PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 536 OF 2018

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR. Writ Petition No. 623 OF 2017 (PIL) PETITIONER : Kanhaiya Shailesh & Others. Vs.

Bar & Bench (

MODEL FORM OF NOTICE, COMPLAINT, AFFIDAVIT AND REPLY MODEL FORM -1 NOTICE BEFORE FILING THE COMPLAINT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 960 OF 2018 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) VERSES

Bar & Bench (

MPSRDC - Government of Madhya Pradesh

Date and Event. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was

Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Petitioner in person.

Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts

Bar and Bench (

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) AND -VERSUS AND. Bhaban (3 rd Floor), 56, Agrabad C/A,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) 5777 OF 2017.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

Bar & Bench (

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

Through: Mr. Kartik Prasad with Ms. Reeja Varghese, Adv. versus

High Cour~ of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE HIGH COURT MANIPUR AT IMPHAL. Writ Petition(C) No. 543 Of 2013

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO OF Society Ltd (IPRS)..Petitioner Vs.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT. CAS(CRL) 2/2014. % Reserved on: 30 th October, Through: versus

Cont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005

1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015

WELFARE SOCIETY OF ORISSA, MANDAL,JAJPUR -V- UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. DEPTT. OF COAL, NEW DELHI & 3 ORS.*

Bar & Bench (

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 147 OF 2018 VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8875/2009 & CM 6241/2009. versus

SOCIAL, WOMEN AND SC S WELFARE DEPARTMENT. NOTIFICATION Shimla-2, the 9 th August, 2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 419/2008 Date of Decision: 05th February, 2013.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, (1) These rules may be called the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act REVIEW PETITIONS 205, 209/2007

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. No. 41/Rules/DHC Dated : PRACTICE DIRECTIONS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter:

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SEN

790 THE PUNJAB LAW REPORTER (2018)1 SCeJ

PART II Procedure and Practice CHAPTER VI. General Rules regarding Applications and Affidavits

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL PETITION No /2012

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRL.M.C. NO. 2521/2011 Date of Decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

Bar and Bench (

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF Sandeep Parekh and ors.

W.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013

Bar&Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

WA No. 8 of HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SR SEN

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BROAD GUIDELINES FOR DRAFTING COMPANY PETITION/WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY AND ANNEXURES

ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK NOTIFICATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

IN THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos OF 2015

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017

Ms. BETTY C. ALVARES Major, r/o B5/F1, Ribandar Retreat,

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No. 866 of COMMON CAUSE Vs UNION OF INDIA

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Decision: 11 th March, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: C.S. (COMM) 334/2016, IA No. 4525/2016 & 6625/2016

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS BILL, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONDONATION OF DELAY. W.P (C ) No /2006. Judgment reserved on: October 19, 2006

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

The Orissa High Court Right to Information Rules,2005

JUDGE. Cont.Cas(C) No. 9 of 2016 B E F O R E HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA (Friday)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No. 422 of 2010 C.R.PARK M, N & P BLOCKS RESIDENTS WELFARE

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Date of decision: 19th April, 2011 W.P.(C) 8647/2007

BEFORE THE COURT OF ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN, JHARKHAND 4 th floor, Bhagirathi Complex, Karamtoli Road, Ranchi

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH

85/B/11-DD/114/11/DC/255/13 on the file of the 2nd Respondent in respect of the complaints of professional misconduct against the 3rd Respondent herei

WRIT PETITION No.31126/2012 (GM-CPC)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Vishal Garg and others Petitioners

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.

W.P.(C) No of 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Special Leave Petition (C) No.of 2016 (Diary No of 2016) Versus

Transcription:

PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010 No.270-R- In exercise of powers conferred under Article 225 of the Constitution of India, and as per direction in the judgment passed by Hon ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos. 1134-1135 of 2002 (State of Uttaranchal Vrs. Balwat Singh Chaufal and others) the High Court of Orissa do hereby make the following Rules:- 1. Short title, Extent and commencement: (i) (ii) (iii) These rules may be called the Orissa High Court Public Interest Litigation rules, 2010. They shall come into force all over the State of Orissa from the date of its notification. These Rules shall be in addition to the Rules of the High Court of Orissa, 1948 as amended from time to time with regard to filing of writ petitions. 2. Definition: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Public Interest Litigation (PIL) means a legal action initiated in the Court for the enforcement of any Civil or Constitutional right of the public in general or a class or a community as a whole or protection of any general interest of such public or class or community. Court means the High Court of Orissa. Case means Public Interest Litigation case. Petition means Public Interest Litigation petition. CHAPTER 1 RULES IN GENERAL 3. A public Interest Litigation petition filed in the Court shall be genuine and bona fide. Any such petition filed for extraneous considerations or with oblique motive for personal or individual gain shall be rejected in lime line by imposing exemplary costs or by adopting similar methods.

4. The petitions which involve larger public interest, gravity and urgency shall be given priority over other less important petitions; the public Interest Litigation must aim at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury; and must not be for personal gain, private motive or oblique motive. 5. The Court before entertaining the PIL is to prima facie (i) verify the credentials of the petitioner/petitioners (ii) shall satisfy with regard to the correctness of the contents of the petition and (iii) shall satisfy that substantial public interest involved in the PIL. CHAPTER 2 RULES RELATING TO FORMAT OF THE P.I.L PETITION 6. Every petition filed in Court in the form of Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India shall be in the form appended here to and shall be heard and disposed of by a Division bench presided over by the Chief Justice or any other Bench assigned by the Chief Justice. 7. The petition shall contain the facts of the case in chronological order. If the petition is based on news report, it must be stated as to whether the petitioner has verified the truth of the facts by personally visiting the place or by talking to the people concerned or has verified from the reporter or editor of the news paper concerned. 8. Before filing a PIL, the petitioner must send a representation to the authorities concerned for taking remedial action, akin to what is postulated in Section 80 CPC. Details of such representation and reply, if any, from the authority concerned along with copies thereof must be filed with the petition. However, in urgent cases where making of representation and waiting for response would cause irreparable injury or damage, petition can be filed straightway by giving prior notice of filing to the authorities concerned and/or their counsel, if any. CHAPTER 3 9. Frivolous and Vexatious PIL Where the Court is of the opinion that the Public Interest Litigation petition filed by the petitioner is frivolous or vexatious or is devoid of public interest or is filed as camouflage to foster personal gain or is filed for extraneous and ulterior motives, it shall dismiss the same with exemplary cost.

10. In the cases, where interim relief is sought for and where the Court is inclined to grant the same, it may in order to prevent abuse of process of the Court insist upon the petitioner to furnish security. APPENDIX FORMAT FOR FILING OF PUBLIC INTEREST PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK W.P(C) (PIL) No. of Code In the matter of Versus..Petitioner(s)..Respondent(s) To The Hon ble Chief Justice of Orissa High Court and his companion Justices of the Hon ble Court. The humble petition of the petitioner(s) above named. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is being filed by way of public interest litigation and the petitioner has no personal interest ( if he has any personal interest such interest must be disclosed). The petition is being filed in the interest of (give particulars of the class of persons for whose benefit the petition is filed). 2. That the petitioner is (give short background of the petitioner; if the petitioner is an organization, the names of the office bearers must be furnished). The petitioner has earlier filed/ not filed, any other public interest petition (if filed, details of such PIL filed including the case number and the court, status and brief description of the order passed must be given. It must also be stated whether in any of such cases any cost has been awarded, for. Or imposed against the petitioner; and whether any appreciation or stricture has been passed).

3. That the petitioner is filing the present petition on his own and not at the instance of someone else. The litigation cost, including the advocate s fee and the traveling expenses of the lawyer, if any, are being borne by the petitioner himself ( if not, the petitioner must disclose the source of funds). 4. That the facts of the case in brief are as follows: (narrate the facts leading to the filing of the petition in chronological order by marking paras as 4.1, 4.2 so on). 5. The source of information of the facts pleaded is based on (if news report, whether the applicant has verified the facts by personally visiting the place, talking to other people or from the reporter/editor of the newspaper concerned. If the petitioner does not wish to disclose the source, he may say so with reasons) 6. That the petitioner has/has not sent representation in this regard. (If yes. Details of such representation and reply, if any, from the authority concerned along with copies thereof must be filed if not, reason for not sending such representation). 7. That to the best of knowledge of the petitioner, no public interest petition (whether filed by the petitioner himself or by anyone else) raising the same issue is filed before this Hon ble Court or before any other court. (If filed, details thereof). 8. That the present petition has been filed on the following amongst other grounds: GROUNDS State separate grounds with specific mention of violation of particular constitutional or statutory provision or any administrative instruction. The relevant provision of the Constitution and statue must be quoted and administrative instruction must be filed. 9. That the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon ble, Court may be pleased to pass the following order:

PRAYER Set out the prayer/relief claimed (if more than one relief is claimed, separate prayers may be made for each relief) It is therefore, prayed that this Hon ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this PIL writ petition, issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause, and if the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, the said rule be made absolute in granting the relief s prayed for; And may further be pleased to pass any other order(s) as deemed fit and proper; And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. Place: Date: Drawn and filed by ADVOCATE Any application for interim relief shall be filed as separate Misc. Case. P.K. PANDA Registrar (Vigilance)