mnmlzll a J!: 6ustrial

Similar documents
Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7

ihiiiini U.S. v. Corinth City JC-MS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 3:15-cv AKK Document 1 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA COMPLAINT

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. 1. This action is brought on behalf of those persons least. favored among the citizens, politicians and political entities in

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. Defendant : COMPLAINT. Parties and Jurisdiction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

~------~-----) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. CO? ~ V

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

v. Smith PC-AL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case: 3:17-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/15/17 1 of 22. PageID #: 1

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.

Case 3:07-cv CBK Document 62 Filed 02/02/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 704

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHITE PLAINS DIVISION

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, United States v. Donald Sterling, et al. (C.D. Cal.)

2:10-cv SB-BM Date Filed 10/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 17

CIV97-476PHXR0S. United States Attorney II I III II District of Arizona MR STATE OF ARIZONA; J. FIFE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

3:18-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 07/18/14 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tallahassee Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 5:10-cv C Document 66 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID 869

California Bar Examination

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

arl L Johnson and mmsëllor Ht law 625 ion üto«t ¾road & Jefferson) jacksonüillt, ¾nriila S22ll2

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Introduction

1. This case challenges the constitutionality of the recently enacted federal law known COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:18-at Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CqwRT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLlI!OIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Rscewed f,om SEAnLE. OCl UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:05-cv LY Document 500 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 2017 Mar13 PM 4:45 CLERK OF THE SHAWNEE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CASE NUMBER: 2017-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT )SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49C MI-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NEW ORLEANS DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA (NORTHERN DIVISION)

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 09/20/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:14-cv RH-CAS Document 8-1 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 21. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tallahassee Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION... : : : : : : : : : : : : : : INTRODUCTION

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/15/12 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Comes now the Plaintiffs through counsel seeking relief against the Defendant as set forth below: PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X ELIZABETH SAVARESE ind

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 7:06-cv CLB Document 5 Filed 03/23/2006 Page 1 of 21

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 143 Filed: 10/17/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1018

Case 2:11-cv MCE -GGH Document 9 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10

urginal THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION 1. Plaintiff RICHARD RALPH, a prisoner at Phillips State

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:10-cv ECR-RAM Document 1 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. 03- VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction And Venue

Notice of Petition; and, Verified Petition For Warrant Of Removal

JC-MS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 8

COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF. HAWAII, MELE STOKESBERRY, and CHARLES M. CARLETTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

3:14-cv CMC Date Filed 04/20/15 Entry Number 24 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 1:14-cv SJD Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 11/23/14 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 9

Case 1:15-cv WJM-MJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * CIVIL ACTION * * NO. * IN RE SEARCH AND SEIZURE * JUDGE * * MAGISTRATE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

COMPLAINT. The Plaintiff, Marie Menard, brings this civil action for violation of her rights secured

Case 1:14-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 09/22/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Ira DeMent P. 0. Box 4163 Montgomery, Alabama

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) ) Defendant. ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

mnmlzll a J!: 6ustrial for i Children mm I.»j Till- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE -i MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHARLES JEROME STOCKTON, et al., v. ALABAMA INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL FOR NEGRO CHILDREN, et al., Plaintiffs, Defendants, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2834 COMPTAINTJN INTERVENTION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Applicant for Intervention. The United States, plaintiff-intervenor, as a - claim against the defendants, alleges: 1. This is a class action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 on behalf of Negro juveniles who are confined to, or may be confined to, the Alabama Industrial School for Negro children, seeking relief from the denials of equal protection of the laws on account of race and from denials of liberty without due process of law. 2. The Attorney General has certified that this case is of general public importance within the mean5.ng of Section 902 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 UrS-rSv 2000h-2. His certificate is attached to this Complaint in Intervention. r

3. Defendants are the Alabama Industrial S(. K( for Negro children, an agency of the State of Alabama (hereinafter referred to as Mt. Meigs, R. E. Belser, Chairman of the Board of Trustees, E. B. Holloway, Superintendent (Warden,, various named employees, and various unnamed members of the Board of Trustees of said agency. 4. Mt. Meigs is one of three institutions operated by the State of Alabama for the confinement of juvenile "delinquents". Mt. Meigs has traditionally been maintained for Negro juveniles, and as of August 15, 1969, there were 351 Negro boys, 90 Negro girls and no white boys or girls at Mt. Meigs. The other two institutions, the State Training School for Girls at Chalkville, Alabama, and the Alabama Boys Industrial School at Birmingham, Alabama, have traditionally been maintained for white juveniles. As of August 15, 1969, there were 79 white girls and 1 Negro girl at the School for Girls at Chalkville, and 202 white boys and no Negro boys at the Boys Industrial School at Birmingham. 5. The institutions described in paragraph three were created under Alabama law for the purpose of rehabilitating juvenile offenders who have been committed to these institutions under state juveniles v i V proceedings.. v*. - 2 - r

C>. While Che School for Gtrln nt; ChalVvlll the Industrial School at Birmingham are administered rehabilitative institutions and offer courses and proj'r-u-, to meet this end, the defendants administer Mt. Meigs ns a penal institution, and punish rather than rehabilitate the Negro juvenile offenders committed there. \ 7.. The defendants have deprived Negro juveniles at Mt. Meigs of a proper rehabilitative program, among * other ways, as follows: j a Corporal punishment is administered! i freely and excessively to the juveniles confined < I there at the unfettered discretion of the i I various staff members. j b The programs, facilities, counseling services, and educational services at Mt.! «. i Meigs are inferior in every way to the two ' j rehabilitative institutions traditionally! i maintained for white children by the State ; of Alabama, and to any other institution which provides an adequate rehabilitative program for juveniles. c The juveniles confined to Mt. Meigs are required to spend large amounts of time performing manual farm labor for the sole purpose of producing income for the institution; this labor is not reasonably calculated to serve any rehabilitative function. ''! - 3 -

d There are no uniform standards and procedures for taking disciplinary action. y, 8. The juveniles who are in custody at Mt. Meigs II have been committed there pursuant to juvenile court proceedings which do not incorporate the constitutional ' il.'l * W SI safeguards of criminal trials, and it is constitutionally > M impermissible to commit or to confine such juveniles through these procedures to institutions which are not adequate to serve as rehabilitative institutions for?! i i ; i<5 juveniles. ' ' ^ 9. The conditions and practices described herein deprive plaintiffs and members of their class of the equal protection of the laws on account of race, and of their liberty without -due process of law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. WHEREFORE, the United States p*rays this Court to enter an Order enjoining the defendants, their agents, employees, successors in interest and all others in active concert with them from: a Failing to immediately establish and implement a program designed to serve the rehabilitative needs of the juveniles confined to Mt. Meigs.. ' ^ f b Failing to immediately establish and maitt-tain reasonable standards and procedures for the administration of discipline. I a ~ h - I - T

- r» :!( t-ilii.-ij**-w'>* '*'" ' - ; v < r *** ::t '" : ' " v Kef U.iring the Juvenile Inmates to onf'.np.o {, \\ f/inn lnbor until such time as this Court approves the limited circumstances, if any, under which farm labor may be required. d Administering corporal punishment until such time as this Court approves the conditions, if any, under which corporal punishment may be administered. The United States further prays this Court to [ ; grant such other injunctive and declaratory relief as the needs of justice may require together with the costs and disbursements of this action. V 7 JQHN N. MITCHELL Attorney General,.JERRIS LEONARD Ass is tanv Attorney General IRA DE WENT United States Attorney /6\m M. Attomey Department of Justice _ c {' *.

...'"i-a'ii:.-: n i :;TJ; i I;T COURT,M n:.ti " MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHARLES JEROME STOCKTON, et al., Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL FOR NEGRO CHILDREN, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Applicant for Intervention CIVIL ACTION NO. 2834-N CERTIFICATE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL I, JOHN N. MITCHELL, Attorney General of the United States v hereby certify that the above-styled case, which has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division, seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws on account of race or color, and from other denials of constitutional rights, is of general public importance within the meaning of Section 902 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000h-2. Signed this fa- /JOHN N. MITCHELL ^Attorney General - T