THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED

THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED ALL ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID ACCOUDING TO THE RULE OF LAW, THIS CASE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE AND ALL JUDGEMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN VOIDED BY THE RULE OF LAW! NO DUE PROCESS PRIOR TO THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE JUNE 1, 2012, VOIDS ALL ORDERS AND MORE. THE LOAN WAS CREATED PRIOR TO THE ILLEGAL ASSIGNMENT FILED (JULY 11, 2008). THIS CRIME WAS INITIATED IN (2005) UNDER LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) IN THE INITIAL BANKRUPCY CASE (05-13142) THAT WAS BASED UPON FRAUD, WITHOUT LACK OF STANDING IN (2005). THIS IS RECORDED. AN APPEAL WILL NOT SUPPORT VOIDED JUDGEMENTS! Relief under Bankruptcy Code 362(k) is mandatory. Weber v. SEFCU (In re Weber), 719 F.3d 72, 82-83 (2d Cir. 2013). Both Assignments Are Fraud and more. There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Under Loan Number (0835002124) To Collect A Debt On By The Rule Of Law. This Crime Was Initiated In (2005) Under Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) Without Lack Of Standing In (2005) This Is Recorded. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires

that [a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008). Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion. The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note. Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan Therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice. Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC. FRAUD UPON THE COURT: See The earlier decision in Wells Fargo v. Erobobo, published held: The assignment of the Defendant s note and mortgage, having not been assigned from the Depositor to the Trust, is therefore VOID as in being in contravention of the PSA. See: Governed Laws and Security Laws under Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13-using deceptive practices and more. There Was Never A Recorded Deed Or Satisfaction Of The Original Note between Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) under the terms and conditions executed in the Mortgage Contract Agreement executed (May 26, 2004) by Governed Law.

It Was Recorded There Was Never An Reconveyance of Loan Number (0835002124) to Corla Jackson from GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, prior to Bankruptcy Case (05-13142) or Bankruptcy Case (10-04820) and Bankruptcy Case (11-01545) Prior To The Discharge, Illegal Relief and Dismissals, This Is Recorded. CORLA REEVES JACKSON AUTOMATICALLY WIN BY FEDERAL RULE OF LAW UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION GOVERNED LAW! NO DUE PROCESS, THE NEW FABRICATED LOAN- MORTGAGE UNDER THE FABRICATED LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) THAT WAS ILLEGALLY CREATED IN (2005). THE FABRICATED ASSIGNMENT, in Instrument 2008050095 at Book 6409 and Page 1483 in the records of the Probate Court in Mobile County, Alabama, Was Filed After The Loan Was Illegally Created In (2005) Without Lack Of Standing, Which Is Null and Void. In Addition To The Above: OCWEN OWNED THE FABRICATED MORTGAGE NOTE that GMAC Illegally Created In (2005) when JUDGE YORK-JUDGE HARDESTY, JUDGE JOHNSTON, JUDGE DUBOSE AND YORK AGAIN, ISSUED THEIR ILLEGAL ORDERS WHICH ARE ALL NULL AND VOID, ACCORDING TO THE RULE OF LAW. THEY

ISSUED ILLEGAL ORDERS TO COVER UP THE WIDESPREAD FRAUD AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT OUSTSIDE ALABAMA JURISDICTION THAT WAS CAUSED BY THE ALABAMA JUDGES TO DATE. OCWEN NEVER PAID CORLA REEVES JACKSON FOR ALL THESE DAMAGES TO DATE, THEY KEPT THE MONEY AND MORE, AROUND SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE-CFPB, and MORE ON USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, UNDER THE PRIOR SERVICERS NAME, SO THEY WOULDN T GET CAUGHT BY SEC- FEDERAL RESERVE-CFPB-MORE! THAT S HOW THEY GOT AROUND THE FEDS AND WALL STREET INVESTORS ON ILLEGAL PROFITS AND MORE! See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires that [a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008). Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion. The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note. Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan Therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice. Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC. FRAUD UPON THE COURT:

See The earlier decision in Wells Fargo v. Erobobo, published held: The assignment of the Defendant s note and mortgage, having not been assigned from the Depositor to the Trust, is therefore VOID as in being in contravention of the PSA. See: Governed Laws and Security Laws under Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13-using deceptive practices and more. A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b). 18 U.S. Code 3231 - District courts: The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States. Nothing in this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 826. There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Under Loan Number (0835002124) The Initial Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) - (10-04820) - (11-01545) Prior To The Illegal Relief- Dismissals, This Is Recorded. This Is A Robbery Under RICO Cause Of Action and More. A Null and Void Judgment Will Not Support An Appeal, or No Due Process Prior To The Illegal Foreclosure, This Is Recorded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND MORE GUARANTEED! 1. NO DUE PROCESS RECORDED UNTIL (10/25/2012). THIS WAS DONE AFTER THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE (JUNE 1, 2012) THIS IS RECORDED. The New Mortgage Loan Number (0835002124) Was Illegally Created In (2005) Without Owning The Property and Without Lack Of Standing, This Is Recorded. 2. NO RECORDED DEED between CORLA JACKSON and GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Loan-Mortgage Number (0835002124) Prior to the Initial Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) or (10-04820) and (11-01545) Prior to the Illegal Relief-Dismissals, This Is Recorded. 3. NO SATISFACTION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE 4. NO TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE 5. NO ASSIGNMENT-VALID ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE, PRIOR TO LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) BEING CREATED IN (2005). 6. NO RECONVEYANCE OF THE NEW LOAN (0835002124) to Corla Jackson from GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, prior to the Initial Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) or (10-04820) and (11-01545) to collect a Debt on,

prior to the Illegal Foreclosure (June 1, 2012), This Is Recorded. 7. NO DUE PROCESS RECORDED UNTIL (10/25/2012). THIS WAS DONE AFTER THE ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE (JUNE 1, 2012), This Is Recorded. The New Mortgage Loan Number (0835002124) Was Illegally Created In (2005) Without Owning The Property and Without Lack Of Standing, This Is Recorded. 8. NO RECORDED DEED between CORLA JACKSON and GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Loan-Mortgage Number (0835002124) Prior to the Initial Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) or (10-04820) and (11-01545) Prior to the Illegal Relief-Dismissals, This Is Recorded. 9. NO SATISFACTION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE: under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) that was executed May 26, 2004. 10. NO TRUSTEE'S DEED OF SALE 11. NO ASSIGNMENT-VALID ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE, PRIOR TO LOAN NUMBER (0835002124) BEING CREATED IN (2005). 12. NO RECONVEYANCE OF THE NEW LOAN (0835002124) to Corla Jackson from GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC, prior to the Initial

Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) or (10-04820) and (11-01545) to collect a Debt on, prior to the Illegal Foreclosure (June 1, 2012), This Is Recorded. Relief under Bankruptcy Code 362(k) is mandatory. Weber v. SEFCU (In re Weber), 719 F.3d 72, 82-83 (2d Cir. 2013). Both Assignments Are Fraud and more. See: The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9: Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate,made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust contrary to the provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary.(code 1923, 9018; Code 1940, T. 47, 172.).. FRCP RULE 60(b) FRCP Rule 60(b) provides that the court may relieve a party from a final judgment and sets forth the following six categories of reasons for which such relief may be granted: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly-discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59; (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an adverse party; (4) circumstances under which a judgment is void; (5) circumstances under which a judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. F.R.C.P. Rule 60(b)(1)-(b)(6). To be entitled to relief, the moving party must establish facts within one of the reasons enumerated in Rule 60(b). Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

It is illegal to knowingly and with intent to defraud, file a bankruptcy petition or other document, or make a false or fraudulent representation, claim. 18 US 157 also applies to involuntary bankruptcies. This statute is based on the wire, mail, and bank fraud statutes. See 18 US 1341, 1343, and 1344, respectively. Perjury. 18 US 1621. Perjury is punished by a maximum of 5 years in prison. Conspiracy. 18 US 371. Conspiracy has a maximum 5-year prison sentence (or less if the underlying crime has a lesser penalty, such as a misdemeanor). Wire fraud. 18 US 1341. This offense has a possible sentence of 20 years in prison, or 30 years with a possible $1,000,000 fine where the offense impacts a financial institution. Mail fraud. 18 US 1343. Mail fraud has the same penalties as wire fraud. Bank fraud. 18 US 1344. Bank fraud is a criminal offense with a possible penalty of 30 years imprisonment and $1,000,000 fine. RICO (racketeering). 18 US 1962. The sentence for a RICO charge can be 20 years incarceration. Finally, 18 US 157 prohibits any scheme to defraud another, or attempt, during bankruptcy. The sentence for this charge is a maximum 5 years in federal prison. It is illegal to knowingly and with intent to defraud, file a bankruptcy petition or other document, or make a false or fraudulent representation, claim. 18 US 157 also applies to involuntary bankruptcies. This statute is based on the wire, mail, and bank fraud statutes. See 18 US 1341, 1343, and 1344, respectively. In a federal prosecution for conspiracy, the defendant is typically charged with two offenses. First, he is charged with conspiracy. Second, he is charged with the offense that he and his co-conspirators were conspiring to commit. This is known as the object of the conspiracy. For instance, a person charged in connection with a drug or burglary.

Conspiracy against the rights of citizens. See 18 USC 241. This offense has a sentence of 10 years in prison. Conspiring in bribery of sporting contests. See 18 USC 224. Under 18 USC 371, a person can be charged with conspiracy based on two elements 1. An agreement to commit a criminal offense. 2. An overt act that furthers the conspiracy. The US Attorney does not have to prove that the agreement was in writing. It can be verbal and still subject the parties to criminal liability. It is not a violation of double jeopardy for the defendant to be prosecuted and sentenced for both the conspiracy and the offense he agreed to commit. Each is a separate and distinct offense. FRAUD UPON THE COURT: In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation: Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism. Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.

There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Under Loan Number (0835002124) The Initial Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) - (10-04820) - (11-01545) Prior To The Illegal Relief-Dismissals, This Is Recorded.

FRCP RULE 60(b) FRCP Rule 60(b) provides that the court may relieve a party from a final judgment and sets forth the following six categories of reasons for which such relief may be granted: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly-discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59; (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an adverse party; (4) circumstances under which a judgment is void; (5) circumstances under which a judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. F.R.C.P. Rule 60(b)(1)-(b)(6). To be entitled to relief, the moving party must establish facts within one of the reasons enumerated in Rule 60(b). See The earlier decision in Wells Fargo v. Erobobo, published held: The assignment of the Defendant s note and mortgage, having not been assigned from the Depositor to the Trust, is therefore VOID as in being in contravention of the PSA. See: Governed Laws and Security Laws under Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13-using deceptive practices and more. A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b) Wells Fargo, Litton Loan v. Farmer, 867 N.Y.S.2d 21 (2008). Wells Fargo does not own the mortgage loan Therefore, the matter is dismissed with prejudice. Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T.

Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC. FRAUD UPON THE COURT: See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(1) which requires that [a]n action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. See also, In re Jacobson, 402 B.R. 359, 365-66 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2009); In re Hwang, 396 B.R. 757, 766-67 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2008). Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Chong, 824 N.Y.S.2d 764 (2006). MERS did not have standing as a real party in interest under the Rules to file the motion. The declaration also failed to assert that MERS, FMC Capital LLC or Homecomings Financial, LLC held the Note. 18 U.S. Code 3231 - District courts: The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States. Nothing in this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 826. Section 35-10-26: Title revested upon payment of debt. The payment or satisfaction of the real property mortgage debt divests the title passing by the mortgage. "Payment or satisfaction of the real property mortgage debt" shall not occur until there is no outstanding indebtedness or other obligation secured by the mortgage, and no commitment or agreement by the mortgagee to make advances, incur obligations or otherwise give value (collectively referred to as "extend value"), under any agreement, including, without limitation, agreements providing for future advances, open end, revolving or other lines of credit, or letters of credit. Except as otherwise specifically provided to the contrary in the Alabama Residential Mortgage Satisfaction Act, upon the written request to satisfy a mortgage signed by the mortgagors and by all other persons who have a right to require the mortgagee to extend value or signed by other authorized representatives on behalf of the mortgagors and such other persons, which notice shall actually be served upon the mortgagee, and provided there is no outstanding obligation secured by the mortgage at that time, the mortgagee shall file a properly executed and notarized satisfaction of the mortgage or otherwise cause the mortgage to be satisfied in accordance with other applicable provisions of law. From and after such written request for mortgage satisfaction, neither the mortgagors nor any other person who signed such request, or on whose behalf such request was signed, shall have the right to request or demand that the mortgagee extend value under the

mortgage or other agreements and the mortgagee shall be released from all obligations and commitments to extend value thereunder. (Code 1886, 1870; Code 1896, 1067; Code 1907, 4899; Code 1923, 9026; Code 1940, T. 47, 181; Acts 1988, No. 88-89, p. 115; Act 2012-278, p. 554, 10.) See: The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9: Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate,made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust contrary to the provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary.(code 1923, 9018; Code 1940, T. 47, 172.).. Option One Mortgage Corporation (4/30/2008). A proof of execution by a subscribing witness cannot be used in conjunction with any quitclaim deed, grant deed document (other than a trustee s deed or a deed of reconveyance), mortgage, deed of trust or security agreement. (Government Code section 27287 and Civil Code section 1195(b) OVERVIEW OF FACTS November 7, 2003 the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson executed a Vendors Lien Deed between the prior owners the Smith s and Corla Jackson. Filed under Instrument Number is 2003100227 book 5490 page 1847, in Mobile County Probate Court. The Vendors Lien Deed Was Released Paid In Full. See 2004042905 Book 5605 Page 1909. On May 26, 2004 the Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson executed a mortgage with Option One Mortgage Corporation, to pay off her Vendor s Lien Deed under Instrument Number 2003100227 book 5490 page 1847. The Release-Satisfaction of the Vendors Lien Deed was (Paid In Full) on June 3, 2004 and recorded June 10, 2004, under Instrument Number 2004042905 Book 565605 Page1909, in Mobile County Probate Court. The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson Mortgage Contract Agreement is between, Corla Jackson and Option One Mortgage Corporation. The loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) is based upon all the

following terms and conditions executed in the Mortgage Contract Agreement (May 26, 2004) by Governed Law. The Recorded Deed and Mortgage Contract Agreement has terms and conditions, which was filed under Instrument 2004042906 Book 5605 page 1910 that was recorded on June 10, 2004 in Mobile County Probate Court. The Plaintiff-Appellant Corla Jackson didn t Breach her Mortgage Contract Agreement terms and conditions under loan number (651003367) servicing number (001347464-8) that was executed May 26, 2004. The Plaintiff- Appellant Corla Jackson wasn t in Default or behind in payments for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64). This Was Fraud Based Upon A New Mortgage Loan (0835002124) That GMAC Mort age Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Illegally Created In Corla Jackson Name Under Her Credit And Property For Illegal Profits, Personal Gain and Favor, Without Owning Her Property and Without Lack Of Standing In (2005), That Fabricated Arrears Were Attached To for (5) payments of ($1,920.64) each for (02/2005) through (06/2005) totaling ($10,409.64). The Loan (0835002124) Itself, Is Null and Void! The Loan- Mortgage (0835002124) Was Illegally Created In (2005) Prior to the Fabricated Assignment in Instrument 2008050095 at Book 6409 and Page 1483 in the records of the Probate Court in Mobile County, Alabama, filed on (July 11, 2008). This Crime Under Loan Number (0835002124) Was Initiated In (2005) Under The Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142).

This Is A Robbery Under RICO Cause Of Action and More. A Null and Void Judgment Will Not Support An Appeal, or No Due Process Prior To The Illegal Foreclosure, This Is Recorded. There Was Never A Recorded Deed Between Corla Jackson and GMAC Under Loan Number (0835002124) The Initial Bankruptcy Cases (05-13142) - (10-04820) - (11-01545) Prior To The Illegal Relief-Dismissals, This Is Recorded. OCWEN NEVER PAID CORLA REEVES JACKSON FOR ALL THESE DAMAGES TO DATE, THEY KEPT THE MONEY AND MORE, AROUND SEC-FEDERAL RESERVE-CFPB, and MORE ON USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, UNDER THE PRIOR SERVICERS NAME, SO THEY WOULDN T GET CAUGHT BY SEC- FEDERAL RESERVE-CFPB-MORE! THAT S HOW THEY GOT AROUND THE FEDS AND WALL STREET INVESTORS ON ILLEGAL PROFITS AND MORE! See: The Code of Alabama 1975 Section 35-10-9: Sales contrary to article null and void: All sales of real estate,made under powers contained in mortgages or deeds of trust contrary to the provisions of this article, shall be null and void, notwithstanding any agreement or stipulation to the contrary.(code 1923, 9018; Code 1940, T. 47, 172.)..

Sirote & Permutt P.C. Gulf Coast Tribune.Com THIS WEBSITE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED