AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Chairman Phil Mendelson IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Am. Sub. H.B. 49 As Passed by the Senate AGOCD15

Councilmember Anita D. Bonds IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, FONTANA, SCHWANK, WILLIAMS, WHITE AND HAYWOOD, AUGUST 29, 2017 AN ACT

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. House Bill 2657

ILLINOIS. Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter /5(h)

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

HB3010 Enrolled LRB RLC b

20 ILCS 2630/5.2) (Text of Section from P.A ) Sec Expungement and sealing. (a) General Provisions. (1) Definitions. In this Act, words

A. Motion. Upon motion, or sua sponte, expungement proceedings may be commenced: 1) if a written allegation is not approved for prosecution;

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION

OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION 600 CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK AND FITNESS DETERMINATION RULES

15A-725. Extradition of persons imprisoned or awaiting trial in another state or who have left the demanding state under compulsion.

NEW YORK. New York Correction Law Article Discretionary Relief From Forfeitures and Disabilities Automatically Imposed By Law

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO EXPUNGE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 642

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

IC Chapter 9. Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records

H 5510 SUBSTITUTE B AS AMENDED ======== LC001499/SUB B ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

IC Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts

Senate Bill 107 Sponsored by Senator THATCHER (at the request of Rosana Sherwood) (Presession filed.)

A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Sealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals. Expungements in Ohio

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

H 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Sealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals. Expungements in Ohio

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

HOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

PART 6 COURT CHAPTER 1 MUNICIPAL COURT

6/13/2016. Second Chances Setting Aside a Juvenile Adjudication. Why Expunge an Adjudication (aren t juvenile records sealed)?

(A) subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release

SEALING OF JUVENILE RECORDS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 26 1

COMPREHENSIVE SENTENCING TASK FORCE Diversion Working Group

CHAPTER Section 1 of P.L.1995, c.408 (C.43:1-3) is amended to read as follows:

Courtroom Terminology

EXPUNGEMENT APPLICATION

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Session of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance 1-10

Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2159

KENTUCKY BAIL STATUTES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 14 Article 13A 1

CRIMES CODE (18 PA.C.S.) AND JUDICIAL CODE (42 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS Act of Nov. 29, 2006, P.L. 1567, No. 178 Cl. 18

TITLE 6 - COURTS CHAPTER 1 - COURTS AND PROCEDURES

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator TROY SINGLETON District 7 (Burlington)

Amended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

How are Ex Offenders impacted by

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 HOUSE BILL 1684

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

Your Guide to. in South Carolina. Issued: August 2013 Revised: July 2016

Maryland Laws on Bail Page D-1. Maryland Declaration of Rights

Expungement Statutes

DIANA M. STEVENSON, CLERK OF COURTS BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT

ORDINANCE NO. ^8465J

EXPUNCTION OF CRIMINAL RECORDS IN NORTH CAROLINA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494

Republic of Trinidad and Tobago

Texas Administrative Code

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CONVICTION OR DIVERSION Pursuant to K.S.A

Conditions of probation; evaluation and treatment; fees; effect of failure to abide by conditions; modification.

CARSON CITY JUSTICE & MUNICIPAL COURT SEALING OF RECORDS INFORMATIONAL PACKET (REVISED JUNE 2015)

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 966 SUMMARY

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 89 1

Criminal Records and Expungement. Rhode Island Public Defender

SENATE BILL NO. 33 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 618

DIANA M. STEVENSON, CLERK OF COURTS BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT

APPENDIX A RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS

Senate Bill 1008 Ordered by the Senate February 8 Including Senate Amendments dated February 8

SECTION 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: Section 1. KRS is amended to read as follows:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 91 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS. SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBAL CODE Title 28 EXPUNGEMENT CODE

MINNESOTA. Chapter Title: DOMESTIC ABUSE Section: 518B.01. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings given them:

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Orders of Nondisclosure Overview

CHAPTER 6 FAIR CHANCES HIRING PROCESS ACT

PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS (Section et seq., Ala. Code 1975)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. concerning the Board s consideration of the Final Report of the Character. Background

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION

What Is Expungement?...1 When Can I File For Expungement?...2 Case Information...3 Petitions For Expungement...4 What Do the Dispositions Mean and

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAC COUNTY

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Sample Three Column DCJS Rap Sheet And Key

ARTICLE XIV PAIN MANAGEMENT CLINICS AND CASH ONLY PHARMACIES

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Expungements and Pardons in South Carolina Courts

PART A. Instituting Proceedings

JUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL

CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS

7112. Authority to execute compact. The Governor of Pennsylvania, on behalf of this State, is hereby authorized to execute a compact in substantially

Transcription:

AN ACT Codification District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Summer 2013 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To create limited liability for employers who hire or retain returning citizens if the employer has taken certain steps to make a good-faith determination that hiring or retaining a returning citizen is favorable; to amend the Human Rights Act of 1977 to allow individuals access to their full arrest record so that they may determine eligibility for sealing or file a motion to seal; to amend Chapter 8 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official Code to exclude certain interpersonal violence as an ineligible misdemeanor, to reduce the time a movant must wait before filing a motion to seal his or her case, to provide individuals an opportunity to seal qualifying arrests despite having ineligible convictions on their record, to permit individuals to whom a District of Columbia arrest has been wrongly attributed the ability to seal the arrest if law enforcement did not take an individual s fingerprints at the time of the arrest, to add a new section dealing with the sealing of arrest records of fugitives from justice, to allow a movant the opportunity to amend the original motion to seal within 30 days if the movant failed to include all misdemeanors and felonies, to provide that a motion to seal a case that is not in the court database or a case that is not in a publicly available database shall also not be made publicly available, and to permit movants to obtain certifications from the court that their records have been properly sealed under Title 16; to amend the District of Columbia Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 1981 to allow an individual to access his or her nonpublic court record after expungement of a first-time conviction of drug possession; to amend the Office on Ex-Offender Affairs and Commission on Re-entry and Ex-Offender Affairs Establishment Act of 2006 to authorize the Mayor to establish a certificate of good standing program; and to amend section 1004 of Title 1 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations to allow individuals access to their full arrest record so that may determine eligibility for sealing or file a motion to seal. BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the Re-entry Facilitation Amendment Act of 2012. Codification District of Columbia Official Code 1 2001 Edition

Sec. 2. Limited liability. Information regarding a criminal history record of an employee or a former employee shall not be introduced as evidence in a civil action against an employer or its employees or agents if that information is based on the conduct of the employee or former employee, and if the employer has made a reasonable, good-faith determination that the following factors favored the hiring or retention of that applicant or employee: (1) The specific duties and responsibilities of the position being sought or held; (2) The bearing, if any, that an applicant s or employee s criminal background will have on the applicant s or employee s fitness or ability to perform one or more of the duties or responsibilities related to his or her employment; (3) The time that has elapsed since the occurrence of the criminal offense; (4) The age of the person at the time of the occurrence of the criminal offense; (5) The frequency and seriousness of the criminal offense; (6) Any information produced regarding the applicant s or employee s rehabilitation and good conduct since the occurrence of the criminal offense; and (7) The public policy that it is generally beneficial for persons with criminal records to obtain employment. Sec. 3. Section 266 of the Human Rights Act of 1977, effective December 13, 1977 (D.C. Law 2-38; D.C. Official Code 2-1402.66), is amended to read as follows: Sec. 266. Arrest records. (a)(1) An individual may request production of his or her arrest record for the purposes of determining eligibility for sealing or expunging that record pursuant to Chapter 8 of Title 16, or similar sealing statutes in the District or in another jurisdiction, and may request production of his or her arrest record for filing a sealing or expungement motion. (2) The District may charge the individual a nominal fee for processing this request. (3) For the purposes of this subsection, an arrest record shall contain a listing of all adult arrests, regardless of the disposition of each arrest, and regardless of the date on which the arrest, conviction, or completion of the sentence occurred. (b)(1)(a) An individual may request production of his or her arrest record or authorize another person to request production of his or her arrest record for any other purpose. (B) The District may charge the individual a nominal fee for processing this request. (C) For purposes of this subsection, an arrest record shall contain a Codification District of Columbia Official Code 2 2001 Edition

listing only of adult convictions for which the sentence was completed not more than 10 years before the date on which the records were requested and forfeitures of collateral in a court proceeding that have occurred not more than 10 years before the date on which the record was requested. (2) A person who requires the production of any arrest record or any copy, extract, or statement thereof pursuant to this subsection, at the monetary expense of any individual to whom such record may relate, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in section 101 of the Criminal Fine Proportionality Amendment Act of 2012, passed on 2 nd reading on November 1, 2012 (Enrolled version of Bill 19-214), or imprisoned for not more than 10 days.. Sec. 4. Chapter 8 of Title 16 of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended as follows: (a) Section 16-801(9)(A) is amended to read as follows: (A) Interpersonal violence as defined in 16-1001(6)(B), intimate partner violence as defined in 16-1001(7), and intrafamily violence as defined in 16-1001(9).. (b) Section 16-803 is amended as follows: (1) Subsection (a) is amended to read as follows: (a)(1) A person arrested for, or charged with, the commission of an eligible misdemeanor pursuant to the District of Columbia Official Code or the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations whose prosecution has been terminated without conviction may file a motion to seal the publicly available records of the arrest and related court proceedings if: (A) A waiting period of at least 2 years has elapsed since the termination of the case; and (B) Except as permitted by paragraph (2) of this subsection, the movant does not have a disqualifying arrest or conviction. (2)(A) If a period of at least 5 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant s sentence for a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related court proceedings under this subsection for a case that was terminated without conviction before or after the disqualifying misdemeanor conviction, except when the case terminated without a conviction as a result of the successful completion of a deferred sentencing agreement. (B) If a period of at least 10 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant s sentence for a disqualifying felony conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying felony conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall Codification District of Columbia Official Code 3 2001 Edition

not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related court proceedings under this subsection for a case that was terminated without conviction before or after the disqualifying felony conviction, except when the case terminated without conviction as the result of the successful completion of a deferred sentencing agreement.. (2) Subsection (b) is amended to read as follows: (b)(1) A person arrested for, or charged with, the commission of any other offense pursuant to the District of Columbia Official Code or the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations whose prosecution has been terminated without conviction may file a motion to seal the publicly available records of the arrest and court proceedings if: (A) A waiting period of at least 4 years has elapsed since the termination of the case or, if the case was terminated before charging by the prosecution, a waiting period of at least 3 years has elapsed since the termination of the case; and (B) Except as permitted by paragraph (2) of this subsection, the movant does not have a disqualifying arrest or conviction. (2)(A) If a period of at least 5 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant s sentence for a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related court proceedings under this subsection for a case that was terminated without conviction before or after the disqualifying misdemeanor conviction, except when the case terminated without a conviction as a result of the successful completion of a deferred sentencing agreement. (B) If a period of at least 10 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant s sentence for a disqualifying felony conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying felony conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related court proceedings under this subsection for a case that was terminated without conviction before or after the disqualifying felony conviction, except when the case terminated without conviction as the result of the successful completion of a deferred sentencing agreement.. (3) Subsection (c)(1) is amended to read as follows: (1) A waiting period of at least 8 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant s sentence; and. (4) A new subsection (c-2) is added to read as follows: (c-2) A person to whom a District of Columbia arrest has been attributed, who attests under oath that he or she was incorrectly identified or named, may file a motion to seal publicly available records of the arrest if the law enforcement agency did not take fingerprints at the time of the arrest and no other form of reliable identification was presented by the person who was arrested.. Codification District of Columbia Official Code 4 2001 Edition

(5) Subsection (f) is amended to read as follows: (f) In a motion filed under subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this section, the movant must seek to seal all eligible arrests and convictions in the same proceeding unless the movant waives in writing the right to seek sealing with respect to a particular conviction or arrest.. (c) A new section 16-803.01 is added to read as follows: Sec. 16-803.01. Sealing of arrest records of fugitives from justice. (a) A person arrested upon a warrant issued pursuant to 23-701 or arrested within the District of Columbia as a fugitive from justice without a warrant having been issued may file a motion to seal the record of the District of Columbia arrest and related Superior Court proceedings at any time after the person has appeared before the proper official in the jurisdiction from which he or she was a fugitive. (b)(1) The Superior Court shall grant a motion to seal if: (A) The arrest was not made in connection with or did not result in any other District of Columbia Official Code or District of Columbia Code of Municipal Regulations charges or federal charges in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the person; (B) The person waived an extradition hearing pursuant to 23-702(f)(1) and was released pursuant to 23-702(f)(2) or detained pursuant to 23-702(f)(3); and (C) The person proves by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she has appeared before the proper official in the jurisdiction from which he or she was a fugitive. (2) In all other cases, the Superior Court may grant a motion to seal if it is in the interest of justice to do so. In making this determination, the court shall consider: (A) The interests of the movant in sealing the publicly available records of his or her arrest and related court proceedings; (B) The community s interest in retaining access to those records; (C) The community s interest in furthering the movant s rehabilitation and enhancing the movant s employability; and (D) Any other information it considers relevant. (c) If the Court grants the motion to seal: (1)(A) The Court shall order the prosecutor and any law enforcement agency to remove from their publicly available records all references that identify the movant as having been arrested. (B) The prosecutor s office and law enforcement agencies shall be entitled to retain any and all records relating to the movant s arrest in a nonpublic file. (C) The prosecutor s office and law enforcement agencies shall file a certification with the Court within 90 days that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, all references that identify the movant as having been arrested have been removed from its Codification District of Columbia Official Code 5 2001 Edition

publicly available records. (2)(A) The Court shall order the clerk to remove or eliminate all publicly available court records that identify the movant as having been arrested. (B) The clerk shall be entitled to retain any and all records relating to the movant s arrest, related court proceedings, or conviction in a nonpublic file. (3) The Court shall not order the redaction of the movant s name from any published opinion of the trial or appellate courts that refer to the movant. (4) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the clerk and any other agency shall reply in response to inquiries from the public concerning the existence of records which have been sealed pursuant to this chapter that no records are available. (5) No person as to whom relief pursuant to this section has been granted shall be held thereafter under any provision of law to be guilty of perjury or otherwise giving a false statement by reason of failure to recite or acknowledge his or her arrest as a fugitive from justice in response to any inquiry made of him or her for any purpose. (6) For purposes of this section, the entities listed in 16-801(11)(D)-(F) shall be considered public.. (d) Section 16-804 is amended as follows: (1) Subsection (b) is amended to read follows: (b)(1) A motion pursuant to 16-803 (a), (b), or (c) shall state all of the movant s arrests and convictions and shall: (A) Seek relief with respect to all the arrests and any conviction eligible for relief; and (B) For any arrest or conviction as to which the waiting period in 16-803(a), (b), or (c) has not elapsed, waive in writing the right to seek sealing of the records pertaining to that arrest or conviction. (2) If the Court determines that the motion does not comply with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection, then the movant shall have 30 days after being notified by the Court of the noncompliance to amend his or her original motion to include all of the movant s District of Columbia Code and Municipal Regulation arrests and convictions and either seek relief with respect to all the eligible arrests and convictions or waive in writing the right to seek sealing of the records pertaining to any arrests or convictions for which relief is not sought. If the movant fails to amend his original motion within 30 days, then the motion shall be dismissed without prejudice.. (2) Subsection (c) is amended to read as follows: (c) A copy of the motion and any amended motion shall be served upon the prosecutor.. (3) A new subsection (e) is added to read as follows: (e) If the movant files a motion to seal an arrest that is not in the Court database or an arrest and related court proceedings that are not in a publicly available database, the motion to seal and responsive pleadings shall not be available publicly. If the Court grants Codification District of Columbia Official Code 6 2001 Edition

such a motion, it shall order that the motion and responsive pleadings be sealed to the same extent and in the same manner as the records pertaining to the arrest and related court proceedings. If the Court denies such a motion, the Court, the United States Attorney s Office, the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, and the law enforcement agency that arrested the movant shall be entitled to retain any and all records relating to the motion in a non-public file.. (e) Section 16-806 is amended as follows: (1) Subsection (a) is amended to read as follows: (a) Records sealed on grounds of actual innocence pursuant to 16-802 shall be opened only on order of the Court upon a showing of compelling need; except, that upon request, the movant, or the authorized representative of the movant, shall be entitled to a copy of the sealed records to the extent that such records would have been available to the movant before relief under 16-802 was granted and shall also be entitled to all certifications filed with the Court pursuant to 16-802(h)(5). A request for access to sealed court records may be made ex parte.. (2) Subsection (b) is amended as follows: (A) The lead-in language in amended by striking the phrase 16-803 and inserting the phrase 16-803 or 16-803.01 in its place. (B) Paragraph (4) is amended by striking the phrase To any person or entity and inserting the phrase Except for records sealed under 16-803.01, to any person or entity in its place. (C) Paragraph (5) is amended to read as follows: (5) To the movant or the authorized representative of the movant, upon request, but only to the extent that such records would have been available to the movant before relief under 16-803 or 16-803.01 was granted. The movant, or the authorized representative of the movant, shall also be entitled to all certifications filed with the Court pursuant to 16-803(l)(1)(C).. (3) A new subsection (d) is added to read as follows: (d) Except to the extent permitted by this section, all sealed records shall remain sealed.. Sec. 5. Section 401(e) of the District of Columbia Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 1981, effective August 5, 1981 (D.C. Law 4-29; D.C. Official Code 48-904.01(e)), is amended by adding a new paragraph (3) to read as follows: (3) A person who was discharged from probation and whose case was dismissed pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall be entitled to a copy of the nonpublic record retained under paragraph (1) of this subsection but only to the extent that such record would have been available to the person before an order of expungement was entered pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection. A request for a copy of the nonpublic record may be made ex parte and under seal by the person or by Codification District of Columbia Official Code 7 2001 Edition

an authorized representative of the person.. Sec. 6. The Office on Ex-Offender Affairs and Commission on Re-entry and Ex- Offender Affairs Establishment Act of 2006, effective March 8, 2007 (D.C. Law 16-243; D.C. Official Code 24-1301 et seq.), is amended by adding a new section 4a to read as follows: Sec. 4a. Issuance of certificate of good standing. (a) The Mayor is authorized to establish a program for the issuance of a certificate of good standing to any person previously convicted of a crime in the District of Columbia. (b) A certificate of good standing shall include the following: (1) Its date of issuance. (2) The date the individual s last sentence, including parole, probation, or supervised release, was completed. (3) Any outstanding and pending charges against the individual as of the date that the certificate of good standing is issued. (4) Any outstanding and pending writs and holds placed on the individual as of the date that the certificate of good standing is issued. (5) A statement that the information on the certificate of good standing reflects only the records, as of the date of issuance, in the database of the Department of Corrections and all other databases to which the department has access, and that the certificate is only a statement of the individual s status and shall not be construed as a statement of the individual s character. (c) An individual may petition the Mayor for a certificate of good standing at any time after his or her completion of any and all sentences, including parole, probation, or supervised release. (d) The District of Columbia shall not be liable for the actions of an individual to whom a certificate of good standing has been issued. (e) The Mayor, pursuant to Title I of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, approved October 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1204; D.C. Official Code 2-501 et seq.), may issue rules to implement this section.. Sec. 7. Section 1004 of Title 1 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations is amended as follows: (a) Subsection 1004.1 is amended by striking the phrase D.C. Official Code 4-132 (1994 Repl.) and inserting the phrase D.C. Official Code 5-113.02 in its place. (b) Subsection 1004.4 is amended to read as follows: 1004.4 Subject to the provisions of 1004.1-1004.3, adult arrest records, as provided under D.C. Official Code 5-113.02, shall be released in a form which reveals Codification District of Columbia Official Code 8 2001 Edition

only entries relating to offenses which have resulted in convictions or forfeitures of collateral in a court proceeding.. (c) Subsection 1004.5 is amended to read as follows: 1004.5 Subject to the provisions of 1004.1-1004.3, adult arrest records, as provided under D.C. Official Code 5-113.02, shall be released in a form which reveals only entries relating to offenses for which the sentence was completed not more than ten (10) years before the date upon which the records are requested or for which collateral was forfeited in a court proceeding not more than ten (10) years before the date upon which the records are requested.. (d) A new subsection 1004.9 is added to read as follows: 1004.9 Notwithstanding subsections 1004.4 and 1004.5, an individual may request production of his or her arrest record for the purposes of determining eligibility for sealing or expunging that record pursuant to 16-801 et seq. or similar sealing statutes in the District or in another jurisdiction and may request production of his or her arrest record for filing a sealing or expungement motion. For the purposes of this subsection, an arrest record shall contain a listing of all adult arrests, regardless of the disposition of each arrest, and regardless of the date on which the arrest, conviction, or completion of the sentence occurred.. Sec. 8. Fiscal impact statement. The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code 1-206.02(c)(3)). Sec. 9. Effective date. This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 60-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(2) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Codification District of Columbia Official Code 9 2001 Edition

approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code ' 1-206.02(c)(2)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register. Chairman Council of the District of Columbia Mayor District of Columbia Codification District of Columbia Official Code 10 2001 Edition