European History. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Short Answer Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP United States Government and Politics

AP United States Government and Politics 2005 Scoring Commentary

World History 2014 Scoring Guidelines

AP Human Geography 2005 Scoring Commentary

AP World History 2013 Scoring Guidelines

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 8

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP United States History 2015 Free-Response Questions

AP Human Geography. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP Comparative Government & Politics 2003 Scoring Guidelines

AP Comparative Government & Politics 2001 Scoring Commentary

AP United States History

2017 Politics. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

AP United States History

AP United States History

Student Performance Q&A:

AP European History 2004 Scoring Guidelines

AP UNITED STATES HISTORY 2001 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 5

Bahrain Center for Human Rights Bahrain Center For Human Rights

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT and POLITICS Preliminary Course Outline for Academic Year

Egypt s Administrative Corruption Perception Index February 2018

AP Comparative Government and Politics

AP Literature Teaching Unit

AP European History 2007 Scoring Guidelines Form B

U.S. History Sample Item Set Political Machines, Corruption, and Progressive Reforms

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Ensuring the people of Fiji live a life free of corruption ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY TEMPLATE

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP United States Government and Politics 2008 Scoring Guidelines

Conclusion. This study brings out that the term insurgency is not amenable to an easy generalization.

Interests, Interactions, and Institutions. Interests: Actors and Preferences. Interests: Actors and Preferences. Interests: Actors and Preferences

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT and POLITICS Preliminary Course Outline for Academic Year

Class Election Project

ISSUES WITH INTERVENTION PSC/IR 265: CIVIL WAR AND INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS WILLIAM SPANIEL WILLIAMSPANIEL.COM/PSCIR

ONLINE APPENDIX: DELIBERATE DISENGAGEMENT: HOW EDUCATION

AP GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS: UNITED STATES 1999 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 1! 8 total points possible on this question.

Georgia FFA Association CONDUCT OF CHAPTER MEETINGS CDE

GLOBAL CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX (CPI) 2017 published 21 February

The Information Revolution and Soft Power

AP United States History 2005 Scoring Commentary Form B

AP Comparative Government and Politics

Elections in the Former Glorious Soviet Union

Authoritarianism in the Middle East. Introduction to Middle East Politics: Change, Continuity, Conflict, and Cooperation

Firm-level Perspectives On State-business Relations In Africa: The Food-processing Industry in Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia

the two explanatory forces of interests and ideas. All of the readings draw at least in part on ideas as

THE PREPARED CURRICULUM: FOR POST-SECONDARY AND CAREEER READINESS

Living in our Globalized World: Notes 18 Antisystemic protest Copyright Bruce Owen 2009 Robbins: most protest is ultimately against the capitalist

Student Performance Q&A:

Is corruption getting better or worse? Citizens views

Panel 7 New Governmental Strategies That Use Metrics and Link Economic Growth and Human Rights

ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Senate Bill 487 Ordered by the House June 1 Including Senate Amendments dated April 25 and House Amendments dated June 1

Name: Student #: Due Date: LACHSA AP Government Summer Assignment: Part 1 Reading, Questions and Vocabulary Terms

SENATE BILL lr1577 A BILL ENTITLED. Election Law Political Committees Campaign Finance

CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS ADVANCED PLACEMENT

Political Science Introduction to American Politics

Vote for Best Candy...

Dominican Republic: Corruption, Social Risk, & Security. Public and Private Sector s Role in Social Risk Mitigation

IEEE PES Outstanding Chapter Award (OCA)

Corruption in Kenya, 2005: Is NARC Fulfilling Its Campaign Promise?

THE GENDER DIMENSION OF CORRUPTION

The Court of Appeal Fees Regulations, 2000

Anti-bribery policy. Jesuit Provincial Offices 114 Mount Street London W1K 3AH Index

An Unemployment Insurance Scheme for the Euro Area?

Sport Integrity Review Discussion Document Summary. An overview of the content of the discussion document

WORKING PAPER. Brussels, 07 December 2018 WK 15307/2018 INIT LIMITE RECH

SUNTORY BEVERAGE AND FOOD EUROPE ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY OCTOBER 2015 EDITION 001

First Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL NEW ZEALAND

EXPLAINING THE GE2015 OUTCOMES:

AP United States Government & Politics Textbook & Supplementary Sources: Textbook: American Government and Politics Today

EXPUNGING YOUR RECORD

Unit 8, Period 8 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS Analyzing Causation and DBQ Essentials Early Cold War, From the 2015 Revised Framework:

Public Choice. Slide 1

ACC3611 Corporate Governance and Ethics (Semester 1, AY2015/2016)

Voter and non-voter survey report

Transparency, Accountability and Citizen s Engagement

U6D1 Overview: New Seating Chart

Procurement of Goods. Guidelines for Preparing Responsive Bids for. National and International. Competitive Bidding PPRA.

Transcription:

2018 AP Comparative Government and Politics Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary Inside: Free Response Question 5 RR Scoring Guideline RR Student Samples RR Scoring Commentary College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. AP Central is the official online home for the AP Program: apcentral.collegeboard.org

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2018 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 5 3 points One point is earned for a correct description of a reason why both democratic and authoritarian regimes use coercion to govern. Acceptable descriptions include: To ensure compliance or uphold law and order To assert the authority of the state One point is earned for a correct description of one alternative to the use of coercion to govern in both democratic and authoritarian regimes. Acceptable descriptions include: Cooptation of key social actors Elections to reinforce legitimacy Appeals to nationalist identity Appeals to traditional or charismatic authority Provision of representation to key social actors Propaganda appeals for support Economic redistribution Incentives for compliance One point is earned for a correct explanation of why authoritarian regimes do not rely exclusively on coercion to govern. Acceptable explanations include: To maintain legitimacy and support from internal or external actors International pressures Fear of civil unrest High cost of repression Moral reservations on use of force A score of zero (0) is earned for an attempted answer that earns no points or for an off-task answer. A score of dash ( ) is earned for a blank.

5. Describe one reason both democratic and authoritarian regimes use coercion to govern. Describe one: S--A to the use of coercion to govern in both democratic and authoritarian regimes. Explain why authoritari.. do not rely exclusively on coercion to govern. Unauthorized copying or reuse of any part of this page Is Illegal. -9- GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE.

5. Describe one reason both democratic and authoritarian regimes use coercion to govern. Describe one rurernat1vt to the use of coercion to govern in-6oih democratic and authoritar l!_ imes. Explain why authontari-an regimes do -not rely _ exclusively o _ c rcion to govern. 'A\>&,\o\l\jQY\cm reqwnes do a()+- ye,ly, e Llill 1u1v oo uxcvn <\o qove"a ee-aw e ±½en & qovevomln-1 WLR YllW-- m lf111dm Q. ttbctllq\ to o lbvaw +ll c1ovevntneyja OJN).._ W ancens COIA,ld or{)a!j12, Unauthorized copying or reuse of any part of this page is illegal. -9- GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE.

5. Describe one reason both democratic and authoritarian regimes use coercion to govern. Describe one ltemative to the use of coercion to govern in both democratic and authoritarian regimes. Explain why authoritarian regimes do not rely exclusively on coercion to govern. \J'I\Q, fq Cl (\V\ o c\troac v:urtc, r1'g<l a1tt\f\oy1t:o V10 V\ YQ. 'f\n 5 \)5L, R)(DDY\ ±a Q J\12}[)0 \S 'ORifl\8?. rt:: V\R\PS dne. "2rmn2.nt C\\Y\ -frt)vn \\:S ooopte. Qncl (\\2(2R ax:: ffi(;y2 \Q tljyyl(ttt. CML Q.\-\j){Y\(kfil)Q, +W...-SR, \'f\nls c S;\\!\ ' \Ge, W)stl '1C Dr: CC) e 'f c, a V\ \S ¼) V\ 00 fqjm lli\ (1)(lYC,,\{S\[\ ±0 Q) \JQYY) (ffil& -ffi9. \\ Sb\\ N c\., \\\f'i\x)\9.11, c \iy"&d \ \\f\ W\2 f b.\.(b'l\2 >C Unauthorized copying or reuse of any part of this page Is illegal. -9- GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE.

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2018 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 5 Overview: The intent of this question was to assess students understanding of coercion, how democratic and authoritarian regimes use coercive strategies, and why these regimes seek alternatives to coercion. The skills tested were conceptual and analytical. Students had three specific tasks: to describe why regimes use coercion; to describe alternatives to the use of coercion; and to explain why authoritarian regimes do not rely exclusively on coercive strategies. Sample: 5A Score: 3 The response earned 1 point for describing that regimes use coercion to govern because it is easy to control the masses under the threat that they/their families will be hurt if they don t cooperate or adjust to the expectations of their society. The response demonstrates an understanding of how coercion enables the state to enforce conformity with its expectations. Additional acceptable responses could have focused on the need of the state to assert its authority or to uphold the rule of law. The response earned 1 point for the description of the use of bribes, where government officials will offer money to citizens and other people in high ranks in exchange for cooperation and compliance. The response demonstrates an understanding of how regimes use material incentives to induce compliance. Additional acceptable responses include appeals to national identity, propaganda appeals for support, and cooptation of key social actors. The response earned 1 point for the explanation that [a]uthoritarian regimes do not rely exclusively on coercion because if the threat of violence is too strong and the oppression of the people becomes too unbearable, authoritarian regimes risk having to deal with an uprising from within. The response explains that coercive strategies may result in civil unrest. Additional acceptable responses include a need to maintain legitimacy internally and externally, a fear of international pressure, and the high cost of repression. Sample 5B Score: 2 The response earned 1 point for the description of how regimes use coercion: to demonstrate the governments [sic] authority over the state s policy and citizens. In both regimes, the use of violence, which creates fear, can allow the government to maintain control. The response is clear with regard to how coercion demonstrates state power and authority and enables the state to keep power. Additional acceptable responses could have included the need to uphold law and order or the need to ensure compliance with state policy. The response did not earn a point for describing an alternative to the use of coercion. The statement allowing the citizens the freedom to choose if they want to participate in politics does not represent an alternative to the use of coercion to govern. The response earned 1 point for the explanation that the government will have no legitimacy and the citizens could organize a rebellion to overthrow the government. The response is clear regarding the potential dangers to an authoritarian regime of relying solely on coercion as a governing strategy. Additional acceptable

AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2018 SCORING COMMENTARY Question 5 (continued) responses could have included a need to maintain legitimacy internally and externally, a fear of international pressure, and the high cost of repression. Sample 5C Score: 1 The response did not earn a point for describing a reason why democratic and authoritarian regimes might use coercion. The statement because it helps the government gain trust from it s [sic] people and appear more legitimate does not reflect an understanding of the use of coercion on a population. The response earned 1 point for the description of hold[ing] local level elections or referendums. Even though authoritarian governments could be corrupt in using these, they appear more legitimate to the citizens. The response demonstrates an understanding of how democratic and authoritarian regimes might use elections to win support. Additional acceptable responses include appeal to national identity, propaganda appeals for support, and cooptation of key social actors. The response did not earn a point for explaining why authoritarian regimes do not rely exclusively on coercion. The statement because they still need complete control in their higher levels of government does not explain why authoritarian states cannot exclusively rely on coercion.