Position statement on indigenous peoples and mining

Similar documents
Human Rights Policy July Version 2 - FINAL

What is Free, Prior and Informed Consent?

EBRD Performance Requirement 5

COMPILED RECOMMENDATIONS FROM INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE VARIOUS COMMUNICATIONS TO THE WORLD BANK 1

National Human Rights Institutions and Indigenous Peoples

Indigenous and Tribal Peoples and the ILO

Initiative of the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights Partner for Democratic Change International PDCI (Represented by Socios Peru)

Thematic Report on Freedom of Association and Peaceful Assembly in the context of the exploitation of natural resources

THE WORLD BANK OPERATIONAL MANUAL. Indigenous Peoples

Mining and Indigenous Peoples Issues Roundtable: Continuing a Dialogue between Indigenous Peoples and Mining Companies

Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)

Indigenous peoples: Consultation and participation

Comments submitted by the ILO

Consolidated Group Approach to Artisanal and Small- Scale Mining (ASM)

An informal aid. for reading the Voluntary Guidelines. on the Responsible Governance of Tenure. of Land, Fisheries and Forests

Duty to Consult, Reconciliation and Economic Development Frameworks

THE SYSTEM OF PROVIDING INFORMATION ON SAFEGUARDS (SIS) SHOULD BE BASED ON RIGHTS-BASED INDICATORS TO ASSESS, AMONG OTHERS:

Rights to land, fisheries and forests and Human Rights

3. This means that. 2 Sections 211 and 39 of the Constitution. 3 South Africa has signed and ratified this Charter and is thus bound by it.

COOKBOOK ANNEX. Research Manual Vol. 3 Social Safeguards TAKUYA FURUKAWA, SEIJI IWANAGA, KIMIKO OKABE & MIKI TODA

DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR MINISTRIES ON CONSULTATION WITH ABORIGINAL PEOPLES RELATED TO ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND TREATY RIGHTS

OECD-FAO Guidance for

PT Freeport Indonesia An affiliate of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold November 19, 2013

Briefing Note. Protected Areas and Indigenous Peoples Rights: Applicable International Legal Obligations

SUMMARY EQUIVALENCE ASSESSMENT BY POLICY PRINCIPLE AND KEY ELEMENTS

CLOSING STATEMENT H.E. AMBASSADOR MINELIK ALEMU GETAHUN, CHAIRPERSON- RAPPORTEUR OF THE 2011 SOCIAL FORUM

Human Rights and Business Fact Sheet

Summary of the Indigenous Peoples' Consultation with the Asian Development Bank, November 27 th 2007

Securing Free, Prior & Informed Consent to Resettlement. First Quantum s Cobre Panama Project

Global Indigenous Peoples Dialogue with the. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) December 2012, Doha, Qatar

The Potential Role of the UN Guidelines and the new ILO Recommendation on the Promotion of Cooperatives

October 13, 2010 Kristen Hite, CIEL

Concept Paper on Facilitating Specification of the Duty to Protect

April 6, RSC, 1985, c N-22. SC 1992, c 37. SC 2012, c 19.

License to Operate. Indigenous Relations and Free Prior and Informed Consent in the Mining Industry. Irene Sosa October 2011

Energy Projects & First Nations in Canada:

Inter-American Development Bank. Operational Policy on Indigenous Peoples

IUCN s Rights-Based Approach: A Systematization of the Union s Policy Instruments, Standards and Guidelines

Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Development:

Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security

Multi-Partner Trust Fund of the UN Indigenous Peoples Partnership FINAL PROGRAMME NARRATIVE REPORT

Safeguarding the Living Breath of Life

THE IMPLICATIONS FOR BUSINESSES OF THEIR FAILURE TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS

provides this advice on the basis of the 1995 Act on the Sámi Parliament. 2

Indigenous People's Right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent and the World Bank's Extractive Industries Review

United Nations Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) study on free, prior and informed consent

information on safeguards (SIS): Inclusion of data relevant for indigenous peoples

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights *

Protecting Traditional Knowledge: A framework based on Customary Laws and Bio-Cultural Heritage

SUBMISSIONS TO THE WORKING GROUP ON EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES, ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN AFRICA

INTEGRATING THE APPLICATION OF GOVERNANCE AND RIGHTS WITHIN IUCN S GLOBAL CONSERVATION ACTION

International Human Rights 22 June 2017

I. General Comments. Submitted by

British Columbia First Nations Perspectives on a New Health Governance Arrangement. Consensus

ANNUAL EELF CONFERENCE COPENHAGEN, 30. AUGUST 1. SEPTEMBER 2017

Written Submissions by Stswecem c Xgat tem First Nation. Submitted to the Expert Panel regarding the National Energy Board Modernization Review

AusIMM Qld. i Christine Charles Newmont Mining Corporation September 2008

DPA/EAD input to OHCHR draft guidelines on effective implementation of the right to participation in public affairs May 2017

JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE OFFICE, HOUSE OF COMMONS 7 MILLBANK, LONDON SW1P 3JA

Performance Standard 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

Summary Progressing national SDGs implementation:

HUMAN RIGHTS IN CONSERVATION: PROGRESS SINCE DURBAN CONSERVATION INITIATIVE ON HUMAN RIGHTS

Preston Hardison, Tulalip Natural Resources NPLCC TEK Meeting Guidelines, September 4, Portland, OR. Traditional Knowledges Guidelines

VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR THE REPATRIATION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE

IUCN Policy on Conservation and Human Rights for Sustainable Development

Annex II. The Benefits of Integrating Human Rights Risk Information into the World Bank s Due Diligence

SECOND DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION JULY Environmental and Social Standard 5 Land Acquisition, Restrictions on Land Use and Involuntary Resettlement

2 The Global Environment Facility

The above definition may be amplified at national and/or regional levels.

Comments on the UN REDD Programme Principles and Criteria and Benefit and Risk Assessment Tool

1 Ratified by the UK on 9 February Ratified by the UK on 7 April Ratified by the UK on 16 December 1991.

2018/ /21 SERVICE PLAN

The concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent, which

IOE-ANDI Submission to the 2013 Regional Forum on Business and Human Rights for Latin America and the Caribbean August 2013, Medellín Colombia

Enabling Global Trade developing capacity through partnership. Executive Summary DAC Guidelines on Strengthening Trade Capacity for Development

PROPOSAL FOR A NON-BINDING STANDARD-SETTING INSTRUMENT ON THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE ROLE OF MUSEUMS AND COLLECTIONS

DISCUSSION PAPER INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION

THE CHALLENGES AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF SECURING THE OCCUPATION OF LAND REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS IN WEST AFRICA

Project & Environmental Review Aboriginal Consultation Information for Applicants. July 2015

Climate Change, Human Rights & Indigenous Peoples

Pacific Indigenous Peoples Preparatory meeting for the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples March 2013, Sydney Australia

Guidance Note 5 Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

Relocation of Kiruna and Building the Markbygden Wind Farm and the Sami Rights

Via DATE: February 3, 2014

First Draft. Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests

Governing Body Geneva, March 2009 TC FOR DECISION. Trends in international development cooperation INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE

Christian Aid Ireland's Submission to the Review of Ireland s Foreign Policy and External Relations

American Indian & Alaska Native. Tribal Government Policy

Māori interests in PACER Plus

Comments on Suriname RPP (23 February 2013)

ANNE-KRISTIN TREIBER Conflict Adviser, Security and Justice Team Conflict, Humanitarian and Security Department UK aid

Strengthening Indigenous Peoples' Governance for Biodiversity Conservation, Sustainable Use and Equitable Sharing

History of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advocacy

Forest Peoples Programme

Questionnaire to UN system

Second International Decade of the World s Indigenous People Questionnaire for UN system and other intergovernmental organizations

The Attorney General of Canada s Directive on Civil Litigation Involving Indigenous Peoples

MINING-INDUCED DISPLACEMENT AND RESETTLEMENT (MIDR): DEFINING A RESEARCH AGENDA

Questionnaire to Governments

Consensus Paper BRITISH COLUMBIA FIRST NATIONS PERSPECTIVES ON A NEW HEALTH GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENT

Transcription:

1 on indigenous peoples and mining May 2013

2 ICMM members recognise that they have a significant role to play in creating a safer and more sustainable mining and metals industry. Through their commitments they work together, alongside governments and local communities to improve quality of life beyond the provision of the minerals and metals that sustain modern living. All member companies are represented on ICMM s council by their CEO. Our members African Rainbow Minerals AngloAmerican AngloGold Ashanti Antofagasta Minerals Barrick BHP Billiton Codelco Freeport-McMoRan Glencore Goldcorp Gold Fields Hydro JX Nippon Lonmin Mitsubishi Materials MMG Newcrest Mining Newmont Orano Polyus Rio Tinto South32 Sumitomo Metal Mining Teck Vale Notes 1. As defined in article 1 of the International Labour Organization s Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (ILO 169). 2. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights outlines the responsibility of business to avoid infringing on the rights of others and to address adverse impacts with which they are involved. 3. This involves all parties being willing to: (i) engage in negotiation and to meet at reasonable times and frequency; (ii) provide information needed for informed negotiation and explore key issues of importance; (iii) agree mutually acceptable procedures for negotiation that include sufficient time for decision making; and (iv) compromise in pursuit of reaching a formal and documented agreement. This is consistent with the attributes of good faith negotiation outlined in IFC s Guidance Note 7 on indigenous peoples (paragraph GN 25). 4. Members are expected to implement the commitments in this position statement by May 2015. The commitments will not apply to projects that have started the approvals and permitting processes at the time of the adoption of the position statement. 5. As of October 2012, 22 countries had ratified ILO 169 which is legally binding in those states. 6. As stated in the UN Development Group s Guidelines on Indigenous Peoples Issues (2008). 7. As expressed in the UN s Department of Economic and Social Affairs Resource Kit on Indigenous Peoples Issues (2008). 8. As defined in ILO 169 and outlined in section 1.3 of ICMM s Good Practice Guide: Indigenous Peoples and Mining (2010). 9. Includes natural areas with cultural and/or spiritual values such as sacred groves or water bodies. 10. Relocation of indigenous peoples and impacts on critical cultural heritage should be avoided to the extent possible.

3 on indigenous peoples and mining 1 Overview This position statement sets out ICMM members approach to engaging with indigenous peoples 1 and to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) and replaces ICMM s 2008 Mining and indigenous peoples position statement. ICMM s vision is for constructive relationships between mining and metals companies and indigenous peoples that are based on mutual respect, meaningful engagement, trust and mutual benefit. Recognising the potential vulnerability of indigenous peoples, the commitments in this position statement may be summarised as requiring members to: respect the rights, interests, special connections to lands and waters, and perspectives of indigenous peoples, where mining projects are to be located on lands traditionally owned by or under customary use of indigenous peoples adopt and apply engagement and consultation processes that ensure the meaningful participation of indigenous communities in decision making, through a process that is consistent with their traditional decision-making processes and is based on good faith negotiation work to obtain the consent of indigenous peoples where required by this position statement. In ICMM s view, FPIC comprises a process, and an outcome. Through this process indigenous peoples are: (i) able to freely make decisions without coercion, intimidation or manipulation; (ii) given sufficient time to be involved in project decision making before key decisions are made and impacts occur; and (iii) fully informed about the project and its potential impacts and benefits. The outcome is that indigenous peoples can give or withhold their consent to a project, through a process that strives to be consistent with their traditional decisionmaking processes while respecting internationally recognised human rights 2 and is based on good faith negotiation 3. The commitments in this position statement relating to consent apply to new projects and changes to existing projects that are likely to have significant impacts on indigenous communities. The position statement will not apply retrospectively 4. Where both indigenous and non-indigenous peoples are likely to be significantly impacted, members may choose to extend the commitments embodied in this position statement to nonindigenous people. 2 Background on ICMM principles and position statements All ICMM member companies implement the ICMM Sustainable Development Framework as a condition of membership. This includes commitments to implement 10 principles throughout their businesses, to report in line with the Global Reporting Initiative s (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Framework and to obtain independent external assurance that the ICMM commitments are being met (this framework is described in detail at www.icmm.com/membercommitments). ICMM principles of particular relevance to indigenous peoples and project decision making are: Principle 3: Respect human rights and the interests, cultures, customs and values of employees and others affected by our activities. Principle 6: Pursue continual improvement in environmental performance issues, such as water stewardship, energy use and climate change. Principle 9: Pursue continual improvement in social performance and contribute to the social, economic and institutional development of host countries and communities. In accordance with the principles, ICMM has also developed a number of position statements that further elaborate member commitments to particular issues. Company members comply with these statements by incorporating them into their operational practices.

4 on indigenous peoples and mining 3 Recognition statements ICMM members recognise that: 1. Indigenous peoples often have profound and special connections to, and identification with, lands and waters and these are tied to their physical, spiritual, cultural and economic well-being. They may also have valuable traditional knowledge and experience in managing the environment in a sustainable manner. Indigenous peoples in many regions of the world have been historically disadvantaged and may often still experience discrimination, high levels of poverty and other forms of political and social disadvantage. Mining and metals projects can have significant impacts on local communities, both positive and negative. 2. The interests of Indigenous peoples in mining and metals projects are generally recognised as one or more of the following: owners of formal title to land or recognised legal interests in land or resources; claimants for ownership of land or resources; customary owners or occupants of land or resources; users of land or resources for purposes such as hunting, fishing, gathering of seeds/fruits and medicines, or for spiritual or ritual purposes; in material objects or resources of cultural significance; in landscapes which have special significance because of association, tradition or beliefs; members of host communities whose social, economic and physical environment may be affected by mining and associated activities. 3. Indigenous peoples have individual and collective rights and interests and it is internationally recognised that their rights should be protected by governments and respected by companies. Two of the key international instruments in this area are International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989), and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) adopted by the UN General Assembly in September 2007 5. UNDRIP sets out rights that countries should aspire to recognise, guarantee and implement and establishes a framework for discussion and dialogue between indigenous peoples and States. 6 4. Successful mining and metals projects require the support of a range of interested and affected parties. This includes both the formal legal and regulatory approvals granted by governments and the broad support of a company s host communities. Indigenous peoples often have cultural characteristics, governance structures and ways of interacting and decision making that sets them apart from the non-indigenous population. This requires companies to engage in ways that are culturally appropriate and to pay special attention to the capacities, rights and interests of indigenous peoples, within the context of broader community engagement. States have the right to make decisions on the development of resources according to applicable national laws, including those laws implementing host country obligations under international law. Some countries have made an explicit consent provision under national or sub-national laws. In most countries however, neither indigenous peoples nor any other population group have the right to veto development projects that affect them, so FPIC should be regarded as a principle to be respected to the greatest degree possible in development planning and implementation. 7 5. States also have an important role to play in the process of engaging with indigenous peoples. They may be involved in determining which communities should be considered indigenous, in shaping the process for achieving FPIC and in determining how this relates to regulated processes for ensuring community participation in decision making. Given their role in balancing the rights and interests of indigenous peoples with the wider population, states may also play an important role in supporting the resolution of disagreements that may arise between indigenous peoples and companies in the pursuit of FPIC. 6. In some countries, the term indigenous may be controversial and local terms may be in use that are broadly equivalent (such as tribal peoples, first peoples, native people, aboriginal people). In other situations, there may be no recognition of indigeneity by states, or the term may have negative associations that discourage people from acknowledging indigenous identity. Irrespective of the local context, ICMM members reject any discrimination or disadvantage that may be related to culture, identity or vulnerability and will seek to apply the principles embodied in this position statement to groups that exhibit the commonly accepted characteristics of indigenous peoples. 8

5 May 2013 4 Commitments In addition to existing commitments under the ICMM Sustainable Development Framework ICMM member companies commit to: 1. Engage with potentially impacted indigenous peoples with the objectives of: (i) ensuring that the development of mining and metals projects fosters respect for the rights, interests, aspirations, culture and natural resource-based livelihoods of indigenous peoples; (ii) designing projects to avoid adverse impacts and minimising, managing or compensating for unavoidable residual impacts; and (iii) ensuring sustainable benefits and opportunities for indigenous peoples through the development of mining and metals projects. 2. Understand and respect the rights, interests and perspectives of indigenous peoples regarding a project and its potential impacts. Social and environmental impact assessments or other social baseline analyses will be undertaken to identify those who may be impacted by a project as well as the nature and extent of potential impacts on indigenous peoples and any other potentially impacted communities. The conduct of such studies should be participatory and inclusive to help build broad cross-cultural understanding between companies and communities and in support of the objectives described in commitment 1 above. 3. Agree on appropriate engagement and consultation processes with peoples and relevant government authorities as early as possible during project planning, to ensure the meaningful participation of indigenous peoples in decision making. Where required, support should be provided to build community capacity for good faith negotiation on an equitable basis. These processes should strive to be consistent with indigenous peoples decisionmaking processes and reflect internationally accepted human rights, and be commensurate with the scale of the potential impacts and vulnerability of impacted communities. The processes should embody the attributes of good faith negotiation and be documented in a plan that identifies representatives of communities and government, agreed consultation processes and protocols, reciprocal responsibilities of parties to the engagement process and agreed avenues of recourse in the event of disagreements or impasses occurring (see commitment 6 below). The plan should also define what would constitute consent from indigenous communities that may be significantly impacted. Agreed engagement and consultation processes should be applied in collaboration with communities, in a manner that ensures their meaningful participation in decision making. 4. Work to obtain the consent of indigenous communities for new projects (and changes to existing projects) that are located on lands traditionally owned by or under customary use of indigenous peoples and are likely to have significant adverse impacts on indigenous peoples, including where relocation of indigenous peoples and/or significant adverse impacts on critical cultural heritage 9 are likely to occur 10. Consent processes should focus on reaching agreement on the basis for which a project (or changes to existing projects) should proceed. These processes should neither confer veto rights to individuals or sub-groups nor require unanimous support from peoples (unless legally mandated). Consent processes should not require companies to agree to aspects not under their control. 5. Collaborate with the responsible authorities to achieve outcomes consistent with the commitments in this position statement, in situations where government is responsible for managing indigenous peoples interests in a way that limits company involvement. Where a host government requires members to follow processes that have been designed to achieve the outcomes sought through this position statement, ICMM members will not be expected to establish parallel processes. 6. Address the likelihood that differences of opinion will arise, which in some cases may lead to setbacks or delays in reaching a negotiated agreement in good faith. Companies and potentially impacted indigenous communities should agree on reasonable tests or avenues of recourse at the outset, to be applied where differences of opinion arise. This might include seeking mediation or advice from mutually acceptable parties. Where commitment 4 applies and consent is not forthcoming despite the best efforts of all parties, in balancing the rights and interests of indigenous peoples with the wider population, government might determine that a project should proceed and specify the conditions that should apply. In such circumstances, ICMM members will determine whether they ought to remain involved with a project.

6 Future ICMM work ICMM commits to continued engagement with indigenous peoples and their representatives and will continue to develop approaches relating to the interests and concerns of indigenous peoples. Among the elements of work currently planned or anticipated for the next few years are: Updating ICMM s Good Practice Guidance on Indigenous Peoples and Mining to support members in implementing this position statement. The promotion of good practice more broadly across the mining and metals sector. Continued dialogue with indigenous peoples organisations, development institutions and/or governments at the national and international levels. ICMM is an international organisation dedicated to enabling a safe, fair and sustainable mining and metals industry. Bringing together 25 mining and metals companies and over 30 regional and commodities associations we strengthen environmental and social performance. We serve as a catalyst for change; enhancing mining s contribution to society. 35/38 Portman Sq. London W1H 6LR United Kingdom +44 (0) 20 7467 5070 info@icmm.com www.icmm.com Follow us: Foll @ICMM_com