FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

Similar documents
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/10/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/10/2017

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

EXHIBIT B IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. In re Sanchez Energy Derivative Litigation C.A. No VCG SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:06-cv WMN Document 270 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/22/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/22/2017

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:09-cv GAG-BJM Document Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Plaintiffs, NOTICE TO CURRENT ARCA STOCKHOLDERS

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 825 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:11-md SAS Document 75 Filed 02/06/14 Pagel of 20 Case 1:11-cv SAS Document Filed 02/04/14 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

E-FILED: Jan 24, :25 PM, Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, Case #1-09-CV Filing #G-60221

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2016

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

HOROWITZ LAW GROUP PLLC

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2016

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 201 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/01/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2015

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Transcription:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/2016 05:32 PM INDEX NO. 162407/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION SPENCER SAVAGE and YOUSEF BARAKAT, Derivatively on Behalf of ibio, INC., Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT B. KAY, ARTHUR Y. ELLIOTT, JAMES T. HILL, GLENN CHANG, PHILIP K. RUSSELL, JOHN D. MCKEY, and SEYMOUR FLUG, Defendants, and, ibio, INC., Nominal Defendant. Index No: 162407/2015 [PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE WHEREAS, a consolidated shareholder derivative action is pending before this Court styled Spencer Savage, et al., v. Robert B. Kay, et al., Index No. 162407/2015 (the Litigation ; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, on behalf of all Settling Parties, have made an application for an order: (i preliminarily approving the proposed settlement (the "Settlement" of the Litigation in accordance with the Stipulation of Settlement dated September 20, 2016 (the "Stipulation", which, together with the Exhibits annexed thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement of the Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein, (ii approving for distribution of the Notice of Pendency of Proposed Settlement of Shareholder Derivative Action (the "Notice", and (iii setting a date for the Settlement Hearing (defined below;

WHEREAS, the Court has read and considered the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto; and WHEREAS, unless otherwise noted, all capitalized and defined terms herein have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Settlement appears to be the product of serious, informed, arms-length negotiations, to have no obvious deficiencies, to provide substantial value to the Company, and to fall within the range of possible approval and, therefore, merits further consideration. 2. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below. 3. A hearing (the "Settlement Hearing" shall be held before this Court on, 2016, at :00.m., at the Supreme Court, New York County, 60 Centre Street, Room, New York, New York 10007, to determine whether the proposed Settlement of the Litigation on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate to ibio and should be approved by the Court, and to determine whether the Final Order and Judgment as provided in Exhibit C to the Stipulation (the Judgment should be entered. The Court will also determine whether the Fee and Expense Amount (including the Plaintiff Case Contribution Award provided by the Stipulation should be awarded to Plaintiffs' Counsel and the Plaintiffs; except that disallowance by the Court of any fees or expenses or interest that has accrued thereon requested by or awarded to Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs Counsel (including without limitation the Fee and Expense Award and the Plaintiff Case Contribution Award, any appeal from or any order relating thereto, and any modification or reversal on appeal of any such order, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation or affect its other terms, including the Released Claims or the Effective Date, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment approving the Stipulation.. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to current ibio shareholders.

4. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice annexed as Exhibit B to the Stipulation and finds that the distribution of the Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order meets the requirements of due process and applicable law, is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto. All reasonable expenses incurred in providing the Notice set forth herein shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. 5. Within ten (10 calendar days after the entry of this Notice Order, ibio shall (i mail by first class postage pre-paid mail a notice, in the form attached as Exhibit B to the Stipulation (the Notice to all ibio shareholders at the last known addresses appearing in the stock transfer records maintained by or on behalf of ibio; (ii post copies of the Notice, the Stipulation, and the Notice Order on the Company website at least through the date of the Settlement Hearing; and (iii issue a press release, via a national newswire service, such as Business Wire, PR Newswire or Investor s Business Daily, announcing the Settlement and directing persons to the Notice and related papers posted on ibio s website. ibio s Counsel shall file with the Court an appropriate affidavit or declaration documenting that ibio has satisfied the requirements of this paragraph as soon as practicable after ibio has done so. 6. Within ten (10 calendar days after entry of this Notice Order, Plaintiffs Counsel shall post copies of the Notice, the Stipulation, and the Notice Order on its website at least through the date of the Settlement Hearing. Plaintiffs Counsel shall file with the Court an appropriate affidavit or declaration documenting that it has satisfied the requirements of this paragraph as soon as practicable after it has done so. 7. All ibio shareholders shall be subject to and bound by the provisions of the Stipulation, the releases contained therein, and by all orders, determinations and judgments, including the Judgment, entered in the Litigation concerning the Settlement.

8. Any ibio shareholder may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at their own expense, individually or through counsel of their own choice. If they do not enter an appearance, they will be represented by Plaintiffs' Counsel. 9. Any ibio shareholder who wishes to object to the Settlement and/or show cause why it should not be approved, why the Judgment should or should not be entered thereon, or why the Fee and Expense Amount should not be awarded, shall state all reasons for the objection and shall also: (a state the case name and number, Spencer Savage, et al., v. Robert B. Kay, et al., Index No. 162407/2015; (b provide proof of current ownership of ibio stock as well as documentary evidence of when such stock ownership was acquired; (c clearly identify any and all evidence that the objector may present at the Settlement Hearing in connection with his, her, or its objection(s; (d identify any case, by name, court, and docket number, in which the objector or his, her, or its attorney, if any, has objected to a settlement in the last three years; and (e include a proof of service signed under penalty of perjury. 10. All objections and accompanying materials shall be filed and served at least fourteen (14 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing as follows: (a personally filed with the Clerk of the Court, 60 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007, and (b served by first class U.S. Mail and/ or through the Court's electronic filing system on counsel for the Settling Parties. Any ibio shareholder wishing to be heard at the Settlement Hearing is required to include a notice of intention to appear at the Settlement Hearing together with his, her, or its written objection. Only shareholders who have filed with the Court and served on the Settling Parties' counsel valid and timely written notices of objection and accompanying materials will be entitled to be heard at the hearing, unless the Court orders otherwise. 11. Any ibio shareholder who does not make his, her, or its objection in the manner provided in this Order shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed

from making any objection to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the proposed Settlement and to the Fee and Expense Amount as set forth in the Stipulation. 12. All papers in support of the Settlement and the Settling Parties' responses to any objections by ibio shareholders, if any, shall be filed with the Court and served at least seven (7 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 13. The Court retains jurisdiction over all proceedings arising out of or relating to the Stipulation and/or the Settlement. 14. If any of the conditions specified in Paragraph 6.1 of the Stipulation are not met, then the Stipulation shall be canceled and terminated subject to Paragraph 6.3 of the Stipulation, unless counsel for the Settling Parties mutually agree in writing to proceed with the Stipulation. 15. Without further order of the Court, the Settling Parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of this Order or the Stipulation. 16. Pending final determination as to whether the Settlement as set forth in the Stipulation should be approved, no ibio shareholder (either directly, derivatively, or in any other capacity shall commence, prosecute, pursue, or litigate any Released Claim against any Released Persons in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: The Honorable O. Peter Sherwood

APPROVED FOR ENTRY: GAINEY, McKENNA & EGLESTON Thomas J. McKenna Gregory M. Egleston 440 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Telephone: (212 983-1300 Email: tjmckenna@gme-law.com Email: gegleston@gme-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP Antonio Yanez, Jr. Matthew W. Edwards 787 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019-6099 Tel: (212 728-8000 Email: ayanez@willkie.com Email: medwards@willkie.com Attorneys for Defendant Robert B. Kay and Nominal Defendant ibio, Inc. AGUILAR BENTLEY LLC Lisa D. Bentley Anna Aguilar 5 Penn Plaza, 19th Floor New York, New York 10001 Tel: (212 835-1521 Email: lbentley@aguilarbentley.com Email: aaguilar@aguilarbentley.com Attorneys for Defendants Arthur Y. Elliott, James T. Hill, Glenn Chang, Philip K. Russell, John D. McKey, and Seymour Flug