D A T A D I C T I O N A R Y D2 D A T A D I C T I O N A R Y

Similar documents
ONLINE SEGMENTS DATA DICTIONARY

Data Dictionary. Online Segments

Data Models. 1. Data REGISTRATION STATUS VOTING HISTORY

DEEP ROOT A UDIENCES. At Deep Root Analytics we make your target audiences the backbone of your advertising campaign.

DNC SCORES IN VOTEBUILDER. VA 5th District Democratic Committee

Latino Decisions / America's Voice June State Latino Battleground Survey

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

DRA NATIONAL AUDIENCE & COALITION MODELING:

NATIONAL: 2018 HOUSE RACE STABILITY

ISSUES IN FOCUS ROAD TO THE APRIL 26 TH CONTESTS

WEEKLY LATINO TRACKING POLL 2018: WAVE 1 9/05/18

State of the Facts 2018

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN ARIZONA. March 4, 2014

2014 Ohio Election: Labor Day Akron Buckeye Poll

Public Preference for a GOP Congress Marks a New Low in Obama s Approval

Job Approval: Barack Obama - Time Series-

Likely General Election Voter Survey

Latino Voters in the 2008 Presidential Election:

National. Likely General Election Voter Survey. November 14 th, On the web

Weekly Tracking Poll Week 3: September 25-Oct 1 (MoE +/-4.4%)

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Louisiana Poll Results Romney 55%, Obama 34%, Third Party 4% (8% Undecided) Obama re-elect: 32-60% Healthcare reform support hurts 58-33%

Release #2337 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Friday, June 4, 2010

I. Cassidy holds a 16 point lead (Cassidy 56.6%/Landrieu 40.5%).

THE TARRANCE GROUP. Interested Parties. Brian Nienaber. Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Immigration Reform: National Polling. Pete Brodnitz January 11, 2010

2012 Weekly Political Tracking Poll August 27-November 5, 2012

EMBARGOED NOT FOR RELEASE UNTIL: SUNDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1993 FLORIO MAINTAINS LEAD OVER WHITMAN; UNFAVORABLE IMPRESSIONS OF BOTH CANDIDATES INCREASE

National/State New Political Realities

Understanding Oklahoma Voters. A Compilation of Studies Conducted Summer 2016

Comprehensive Immigration Reform and Winning the Latino Vote

America s Voice/LD 2016 National and Battleground State Poll (Field Dates August 19-30)

Catholic voters presidential preference, issue priorities, and opinion of certain church policies

Political party major parties Republican Democratic

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Update on OFA Grassroots Organizing: Voter Registration and Early Voting

Nonvoters in America 2012

GOP Makes Big Gains among White Voters

The Social Policy & Politics Program. March 2012

EMBARGOED UNTIL 6 A.M. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2016

Survey of Likely General Election Voters Missouri Statewide

Two-to-one voter support for Marijuana Legalization (Prop. 64) and Gun Control (Prop. 63) initiatives.

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion 3399 North Road, Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

OUTCOME C: POLITICAL IDEOLOGY + ELECTIONS

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Coleman Lead Neutralized by Financial Crisis and Polarizing Presidential Politics

Almost certain 80% Probably 9% % Will not vote 4% Don't know 1%

Rick Santorum has erased 7.91 point deficit to move into a statistical tie with Mitt Romney the night before voters go to the polls in Michigan.

The GOP Civil War & Its Opportunities Report from Republican Party Project Survey

The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll

NEW JERSEYANS SEE NEW CONGRESS CHANGING COUNTRY S DIRECTION. Rutgers Poll: Nearly half of Garden Staters say GOP majority will limit Obama agenda

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

America s Voice/LD 2016 National and Battleground State Poll (Field Dates August 19-30)

President Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio & Pennsylvania September 18-24, 2012

NATIONAL HEALTH CARE VOTER SURVEY

Unique web panel shows how RAE really delivered December, 2018

state offices - are Wk7 Wk8 * 1 2 * 1 *

400 Likely Voters in Clark and Washoe Counties

Unit 3 Take-Home Test (AP GaP)

San Diego Mayoral Election: A Race to the Finish Line

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000

Rock the Vote September Democratic Strategic Analysis by Celinda Lake, Joshua E. Ulibarri, and Karen M. Emmerson

% LV

The Budget Battle in the Republican-Obama Battleground

I-4 Hispanics of Puerto Rican Origin Puerto Rico Statehood Council Dates: 8/20 9/4/ interviews / MoE +/- 4.9%

Clinton Maintains 3% Lead in Michigan (Clinton 47% - Trump 44% - Johnson 4% - Stein 1%)

POLL: CLINTON MAINTAINS BIG LEAD OVER TRUMP IN BAY STATE. As early voting nears, Democrat holds 32-point advantage in presidential race

NEWS RELEASE. Poll Shows Tight Races Obama Leads Clinton. Democratic Primary Election Vote Intention for Obama & Clinton

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Their Government

ALABAMA: TURNOUT BIG QUESTION IN SENATE RACE

Purposes of Elections

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH VOL. 3 NO. 4 (2005)

POLL MUST BE SOURCED: NPR/Marist Poll

Partisan Preference of Puerto Rico Voters Post-Statehood

Incumbent Support its Lowest Since 94 In a Mine-Strewn Political Environment

Economic Agenda for Working Women and Men

University of North Florida Public Opinion Research Lab

Clinton Lead Cut in Half from August (Clinton 47% - Trump 42% in 2-way and Clinton 45% - Trump 39% in 4-way)

THE POLITICO-GWU BATTLEGROUND POLL

Election 2008 Exit Poll David Redlawsk Associate Professor of Political Science University of Iowa

Immigration Reform: National Polling. Pete Brodnitz January 11, 2009

Survey of US Voters Candidate Smith June 2014

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group

Center for American Progress Action Fund Survey of the Florida Puerto Rican Electorate

NEWS RELEASE. Political Sites Gain, But Major News Sites Still Dominant MODEST INCREASE IN INTERNET USE FOR CAMPAIGN 2002

Virginia s 7 th Congressional District Republican Primary Survey Analysis

POLL Republican National Delegate Survey. July 23 August 26, 2008 N= 854

2018 Vote Margin Narrows as Democratic Engagement Slips

November 2018 Hidden Tribes: Midterms Report

Newsweek Poll Congressional Elections/Marijuana Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Final Topline Results (10/22/10)

University of North Florida Public Opinion Research Lab

Elections Alberta Survey of Voters and Non-Voters

MSNBC/Telemundo/Marist Poll December 2015 National Questionnaire. Screener <Marist Poll Introduction> Are you 18 years of age or older?

It s Democrats +8 in Likely Voter Preference, With Trump and Health Care on Center Stage

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

Chapter 9: The Political Process

Changes in Party Identification among U.S. Adult Catholics in CARA Polls, % 48% 39% 41% 38% 30% 37% 31%

Engaging New Voters: The Impact of Nonprofit Voter Outreach on Client and Community Turnout

The Latest Rocky Mountain Poll Release Follows

Transcription:

DATA DICTIONARY i360 joined forces with Media Sales, a joint venture between DIRECTV and DISH, to provide voter behavior data to aligned campaigns and organizations. i360 s voter data has been pre-matched to s advertising platform, bringing addressable TV advertising to nearly 20 million DIRECTV and DISH satellite households. The arrangement enables you to target your TV ads at the household level using the following segments from the i360 database. 1

REGISTRATION & PARTISANSHIP REGISTRATION STATUS ALL REGISTERED VOTERS Individuals who are registered to vote in the state in which they reside. PARTISANSHIP REPUBLICAN VOTERS Voters who are considered Republican or Conservative based on state registration, historical ID work, primary ballot preference and the i360 National Partisan Model 7. SWING VOTERS Voters who are considered Independent Leaning or Swing based on state registration, historical ID work, primary ballot preference and i360 National Partisan Model 7. DEMOCRATIC VOTERS Voters who are considered Democratic or Liberal based on state registration, historical ID work, primary ballot preference and i360 National Partisan Model 7. PRIMARY VOTERS PRIMARY VOTERS Individuals who have voted in one or more recent primary election. REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS Voters who are considered Republican or Conservative and have voted in at least one or more recent primary election. DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY VOTERS Voters who are considered Democratic or Liberal and have voted in at least one or more recent primary election. PROPENSITY TO VOTE HIGH PROPENSITY VOTERS Voters who have a high-likelihood of voting in 2018. This determination is made based on scoring from the i360 National Voter Propensity Model 8 and includes those voters who have a score of.7 and above. MID PROPENSITY VOTERS Voters who have a medium likelihood of voting in 2018. This determination is made based on scoring from the i360 National Voter Propensity Model 8 and includes those voters who have a score of.3 to.7 2

Registration & Partisanship, cont d. LOW PROPENSITY VOTERS Voters who have a low likelihood of turning out to vote in 2018. This determination is made based on scoring from the i360 National Voter Propensity Model 8 and includes those voters who have a score of.3 or below. 2018 LIKELY VOTERS Voters considered likely to turn out and vote in the 2018 election based on previous vote history as well as the i360 National Propensity Model 8. ABSENTEE & EARLY VOTERS Voters who have previously cast ballots via absentee mail or early in person and therefore are likely to do so again in upcoming elections; Data is based on state and municipal voter history records collected nationwide as well as permanent absentee voting lists obtained at the state level and collected nationwide. PRESIDENTIAL YEAR ONLY, GENERAL VOTERS Voters who turn out in presidential year elections but are unlikely to turn out and vote in midterm elections based on previous vote history as well as the i360 National Propensity Model 8. LIKELY VOTING REPUBLICANS Subset of the following two segments: 2018 Likely General Voters and Republican Voters. LIKELY VOTING SWING VOTERS Subset of the following two segments: 2018 Likely General Voters and Swing Voters. LIKELY VOTING DEMOCRATS Subset of the following two segments: 2018 Likely General Voters and Democratic Voters. MEDIA USAGE TV CONSUMPTION HEAVY TV USER Individuals who rank in the top tier for TV Usage based on i360 s National TV Model 11. HEAVY TV GOP Subset of the following two segments: Republican Voters and Heavy TV Users. 3

Media Usage, cont d. HEAVY TV SWING Subset of the following two segments: Swing Voters and Heavy TV Users. HEAVY TV DEM Subset of the following two segments: Democratic Voters and Heavy TV Users. HEAVY TV GOP LIKELY Subset of the following two segments: Likely Voting Republicans and Heavy TV Users. HEAVY TV SWING LIKELY Subset of the following two segments: Likely Voting Swing Voters and Heavy TV Users. HEAVY TV DEM LIKELY Subset of the following two segments: Likely Voting Democratic Voters and Heavy TV Users. ISSUE SEGMENTS ECONOMIC ISSUES FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE VOTERS Voters who rank in the top tier of the i360 National Tax Model 10 and the i360 National Spending Model 8 and are likely to support Fiscally Conservative Policies. LIKELY VOTING FISCAL CONSERVATIVES Voters who are considered Fiscally Conservative and are likely to vote in the 2018 Election. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT PRO ENERGY VOTERS Individuals who have a high likelihood of agreeing government s number one priority should be affordable and reliable energy, as opposed to protecting the environment based on the i360 National Energy Model 1. PRO ENVIRONMENT VOTERS Individuals who have a high likelihood of agreeing government s number one priority should be protecting the environment as opposed to affordable and reliable energy based on the i360 National Energy Model 1. 4

Issue Segments, cont d. HEALTHCARE PERSUADABLE HEALTHCARE Voters who fall in the mid-range of the i360 National Healthcare Model 7 and are likely to be undecided or persuadable on issues related to Obamacare / ACA. IMMIGRATION PRO BORDER SECURITY VOTERS Individuals who have a high likelihood of believing that undocumented immigrants should be required to leave the United States based on the i360 National Immigration Model 4. PRO IMMIGRATION VOTERS Individuals who have a high likelihood of supporting a path to citizenship based on the i360 National Immigration Model 4. OTHER HISPANIC VOTERS Individuals who are Hispanic in heritage, either reported directly or based on modeled data. PRO 2ND AMENDMENT VOTERS Individuals who support 2nd Amendment rights. Segment is based on survey response data or purchase/subscription information indicating an affinity towards firearms and 2nd Amendment rights. PRO GUN CONTROL VOTERS Voters who have a high-likelihood of being pro-gun control; This segment consists of voters and consumers who score low on the i360 National Gun Control Model 2. SOCIAL ISSUES LIKELY VOTING SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES Subset of the following two segments: 2018 Likely General Voters and Socially Conservative Voters. PROCHOICE VOTERS Individuals who have a high-likelihood of being pro-choice; This segment consists of voters and consumers who score low on the i360 National Life Model 5. PROLIFE VOTERS Individuals who have a high-likelihood of being pro-life; This segment consists of voters and consumers who score high on the i360 National Life Model 5. 5

Issue Segments, cont d. SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE VOTERS Voters who rank in the top tier of the i360 National Life Model 5 and the i360 National Marriage Model 6 and are likely to support Socially Conservative policies. TAXES PRO TAX REFORM VOTERS Voters who have a high-likelihood of being pro-tax reform; This segment consists of voters and consumers who score high on the i360 National Tax Model 10. UNDECIDED TAX REFORM VOTERS Voters who have a high-likelihood of being pro-tax reform; This segment consists of voters and consumers who score high on the i360 National Tax Model 10. AGAINST TAX REFORM VOTERS Voters who fall in the midrange of the i360 National Tax Model 10 and are likely to be undecided or persuadable on issues related to tax reform. To learn more about data and partnerships, contact us at www.i-360.com/ contact-us. 6

i360 NATIONAL MODELS i360 NATIONAL ENERGY MODEL 1 The Energy Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to agreeing government s number one priority should be affordable and reliable energy as opposed to protecting the environment. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to agreeing government s number one priority is affordable energy and values near 0 indicating strong predisposition to agreeing government s number one priority is to protect the environment. The Energy Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength in association; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL GUN CONTROL MODEL 2 The Gun Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to opposing stricter gun control laws in the United States. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to opposing stricter gun control laws and values near 0 indicating strong predisposition to supporting stricter gun control laws. i360 NATIONAL HEALTHCARE MODEL 3 The Healthcare Model generates a score that measures an individual s relative likelihood to oppose the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010 and signed into law by President Obama. This score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong opposition to the law and values closer to 0 indicating strong support. The Healthcare Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength of association; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL IMMIGRATION MODEL 4 The Immigration Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to support that undocumented immigrants should be required to leave the United States. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to supporting that undocumented immigrants should be required to leave the United States and values near 0 indicating strong predisposition to supporting that undocumented immigrants should be allowed to stay in the United States and eventually apply for citizenship. i360 NATIONAL LIFE MODEL 5 The Life Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to take a pro-life position. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to take a pro-life position and values near 0 indicating weak predisposition. The Life Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength in predisposition; it does NOT indicate a probability. 7

i360 National Models, cont d. i360 NATIONAL MARRIAGE MODEL 6 The Marriage Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to support traditional marriage. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to supporting laws that preserve traditional marriage and values near 0 indicating weak predisposition. The Marriage Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength in predisposition; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL PARTISAN MODEL 7 The Partisan Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to ideologically align with one of the two major political parties. This score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong association with the Republican Party and values closer to 0 indicating strong association with the Democratic Party. The Partisan Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength of association; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL PROPENSITY MODEL 8 The Propensity Model generates a score that measures the strength of an individual s relative likelihood to turn out and vote in the 201 likelihood to turn out and vote and values closer to 0 indicating low likelihood. The Propensity Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength of association; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL SPENDING MODEL 9 The Spending Model generates a score that measures an individual s relative likelihood to support cuts in government spending. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to support across the board cuts in government spending and values near 0 indicating weak predisposition. The Spending Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength in predisposition; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL TAX MODEL 10 The Tax Model generates a score that measures an individual s relative likelihood to support tax decreases. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating strong predisposition to support across the board tax decreases and values near 0 indicating weak predisposition. The Tax Model score ranks individuals by calculated strength in predisposition; it does NOT indicate a probability. i360 NATIONAL TV MODEL 11 The TV Usage Model generates a score that measures the time an individual is likely to spend watching television. The score is a numerical value between 0 and 1, with values near 1 indicating a higher likelihood of spending a large amount of time watching television and values near 0 indicating a lesser amount of time spent watching television. 8