FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2017

Similar documents
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/22/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/22/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/04/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/04/2017. Exhibit A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 209 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/07/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/07/2015

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 117 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2015

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/17/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2014

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

The English Examine Multiple Dispute Resolution Clauses

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/08/2013 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 76 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/08/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/30/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2015

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER

McGraw-Hill Global Educ. Holdings, LLC v NetWork Group, LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 30004(U) January 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/28/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 125 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/ :53 PM

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2014

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS GORDON RAMSAY'S AND G.R. US LICENSING'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/31/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 37 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/31/2016

Case 4:11-cv Document 102 Filed in TXSD on 09/11/12 Page 1 of 8

English Court Removes Arbitrator For Lack Of Impartiality, Points Out His Tone And Intemperate Language

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/05/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/05/2014

Case 1:16-cv LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015. Exhibit A

Case 1:12-cv CKK-BMK-JDB Document 36 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2015

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 17 March 2015

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Petitioner Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers ("PRI") in the above-captioned proceeding.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2010 INDEX NO /2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2006 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2016. Exhibit 21

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case KJC Doc 172 Filed 08/02/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Case 1:12-cv DLC Document 11 Filed 09/07/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/09/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/09/2016

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Case 1:08-cv LAK Document 32 Filed 04/24/2008 Page 1 of 16. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Barnan Assoc., LLC v 25 Park at 1296 Third Ave., LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33446(U) December 21, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2015

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: * NO

FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 10/07/ /24/ :55 10:55 PM AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2015

v No Oakland Circuit Court JOYA GARLAND as Trustee of the QUINTINA LC No CZ LASHAUN AUSTIN IRREVOCABLE SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2012 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

CIVIL ACTION. Defendant Jeff Carter, by and through his counsel Law Offices of Walter M. Luers, by

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :05 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016

Emil LLC v Jacobson 2018 NY Slip Op 32529(U) October 3, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/06/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/06/2014

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/31/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 78 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/31/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013

CLERK UF ta(3urf SIIPREME COURT OF OHIO

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

False Claims Act Text

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3

Upon the application dated June 15, 2009 (the Application ) 1 of Extended Stay

Case Doc 19 Filed 06/01/16 Entered 06/01/16 14:19:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/10/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO '. RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/10/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/10/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/10/2017 EXHIBIT C

Case 2:12-cv KHV-DJW Document 20 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 25

Chamalu Mgt. Inc. v Waterbridge Cap., LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 32951(U) November 18, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case MFW Doc 275 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/21/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/04/2013

Case bjh Doc 22 Filed 12/30/11 Entered 12/30/11 19:33:15 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 70

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 25 Filed 02/22/19 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:16-cv MAT Document 10 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN BAY CITY

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, - against - FC 42 ND STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant. Index No. 451648/2017 ANSWER Assigned to Justice Ramos Commercial Division Part 53M Defendant FC 42 nd Street Associates, L.P. ( FC 42 nd Street ), by its undersigned attorneys, answering the Complaint, alleges as follows: RESPONSE TO SUMMARY OF ACTION 1. Admits that Plaintiff purports to have brought this action for the reason stated in paragraph 1 and states that paragraph 1 includes conclusions of law as to which no response is required. To the extent paragraph 1 may be deemed to consist of or include allegations that require a response, they are denied. 2. Admits that Plaintiff purports to state certain of its positions regarding the meaning of certain terms in a certain ground lease and to inaccurately characterize FC 42 nd Street s position concerning the determination of rent, admits that a dispute exists between the parties, denies that a judicial declaration is required or appropriate given that the parties disputes are required to be arbitrated, and otherwise denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations of paragraph 2. 1 of 6

THE PARTIES 3. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 3. 4. Admits the allegations of paragraph 4. VENUE 5. States that the allegations of paragraph 5 consist of legal conclusions to which no response is required. RESPONSE TO FACTUAL BACKGROUND 6. Admits the allegations of paragraph 6. 7. Admits the allegations of paragraph 7 and refers to the subject leases for their complete and accurate contents. 8. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 8. 9. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 9. 10. Admits the allegations of paragraph 10. 11. Admits the allegations of paragraph 11. 12. Denies the allegations of paragraph 12. RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING FC SUBLEASES 13. Admits the allegations of paragraph 13. 14. Admits the allegations of paragraph 14. 15. Admits the allegations of paragraph 15. 2 2 of 6

RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING GROUND LEASE RENT RE-SET 16. States that the allegations of paragraph 16 include legal conclusions and selective quotations of certain portions of the Ground Lease, to which no response is required. To the extent the allegations are deemed to require a response, they are denied except FC 42 nd Street admits that, to determine the Base Rent under the Ground Lease for the 2 nd Rental Period, the Ground Lease requires that the Fair Market Value of the Land and the New 42 Land be determined and that the Base Rent under the Ground Lease is equal to ten percent (10%) of the Allocable Share of the Fair Market Value of the Land and the New 42 Land, determined as of the end of the 1 st Rental Period, and that the Allocable Share of the Land is 78.95% and the Allocable Share of the New 42 Land is 21.05%. 17. States that the allegations of paragraph 17 contain selective quotations from the Ground Lease and refers to the Ground Lease for its true and complete contents. To the extent that any allegations of paragraph 17 are deemed to require a response, they are denied. 18. States that the allegations of paragraph 18 purport to describe portions of the Ground Lease and refers to the Ground Lease for its true and complete contents. To the extent that any allegations of paragraph 18 are deemed to require a response, they are denied. 19. Admits the allegations of paragraph 19 and refers to the relevant schedule for its true and complete contents. 20. Admits the allegations of paragraph 20 and refers to the relevant schedule for its true and complete contents. 21. Admits the allegations of paragraph 21 and refers to the relevant schedule for its true and complete contents. 3 3 of 6

22. States that the allegations of paragraph 22 contain selective quotations from Schedule H, refers to the relevant schedule for its true and complete contents, and otherwise denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 22. 23. Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 23. 24. Denies the allegations of paragraph 24 except admits that the Land and New 42 Land were appraised for approximately $27.24 million and this was communicated to New York City Economic Development Corporation. 25. Admits that there exists a dispute between the parties that is subject to arbitration, and otherwise denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 25. 26. Admits that the Ground Lease contains references to AMC and Tussauds and their respective leases, and that the Ground Lease s requirement that these subleases be entered into must be taken into account in connection with the determination of Fair Market Value, and otherwise denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 26. 27. Denies the allegations of paragraph 27. 28. States that the allegations of paragraph 28 contain selective quotations from the Ground Lease and the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal and refers to the Ground Lease and the Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal for their true and complete contents. 29. States that the allegations of paragraph 29 consist of legal conclusions to which no response is required. 4 4 of 6

30. States that the allegations of paragraph 30 contain selective quotations from the Ground Lease and refers to the Ground Lease for its true and complete contents, and otherwise denies the allegations of paragraph 30. 31. States that the allegations of paragraph 31 purport to describe portions of the Ground Lease and refers to the Ground Lease for its true and complete contents, and otherwise denies the allegations of paragraph 31. 32. States that the allegations of paragraph 32 purport to describe portions of the Ground Lease and refers to the Ground Lease for its true and complete contents, and otherwise denies the allegations of paragraph 32. 33. Denies the allegations of paragraph 33. 34. Denies the allegations of paragraph 34. 35. Admits that an arbitrable dispute exists regarding issues relating to the determination of Fair Market Value and otherwise denies the allegations of paragraph 35. 36. Denies the allegations of paragraph 36. 37. Denies any and all allegations contained in the Complaint not specifically admitted. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Arbitration 38. The Ground Lease requires that any dispute regarding the Fair Market value be arbitrated, and FC 42 nd Street has not waived its right to arbitration. Accordingly, Plaintiff s claims may not be maintained in this action and this action is required to be stayed pending arbitration for the reasons stated in FC 42 nd Street s outstanding motion to stay, (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 4-16) which is incorporated by reference. 5 5 of 6

Estoppel 39. Plaintiff s proposed declaration is barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrines of equitable and promissory estoppel. Counterclaims 40. FC 42 nd Street may not assert its counterclaims against Plaintiff in this action on account of the fact that any such claims are required to be arbitrated. FC 42 nd Street reserves the right to assert its counterclaims in an amended pleading in this action or in a separate action in the event that the Court declines to compel arbitration. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE FC 42 nd Street requests that the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice, and that the Court issue such orders as may be appropriate to compel arbitration, and grant such others and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper including award of costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorneys fees. Dated: New York, New York September 20, 2017 FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLP By: /s/ Janice Mac Avoy Janice Mac Avoy Helene Gogadze Shannon N. Doherty One New York Plaza New York, New York 10004-1980 (212) 859-8000 janice.macavoy@friedfrank.com helene.gogadze@friedfrank.com shannon.doherty@friedfrank.com Attorneys for Defendant FC 42nd Street Associates, L.P. 6 6 of 6