Case 5:17-cv CBM-RAO Document 446 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:17580

Similar documents
Also, please carefully follow the directions accompanying each question.

E D AUG 1 G 2 0 « CLERK OF THE COURT CSeriT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 36

Case 2:15-cv DDP-JC Document 246 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:4165

Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 762 Filed 12/26/12 Page 1 of 9

HLED M'I Plaintiff, VERDICT FORM # 1

Directions: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided.

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

CO:MMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 28th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT DMSION.1 CML ACTION NO. 17-CI INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 369 Filed 09/27/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID Qualcomm s Proposed Verdict Form, Phase 1

United States District Court

No th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1901 Filed08/21/12 Page1 of 109

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 4309 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 10

PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 479 Att. 2 EXHIBIT B. Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No.

Case 1:14-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT United States Courthouse 219 S Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois DOCKETING STATEMENT

Case 3:11-cv RBD-TEM Document 364 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID 15714

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2940 Filed 03/07/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:11-cv FLW-LHG Document 49 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1181

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the. instructions I gave you earlier, as well as those I give

Civil Procedure. The Origin of a Lawsuit. The Resolution of Private Disputes Chapter 2 Part 2 Civil Procedure

CAUSE NO IN THE INTEREST OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHILDS NAME CHILDREN COUNTY, TEXAS A CHILD 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHARGE OF THE COURT

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

Supreme Court of Florida

The American Court System BASIC JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS. Jurisdiction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Complaint for Patent Infringement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]:

Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.

FORT SILL LEGAL ASSISTANCE. Small Claims Court. Speedy Justice Between Parties

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Sixth Amendment. Fair Trial

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

PROTECTION SYSTEMS & EXAMINATION AUTHORITY

Case 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document 319 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2017 Page 1 of 6

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

California Eviction Defense:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/01/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 352 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/01/2017

Pennsylvania Bar Association 100 South Street P.O. Box 186 Harrisburg, PA (800)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA JUDGMENT ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

NO. 07-CI JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al.

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Post-Grant Patent Proceedings

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must keep an open

Case 1:08-cv LPS Document 601 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON

trial preparation packet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Civ. No (RHK/JJK) v. JURY INSTRUCTIONS

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. Civil No Judge Barry Lawrence. Tier 3

Case 4:17-cv PJH Document 61 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 33

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

Case 2:07-cv RCJ-GWF Document 1 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case5:11-cv LHK Document902 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

Case 5:-cv-005-CBM-RAO Document Filed // Page of 5 Page ID #:50 ' ' i i= ` ~'D. _.I.._. i h ' r ~OV ~ a.. i '..a ;'~~ JTRAL GIfsTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ' ~ / DEPUTY N THE UI~TITED TATE DTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MONTER ENERGY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, v. Plaintiff, INTEGRATED UPPLY NETWORK, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Defendant. Case No. 5:-CV-005-CBM=R.AO VERDICT FORM Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall Trial:. October 0,

Case 5:-cv-005-CBM-RAO Document Filed // Page of 5 Page ID #:5 '' WE, THE JURY, unanimously find as follows:. Did Monster Energy Company ("Monster Energy") prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Integrated upply Network, LLC ("N") infringed any of Monster Energy's federally registered trademarks that include the word "Monster"? Yes (for Monster Energy) No (for N) (Proceed to Question.). _Did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it. has any trademark rights in the unregistered mark "Monster"? 5 Yes (for Monster Energy) No (for N) (If you answered "No" to Question, skip to Question. If you answered "Yes" to Question, proceed to Question.). Did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence that N infringed Monster Energy's trademark rights in the unregistered mark "Monster"? Yes (for Monster Energy) No (for N) (If you answered "No" to Question, skip to Question. If you answered "Yes" to Question, proceed to Question.) --

Case 5:-cv-005-CBM-RAO Document Filed // Page of 5 Page ID #:5 ~~. Did N prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Monster Energy abandoned its trademark rights in the unregistered mark "Monster"? 5 Yes (for N) No (for Monster Energy) (P~oceed to Question.) 5: Did Monster Energy prove by a preponderence of the evidence that N infringed any of Monster Energy's federally registered trademarks.that include the word "Beast"? Yes (for Monster Energy) No (for N) _~ (Proceed to Question.). Did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it owns rights in its.alleged trade dress? Yes (for Monster Energy) No (for N) _ (If you:. (A) answered "No" to Questions,, and ; and (B) also answered "No" to either Question or Question, or also answered "Yes" to Question, then skip to the end to sign and date the Verdict Form. Otherwise proceed to Question.) --

Case 5:-cv-005-CBM-RAO Document Filed // Page of 5 Page ID #:5 ~. Did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence that N infringed Monster Energy's trade dress? Yes (for Monster Energy) ~ No (for N) ~I.fYou: (A) answered "No" to Questions,, and ; and (B) also answered "No" to either Question or Question, o~ also answered "Yes" to Question, then skip to the end to sign and date the VeYdict Form. Otherwise proceed to Question.). What amount did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence that N should pay in damages caused by its infringement? ~~ ~ (Proceed to Question.). Did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence that N's infringement was willful? Yes (for Monster Energy) No (for N),~ (If you answered "No" to Question, skip to Question. If you answered "Yes" to Question, proceed to Question.) --

Case 5:-cv-005-CBM-RAO Document Filed // Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:5 ~ G. What amount of N's profits did Monster Energy prove by a preponderance of the evidence are attributable to N's infringement and should be awarded to Monster Energy? z~ (P~oceed to Question.).. Did Monster Energy prove by clear and convincing evidence that N acted with malice, oppression, or fraud? Yes (for Monster Energy) ~ No (for N) (If you answered "Yes" to Question, proceed to Question. If you answered "No to Question, skip to the end to sign and date the Verdict Form.). What amount should N pay Monster Energy in punitive damages? $~~ ~~C~~~C~a You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Presiding Juror should then sign and date the verdict form in the spaces below and notify the Court personnel that you have reached a verdict. The Presiding Juror should retain possession of the verdict form and -bring it when the jury is brought back into the courtroom. DATED: ~~ /, REDACTED