Procedure and upcoming tools for simplification. The European Investigation Order

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Situation Before the European Investigation Order (EIO) in Criminal Matters

Applying the European Investigation Order Directive 2014/41/EU

AUSTRIA ISSUING AUTHORITIES VALIDATING AUTHORITIES RECEIVING AUTHORITIES EXECUTING AUTHORITIES CENTRAL/SPECIFIC AUTHORITIES. Updated 18 December 2018

EJN Regional Meetings

11500/14 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Seminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this Field

III. (Preparatory acts) COUNCIL

Seminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this Field

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States (2001/C 332 E/18)

The European Investigation Order: Changing the face of evidence-gathering in EU crossborder

Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament

III ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY

8414/1/14 REV 1 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

THEMIS 2012 Grand Final International cooperation in criminal matters. Team France 2 Alice Bonatti Marine Delanoë Quentin Siegrist

Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 September 2016 (OR. en)

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

INITIATIVE FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Protection Order

The European Arrest Warrant: Part of the Anti-terrorism Emergency Package?

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Gathering foreign evidence: Introducing the European Investigation Order

2nd WORKING DOCUMENT (B)

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

Obtaining Foreign Evidence and Confiscating Proceeds of Crime in the EU

1. The Council unanimously reached a general approach on the text set out in the Annex.

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

Making Legal remedies in EU Criminal Justice More Efficient ERA Conference Brussels 16 May 2013

General Secretariat delegations Report on Eurojust's casework in the field on the European Arrest Warrant

Questionnaire on the application of the Second Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No.

EU-CHINA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRADEMARK LAW. João Miranda de Sousa Head of IP

Measures for pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

dr Tomasz Ostropolski Head of Unit, European Criminal Law Ministry of Justice, Poland BRUXELLES, 12 JUNE 2013

The information contained in this table should be updated on a yearly basis.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 November /07 COPEN 146 EJN 32 EUROJUST 60

Solution approaches. Workshop ERA Helsinki Defence Counsel. A), I. Request for information issue

1064 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Beschluss NR - Englischer Vertragstext (Normativer Teil) 1 von 41

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 November /11 COPEN 338 EUROJUST 200

Report on Eurojust s casework in the field of the European Arrest Warrant

L 350/72 Official Journal of the European Union

2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION LAW OF (English translation) ΓΕΝ (Α) L.94 ISBN NICOSIA

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW

Lead Department Ref. Date of Publication Decision Ministry of 14722/09 20/10/2009 Did not opt in: Link to Written Ministerial Statement

CAC/COSP/IRG/2011/CRP.4

EJN Regional Meetings

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Proposed Framework Decision on European arrest warrants

EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION. Paris, 13.XII.1957

RECOGNITION, EXECUTION AND TRANSMITTING OF CONFISCATION OR SEIZURE DECISIONS AND DECISIONS IMPOSING FINANCIAL PENALTIES

Exchanging criminal records and Taking Into Account Foreign Convictions

REQUESTS FOR MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS. Guidance for Authorities Outside of Kenya

Delegations will find the text of this Resolution in annex II and are invited to present their comments at the COPEN meeting of 28 May 2014.

Prisoner transfer in the EU with the aim of enhancing social rehabilitation prospects.

8193/11 GL/mkl 1 DG C I

IPEX STATISTICAL REPORT 2014

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to

Double Jeopardy and EU Law: Time for a Change? Steve Peers*

European investigation order in criminal matters in the European Union. General considerations. Some critical opinions

Introduction. The European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 The European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 came into operation on 1 January 2004.

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 33 / 2 SEPTEMBER 2013, PRISTINA

Factual summary Online public consultation on "Modernising and Simplifying the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)"

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 October /2/12 REV 2 LIMITE COPEN 210 USA 27 JAIEX 72

Brussels, 13 December 2007 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 16494/07. Interinstitutional File: 2006/0158 (CNS) COPEN 181 NOTE

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Annex to the

Delegations will find attached Commission document C(2008) 2976 final.

5859/3/15 REV 3 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

ARTICLE 95 INSPECTION

THE RECAST EWC DIRECTIVE

COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 11 December /12 Interinstitutional File: 2012/0036 (COD) DROIPE 185 COPE 272 CODEC 2918

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

UK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Ne bis in idem. From obstacle to extradition to fundamental right not to be prosecuted twice within the EU

Table of content What is data protection? Why was is necessary? Beginnings of Data Protection Development of International Data Protection Data Protec

Scope of the obligation to provide extradition

Official Journal C 195, 25/06/1997 P

Limited THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as the "Union" THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

EU update (including the Green Paper on the Presumption of Innocence) ECBA Conference, Edinburgh April 2006

INTENSIVE LEGAL ENGLISH TRAINING COURSE FOR EJN CONTACT POINTS: FOCUS ON JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS. 5th training course

Addressing Emerging Terrorist Threats and the Role of UNODC

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC)

Pre-trial detention, custodial sentences, supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The European Parliament has delivered its opinion on the proposal on 14 June 2006.

13515/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption

OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF A SERIES OF MISSIONS TO EVALUATE CONTROLS OF ANIMAL WELFARE ON FARMS IN SEVEN MEMBER STATES CARRIED OUT

14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/JHA)

The information contained in this table should be updated on a yearly basis.

L 348/98 Official Journal of the European Union

***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Material detention conditions, execution of custodial sentences and prisoner transfer in the EU

Briefing Note on Foreign Nationals

NATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ETS NO.141 PROSECUTOR GENERAL S OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Anti-human trafficking manual for criminal justice practitioners. Module 6

Transcription:

Procedure and upcoming tools for simplification The European Investigation Order

Todays presentation General introduction Issuing and executing EIO Practical tools to facilitate the use of EIO

EIO Directive - Background When? In 2010 seven Member States (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden) tabled the initiative for a Directive As from 22/05/2017 the Directive 2014/41/EU, adopted in 2014, became applicable Who? Does not apply to IE and DK National transposition: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/nim/?uri=celex:32014l0041

Two different regimes for obtaining evidence in the EU mutual legal assistance mutual recognition

Mutual legal assistance: 1959 CoE Convention + 2 additional protocols (1978 + 2001) Convention implementing Schengen agreement (1990) 2000 EU Convention + additional protocol (2001) Bilateral and multilateral agreements Mutual recognition: FD freezing of property and evidence (2003/577) FD European Evidence Warrant (2008/978)

EIO Main objectives of the proposal Create a single comprehensive legal framework Speed up the gathering and transfer of evidence Ensure a high level of protection of fundamental rights

MLA MLA and EIO in the EU EIO 28 MS 26 MS Mutual assistance in criminal matters Requesting State Requested State Request Obtaining evidence in criminal matters Issuing State Executing State Order

What is the EIO? The EIO is: a judicial decision issued or validated by a judicial authority of a Member State ("the issuing State") in order to have one or several specific investigative measure(s) carried out in another Member State ("the executing State") with a view to obtaining evidence in criminal matters

EIO a broad scope Exceptions: Setting up of a JIT and the gathering of evidence within a JIT (Art.3) Cross-border surveillance as referred to in the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (Recital 9) Freezing/seizure for the purpose of confiscation (Recital 34, Art. 34(2)) Transfer of a person for the purposes of prosecution (Recital 25) Sending and service of procedural documents / Information on previous convictions / Returning of objects to an injured party / Spontaneous exchange of information / Transfer of proceedings / Confiscation / Cooperation between customs authorities / Police to police cooperation

How to get an EIO? Conditions for issuing an EIO (Art. 6) Necessary and proportionate Possible in a similar domestic case In case of doubt, possibility of consultation which may lead to withdrawal by the issuing authority

EIO flowchart

EIO - Time limits New principle: same celerity and priority as for a similar domestic case The EIO Directive sets the following time limits: 30 days for deciding on recognition or execution of an EIO (Art. 12(3)); 90 days for carrying out investigative measures following the taking of the aforementioned decision (Art. 12(4)); 24 hours, where practicable, for decision on provisional measure following the receipt of an EIO (Art. 32(2)). Possibility shorter deadlines or specific date Grounds for postponement (Art. 15)

EIO - Grounds for refusal General grounds for refusal (art 11) Applicable irrespective of the measure concerned Immunity or privilege or rules limiting the criminal liability relating to freedom of the press Harm to essential national security interests Non-criminal procedures Ne bis in idem Extraterritoriality coupled with double criminality Incompatible with fundamental rights obligations

EIO - Grounds for refusal Additional grounds for refusal for certain measures Lack of double criminality (Art. 11(1)(g)) Except for a list of serious offences Measure is restricted to a list or category of offences or offences punishable by a certain threshold (Art. 11(1)(h)) Impossibility to execute (Art. 10(5)) Investigative measure does not exist or would not be available in a similar domestic case Absence of alternative measures

EIO - Grounds for refusal Additional grounds for refusal for certain measures Not applicable for a list of measures: pre-existing evidence databases directly accessible hearings non-coercive measures (law of executing State) identification of telephone number / IP address

What next? Electronic version of the forms in Annex A, B, C + Guidelines on the completion of EIO E-evidence platform

E-evidence portal

Thank you for your attention! Questions / comments?