IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Case: 4:18-cv JG Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/09/18 1 of 8. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

DEADLINE.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA COMPLAINT

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 8:19-cv SCB-JSS Document 2 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

Case 8:19-cv SDM-AAS Document 1 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 4:17-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/23/17 1 of 9. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 4:14-cv AGF Doc. #: 49 Filed: 04/03/15 Page: 1 of 49 PageID #: 637

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

0:17-cv JMC Date Filed 08/08/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/14/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 3:12-cv L-BH Document 43 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 611

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. Defendants.

Case: 1:18-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 3:09-cv MRK Document 1 Filed 08/06/09 Page 1 of 19. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURF 11J: F: f) FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CASE

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

approximately 1,100other similarly situated employees at its facilities in the Freemont,

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 2:10-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

Case: 5:16-cv JRA Doc #: 8 Filed: 11/30/16 1 of 8. PageID #: 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv SO Doc #: 50 Filed: 07/15/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 438 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 1:16-cv WTL-DLP Document 44 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 615

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

2:15-cv LJM-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/14/17 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 05/17/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:18-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/19/18 1 of 21. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

FILED 2018 Nov-30 PM 04:36 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14

Case: 1:18-cv CAB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/18/18 1 of 20. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

case 4:12-cv RLM-APR document 10 filed 02/27/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15

corporation with its principal place of business in Redford, Michigan. Attorney for Plaintiff Northwestern Hwy, Suite 200 Plaintiff, Case No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) )

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge COMPLAINT

Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Case 3:16-cv GMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:13-cv B Document 1 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

Transcription:

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 1 of 8. PageID #: 1 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, GENERAL MOTORS LLC, Defendant. COMPLAINT NATURE OF CASE 1. This is an action brought under 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act ( LMRA ) 29 U.S.C. 185, for breach of a labor contract to which the Plaintiff, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (the UAW ) and the Defendant, General Motors LLC (the Company ) are parties. The UAW brings this 301 action to remedy the Company s failure to honor its obligation to utilize Appendix A of the National Collective Bargaining Agreement, entitled Memorandum of Understanding

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 2 of 8. PageID #: 2 Employee Placement, to staff the Fort Wayne Assembly Plant. There are approximately 1,000 employees with contractual seniority rights ( seniority employees ) currently on layoff nationwide who have Appendix A rights, including 690 seniority employees laid off at Lordstown Assembly, many of whom have applied to transfer to openings at Fort Wayne Assembly. The Company, however, is circumventing the parties agreement on employee placement by employing temporary employees at Fort Wayne Assembly rather than transferring laid-off seniority employees under the provisions of Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this lawsuit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 185 and 28 U.S.C. 1331. 3. Venue lies in this District pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 185 and 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). PARTIES 4. Plaintiff is a labor organization representing employees of an employer in an industry affecting commerce under 29 U.S.C. 185. 2

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 3 of 8. PageID #: 3 5. The offices of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America are at 8000 East Jefferson Ave., Detroit, MI 48214. 6. The Defendant Company is a Delaware Corporation that employs various individuals represented by Plaintiff for the purpose of collective bargaining. 7. The Company is an employer in an industry affecting commerce under 29 U.S.C. 185. 8. The Company s principal offices are located at 300 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48265, and it also has extensive operations within this District. The Company owns and operates the Lordstown Assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio, Trumbull County. FACTS 9. The UAW and the Company are parties to a National Collective Bargaining Agreement (the Agreement ). 10. The duration of the Agreement between the UAW and the Company is from October 25, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. (eastern time), September 14, 2019. A true and correct copy of the Agreement is attached as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference. 3

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 4 of 8. PageID #: 4 11. The Agreement states in Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement: It is recognized that the hiring of new employees in one location while there is a surplus of seniority employees in other locations is not in the best interest of the parties. Therefore, the parties will provide eligible seniority laidoff and active seniority employees an opportunity to relocate to UAW-GM facilities outside of their area, with particular emphasis on placing employees from closed or idled facilities. Agreement, Appendix A, p. 169. 12. The Agreement also states in Appendix A: Temporary Employees can be utilized, with approval of the National Parties, as vacation replacements and on other occasions such as, but not limited to, product launch, hunting season, and awaiting transfer of laid off employees from other locations. See Agreement, Appendix A, Attachment B Workforce Composition, Section C, p. 189. 13. On May 31, 2018, the UAW approved the Company s request to employ temporary employees (the temporary group ) at Fort Wayne Assembly through August 31, 2018 to support the launch of a new pickup truck. 14. The Company asked the UAW to agree to extend the employment of the temporary group until February 28, 2019. The UAW rejected this request 4

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 5 of 8. PageID #: 5 and, instead, conditionally agreed to extend the temporary group through December 31, 2018 provided that the Company presented a plan to eliminate the temporary group by that date and transfer seniority employees to Fort Wayne Assembly under the provisions of Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement. 15. On or around October 31, 2018, the Company presented a plan to the UAW which did not eliminate the temporary group until May 2019. In response, at the same meeting, the UAW informed the Company that it would only approve the employment of the temporary group through November 30, 2018. 16. By allowing the use of the temporary group through November 30, 2018, the UAW afforded the Company adequate time to transfer seniority employees to Fort Wayne Assembly in accordance with Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement. 17. On multiple occasions including, but not limited to, November 13, 2018 and by letter dated November 30, 2018, the UAW reiterated that the Company did not have the UAW s approval to employ the temporary group past November 30, 2018. Nevertheless, the Company continues to employ the temporary group instead of transferring seniority employees to Fort Wayne 5

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 6 of 8. PageID #: 6 Assembly in accordance with Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement. 18. There are approximately 1,000 seniority employees on layoff nationwide who have Appendix A rights, including 690 employees laid off at Lordstown Assembly many of whom have applied to transfer to openings at Fort Wayne Assembly. CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Breach of Contract, Under 29 U.S.C. 185) 19. The allegations in Paragraphs 1 through 18 above are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference. 20. The Agreement between the UAW and the Company including Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement is a contract [] between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of LMRA 301, 29 U.S.C. 185. 21. The Company violated the Agreement by extending the employment of the temporary group past November 30, 2018 without approval of the UAW. 22. The Company violated the Agreement by employing the temporary group instead of transferring seniority employees to Fort Wayne Assembly in 6

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 7 of 8. PageID #: 7 accordance with Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employment Placement. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the UAW respectfully requests that this Court: A. Find and declare that the Company is in breach of its contractual obligations under the Agreement by extending the employment of the temporary group past November 30, 2018 without approval of the UAW. B. Order the Company to cease using the temporary group, transfer seniority employees to Fort Wayne Assembly in accordance with Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding Employee Placement and make affected seniority employees whole for all losses resulting from the Company s breach of contract, including, but not limited to, back wages, benefits, relocation allowances and seniority credit. C. Order such other and further relief as this Court may deem appropriate. 7

Case: 4:19-cv-00013 Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/02/19 8 of 8. PageID #: 8 Date: January 2, 2019 Respectfully submitted, /s/ JOYCE GOLDSTEIN Joyce Goldstein (OH #0029467) jgoldstein@ggcounsel.com Richard L. Stoper, Jr. (OH #0015208) rstoper@ggcounsel.com GOLDSTEIN GRAGEL LLC 1111 Superior Avenue East, Suite 620 Cleveland, OH 44114 (216) 771-6633 /s/ NIRAJ GANATRA Niraj Ganatra (P63150) nganatra@uaw.net Jeffrey D. Sodko (P65076) jsodko@uaw.net William J. Karges (P57360) wkarges@uaw.net UAW LEGAL DEPARTMENT 8000 East Jefferson Avenue Detroit, MI 48214 (313) 926-5216 Counsel for Plaintiff UAW opeiu494afl-cio 8