PET. Professional Employment Test.

Similar documents
Social-Work-Board PACE. NFPA Paralegal Advanced Competency Exam.

Customer will bring an action against Businessman under a negligence theory.

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

MODULE TITLE:Business Law

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S LIMITED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY PARALEGAL PROGRAM SYLLABUS. CEPL Substantive Law: TORTS

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

Research, Writing, and Analysis BRIEFING A CASE

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS O P I N I O N

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *

3. Competition begins at 09:00hrs on Saturday 12 November 2016 and closes at 23:59hrs on Friday 9 December 2016 (the Competition Period ).

Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

JUNE 2012 EXAMINATION DATE: 12 JUNE 2012 DURATION: 2 HOURS PASS MARK: 40% (UU-50)

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Understanding the RM Process

Professor DeWolf Summer 2014 Torts August 18, 2014 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE

CITY OF KELOWNA BYLAW NO REVISED: December 4, 2017 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE TO INCLUDE BYLAWS NO. 9082, 9123, 9315, 10821, & BL11510

Anglo-American Contract and Torts. Prof. Mark P. Gergen. 11. Scope of Liability (Proximate Cause)

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2001 MT 251. ROBERT D. DuBRAY, Plaintiff and Appellant, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE and

Terms and Conditions: Regulatory Examinations

Page 1 of 7. Fall 2015 Business Law Fundamentals O'Hara 2015 E

summer 2019 work placement application form

Swedish Code of Statutes SFS 2010:682 Act Governing the Amendment to the Tobacco Act (1993:581);

ESSAY INTRODUCTION PROFESSOR RICHARD T. SAKAI. Copyright 2018 by BARBRI, Inc.

PACE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. Practice Questions

a) test the strength of the opposing positions and encourage the parties to reach a compromise b) ensure that all documents are in order before trial

Intentional Torts. Intentional Torts, Generally. Legal Analysis Part Two Fall Types of Intentional Torts 10/23/16

Canadian Systems of Law Contract and Tort Law for Professionals There are two systems of law that operate in Canada: Common Law and Civil Law.

Answer A to Question 4

Exam #2 LAWS 3930 Page 1 of 6

Torts: Exam Notes LAW5003 Trimester 1, 2016

Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties.

MOTORIST DROWNS IN RETENTION POND ADJACENT TO HIGHWAY

Part of the requirement for a criminal offence. It is the guilty act.

EXAM NO. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW FINAL EXAMINATION

Fall 1995 December 15, 1995 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

How to Write a Brief Thursday, March 7 pm ET Presenter Sherry Olsen Kaplan University Writing Center Please click here to view this recorded

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Torts Syllabus Summer AJD Class. Course text: Dominick Vetri, Lawrence Levine, Joan Vogel & Ibrahim Gassama, Tort Law and Practice, 5th ed.

Negligence: Elements

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

Employers of Notaries Must Train and Supervise or Face Direct Liability for Failure to Prevent Harm to Third Parties

Fall 1994 December 12, 1994 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

STATE OF TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW

ANSWER A TO ESSAY QUESTION 5

Torts Tutorial Chapter 6 Joint Tortfeasors

CED: An Overview of the Law

Civil Jury Instructions Update

LAWS1100 Final Exam Notes

NEGLIGENCE. Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) s43 Negligence means failure to exercise reasonable care.

CIVIL LITIGATION PROCESS

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge

OCTOBER 2012 LAW REVIEW OBVIOUS TREE HAZARD ON PARK SLEDDING HILL

Fall 1997 December 20, 1997 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

2014 PA Super 128. Appellee No. 192 MDA 2013

Gerald Tucker et ux. v. Charles Shoemake d/b/a Rio Vista Plaza, No. 120, September Term, 1998.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC FOURTH DCA CASE NO.: 4D L.T. No.: (27)

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D02-691

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE. Plaintiff v. Defendant TRIAL BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 18, 2009 Session

Basic Information on Professor Eaton s Torts Class (Section Y) Fall 2017

The Animal Welfare Act

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

SUMMER 2002 July 15, 2002 MIDTERM EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER

ON THE LAST PAGE, PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE YOUR FULL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AND BOTH YOUR RACE AND YOUR ETHNICITY.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

A. COURSE DESCRIPTION

Particular Crimes can be grouped under 3 headings: Crimes against people Crimes against property Crimes against business interests

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

SPRING 2009 May 7, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE

UPDATE MEMORANDUM 2016 ISBA High School Mock Trial Invitational

Does a hospital owe a duty of care when discharging a mentally ill patient?

MBE WORKSHOP: TORTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES

Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN March 3, 2000 MATT MARY MORAN, INC., ET AL.

BACKGROUND CHECK FORM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

CASE 0:13-cv JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) Civil Action

IMPORTANT NOTICE FAIRBRIDGE FARM SCHOOL CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT

Answer A to Question 1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/18/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/18/2015

Restatement (Second) of Torts 496A (1965) Assumption of Risk

FALL 2001 December 15, 2001 FALL SEMESTER SAMPLE ANSWER

California Bar Examination

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Private Law: Torts. Louisiana Law Review. William E. Crawford Louisiana State University Law Center

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Business Law PRECISION EXAMS

Case study OLA Why was his claim under OLA 1957 rejected? 2. What was the alternative claim? 3. What did the first court decide?

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 3, 2001 Session

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Defence and Counterclaim Training. By Andrew Mckie Barrister Clerksroom.

Transcription:

HR PET Professional Employment Test https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/pet

Question: 35 Select the answer choice that correctly provides the missing premise:.darlene is an automobile driver who breached the duty of care.darlene was negligent. A. All automobile drivers who breach the duty of care owed to others are negligent. B. All automobile drivers breach the duty of care to others. C. All automobile drivers owe a duty of care to others. D. All automobile drivers named Darlene are negligent. Answer: A All automobile drivers who breach the duty of care owed to others are negligent. To draw the conclusion that Darlene was negligent, the major premise must establish a connection between automobile drivers who breach the duty of care and negligence. Only answer A makes that connection by establishing that all automobile drivers are negligent if they breach the duty of care owed to others. Since Darlene is within the class of drivers who breached the duty of care (the minor premise), the conclusion can be reached. Answer B and Answer C are both incorrect because they do not establish a connection to negligence. Answer D is incorrect because the minor premise would not be necessary for the conclusion. Question: 36 Select the answer choice that correctly completes the following: All negligent drivers can be liable if the driver s negligence caused the plaintiff s injury.darlene s negligence caused Plaintiff Paul s injury. A. Darlene caused Plaintiff Paul s injury. B. Darlene was negligent. C. Darlene can be liable for Plaintiff Paul s injury. D. Darlene has no defense to Plaintiff Paul s negligence suit.

Answer: C Darlene can be liable for Plaintiff Paul s injury. The major premise establishes that any driver who was negligent (that is, who had a duty and breached that duty) can be held liable if that negligence was the cause of the plaintiff s injury. Since the minor premise states that Darlene s negligence was within the category of negligence that caused Paul s injury, Darlene can be liable. Answer A is incorrect because it does not state that Darlene can be liable. Answer B is incorrect because the issue is causation and (potential) liability, not negligence. Answer C is not correct because the issue is causation and (potential) liability, not Darlene s defenses. Question: 37 Select the answer choice that correctly completes the following: All negligent drivers who caused a plaintiff s injury are liable if the plaintiff suffered actual damages.plaintiff Paul suffered actual damages from Darlene s negligent driving that caused his injury. A. Darlene caused Plaintiff Paul s injury. B. Plaintiff Paul suffered actual damages. C. Darlene is liable for negligent driving. D. Darlene is liable for Plaintiff Paul s actual damages. Answer: D Darlene is liable for Plaintiff Paul s actual damages. Here, the major premise establishes the liability of (1) negligent drivers (requiring duty and breach of duty), (2) who cause a plaintiff s injury, (3) if the plaintiff suffered actual damages. The minor premise states (1) that Darlene was a negligent driver ( Darlene s negligent driving ), (2) that the negligent driving cause Plaintiff Paul s injury ( that caused his injury ), and (3) that Plaintiff Paul suffered actual damages. Since Darlene is within the class of negligent drivers who cause a plaintiff s injury, with the plaintiff also suffering actual damages, Darlene is liable. Answers A and B are incorrect because they merely restated facts from the minor premise. Answer C is incorrect because it is incomplete - it does not state Darlene is liable for actual damages.

Question: 38 At a press conference, a reporter asked a candidate for mayor, Did you sleep with Annie Actress? The candidate responded, Definitely not. Another reporter asked, Is that false? The candidate responded, Yes. Select the answer choice that correctly describes the candidate s responses: A. The candidate slept with Annie Actress between the first and second question. B. If the candidate s second answer is true, his first answer is true. C. If the candidate s first answer is false, his second answer is true. D. If the candidate s first answer is false, his second answer is false. Answer: C If the candidate s first answer is false, his second answer is true. If the candidate did sleep with Annie Actress, and the candidate falsely answered that he did not do so, then his second answer is true. Answer A is not correct because it adds facts that are not a part of the question. Answer B is incorrect because George s responses cannot both be true. Answer D is incorrect because George s responses cannot both be false. Question: 39 Select the answer choice that correctly completes the following: Some human beings are mortal.plato is a human being. A. Plato may need a will. B. Plato may be mortal. C. Some mortals are human beings. D. Some human beings are Plato. Answer: B Plato may be mortal. The first sentence is a major premise and establishes a general principle taken as true-that some human beings are mortal. The second sentence is a minor premise and establishes that a specific person is a human being. In reaching a conclusion, however, the test-taker must recognize that the major premise is not an absolute. Answer B properly connects the major and minor premises by concluding that Plato (a human being) comes within the

principle established in the major premise and that conclusion is limited by the same limitation of the major premise. Question: 40 Select the answer choice that correctly completes the following: All human beings are mortal.george is an extraterrestrial. A. All human beings are extraterrestrials. B. George is not mortal. C. George is not a human being. D. None of the above. Answer: D None of the above. No conclusion can be reached because George does not fall within the general principle of the major premise. Answer A is not correct because the major premise does not establish a connection between human beings and extraterrestrials. Answer B is not correct because the major premise does not establish anything about whether extraterrestrials are mortal-so it is possible they could be either mortal or immortal. Answer C is not correct because it repeats the minor premise in different words and does not draw a conclusion based on the major premise.

For More exams visit https://killexams.com Kill your exam at First Attempt...Guaranteed!