May 22, 2002 OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Similar documents
PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

April 14, 2006 PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

May 16, Michael Mulvey PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

******************************************************* * KEY ISSUES:

Article 7. Department of Environmental Quality. Part 1. General Provisions.

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

TITLE 42, CHAPTER 103 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) EMERGENCY RESPONSE & NOTIFICATION PROVISIONS

LEGISLATIVE COUNSELʹS DIGEST

Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

Case Document 664 Filed in TXSB on 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12

Overview. Types of Water. Lost Pines Groundwater Conservation District Workshop - May 19,

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

This Policy is State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 Remediation of Land.

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

The Environmental Crimes Division

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL OIL AND GAS SECTION

OFFICIAL MINUTES RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FORMAL COMMISSION ACTION JANUARY 23, 2004

WATER CODE CHAPTER 7. ENFORCEMENT

AGREEMENT on the Environment between Canada and The Republic of Peru

2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.

CHAPTER 25B. Change of Owner, Operator, or Guarantor for Certain Oil and Gas Facilities

Convention for the. Protection and. Development of the. Marine Environment. of the Wider. Caribbean Region. and its Protocols

OIL & GAS DOCKET NO

PARKS AND WILDLIFE CODE TITLE 5. WILDLIFE AND PLANT CONSERVATION SUBTITLE F. MARL, SAND, GRAVEL, SHELL, AND MUDSHELL

DOCKET NO ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

CHAPTER 246. AN ACT concerning the enforcement of the State s environmental laws, and amending parts of the statutory law.

FACT SHEET FOR DRAFT RENEWAL GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER 0000-WG-CW FOR THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER GENERATED BY CARWASH FACILITIES

788 Act Nos LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Number 18 of 1999 SEA POLLUTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1999

Law Concerning Special Measures against Dioxins (Law No. 105 of Promulgated on July 16, 1999)

Oil and Gas Development

Case Document 2587 Filed in TXSB on 09/24/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Convention for the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the East African Region, 1985.

Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972

Virginia s Experience with Offshore Energy Planning

VINCE RYAN, County Attorney 1019 Congress, Houston TX Phone: (713)

REVISED PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY. John Chakales, Hearings Examiner Danny Bivens, Technical Examiner

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS. Hearings Division

Convention for the. Protection and. Development of the. Marine Environment. of the Wider. Caribbean Region. and its Protocols

AGREEMENT on the Environment between Canada and The Republic of Panama

COOPERATION AGREEMENT for the protection of the coasts and waters of the north-east Atlantic against pollution

XIV. County of Hanover. Board Meeting: July 27, 2016

CHAPTER 159 CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1967

RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ON-SITE SEWAGE FACILITY REGULATIONS

Case Document 774 Filed in TXSB on 07/31/17 Page 1 of 12

Chapter 5: Water Management and Inuit Water Rights

TREATY SERIES 2001 Nº 23. International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-Operation

State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 Remediation of Land

Pacific Ocean Resources Compact. The provisions of the Pacific Ocean Resources Compact are as follows:

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FORMAL COMMISSION ACTION DECEMBER 7, 2004

Control Number : Item Number : 1. Addendum StartPage : 0

Case Document 1870 Filed in TXSB on 05/13/13 Page 1 of 7

Case Document 2473 Filed in TXSB on 08/28/13 Page 1 of 4

Number 54 of Fisheries and Foreshore (Amendment) Act 1998 REVISED. Updated to 2 July 2015

GUIDE FOR SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY AUDIT PRIVILEGE ACT

RULES GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, USE, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEMS WITHIN ANY AREA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, IOWA

Calendar No th CONGRESS. 2d Session S. 3643

NOTICE ANNOUNCING RE-ISSUANCE OF A REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT

Public Trust and Public Necessity Defenses to Takings on the Gulf Coast

Senate Bill No. 44 CHAPTER 645

AGREEMENT. being convinced that protection of the marine environment demands active cooperation and mutual help among the States,

GOVERNMENT CODE TITLE 2. JUDICIAL BRANCH SUBTITLE G. ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 81. STATE BAR SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1969 SESSION CHAPTER 1089 HOUSE BILL 1324 AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE LAKE NORMAN MARINE COMMISSION.

Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Chapter 4: Emergency Response Notification Article I: Oklahoma Emergency Response Act

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

CLEAN AIR. The Clean Air Act. Repealed by Chapter E of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2010 (effective June 1, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OFFICE OF OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS FERROUS MINERAL MINING

This report is published and distributed by America s Survival, Inc. Cliff Kincaid, President

SURFACE MINING AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 1975

US ARMY CORPS Reply To: Public Notice No. OF ENGINEERS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P-3104

The City of Florence shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of these regulations. Any powers granted or

Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District Rules Approved March 18, 2014

Sewage Disposal ARTICLE II SEWAGE RETAINING TANKS

FPL FARMING, LTD. V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS, L.C.: SUBSURFACE TRESPASS IN TEXAS

SEBASTIAN COUNTY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Proposed Rules

Environmental Governance in Bangladesh

Transcription:

May 22, 2002 OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO. 03-0230362 ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST OPMI OPERATING COMPANY (OPERATOR NO. 625050) FOR VIOLATIONS OF STATEWIDE RULES ON THE S/L M-95048 LEASE, WELL NO. 1, (GAS ID# 120918), BRAZOS BLOCK 403-L (MIOCENE 5370) FIELD; AND S/L M-95047 LEASE, WELL NO. 1, (GAS ID# 138164), BRAZOS BLOCK 403-L (MIOCENE 5370) FIELD, BRAZOS-LB, OFFSHORE MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS. APPEARANCES: FOR MOVANT: Lowell Williams, Attorney MOVANT: Enforcement Section of the Railroad Commission NO APPEARANCE BY RESPONDENT OPMI OPERATING COMPANY PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY DATE OF REQUEST FOR ACTION: March 27, 2002 DATE CASE HEARD: May 6, 2002 HEARD BY: Mark Helmueller, Hearings Examiner PFD ISSUED: May 22, 2002 CURRENT STATUS: Default

STATEMENT OF THE CASE This was a Commission-called hearing on the recommendation of the District Office to determine the following: 1. Whether the respondent, OPMI Operating Company, should be required to place in compliance with Statewide Rule14 (16 T.A.C. 3.14) the S/L M-95048 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 120918), Brazos Block 403-L (Miocene 5370) Field; and S/L M-95047 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 138164), Brazos Block 403-L (Miocene 5370) Field, Brazos-LB, Offshore Matagorda County, Texas; 2. Whether the respondent has violated provisions of Title 3, Oil and Gas, Subtitles A, B and C, Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 27 of the Texas Water Code, and Commission rules and laws pertaining to safety or prevention or control of pollution by failing to comply with said statutes and Statewide Rule 14; 3. Whether the respondent should be assessed administrative penalties of not more than $10,000.00 per day for each offense committed regarding such lease; 4. Whether any violations of Rule 14 should be referred to the Office of the Attorney General for further civil action pursuant to TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. 81.0534. 5. Whether other orders should be entered as permitted by law. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY Following service by certified mail of the Notice of Opportunity of Hearing and Complaint on March 27, 2002, the Commission convened a default hearing on May 6, 2002 to address the violations. Lowell Williams, Staff Attorney, appeared representing the Railroad Commission of Texas, Enforcement Section. The Enforcement Section's hearing file for this docket was admitted into evidence. The staff recommended a $100,000.00 penalty at the hearing for two violations of Statewide Rule 14(b)(2); $50,000.00 for each offshore well. The examiner believes a total administrative penalty of $272,000.00 is warranted where: 1) OPMI acknowledged receipt of the complaint by certified mail but did not appear or respond; 2) the wells were never produced and have been out of compliance for 38 months; and 3) the wells are in a marine environment near the sensitive coastal area of Matagorda Island which poses an enhanced impact of any potential pollution on both wildlife and the public. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE Enforcement presented evidence that respondent designated itself operator of the S/L M-

95048 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 120918), and S/L M-95047 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 138164), by filing a Commission Form P-4 (Producer s Transportation Authority and Certificate of Compliance), approved by the Commission on March 26, 1997 as effective on December 1, 1996. OPMI first filed an organization report with the Commission in October 1996. In the three years it engaged in active operations, OPMI acquired 5 offshore wells. It never produced any of the wells, transferring three of the wells to other operators. The two wells which are the subject of this docket were never produced by OPMI. The most recent Form P-5 (Organization Report) for OPMI was filed with the Commission on November 18, 1998 and identified Clinton Todd Harwell, as the only officer of the company. The last reported production for the subject wells was in February 1993. Commission records indicate that the last plugging extensions for the wells expired on March 25, 1999. Enforcement therefore argued that both wells have been out of compliance with Statewide Rule 14(b)(2) plugging requirements for 38 months. Enforcement submitted maps showing that the S/L M-95048 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 120918) and S/L M-95047 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 138164) are located approximately 5 to 6 miles offshore of Matagorda Island. Enforcement also noted the proximity of sensitive marine and coastal wildlife habitat in the area. Enforcement believes that a higher administrative penalty than that pled in the complaint is appropriate based on the time period that the wells were out of compliance and the sensitive nature of the marine and coastal ecosystems in the area. EXAMINER S OPINION The operator of a well must plug a well when required and in accordance with Commission rules. For Form P-4s filed prior to September 1, 1997, the operator, for purposes of plugging liability, is presumed to be the person who assumed responsibility for the physical operation and control of a well as shown on the approved Form P-4 designating that person as operator. The evidence presented by the Enforcement Staff clearly establishes respondent s violations of Statewide Rule 14 (b)(2). These two offshore wells were never produced by OPMI and have remained out of compliance with Commission plugging requirements for more than 3 years. Even more disturbing is the fact that these two wells reported no production after February 1993, over three years before the wells were transferred to OPMI. No steps whatsoever have been taken to bring the wells into compliance with Commission rules. Due to the marine environment and the proximity to sensitive coastal areas there would be an enhanced impact of any potential pollution from these two wells. Current Commission penalty guidelines recommend a penalty of $50,000.00 for any offshore well in violation of Statewide Rule 14(b)(2). This was the recommendation made in the complaint. However, Commission penalty guidelines also provide for enhanced penalties of up to $2,000.00 per month for each month a well is not in compliance with Statewide Rules. Additionally, Commission penalty guidelines also provide that enhanced penalties between $5,000.00 and $25,000.00 per violation may be applicable for violations which occur in a marine environment due to the potential pollution impact

Under the facts presented in this case, these two wells were out of compliance with Statewide Rule 14(b)(2) from March 25, 1999 to the present. The examiner recommends enhanced penalty for these violations based on the 38 months the wells have been out of compliance multiplied by $2,000.00 per month. This enhanced penalty adds an additional $76,000.00 to the recommended $50,000.00 penalty for each well. Additionally, the examiner recommends an additional enhancement of $10,000.00 per well because of the potential impact on sensitive wildlife and the marine and coastal habitat. Accordingly, the examiner recommends an administrative penalty of $136,000.00 be assessed for each well and that the total administrative penalty against OPMI be assessed at $272,000.00. Based on the record in this docket, the examiner recommends adoption of the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. OPMI Operating Company ("respondent") was given at least 10 days notice of this proceeding by certified mail, addressed to the most recent Form P-5 (Organization Report) address, the receipt for which was signed and returned to the Commission. OPMI did not answer the complaint. 2. OPMI first filed an organization report with the Commission in October 1996. In the three years it engaged in active operations, OPMI acquired 5 offshore wells. It never produced any of the wells, transferring three of the wells to other operators. The most recent Form P-5 (Organization Report) for OPMI was filed with the Commission on November 18, 1998 and identified Clinton Todd Harwell, as the only officer of the company. 3. Respondent designated itself to the Commission as the operator of the S/L M-95048 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 120918), and S/L M-95047 Lease, Well No. 1, (Gas ID# 138164) ( subject wells ), by filing a Commission Form P-4 (Producer s Transportation Authority and Certificate of Compliance), approved by the Commission on March 26, 1997 as effective on December 1, 1996. 4. The subject wells have been inactive for a period in excess of one year. The last reported production for the subject wells was in February 1993. Both wells have been out of compliance with Statewide Rule 14(b)(2) plugging requirements since March 25, 1999. 5. The subject wells have not been properly plugged. 6. The marine environment in the area of these offshore wells and the sensitive coastal ecosystem may be contaminated by migrations or discharges of saltwater and other oil and gas wastes from the subject wells. Unplugged wellbores constitute a cognizable threat to the public health and safety because of the probability of pollution. 7. The 38 months the subjects wells have been out of compliance with Statewide Rule 14(b)(2) plugging requirements and the potential impact on sensitive wildlife and the marine and coastal habitat warrants an enhanced administrative penalty for these violations pursuant to

Texas Natural Resources Code 81.0531(c). 8. The record does not reflect any previous violations by respondent of Commission rules. 9. Respondent has not demonstrated good faith since it failed to plug or otherwise place the subject wells in compliance after being notified of the violations by the District Office. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Proper notice of opportunity for hearing was timely issued to the appropriate persons entitled to notice. 2. All things necessary to the Commission attaining jurisdiction have occurred. 3. Respondent is the operator of the subject wells, as defined by Statewide Rule 14 and Section 89.002 of the Texas Natural Resources Code and is a person as defined by Commission Statewide Rule 79 and Chapters 85 and 89 of the Texas Natural Resources Code. 4. As operator, respondent has the primary responsibility for complying with Rule 14 and with Chapter 89 of the Texas Natural Resources Code as well as other applicable statutes and Commission rules relating to the subject wells. 5. The subject wells are not properly plugged or otherwise in compliance with Commission Statewide Rule 14, or Chapters 85, 89 and 91 of the Texas Natural Resources Code. The wells have been out of compliance since on or before March 25, 1999. 6. The documented violations committed by respondent constitute acts deemed serious, a hazard to the public health, and demonstrate a lack of good faith pursuant to TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. 81.0531(c). RECOMMENDATION The examiner recommends that the above findings and conclusions be adopted and the attached order approved, requiring OPMI Operating Company to plug the wells in compliance with Statewide Rule 14 and assessing an administrative penalty in the amount of TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($272,000.00). Respectfully submitted, Mark J. Helmueller Hearings Examiner

mjh OPMI.wpd