BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 148 of Mahesh Chandra Saxena Vs. SDMC and Ors.

Similar documents
appearing for the parties vide our order dated 25 th May,

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Manoj MisraVs. Delhi Development Authority &Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

in accordance with law.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

HON BLE DR. JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. WANGDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Satish Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. and Mahavir Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors.

$~30-33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM Nos , 24626/2017 in + W.P.(C) 8917/2015. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. M.A. No. 841/2013 to M.A. No. 863/2013 In Original Application No.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 16/2014 (CZ) (THC)

2016 the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar, Additional SP and CEOs of NOIDA Development Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 411 Of Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. M.A. No. 284 of 2015

State of Rajasthan CORAM : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHUVENDRA S. RATHORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. SATYAWAN SINGH GARBYAL, EXPERT MEMBER

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 15 th January, W.P.(C) No.3687/1995

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9663/2015 RKDF MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION No. 91/2014(WZ)

Case No. 295 of Coram. Anand B. Kulkarni, Chairperson Mukesh Khullar, Member. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI WATER BOARD ACT, Date of decision: 4th February, 2011.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

1) LPA 561/2010. versus 2) LPA 562/2010. versus 3) LPA 563/2010

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 264/2014 (THC) (CZ)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Reserve: January 14, Date of Order: January 21, 2009

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish Jain & Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 5180/2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No /2009 & CM. No.15749/2009. Date of Decision :

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONG WITH OUR COMMENTS IN. Appeal No.03/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

$~J *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT. Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011. Reserved on: 18th January, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : IMC ACT, 1956 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 4223/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010

Original Application No. 88/2015 (CZ) Babulal Jajoo Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.8693/2014. George. Versus. Advs. for UOI. HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Misc. Application No. 535/2014, 333/2014 & 341/2014 and

SLP(C) No. 3052/08 etc. ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVII SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Original Application No. 57/2014 (M.A No. 116 of 2014) Versus

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No. 422 of 2010 C.R.PARK M, N & P BLOCKS RESIDENTS WELFARE

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI M.A. NO. 762 OF 2014 IN M.A. NO. 44 OF 2013 IN O.A. NO. 36 OF 2012.

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, W.P.(C) 7444/2018, C.M. APPL. No /2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No.13139/2011 in CS(OS) 1163/2011 Date of Decision : July 05, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT. LPA No.658 of 2011 & CM No /2011 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION :

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(OS) No. 684/2004 % 8 th December, versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Original Application No. 59 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT Date of decision: 10th January, 2012 LPA No.18/2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: 11 th November 2009 Judgment Delivered on:18 th November 2009

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No of 2008

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5661/2015, C.M. No /2015, C.M. No /2017 & C.M. No. 2777/2018.

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT W.P.(C) No.1098 of 2012 Reserved on: February 24, Pronounced on: April 20, 2012

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA. O.A. No. 06/2016/EZ & MA 946/2016/EZ SUBHASH DATTA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

ORDER (Date of hearing 24 th November, 2012) (Date of order 10 th December, 2012)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 29 th March, LPA No.777/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI CONTROL OF VEHICULAR AND OTHER TRAFFIC ON ROAD & STREET REGULATION, 1980 W.P.

CONSUMER GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM; MSEDCL NAGPUR (RURAL) ZONE NAGPUR COMPLAINT NO.7 /2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Writ Petition (Civil) No of Judgment reserved on : November 05, 2008

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman. Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person. Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : APPOINTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 11th July, 2012 W.P.(C) No.1343/1998.

Present: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Ujjal Banerjee and Ms. Ankita Sinha, Advocates

Through Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate with petitioner in person. VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2013 (T HC )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 20 th October, 2015

Transcription:

CORAM: BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 148 of 2016 Mahesh Chandra Saxena Vs. SDMC and Ors. HON BLE DR. JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER Present: Applicant : Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar and Ms. Guneet Khehar, Mr. Charanjeet Singh Advs. Mr. Dinesh Jindel, LO CGSC : Mr. B.V. Niren Mr. Vinyak Gupta, Advs. DJB : Ms. Sakshi Popli, Adv. DDA : Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Mr. Kush Sharma, Ms. Arpita, Advs. SDMC : Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. Mr. Narender Pal Singh Adv.. Date and Orders of the Tribunal Remarks Item No. 17 April 18, 2017 jg The principal prayer in this application is to direct the SDMC to stop construction or installation work of rain water harvesting system in SDMC park near Chhattarpur Temple, New Delhi and further direction to SDMC to stop ground water used through borewell. Instead use recycled treated water of the STP of DJB situated at Qutub Metro Station, Meharauli Gurgaon Road for horticulture use. The Environment Department, NCT of Delhi to be directed to stop ground water used through borewell and use recycled treated water of STP of DJB as referred to above. The respondents have entered contest and filed their replies. After considerable time had lapsed and opportunity given to both sides this Tribunal passed an order on 06-12-2016 by way of an interim direction to prevent wastage of STP water of huge quantity and instead, to use it for horticulture purposes. The reasons which prevailed on the mind of this Tribunal is indicated 1

in the order, which resulted in passing of the following order: Heard. Perused. Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 7 were to examine the design of rain water harvesting system in the SDMC park, Chattarpur Village, New Delhi and submit a report before us vide order dated 03-11-2016. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2-DJB submits that the Joint Inspection of the RWHS in question was carried out by respondent nos. 2 and 7 and requisition has been sent to the respondent no. 1 SDMC to furnish the specifications of the design of the RWHS in question vide letter dated 28-11-2016 and Copy of this letter be furnished to the Respondent No. 1 or its counsel. Learned Counsel holding on behalf of the respondent no.1-sdmc submits that copy of the said letter be given so as to enable them to take instructions in the matter and place the facts before us. There is no response yet from the respondent no.1-sdmc. We also find from the application that an issue regarding utilization of treated water from STP situate at 2kms distance from the said park arises. The facts asserted in that regard in the application at para(iv) (page no. 6) are not disputed by DJB. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the DJB submits that the DJB is ready to make available the treated water of the STP for SDMC park in Chattarpur area. Now, a new debate arises regarding laying of the pipeline for fetching the treated water from the STP to the SDMC park. We, therefore, direct the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the SDMC and respondent no.2- DJB to make submissions in this regard with reference to the legal provisions made therefore. We also find from the application that the issue regarding utilization of treated water from the STP situated at a distance of 2 km from the said park. The fact asserted in this regard in the application at para no. 4, page no.61 are not disputed by the DJB. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of DJB submits that DJB is ready to make available treated water of STP for SDMC Park at Chhattarpur area. Now, dispute arises regarding laying down of pipeline for fetching treated water for SDMC park. We, therefore, direct Learned Counsel appearing on 2

behalf of SDMC and respondent no.2-djb to make submission with regard to and reference to the legal provision made therefore. Thus, we have taken this case for hearing today. Mr. Rahul Khurana, Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant has rightly pointed out that despite the direction of this Tribunal in the month of December, the authorities named therein have not responded, consequent to which huge quantity of water of the STP has been wasted. The statement so made is disputed by the Learned Counsel appearing for the DJB who submits that they have filed their submission in detail making it clear that the DJB is prepared to lay the pipeline if the cost is borne by the SDMC or the DDA concerned. She would also submits that they may procure the water through tankers the facility which they already have for their utilization. Learned Counsel appearing for the DDA submits that as far as the DDA is concerned, a meeting was held on 13-06-2016 and proceedings have already been placed on record of this Tribunal in which this issue was discussed and considered. Ms. Puja Kalra, Learned Counsel appearing for the SDMC submits that they will be willing to utilize recycled water for park provided the DJB lays down the pipelines for the colonies, where it could be utilized. We do not find any serious dispute on the issue between the authorities referred to above for utilization of recycled water. The only hesitation expressed by these authorities is with regard to the facility of supplying 3

water to the area where it could be utilized. Ms. Puja Karla, Learned Counsel for SDMC submits that DJB has already been laying the pipeline in Delhi for utilization of STP water and the same could be done with regard to Chhattarpur area as well. Apart from the above, the authorities have not indicated to us as to whether the recycled water from STP is usable for horticulture purposes or not. Hence, the directions: 1. The DPCC shall ensure the quality of water is within in the prescribed parameters. 2. There being no serious dispute amongst the authorities referred as above about the water, we direct a meeting to be conducted by SDMC, DJB, DDA and also by the NCT of Delhi to reach a consensus with regard to laying of pipeline or otherwise, lifting the recycled water for its utilization and to take steps for immediate stoppage of wastage of the water so generated. The Principal Secretary Urban Development, Delhi Administration will be the Chairman of this Committee and the other senior most officer of the Department in question will participate in the meeting. The report shall be filed within two weeks from now after serving copy on the applicant s counsel. By mutual agreement the date of meeting is fixed on 27 th April, 2017 and report shall be filed by 5 th May, 2017. List the matter on 8 th May, 2017. Copy of order be issued by dasti to all concerned. 4

NCT of Delhi is also directed to consider the use STP water for the green belt also. JM (Dr. Jawad Rahim)...,EM ( Dr. Nagin Nanda) 5