Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

Similar documents
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE EL DORADO COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS AND OF CHAPTER 18.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

Gerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney (Staff Contacts: Gerald Hobrecht (707) and Scott Whitehouse, (707) )

City Attorney s Synopsis

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Manteca does ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Choteau, Montana, that:

WHEREAS, the City of Westminster, pursuant to its police power, may adopt

Article X. - Establishment and Operation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Sec Purpose. The purpose of interim urgency Ordinance 4770 is to

/ 8 ~Qb ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Carlos as follows:

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ELDORADO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

require that cities provide for or allow the establishment and or operation of medical marijuana

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF KIOWA ORDINANCE NO

INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

TOWNSHIP OF WILBER IOSCO COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO ADOPTED: January 7, 2013 PUBLISHED: January 16, 2013

SCC NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County Of Sacramento ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Yolo hereby ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY Of RANCHO SANTA MAR GAR IT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. C.S AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.86 OF THE STANISLAUS COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING CANNABIS ACTIVITIES

ORDINANCE NO

1. Adopt an ordinance amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code for additional remedies for Code Enforcement violations.

Agenda Item C.1 DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: February 17, 2015

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO:

OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO Effective: Upon Publication After Adoption Published: March 16, 2011 OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE

ARTICLE III. - MEDICAL MARIJUANA. Sec Distribution. Page 1

Agenda Item F.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: February 3, 2015

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Perris hereby ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY OF WOODLAND, WASHINGTON

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

ORDINANCE NO ; CEQA

CITY OF HEMET Hemet, California ORDINANCE NO. 1850

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

Staff Report. Susanne Brown, City Attorney Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development Laura Simpson, Planning Manager

SUMMARY: BILL NUMBER: ORDINANCE NUMBER:

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. 08- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATION CITATION PROCEDURE OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

BLAIR TOWNSHIP MEDICAL MARIHUANA ORDINANCE #140-12

When used in this chapter, the words or phrases shall be defined as the following:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO CENTRAL DIVISION UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Certified copy of portion of proceedings, Meeting of November 14,2017

ORONOKO CHARTER TOWNSHIP COUNTY OF BERRIEN STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 68

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No. : 8b CC Mtg. : 7/12/2005

purpose of regulating electronically amplified loud and raucous noise within the City of Santa Ana.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK

Medical Marihuana Facilities Ordinance

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE No THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH FULTON HEREBY ORDAINS as follows:

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WASHTENAW ANN ARBOR CHARTER TOWNSHIP

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAMAR, COLORADO AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO CITY OF EVART OSCEOLA COUNTY, MICHIGAN

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WELLINGTON, COLORADO THAT:

On April 6, 2015, the City Council introduced on first reading Ordinance No

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, there exists the potential for misappropriation and diversion of medical marijuana to non-medical uses; and

* CITY CHICO City Council Agenda Report

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP

CITY OF READING COUNTY OF HILLSDALE, STATE OF MICHIGAN. ORDINANCE NO ADOPTED: November 14, 2017 EFFECTIVE: December 1, 2017

BILL NO ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the CSA is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any conflicting State enactments; and

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Recommendation to Adopt Proposed Ordinance Relating to Pain Management Clinics

AGENDA. Rules of Decorum. Under the Government Code, the City Council may regulate disruptive behavior that impedes the City Council Meeting.

TOWNSHIP OF BRUCE MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 194 PROHIBITION OF MARIHUANA ESTABLISHMENTS ORDINANCE TITLE

Resolution No

ORDINANCE NO N.S.

24 in the manufacture of honey oil where such activity presents grave dangers and adverse health risks 25

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT. Jonathan P. Hobbs, City Attorney

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

Agenda Item Meeting of ORDINANCE 14-

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF YPSILANTI NOTICE OF ADOPTED ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 1298

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

in Sections et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; herein the State Fireworks Law")

ORDINANCE NO. O

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

ORDINANCE No. 17- WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

Req. # SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE NO

Agenda Item B.3 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 9, 2015

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

John Harpootlian Thursday, June 09, :38 AM Deborah Padovan Fw: Joint Los Altos/Los Altos Hills Senior Commission

TOWN OF RAYMOND ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON REGISTERED CAREGIVER RETAIL STORES

Transcription:

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009 TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Mayor and Councilmembers Vyto Adomaitis, Director, RDA, Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department Lt. Phil Willis, Chief of Police Services Claudia Dato, Management Analyst Ordinance Prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries RECOMMENDATION: Conduct the second reading (by title only), waive further reading and adopt City Council Ordinance 09- entitled An Ordinance of the City of Goleta Rescinding Ordinance No. 07-17 and Amending Divisions 2 and 7 of Article II and Article III of Chapter 35 (Zoning) of the Goleta Municipal Code to add a Prohibition of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries (Attachment 1). BACKGROUND: On June 2, 2009, the City Council introduced and conducted a first reading of a proposed ordinance to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries (MMDs) within Goleta City limits. As requested by Council, the ordinance includes provisions that a qualified patient is not prohibited from possessing marijuana for personal use and a primary caregiver is not prohibited from possessing marijuana for the personal use of qualified patients of such primary caregiver. DISCUSSION After receiving public input and engaging in considerable discussion on the issue of MMDs, Council voted 5-0 to adopt the proposed ordinance. Because the existing moratorium (Ordinance No. 07-17) is set to expire August 30, 2009, the adoption of this ordinance will allow the ordinance prohibition to take effect and not allow MMDs to legally be established without appropriate regulations. The purpose of this item is to conduct the second reading in order to allow for adoption of the ordinance. Based on Council s direction, staff will conduct additional research on the topic of MMDs and will provide the Council with an opportunity to consider a new ordinance which would allow MMDs in certain zoning districts subject to certain development standards and/or operational restrictions.

Meeting Date: June 16, 2009 ALTERNATIVES Any modifications to the ordinance would require it to be re-introduced and re-noticed for adoption. Any alternative would prevent the ordinance from taking effect prior to expiration of the moratorium and allow MMDs to legally be established with regulations. FISCAL IMPACTS: There are no fiscal impacts associated with this ordinance other than the staff time associated with drafting this staff report and minor public noticing costs. Legal Review By: Reviewed By: Approved By: Tim W. Giles Michelle Greene Daniel Singer City Attorney Administrative Services Director City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 09- Rescinding Ordinance 07-17 and Amending Articles II and III to Prohibit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries 2

ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed Ordinance 09- Rescinding Ordinance 07-17 and Amending Articles II and III to Prohibit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

ORDINANCE NO. 09- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GOLETA RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 07-17 AND AMENDING DIVISIONS 2 AND 7 OF ARTICLE II AND ARTICLE III OF CHAPTER 35 (ZONING) OF THE GOLETA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A PROHIBITION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WHEREAS, in 1970, Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. section 841, which makes it illegal to import, manufacture, distribute, possess or use marijuana in the United States; and, WHEREAS, the State of California makes it illegal, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11357 et seq., to possess, cultivate, sell or use marijuana in California; and, WHEREAS, in 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215, entitled the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, codified as Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, et seq., which created a limited exception from state criminal liability under Health and Safety Code sections 11357 and 11358 for seriously ill persons who are in need of medical marijuana for specified medical purposes and who obtain and use medical marijuana under limited, specified circumstances; and, WHEREAS, California state legislature Health and Safety Code section 11362.7 et seq. (Medical Marijuana Program), clarifies the scope of the Compassionate Use Act and allows cities and counties to adopt and enforce rules and regulations consistent therewith (Health and Safety Code 11362.83); and, WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative, 532 US 483 (2001) that, notwithstanding California law, the federal Controlled Substances Act continues to prohibit marijuana use, distribution, and possession, and that no medical necessity exception exists to these prohibitions; and, WHEREAS, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), that pursuant to the commerce clause, the federal government has the power to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana, even if such cultivation and use is for medical purposes and complies with California law; and, WHEREAS, on November 19, 2007, the City adopted an interim moratorium ordinance prohibiting the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries (Ordinance No. 07-17) to allow the City of Goleta time to study the potential impacts such facilities may have on the public health, safety, and welfare, as well as the ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 1 OF 8

impacts that the inconsistent and conflicting authorities may have on the City s ability to regulate such facilities; and WHEREAS, the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries (MMDs) has proven to lead to an increase in crime, such as burglaries, robberies, sales of illegal drugs in the areas immediately surrounding such dispensaries, as well as other public nuisances such as loitering, smoking marijuana in public places and driving while under the influence of marijuana, thereby endangering the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of Goleta; and WHEREAS, the impacts of MMDs are documented in the White Paper on Marijuana Dispensaries published by the California Police Chiefs Association s Task Force on Marijuana Dispensaries (April 22, 2009), and the United States Department of Justice s California Medical Marijuana Information report; and WHEREAS, continuing legal developments in the area of medical marijuana dispensaries justify the continued prohibition of such facilities while the courts and other competent authorities address the apparent conflict between federal and state law including internal California legal conflicts, as well as the community and statewide concerns regarding the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries; and, WHEREAS, the City finds that prohibiting MMDs is in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Goleta ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, are each relied upon independently by the City Council for its adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Amendment of DIVISION 2. DEFINITIONS of Article III Inland Zoning Ordinance Section 35-209 of Division 2 of Article III of the Goleta Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following definitions: A. MARIJUANA: Marijuana shall have the same meaning as provided in Health and Safety Code Sections 11018, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. B. MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY: Any site, facility, location, use, cooperative or business, whether for profit or non-profit, whether permanent or mobile, which to any extent distributes, sells, exchanges, processes, delivers, gives ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 2 OF 8

away, or cultivates marijuana for medical purposes to qualified patients, health care providers, patients primary caregivers, or physicians pursuant to Proposition 215, Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seq. or any State regulations adopted in furtherance thereof. C. PERSON WITH AN IDENTIFICATION CARD: Person with a medical marijuana identification card shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. D. PRIMARY CAREGIVER: Primary caregiver shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. E. QUALIFIED PATIENT: Qualified patient shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. SECTION 3: Amendment of DIVISION 7. GENERAL REGULATIONS of Article III Inland Zoning Ordinance DIVISION 7 of Article III of the Goleta Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 35-292i. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Sec. 35-292i.1 Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this ordinance is to prohibit the establishment and operation of any new medical marijuana dispensary within the City limits of the City of Goleta. Sec. 35-292i.2 Applicability The provisions of this Section shall apply to any site, facility, location, use, cooperative or business, whether for profit or non-profit, whether permanent or mobile, which to any extent distributes, sells, exchanges, processes, delivers, gives away, or cultivates marijuana for medical purposes to qualified patients, health care providers, patients primary caregivers, or physicians pursuant to Proposition 215, Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seq. or any State regulations adopted in furtherance thereof. This Section shall not prohibit the use or possession of quantities of marijuana by a qualified patient for personal use. This Section shall not prohibit the possession of quantities of marijuana by a primary caregiver for personal use of qualified patients of such primary caregiver. ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 3 OF 8

Sec. 35-292i.3 Prohibitions and Exceptions. A. It shall be unlawful to establish, operate or maintain, or to participate in the establishment, operation or maintenance of a medical marijuana dispensary anywhere within the City limits of the City of Goleta. B. In accordance with the authority granted the City of Goleta under Government Code Section 65858(b), and pursuant to the findings stated herein, from and after the date of adoption of this ordinance, no use permit, variance, zoning clearance, business license or other applicable entitlement shall be accepted, approved or issued for the establishment or operation of a medical marijuana dispensary. C. Medical marijuana dispensaries shall not be permitted as a component or exclusive use under the definition of a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a healthcare facility or facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential hospice, or home health agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code. Sec. 35-292i.4 Penalties Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment in the County jail for not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. In addition to the foregoing, any violation of this Ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as provided by all applicable provisions of law. SECTION 4: Amendment of DIVISION 2. DEFINITIONS of Article II Coastal Zoning Ordinance Section 35-58 of Division 2 of Article II of the Goleta Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following definitions: A. MARIJUANA: Marijuana shall have the same meaning as provided in Health and Safety Code Sections 11018, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. B. MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY: Any site, facility, location, use, cooperative or business, whether for profit or non-profit, whether permanent or mobile, which to any extent distributes, sells, exchanges, processes, delivers, gives ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 4 OF 8

away, or cultivates marijuana for medical purposes to qualified patients, health care providers, patients primary caregivers, or physicians pursuant to Proposition 215, Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seq. or any State regulations adopted in furtherance thereof. C. PERSON WITH AN IDENTIFICATION CARD: Person with a medical marijuana identification card shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. D. PRIMARY CAREGIVER: Primary caregiver shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. E. QUALIFIED PATIENT: Qualified patient shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7, as that section now appears or may hereafter be amended or renumbered. SECTION 5: Amendment of DIVISION 7. GENERAL REGULATIONS of Article II Coastal Zoning Ordinance DIVISION 7 of Article II of the Goleta Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 35-144G. Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Sec. 35-144G.1 Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this ordinance is to prohibit the establishment and operation of any new medical marijuana dispensary within the City limits of the City of Goleta. Sec. 35-144G.2 Applicability The provisions of this Section shall apply to any site, facility, location, use, cooperative or business, whether for profit or non-profit, whether permanent or mobile, which to any extent distributes, sells, exchanges, processes, delivers, gives away, or cultivates marijuana for medical purposes to qualified patients, health care providers, patients primary caregivers, or physicians pursuant to Proposition 215, Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seq. or any State regulations adopted in furtherance thereof. This Section shall not prohibit the use or possession of quantities of marijuana by a qualified patient for personal use. This Section shall not prohibit the possession of quantities of marijuana by a primary caregiver for personal use of qualified patients of such primary caregiver. ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 5 OF 8

Sec. 35-144G.3 Prohibitions and Exceptions. A. It shall be unlawful to establish, operate or maintain, or to participate in the establishment, operation or maintenance of a medical marijuana dispensary anywhere within the City limits of the City of Goleta. B. In accordance with the authority granted the City of Goleta under Government Code Section 65858(b), and pursuant to the findings stated herein, from and after the date of adoption of this ordinance, no use permit, variance, zoning clearance, business license or other applicable entitlement shall be accepted, approved or issued for the establishment or operation of a medical marijuana dispensary. C. Medical marijuana dispensaries shall not be permitted as a component or exclusive use under the definition of a clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a healthcare facility or facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for persons with chronic life-threatening illness licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.01 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; a residential hospice, or home health agency licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code. Sec. 35-144G.4 Penalties Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment in the County jail for not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. In addition to the foregoing, any violation of this Ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance and shall be subject to abatement as provided by all applicable provisions of law. SECTION 6. Compliance With CEQA. The City Council finds that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; it prevents changes in the environment pending the completion of the contemplated municipal code review. SECTION 7. Effective Date. ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 6 OF 8

This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the thirty-first (31) day following the date of its final adoption. SECTION 8. Abandonment of Legal Non-Conforming Use. For any legal non-conforming use prohibited by this ordinance, any lapse in prohibited operations of more than 96 consecutive hours duration shall constitute an abandonment of the use and result in a forfeiture of any pre-existing status. Any subsequent use shall be prohibited under this ordinance. SECTION 9. Repeal of Ordinance No. 07-17 City of Goleta Ordinance No. 07-17 is hereby rescinded. SECTION 10. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 11. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of June 2009. ROGER S. ACEVES, MAYOR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DEBORAH CONSTANTINO CITY CLERK TIM W. GILES CITY ATTORNEY ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 7 OF 8

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) ss. CITY OF GOLETA ) I, Deborah Constantino, City Clerk of the City of Goleta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 09- was introduced on June 2, 2009, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, held on the day of 2009, by the following roll-call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: (SEAL) DEBORAH CONSTANTINO CITY CLERK ORDINANCE NO. 09- PAGE 8 OF 8