Basic Legal Questions for Pre-Exam and Paper D

Similar documents
Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010

Part II. Time limit for completing the International search. Application not searched

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

JETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:

Update on the patentability of inventions concerning plants and animals under the EPC SUMMARY

Candidate's Answer - DI

Foundation Certificate

RECENT CASE LAW OF THE EPO REGARDING SOFTWARE/BUSINESS METHOD- RELATED INVENTIONS

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art

DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data

The EPO approach to Computer Implemented Inventions (CII) Yannis Skulikaris Director Operations, Information and Communications Technology

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

Part IV. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase. Fees - general remarks

News and analysis on IP law, regulation and policy from around the world. For the latest updates, visit

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

ASEAN PATENT EXAMINATION CO-OPERATION (ASPEC) DOCUMENT SUBMISSION GUIDELINE

PATENT ACTIVITY AT THE IP5 OFFICES

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

How to get a European patent. Guide for applicants

epi-ceipi Basic Training in European Patent Law

Part VIII International Patent Application

Functions of the receiving Office

D-Book. Leseprobe. How to answer legal questions, draft legal opinions and pass Paper D of the European Qualifying Examination. written and edited by

PATENT ACTIVITY AT THE IP5 OFFICES

Overview of Trial for Invalidation and Opposition Systems in Japan. March 2017 Trial and Appeal Department Japan Patent Office

The European patent system

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as:

The effects of the EPC

CEIPI Basic Training in European Patent Law Program for 1st Year 2010/2011 Subject to changes

European qualifying examination. Guide for preparation l 2nd edition

PATENT ACTIVITY AT THE IP5 OFFICES

SEEKING THE GOLD (STANDARD) Amendments before EPO. Marco Lissandrini European Patent Attorney

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2015 EDITION

C.PCT August 6, Madam, Sir, Proposed new and modifications of certain Forms of the International Bureau

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Guidelines for Examination Part E - Guidelines on General Procedural Matters Amended in December, 2007

Inventive Step in Korea

Your Guide to Patents

Note concerning the Patentability of Computer-Related Inventions

Inventive Step in Japan Masashi Moriwaki

Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

Recent developments at the European Patent Office

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority. Camille-Rémy Bogliolo Head, Department of PCT Affairs

Unity of inventions at the EPO - Amendments to rule 29 EPC

Criteria for Patentability

IP Report Patent Law. The right of priorities: Recent developments in EPO case law Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher

ROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014

EPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 30 October 1991 Case number J 0042/

Part IV. IV.7. Republication of the international application in an EPO official language. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase

11th Annual Patent Law Institute

How patents work An introduction for law students

Examination Matters 2017 Webinars

Real-file examples from the international phase at the EPO

European Patent Opposition Proceedings

should disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. as in force from July 1, 2017

Speed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products

Recent developments at the European Patent Office

TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER 1: THIS GUIDE AND ITS ANNEXES Introduction CHAPTER 2: WHAT IS THE PCT?

Guidelines2day Roadshow for professional representatives. Programme. European Patent Academy. supported by

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

EPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 24 March 1986 Case number J 0020/

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

IPDAS Forms Library: A Complete List

FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality

SINGAPORE IP LEGISLATION UPDATE

Practical Advice For International Patenting

Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Benefits and Dangers of U.S. Provisional Applications

Chapter 1900 Protest Protest Under 37 CFR [R ] How Protest Is Submitted

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2016 EDITION

Patent protection in Latin America: Main provisions and recommended strategy

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

Outline of the Patent Examination

PRACTICE TIPS FOR PATENT PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO

Drafting, Filing and Processing of PCT Applications

Patent Prosecution in Multiple Countries. Alessandro Steinfl U.S. and EP Patent Attorney

Summary and Conclusions

IPPT , TBA-EPO, AgrEvo. Technical Board of Appeal EPO, 12 september 1995, AgrEvo [T 939/92]

PCT developments. U.S. Bar-EPO Partnership for Quality meeting

IP Part IV: Patent prosecution

Patenting Software-related Inventions according to the European Patent Convention

COMMENTARY. Antidote to Toxic Divisionals European Patent Office Rules on Partial Priorities. Summary of the Enlarged Board of Appeal s Decision

Overview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness. Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law

Contents. I. Introduction 1. II. Filing of European patent applications 1. III. Documents which may be filed with the competent national authorities 2

Understanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office

Art. 123(2) EPC ADDED MATTER A US Perspective. by Enrica Bruno Patent Attorney. Steinfl & Bruno LLP Intellectual Property Law

Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017

The programme commenced on 15 Jun 2009 and was revised on 15 Apr It will continue to be reviewed regularly.

Examination of CII and Business Methods Applications

Ref. No POD/Application No/ 1523/DEL/2012 Date of Dispatch/ 04/05/2017

IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System

Transcription:

TRAINING FOR THE EUROPEAN QUALIFYING EXAMINATION L Basic Legal Questions for Pre-Exam and Paper D Update to edition August 2013 (EQE 2014) (Updated until 19 December 2013)

EIPEF Contents Introduction and acknowledgement... 1 Announcement... 1 1. General remarks... 3 1.1. Change of required marks for passing Pre-Exam... 3 1.2. Tutor s report EQE 2014... 4 1.3. Latest information... 4 2. Update of Study Guide... 5 Training Material and Sources - Guidelines (EPC)... 5 Training Material and Sources Case Law... 6 Training Material and Sources EQE... 6 3. Calendars... 8 5. Update of Answers to Basic Legal Questions... 10 Copyright DeltaPatents, 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this Training Material may be reproduced, used in any way for generating further course material or updates, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written consent of DeltaPatents. The Training Material is made available for personal use only. This Training Material may not be used in courses competing with DeltaPatents courses. DeltaPatents does not accept any liability for the correctness or completeness of the Training Material.

1 EIPEF Introduction and acknowledgement This document comprises an update to the Basic legal Questions for Pre-Exam and Paper D book (edition August 2013, EQE 2014): o Publications in OJ EPO after the Book was printed (August 2013); o Publications in PCT Newsletter after the Book was printed; o Amendments to AG-IP after the Book was printed; o A few corrections to the answers. We thank all who provided any comments and all candidates who participated in our legal training courses for useful feedback. Any further comments are highly appreciated. The latest version of this document is available on our website. Roel van Woudenberg, 19 December 2013 Announcement In January 2014, DeltaPatents organizes some further training sessions for candidates preparing for Pre-Exam 2014 and for the Main Exam 2014. Also, our Correction Papers programme for Paper D is still active until late January. Later in 2014, DeltaPatents will organize further training for new candidates preparing for Pre-Exam 2015 as well as courses for candidates who prepare for the Main Exam in 2015 (A, B, C and D papers). Please check our website for course details and further announcements: http://www.deltapatents.com/en/ip_courses/ http://www.deltapatents.com/en/ip_courses/eqe_training/preexam_courses/ http://www.deltapatents.com/en/ip_courses/eqe_training/methodology_and_guided_exam_courses/ http://www.deltapatents.com/en/ip_courses/eqe_training/correction_papers/ For further information and enrolment, please refer to our website: http://www.deltapatents.com/en/ip_courses/eqe_training/ or contact training@deltapatents.com. Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013

2 EIPEF This page intentionally left blank Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013

EIPEF 3 1. General remarks 1.1. Change of required marks for passing Pre-Exam The pass level for the Pre-Exam changed from 50 marks to 70 marks as of Pre-Exam 2014 (Decision Supervisory Board 1 Oct 2013) EQE section on EPO website: December 2013 Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014)

4 EIPEF 1.2. Tutor s report EQE 2014 In autumn each year, the EPA and EPO organize a meeting between the Exam Committees and the tutors. As last year, DeltaPatents took the initiative to prepare a tutor s report about the EQE 2013 and the discussions at the meeting. Tutors from various nationalities, patent attorney firms and training organizations contributed to the tutor s report: Pete Pollard, Harrie Marsman, Derek Jackson, Simon Roberts and Roel van Woudenberg. The tutor s report is/will shortly be published in epi Information and is/will be available online from: http://www.patentepi.com/en/publications/epi-information/ Until it is published in eoi information, it is available from the EQE Forum page: http://www.eqe-online.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10137 1.3. Latest information Check the EQE website during January and February for possible announcements from the Examination Board: http://www.epo.org/learning-events/eqe.html Our latest information for your EQE 2014 preparation will be published on or announced via our blogs: - DeltaPatents Pre-Exam http://pre-exam.blogspot.com/ - DeltaPatents Paper D: http://eqe-d.blogspot.com - DeltaPatents Paper C: http://eqe-c.blogspot.com - DeltaPatents Course Links: http://www.deltapatents.com/en/ip_courses/course_links/ - Salted Patent: http://www.saltedpatent.com Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013

EIPEF 5 2. Update of Study Guide Training Material and Sources - Law +Regulations 1. EPC A new complete edition of How to get a European patent, Guide for applicants - Part 1, 14 th edition, is available online (since 18/12/2013), up-to-date until 1 October 2013, and refers to GL (2013) and recent OJ publications. The paragraph numbering has not substantially changed compared to 13 th edition - its content and the references given in the margin have been updated (until 1/10/2013) and a few new paragraphs have been inserted (8a, 75a, 96a, 201a). Further, the example patent applications in Annex III have been replaced by different ones, except for the chemistry example. The version published in December differs from the version pre-published online in September by updated OJ and PCT NL references and amended text in: Note that the HTG-I guide is not accepted as legal basis in your D-paper if true legal basis cover the topics, e.g., Articles, Rules, OJ-references, a Guidelines-reference, or case law. In the Study Guide and in the Answers, all references to HTG-I (2010) may be replaced by references to HTG-I (2013). 3. London agreement o OJ 2013, 404: AL acceded London Agreement per 1/9/2013 Warning o Amendments to R.36(1) (OJ 2013, 501) and R.164 EPC have been announced and published. However, as these only enter into force per 1 April 2014 and per 1 November 2014, you need to use the current, old versions of these Rules as in force on 31 Decembe 2013 at the EQE 2014. Only at EQE2015, you need to apply the new versions, and, where applicable in view of the transitional provisions, the old versions. o The same applies with respect to various Decisions of the Council and the President and Notices from the EPO having effect as of 1 January 2014, such as e.g. OJ 2013, 416,. o The same also applies with respect to PCT R.66 and R.70, as well as PCT R.44ter and R.94, with effect per 1 July 2014. Training Material and Sources - Guidelines (EPC) A new edition of the Guidelines is in force as from 20 September 2013, and is the only valid version at EQE2014: o Guidelines for Examination in the EPO [September 2013] (GL2013) OJ 2013, 447 The paragraph numbering has not substantially changed compared to June 2012 edition. However, E-II, 11.2.3-11.2.6 are renumbered as E-II, 11.3 11.6, and a new paragraph E-VIII, 2.9 has been included (relating to early entry into the EP regional phase), and the par. E-VIII, 2.9 and 2.10 have been renumbered accordingly. Amendments in the 2013 revision have been made in all eight parts in order to bring the text into line with legal and procedural developments. December 2013 Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014)

6 EIPEF For example, all paragraphs of GL G-II, 2 have been brought in line with G3/08, wherein the abandonment of the contribution approach was confirmed, such that technical character has to be assessed from the claim as a whole (of particular relevance for the application of Art.52(2),(3) EPC); H-VI, 5.1 has been brought in line with G1/10 (application of R.139 and R.140 EPC after grant). Note that the European Patent Office decided to allow for annual revisions in order to keep the Guidelines in line with legal and procedural developments. In the Study Guide and the Answers, all references to GL (2012) may be replaced by references to GL (2013). References to GL (2012) E-II, 11.2.3-11.2.6 have to renumbered as GL (2013) E-II, 11.3 11.6. References to GL (2012) E-VIII, 2.8 may be replaced with a reference to GL (2013) E-VIII, 2.8& 2.9. References to GL (2012) E-VIII, 2.9 and 2.10 have to be replaced by GL (2013) E-VIII, 2.10 and 2.11. Training Material and Sources - Applicant s Guide (PCT) No changes were made to Introduction to the International Phase since the Book was printed. However, several Annexes were updated, especially fee amounts cited therein. Training Material and Sources Case Law The EPO published a new version of the Case Law Book: o Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office [7th edition, Oct 2013 updated until end Dec 2012] The Book had a major revision: many decisions were deleted, others added, and the chapter and paragraph numbering changed considerably. If using the Case law Book 2010 or 2013 edition at EQE2014, it is advised to cite the respective G, J, T, W or R-decision, and not (only) the Case Law Book paragraph. The next edition of the Basic Legal Questions Book will include references to the new edition of the Case Law Book. Training Material and Sources EQE o o Note that the pass level for the Pre-Exam changed from 50 marks to 70 marks as of Pre- Exam 2014 (Decision Supervisory Board 1 Oct 2013) EQE section on EPO website. Notice from the Examination Board dd. 18 July 2013 candidates shall answer the papers solely on the basis of the calendars in the examination papers B4, Law +Regulations: o OJ 2013, 404: AL accedes to London Agreement 1/9/2013 B5, Law +Regulations: o OJ 2013, 500 Decision of the Administrative Council of 16 Octobert 2013 abrogating its 1978 decision relating to the interpretation of the term "association of representatives" (CA/D 9/13) (per 16/10/13) Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013

EIPEF 7 o OJ 2013, 535 Notice from the European Patent Office dated 28 August 2013 on matters concerning representation before the EPO (about associations) C2, Case Law: o OJ 2012, 342 International exhibitions as referred to in Art.55 EPC (Venlo, Yeosu, Milano) o OJ 2013, 270 International exhibitions as referred to in Art.55 EPC (Milano, Astana) C4, Case Law: o Referral G2/13, Broccoli II (by T 83/05) Effect of exclusion of essentially biological processes for the production of plants u. A.53(b) on allowability of product claims directed to plants or plant material such as plant parts C7, Law +Regulations: o PCT NL 11/2011: Brunei Darussalam (BN) acceded Paris Convention; bound per 17 Feb 2012 o PCT NL 07/2013: Samoa (WS) acceded Paris Convention; bound per 21 Sep 2013 H10, Case Law: Reformation in peius: o T 1843/09 (OJ 2013, 508) Exceptions from the prohibition of reformatio in peius Petition for review o R15/11 Allowable petition for review; no opportunity to comment on grounds on which the decision under review was based H12, Law +Regulations: o OJ 2013, 552 List of days in 2013 on which EPO filing offices and national authorities are closed corrigendum (DE office also closed on 27/12/13 and 30/12/13) However, at the EQE, you must use the calendars as provided with the exam paper. L1, Law + Regulations: o OJ 2013, 430 / PCT NL July 2013: Accession by Iran (IR) - in force per 4/10/2013 L3, Law + Regulations: o OJ 2011, 327 Informal clarification by EPO acting as ISA (IAs filed, or no ISR/decl, 1/4/2011) December 2013 Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014)

8 EIPEF 3. Calendars Be reminded not to use the calendars provided in our Q&A books at the actual EQE the Examination Board provides official calendars as part of the paper. Candidates shall answer the papers solely on the basis of the calendars in the examination papers Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013

EIPEF 9 4. Update of Basic Legal Questions NOTES ON THE REFERENCES: Refer to section 2, Update of Study Guide QUESTIONS DEALING WITH LAW CHANGES OF 2013 : Please add: IR accedes to PCT in force per 1 Oct 2013 L1-21 PCT NL July 2013; OJ 2013, 430 New accessions to London Agreement H8-15 and related provisions OJ 2013, 404 (AL) H8-15: Please amend to question to read: List the three most recent states that acceded the London Agreement and the respective dates of entry into force. December 2013 Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014)

10 EIPEF 5. Update of Answers to Basic Legal Questions All references to HTG-I (2010) may be replaced by references to HTG-I (2013), which uses the same paragraph numbering. In the Study Guide and the Answers, all references to GL (2012) may be replaced by references to GL (2013), which uses substantially the same paragraph numbering with the following most important differences: - References to GL (2012) E-II, 11.2.3-11.2.6 have to renumbered as GL (2013) E-II, 11.3 11.6. - References to GL (2012) E-VIII, 2.8 may be replaced by references to GL (2013) E-VIII, 2.8& 2.9. - References to GL (2012) E-VIII, 2.9 / 2.10 have to be replaced by GL (2013) E-VIII, 2.10 / 2.11. Case Law Book references will be updated in the next edition of the Basic legal Questions Book. C1-04: In view of amendments in the new edition GL (2013), please expand first paragraph of answer to: o Claim must be considered as a whole - T931/95 hn.4; GL (2013) G-II, 2 o Invention may not be subject of EP appln if it is non-technical as such - Art.52(2)(b), (3) EPC o Technical character should be assessed without regard to the prior art T1173/97, confirmed by G3/08; also GL (2013) G-II, 2 and add to comments: (a) In T 2258/10 of 04.10.2011 the board found that any apparatus constituting a physical entity or concrete product has technical character. A cooking vessel clearly falls within this definition, and thus per se has technical character. (Case Law Book (2013) I.A.1.4.6). (b) GL (2013) G-II, 3.4: If technical aspects are present in such an aesthetic creation, it is not an aesthetic creation as such and it is not excluded from patentability. C1-07: In view of amendments in the new edition GL (2013), please expand first paragraph of answer to: o Claim must be considered as a whole - T931/95 hn.4; GL (2013) G-II, 2 o Invention may not be subject of EP appln if it is non-technical as such - Art.52(2)(b), (3) EPC o Technical character should be assessed without regard to the prior art T1173/97, confirmed by G3/08; also GL (2013) G-II, 2 and change comment into: GL (2013) G-II, 3.7: A feature relating to a presentation of information defined solely by the content of the information does not have a technical character. This applies whether the feature is claimed as a presentation of the information per se (e.g. by acoustical signals, spoken words, visual displays, books defined by their subject, gramophone records defined by the musical piece recorded, traffic signs defined by the warning thereon) or as relating to processes and apparatus for presenting information (e.g. features of indicators or recorders defined solely by the information indicated or recorded would not be technical features). A feature which relates to the manner in which cognitive content is conveyed to the user on a screen normally does not contribute to a technical solution to a technical problem. An exception would be if the arrangement or manner of presentation can be shown to have a credible technical effect (T 1741/08, T 1143/06). When deciding if a feature relating to the presentation of information is technical or not, what has to be considered is whether or not it contributes to solving a technical problem. Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013

EIPEF 11 C4-02: In view of the new referral G2/13, please add to comments: o Another new referral is pending as G2/13 (by the same board T 83/05 )with the following questions: 1. 1. Can the exclusion of essentially biological processes for the production of plants in Article 53(b) EPC have a negative effect on the allowability of a product claim directed to plants or plant material such as plant parts? 2. In particular: (a) Is a product-by-process claim directed to plants or plant material other than a plant variety allowable if its process features define an essentially biological process for the production of plants? (b) Is a claim directed to plants or plant material other than a plant variety allowable even if the only method available at the filing date for generating the claimed subject-matter is an essentially biological process for the production of plants disclosed in the patent application? 3. Is it of relevance in the context of questions 1 and 2 that the protection conferred by the product claim encompasses the generation of the claimed product by means of an essentially biological process for the production of plants excluded as such under Article 53(b) EPC? H3-14: Please correct the last date of the time limit calculation under a): H8-15: Please add: 10/6/14 + 2m [R.40(3); R.131(4)] 10/8/14 (Sun) [R.134(1)] 11/8/14 (Mon). o Albania acceded per 1/9/2013 OJ 2013, 404 H9-02 & H10-05: Replace reference to OJ 2010, 226 by OJ 2012, 448 in Comments (d)(2) L1-21 Please add: o Iran (IR) in force per 4/10/2013 OJ 2013, 430 / PCT NL 07/2013 L2b-07 Option 2 of answer: Correct references to AG-IP 10.038 and 10.039 into 11.038 and 11.039 L3-18: Please correct the time limit calculation under a) into: 7/5/12 + 19m [R.80.2 ] 7/12/13 (Sat) [R.80.5] 9/12/13 (Mon) L4-02 Please supplement answer to (b) to read: o EP: 31m Art.22(3) PCT (d0)/ Art.39(1)(b) PCT (eo), R.159(1) EPC L4-22 In Comment: Reference to GL (2012) E-VIII, 2.8 may be replaced by references to GL (2013) E-VIII, 2.8& 2.9. December 2013 Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014)

12 EIPEF This page intentionally left blank Basic Legal Questions book - Update to Edition Aug 2013 (EQE2014) December 2013