CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Similar documents
CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Short-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

COUNTY OF ORANGE. PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT PAPER PILOT STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY (Pretrial Supervision Meeting)

Correctional Population Forecasts

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

Jail: Who is in on bail?

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT S.2371, AN ACT RELATIVE TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

Santa Clara County, California Baseline and Alternative Jail Population Projections Report

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Populations Forecasts

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

CSG Jus(ce Center Massachuse2s Criminal Jus(ce Review

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

Sentencing in Colorado

Overcrowding Alternatives

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Work Group to Re-envision the Jail Replacement Project Report Release & Next Steps. Board of Supervisors June 13, 2017

Objectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma. Detailed Analysis. October 17, Council of State Governments Justice Center

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Probation and Parole Violators in State Prison, 1991

NEW ORLEANS PRETRIAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

Identifying Chronic Offenders

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

Criminal History Analysis with Suspects Arrested at Portland State University

Appendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report

Criminal Justice Reform and Reinvestment In Georgia

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PINELLAS COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

AN ANALYSIS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE CASE PROCESSING AND SENTENCING USING NIBRS DATA, ADJUDICATION DATA AND CORRECTIONS DATA

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY WITH NO PERMIT

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Preventing Jail Crowding: A Practical Guide

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2014

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

List of Tables and Appendices

How States Can Achieve More Effective Public Safety Policies

McHenry County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Assault and the Criminal Justice System. Alaska Criminal Justice Commission, presentation to ASHNHA

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY BROWARD COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Detention, Commitment, and Parole Population Projections

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

Arkansas Current Incarceration Crisis

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

Criminal Justice & Public Safety Committee

Criminal Justice Reforms

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

Marijuana: FACT SHEET December 2018

State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT & PRAXIS. Instruction Manual

NEW INCARCERATION FIGURES: THIRTY-THREE CONSECUTIVE YEARS OF GROWTH

Procrastinators Programs SM

Aroostook and Cumberland County Jails Census Report

Reconviction patterns of offenders managed in the community: A 60-months follow-up analysis

Highlights. Federal immigration suspects 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

FOCUS. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Accelerated Release: A Literature Review

Alaska Department of Corrections: Post-conviction Incarcerated Population,

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Commitment and Parole Population Projections

DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY PALM BEACH COUNTY JUNE Office of Research and Data Integrity Florida Department of Juvenile Justice

Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures

Bulletin. Probation and Parole in the United States, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Revised 7/2/08

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23

Time Served in Prison by Federal Offenders,

Justice and Public Safety Subcommittee Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

Pretrial Service Programs in North Carolina

Summit on Effective Responses to Violations of Probation and Parole

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1995 SESSION CHAPTER 545 SENATE BILL 53

Analysis of Senate Bill

PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT 2011/2012

Vermont. Justice Reinvestment State Brief:

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

Evaluation of Broward County Jail Population. Current Trends and Recommended Options

Summit County Pre Trial Services

2014 Kansas Statutes

DRC Parole Population. Correctional Institution Inspection Committee

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

The New Mexico Picture: Who & How Many are Incarcerated?

Enhancing Pretrial Justice in Cuyahoga County: Results From a Jail Population Analysis and Judicial Feedback

REPORT # O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF M INNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION R EPORT. Chronic Offenders

Sample Three Column DCJS Rap Sheet And Key

Background: Focus on Public Safety Outcomes in Sentencing

Special Report October 2, 2018

Transcription:

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW RESEARCH ADDENDUM - Working Group Meeting 3 Interim Report July 12, 2016 The Council of State Governments Justice Center Interim report prepared by: Katie Mosehauer, Project Manager; Steve Allen, Senior Policy Advisor, Behavioral Health; Monica Peters, Research Manager; Cassondra Warney, Policy Analyst

OVERVIEW 1 2 3 4 5 ADDITIONAL RESEARCH: JAIL and DOC DETAINEE RELEASE DECISION MAKING ADDITIONAL RESEARCH: HOC POPULATION ADDITIONAL RESEARCH: DOC POPULATION ADDITIONAL RESEARCH: DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INCARCERATED POPULATIONS ADDITIONAL RESEARCH: CWOF FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS

JAIL and DOC DETAINEE RELEASE DECISION MAKING Research Addendum Slides Data used in this analysis was provided upon request by Hampden, Middlesex, and Essex counties. These counties were selected for a sample of jail data due to the size of their populations as well as their geographic representation. General information on demographics and governing offense types was included as well as admission and release dates, type of admission, status at release, and bail information. DOC also provided information on pretrial detainees including admission and release dates.

Jail data acquired for this analysis is a sample of the total jail population * 60% POPULATION IN COUNTY JAIL OR DOC DETAINEE UNITS Jan 1, 2015 N=5,454 10% DOC Females admitted as a DOC detainee are transferred from counties that do not have a designated capacity for females. Hampden County operates a regional facility that serves females in Hampden County and surrounding areas, mostly Hampshire and Worcester County. Department of Correction Weekly Count Sheets, Jan 1, 2015; CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 Middlesex, Essex and Hampden county jail data and DOC data. Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden Counties 30% DOC DETAINEE POPULATION DATA RECEIVED COUNTY JAIL POPULATION DATA RECEIVED COUNTY JAIL POPULATION DATA NOT ANALYZED The Justice Center requested and received three county data sets and DOC detainee data, representing approximately 40% of the detainee population statewide. Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden Counties were included in the sample due to the size of their populations, geographic representation, and the scope of data these counties collect electronically at their jails. ADMISSIONS TO COUNTY JAIL OR DOC DETAINEE UNITS FY2014 N=18,171 4,968 Middlesex County Jail 4,041 4,050 Essex County Jail 697 3,353 Hampden County Jail 5,112 3,528 1,584 DOC Detainee MALE FEMALE *Over 90% of males admitted as a DOC detainee are 52As people charged with a new offense who have previously served a state prison sentence. Council of State Governments Justice Center 4

Female admissions to jail have increased nearly 40 percent in sampled facilities FEMALE ADMISSIONS TO HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL and DOC DETAINEE UNITS FY2011 FY2015 MALE ADMISSIONS TO HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL and DOC PRETRIAL FY2011 FY2015 5,000 HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL DOC DETAINEE UNITS HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL DOC DETAINEE UNITS 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 3,107 464 3,504 3,561 531 554 4,225 697 4,302 1,577 3,625 3,559 3,327 3,353 3,164 1,624 1,666 1,571 1,584 1,481 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 3,528 2,643 2,973 3,007 2,725 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 The number of male Hampden County jail admissions and DOC detainees declined during the same period. Over 90% of males admitted as a DOC detainee are 52As people charged with a new offense who have previously served a state prison sentence. Females admitted as a DOC detainee are transferred from counties that do not have a designated capacity for females. Hampden County expanded capacity in FY2015 by opening a regional facility accepting females from surrounding jurisdictions, the majority from Hampshire and Worcester counties. CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2011-2015 Hampden County jail data and DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 5

Despite increases in the female pretrial population, female county sentenced admissions have remained stable FEMALE DETAINEE ADMISSIONS TO HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL/DOC AND SENTENCED ADMISSIONS TO HOC/DOC FY2011 FY2015 DETAINEE ADMISSIONS SENTENCED ADMISSIONS 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 3,504 3,561 3,107 1,694 1,604 1,481 4,225 4,302 1,598 1,573 Increases in female jail admissions have not correlated with increases in sentenced admissions for females. 500 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2011-2015 Hampden County jail data, DOC data, and Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data. Sentenced admissions includes county sentences admitted to HOC or DOC and DOC sentences admitted to DOC. Council of State Governments Justice Center 6

Admissions for drug charges had the largest increase of all offense categories for females admitted to Hampden County jail FEMALE ADMISSIONS TO HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL FY2011 FY2014 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 Drug possession made up 1/3 of drug admissions Drug possession made up over 2/3 of admissions for drug charges Drug +94% Property +48% Person/weapon +18% Outstanding warrant +91% Other +56% Public Indecency +0% Motor vehicle +80% The average length of stay for women released from Hampden County jail or DOC pretrial was approximately 27 days.* *27 days for women released from DOC pretrial and 28 days for women released from Hampden County jail. 20 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 Male admissions to Hampden County jail for drug charges increased 11% during the same time period. 2015 was not included due to significant changes in female populations in Hampden County due to expanded capacity. CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2011-2014 Hampden County jail data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 7

In sample counties, admissions to county jails for drug charges increased considerably more than admissions for other charges PERCENT CHANGE IN JAIL ADMISSIONS FY2011 FY2014* Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden County Jails AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY FOR PROPERTY AND DRUG RELEASES FROM COUNTY JAIL FY2014 Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden County Jails Person Weapon Property Drug MV/OUI Other 25% Middlesex County N = 1,667 51 days 2% 10% 5% Essex County N = 1,328 53 days -2% Hampden County N = 1,690 46 days -24% The average length of stay in jail for admissions for property and drug charges was more than 45 days. *2015 was not included due to significant changes in female populations in Hampden and Essex Counties due to expanded capacity. CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2011-2014 Middlesex, Essex and Hampden county jail data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 8

HOC POPULATION Research Addendum Slides Statewide HOC data included in this analysis was obtained from the Parole Board s SPIRIT database and includes information on commitments and commitment closures statewide. This data was combined with parole supervision data, also obtained from the Parole Board, to create a release date as well as a return date for parole violators. Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) data was incorporated in order to categorize the governing offense type as well as identify commitments based on noncriminal behavior. The SPIRIT data should be considered a proxy for HOC populations. The data captured in SPIRIT is not entered or maintained by sheriffs offices. The database primarily functions through the lens of parole and parole eligibility, not as a case management system for HOC facilities. Additional county-level HOC data in this analysis was provided upon request from Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden counties.

Statewide, HOCs had approximately three times the number of admissions as DOC each year ADMISSIONS TO HOC AND DOC* FY2011 FY2015 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 11,914 ADMISSIONS FOR STATE PRISON SENTENCES 11,368 ADMISSIONS FOR COUNTY SENTENCES 10,369 10,304 9,870 Admissions mirror the differences in volume of court activity between district and superior court. 4000 3,858 3,403 2,999 3,220 2,901 2000 FACILITY 0 HOC DOC HOC DOC HOC DOC HOC DOC HOC DOC FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 *Admissions to both DOC and HOC include new court commitments, parole and probation revocations CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2011-2015 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data and DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 10

Between 7 and 15 percent of HOC admissions in sample counties were serving a sentence of less than 60 days ADMISSIONS TO HOC BY SENTENCE LENGTH FY2014 Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden County HOCs MIDDLESEX COUNTY N = 1,348 ESSEX COUNTY N = 1,963 HAMPDEN COUNTY N = 1,946 Parole Violation Holds > 1 year 20% 5% Less than 60 days 7% Parole Violation Holds > 1 year 15% 4% Less than 60 days 15% Parole Violation Holds > 1 year 21% 3% Less than 60 days 14% Less than 6 months to 1 year 28% 60 days to 6 months 40% Less than 6 months to 1 year 25% 60 days to 6 months 41% Less than 6 months to 1 year 19% 60 days to 6 months 43% The average length of stay in jail for individuals who are sentenced and transferred to HOC is longer in Middlesex County compared to Essex or Hampden, by 26% and 88% respectively. This could be resulting in more sentences deemed time served and thus fewer short sentences admitted to HOC. CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 Middlesex, Essex and Hampden county HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 11

In sample counties, weapon offenses had the longest lengths of stay at HOCs AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY (LOS) BY OFFENSE TYPE FY2015 Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden County HOCs 12.0 HAMPDEN COUNTY N = 1,967 ESSEX COUNTY N = 2,231 MIDDLESEX COUNTY N = 1,364 10.0 8.0 Approximately 90% of weapon offenses were firearm related. The remainder were for carrying a dangerous weapon. 9.2 10.3 8.5 6.0 4.0 5.3 4.7 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.9 3.3 4.7 4.1 6.2 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.1 4.3 5.3 5.3 6.0 4.5 4.4 5.7 2.0 0.0 Other Abuse Prev MV/OUI Drug Property Weapon Person Overall Average County HOC and Parole SPIRIT HOC data did not identify which sentences were mandatory minimums sentences, thus this analysis was not able to include this breakdown. CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2015 Middlesex, Essex and Hampden county HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 12

Felony property offenses account for the largest subset of the HOC population ESTIMATED HOC POPULATION June 30, 2014 Statewide Population Snapshot N = 4,800* 1,600 1,400 2,317 1,438 MISDEMEANOR FELONY 1,200 1,000 800 831 879 Arson, B&E, Larceny from a Person All other property 64% 36% 600 400 200 0 153 Violent sex offense Felony persons Felony property 444 Felony drug 664 Misd persons 420 184 212 201 190 Misd weapons Misd property Misd drug 610 Misd MV OUI Non-OUI 253 Other Over 1/3 of the HOC population have a misdemeanor as their most serious committing offense *6% of HOC records could not be matched to obtain information on offense - Total N = 5,099 CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 13

Approximately 40% of HOC populations in sample counties were incarcerated for property or motor vehicle (MV) offenses HOC POPULATION SNAPSHOT June 30, 2014 Middlesex, Essex, and Hampden County HOCs MIDDLESEX COUNTY N = 609 ESSEX COUNTY N = 786 HAMPDEN COUNTY N = 661 Abuse Prevention Order 4% MV/OUI 13% Other 6% Weapon 5% Person 29% Abuse Prevention Order 5% MV/OUI 15% Other 8% Weapon 5% Person 27% Abuse Prevention Order 3% MV/OUI 10% Other 12% Weapon 6% Person 24% Drug 14% Property 29% Drug 15% Property 25% Drug 20% Property 25% CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 Middlesex, Essex and Hampden county HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 14

Nearly one-quarter of the HOC population are between the ages of 18 and 24 PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION AND HOC POPULATION BY AGE, 2014 Resident Population 42% HOC population 36% PERCENT OF HOC POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 23% 21% 20% 90% 10% Male 10% 13% 13% Female 18-24 25-34 35-44 45 and older PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION AND HOC POPULATION BY RACE, 2014 75% Resident Population HOC Population 56% PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 48% Male 19% 19% 52% Female 6% 10% 9% 6% White Black Hispanic Other CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data; U.S. Census 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Council of State Governments Justice Center 15

A larger portion of younger individuals are committed to HOCs on a weapon offense, and a smaller portion are committed on a motor vehicle offense compared to other age groups ESTIMATED HOC POPULATION June 30, 2014 Statewide Population Snapshot N = 4,800* ESTIMATED HOC POPULATION June 30, 2014 Statewide Population Snapshot N = 5,099 18 24 year olds N = 1,128 Drug 15% Property 34% MV 3% Person 33% Weapon 11% VIOLENT SEX OFFENSE PERSONS 18-24 25-34 Committed on a Violation (no new offense at commitment) 23% 25% WEAPONS All other ages N = 3,971 Drug 13% MV 12% Person 31% PROPERTY DRUG MV OTHER 35-44 45+ 20% 23% Property 35% Weapon 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% *6% of HOC records could not be matched to obtain information on offense CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 16

DOC POPULATION Research Addendum Slides Data for this analysis was extracted by DOC research staff to include sentence and offense information, admission and release types, length of stay, and supervision status for criminally sentenced admissions, releases, and snapshot populations. Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) was also used for a reconviction analysis. CORI data was obtained from EOPSS using a batch file-matching process using individuals unique state identifier PCF number.

The DOC population has been declining for several years and is projected to continue to decline slightly over the next few years DOC HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED SENTENCED JURISDICTION POPULATION FY2007 FY2022 ACTUAL DOC POPULATION PROJECTED DOC POPULATION 12,000 10,000 PROJECTED YEARS 9,551 9,497 9,469 9,470 9,490 9,525 9,572 9,628 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 $5.1 $5.3 $5.6 $5.6 $5.8 DOC BUDGET, IN MILLIONS Despite declines in population, the annual budget for DOC has been increasing 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 DOC Prison Population Trends 2014; www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/state-budget/ Council of State Governments Justice Center 18

Admissions and releases to DOC have been close in number in four of the last five years DOC CRIMINALLY SENTENCED ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES FY2011 FY2015 ADMISSIONS RELEASES 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 3,858 3,512 3,403 3,325 2,999 3,721 3,374 3,220 2,901 3,223 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 Jurisdiction population FY2011 FY2015 TOTAL NUMBER OF ADMISSIONS TOTAL NUMBER OF RELEASES % DIFFERENCE Including FY2013 16,381 17,155 4.7% Excluding FY2013 13,382 13,434 0.4% CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2011-2015 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 19

The number of people in DOC serving shorter sentences has declined, but the number serving life sentences has increased DOC CUSTODY POPULATION BY SENTENCE LENGTH December 31, 2010-2014 Year < 5 years 5 to < 10 years 10 to 20+ years Life 2010 2,470 2,976 2,751 1,788 2011 2,430 3,139 2,823 1,859 2012 2,257 2,902 2,808 1,910 2013 2,047 2,729 2,725 1,952 2014 2,082 2,625 2,665 1,965 % change 16% 12% 3% +10% Admissions for life sentences declined 15% during this period while releases for life sentences declined 30% In 2014, those serving 2 nd degree life sentences on average had served 20 years and were 29 years old at the time of commitment The average current age for all life sentences was 48 *2015 population snapshots were not available at the time of the data request CSG Justice Center analysis of 2010-2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 20

Approximately half of the DOC population are serving sentences of 10 years or longer DOC CUSTODY POPULATION December 31, 2014* N = 9,337 7% 15% 28% 20% 9% 21% Half of life sentences are without parole ** < 3 YRS 3 TO < 5 YRS 5 TO < 10 YRS 10 TO < 20 YRS 20+ YRS LIFE *2015 population snapshots were not available at the time of the data request **Life with the possibility of parole sentences are parole eligible after serving 15 years CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 21

Over one-third of the DOC population is serving a mandatory incarceration sentence for a motor vehicle, drug, weapon, or person offense DOC CUSTODY POPULATION December 31, 2014* N = 9,337 MANDATORY NON-MANDATORY DOC CUSTODY DRUG OFFENDER POPULATION SERVING A MANDATORY SENTENCE N = 928 6000 5000 37% mandatory 1867 Trafficking N = 634 Distribution N = 273 29% 68% 4000 Possession 0% 3000 3171 School Zone 2% 2000 1000 0 94% mandatory 69% mandatory 928 9 415 821 85% mandatory 490 75 1267 Other MV Drug Property Weapons Persons Sex Offense The proportion of the DOC custody population serving a mandatory sentence has declined slightly from 39% in 2010 to 37% in 2014. Mandatory persons offenses include life sentences. *2015 population snapshots were not available at the time of the data request CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Jus4ce Center Council of State Governments Justice Center 22

Mandatory sentences for drug offenses have slightly lower reconviction rates than non-mandatory drug sentences THREE-YEAR RECONVICTION RATE DRUG OFFENDERS ONLY FY2011 Prison Releases to the Community N = 653 OVERALL N=653 NOT SUPERVISED 45% N=390 SUPERVISED N=263 39% 30% 30% 29% 29% Non-Mandatory Mandatory Non-Mandatory Mandatory Non-Mandatory Mandatory Differences in recidivism were level when looking only at sentences that were released to supervision CSG Justice Center analysis of 2011-2014 DOC and CORI data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 23

DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INCARCERATED POPULATIONS Research Addendum Slides Data for this analysis includes demographic information on sentenced populations at DOC and HOC, jail populations at two sample counties, as well as a resident population comparison group. DOC data was obtained from DOC research staff while the HOC data was obtained from the parole board s SPIRIT data. Jail data was provided upon request by Middlesex and Hampden counties. Essex County also provided jail data, but demographic information could not be analyzed in a comparable way. Resident population was obtained from the U.S. Census American Community Survey for 2014.

Demographic composition of jail populations varies across county locations DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF JAIL POPULATION June 30, 2014 Hampden and Middlesex County Jail Snapshot 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% HISPANIC BLACK WHITE N = 609 19% 16% 63% Middlesex County N = 520 N = 52 54% 21% 25% Hampden County Males HAMPDEN COUNTY RESIDENT POPULATION 4% 27% 69% Hampden County Females MIDDLESEX COUNTY RESIDENT POPULATION White 66% 76% Black 8% 5% Hispanic 22% 7% CSG Justice Center analysis of Middlesex County and Hampden County jail data; U.S. Census 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 or older 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 or older HAMPDEN COUNTY JAIL MALE POPULATION June 30, 2014 Snapshot N = 520 HISPANIC BLACK WHITE 17% MIDDLESEX COUNTY JAIL POPULATION June 30, 2014 Snapshot N = 609 17% 24% 28% 32% 31% 28% 33% 33% 33% 40% 36% 37% 39% 39% 37% 46% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% HISPANIC BLACK WHITE 50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Middlesex County does not house females locally, and therefore does not have a female population. Essex County data were not included due to the fact that 55% of admissions were coded as Other. Council of State Governments Justice Center 25

Within HOCs, black and Hispanic individuals are represented at greater rates than they are in the general population PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION AND HOC POPULATION BY AGE, 2014 HOC POPULATION RESIDENT POPULATION 42% PERCENT OF HOC POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 36% 10% 23% 13% 13% 21% 20% 90% 10% MALE FEMALE 18-24 25-34 35-44 45 and older PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION AND HOC POPULATION BY RACE, 2014 HOC POPULATION RESIDENT POPULATION PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 75% 56% 48% MALE 19% 19% 52% FEMALE 6% 10% 9% 6% White Black Hispanic Other CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data; U.S. Census 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Council of State Governments Justice Center 26

A larger proportion of the 18- to 24-year-old HOC population are people of color as compared to other age groups ESTIMATED HOC POPULATION June 30, 2014 Statewide Population Snapshot N = 5,099 OTHER HISPANIC BLACK WHITE 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 8% 5% 4% 6% 13% 19% 23% 22% 17% 17% 16% 27% 40% 30% 58% 57% 65% 20% 43% 10% 0% 18-24 25-34 35-44 45+ CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 27

Black, Hispanic, and individuals age 25-34 are represented in DOC populations at more than twice the rate they are in the general population PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION AND DOC POPULATION BY AGE, 2014 DOC POPULATION RESIDENT POPULATION 42% PERCENT OF DOC POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 10% 8% 31% 13% 13% 26% 35% 95% 5% MALE FEMALE 18-24 25-34 35-44 45 and older 75% PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION AND DOC POPULATION BY RACE, 2014 DOC POPULATION RESIDENT POPULATION PERCENT OF RESIDENT POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 43% 48% MALE 28% 26% 52% FEMALE 6% 10% 9% 3% White Black Hispanic Other CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 DOC data; U.S. Census 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Council of State Governments Justice Center 28

The DOC population has a higher proportion of older, male, and non-white individuals than the HOC population PERCENT OF HOC AND DOC POPULATION BY AGE, 2014 HOC POPULATION DOC POPULATION PERCENT OF DOC POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 23% 36% 31% 26% 21% 20% 35% 95% 5% MALE FEMALE 8% 18-24 25-34 35-44 45 and older 56% PERCENT OF HOC AND DOC POPULATION BY RACE, 2014 HOC POPULATION DOC POPULATION PERCENT OF HOC POPULATION BY SEX, 2014 43% 28% 19% 19% 26% 90% 10% MALE FEMALE 6% 3% White Black Hispanic Other CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data and DOC data; U.S. Census 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Council of State Governments Justice Center 29

A larger portion of black and Hispanic individuals released from HOCs served sentences over one year than white or other individuals AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY LENGTH OF STAY, FY2014 HOC RELEASES Excluding Sentences Less Than 60 Days 3 MONTHS OR LESS > 3 TO 6 MONTHS > 6 TO 12 MONTHS > 12 MONTHS 6.7 months White N = 5,116 32% 30% 24% 14% 7.4 months Black N = 1,596 29% 26% 27% 19% 6.9 months Hispanic N = 1,737 30% 26% 25% 18% 4.7 months Other N = 574 48% 29% 15% 9% CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 30 Council of State Governments Jus4ce Center 30

Black and Hispanic individuals released from DOCs served an average of 10 months more than white or other individuals AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY LENGTH OF STAY, FY2014 DOC RELEASES Includes County Sentences LESS THAN 2 YEARS > 2 TO 5 YEARS > 5 TO 10 YEARS > 10 YEARS 28 months White N = 1,663 62% 26% 9% 3% 36 months Black N = 765 45% 40% 13% 3% 38 months Hispanic N = 800 40% 42% 15% 3% 28 months Other N = 102 65% 23% 9% 4% CSG Justice Center analysis of FY2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 31 Council of State Governments Jus4ce Center 31

Disproportionality of the DOC population increases with sentence length DOC CUSTODY POPULATION December 31, 2014 N = 9,337 60% WHITE BLACK HISPANIC OTHER 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 47% 25% 43% 40% 29% 29% 27% 25% 26% 2% 2% 3% 44% 33% 19% 4% Growth or a lack of decline in the population serving 10+ years and life sentences may result in greater disproportionality in the DOC population 0% < 5 years 5 to < 10 years 10 to 20+ years Life N = 2,082 N = 2,625 N = 2,665 N = 1,965 CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 32

Black and Hispanic individuals comprised a larger portion of the population in DOC for drug and weapon offenses than other groups and were more often younger than the overall DOC population 2014 DRUG, WEAPON, AND OVERALL DOC POPULATION BY RACE 43% 25% 18% 28% 27% 48% 26% 46% 32% 2014 DRUG, WEAPON, AND OVERALL HOC POPULATION BY RACE OVERALL DRUG WEAPON OVERALL DRUG WEAPON 56% 40% 27% 38% 19% 20% 20% 34% 27% 3% 3% 2% 6% 5% 9% White Black Hispanic Other White Black Hispanic Other 2014 DRUG, WEAPON, AND OVERALL DOC POPULATION BY AGE 2014 DRUG, WEAPON, AND OVERALL HOC POPULATION BY AGE OVERALL DRUG WEAPON OVERALL DRUG WEAPON 51% 49% 8% 6% 17% 31% 39% 26% 34% 24% 35% 21% 8% 26% 24% 39% 36% 35% 21% 21% 20% 14% 9% 6% 18-24 25-34 35-44 45 and older DOC custody population on 12/31/2014, including county sentences. CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 Parole Board s SPIRIT HOC data and DOC data. 18-24 25-34 35-44 45 and older Council of State Governments Justice Center 33

44 percent of black individuals and 40 percent of Hispanics in DOC are serving mandatory sentences, compared to only 30 percent of white individuals 2014 DOC CUSTODY POPULATION SERVING NON-MANDATORY AND MANDATORY SENTENCES BY RACE 2,821 NON-MANDATORY N=5,880 MANDATORY N=3,457 1,219 1,480 1,150 1,433 967 37% of the DOC population are serving mandatory sentences 146 121 White Black Hispanic Other CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 34

Black and Hispanic individuals were incarcerated in DOCs for a drug or weapon offense more often than other groups, and their sentences for drug and weapon offenses were more often a mandatory sentence 2014 DOC CUSTODY POPULATION BY OFFENSE TYPE AND RACE N = 9,337 MV/Other Drug Property Weapon Person Sex Offense 700 600 500 400 2014 DOC POPULATION DRUG OFFENSE MANDATORY NON-MANDATORY 425 White 4% 8% Black 1% 14% 13% 3% 6% 11% 54% 59% 18% 10% 300 200 100 0 205 278 188 125 87 20 White Black Hispanic Other 2014 DOC POPULATION WEAPON OFFENSE 300 MANDATORY NON-MANDATORY Hispanic 1% 26% 6% 8% 48% 12% 250 237 200 150 159 Other 2% 13% 5% 5% 62% 13% 100 50 0 80 24 39 22 14 White Black Hispanic Other CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 35

ADDITIONAL CWOF ANALYSIS Research Addendum Slides Data for this analysis was provided upon request by the Massachusetts Trial Court and include all CWOF dispositions in FY2014 and probation sentences in FY2013. The recidivism analysis was conducted using data from EOPSS (CORI data for arraignment and conviction), the parole board (SPIRIT data for HOC incarceration), and the DOC (state prison incarceration). CORI data was obtained from EOPSS using a batch filematching process using individuals unique state identifier PCF number. In addition to a re-arraignment and reconviction analysis, CORI data was used to identify the final disposition of CWOF cases and whether violations occurred during the CWOF period.

The majority of CWOF dispositions end in dismissal Additional findings: Sentencing analysis in April presented information on 31,943 CWOF dispositions in FY2014. Over three-quarters of CWOF dispositions in FY2014 ended as a dismissal, 4% ended in a commitment, and nearly a quarter are ongoing as of May 2016. 41% of CWOF dispositions had a violation notice or finding. 31% of CWOF dispositions had a default warrant for a failure to appear. 4% 77% 59% 41% 69% 31% 23% CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 CWOF and CORI data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 37

One-quarter of CWOF dispositions were re-arraigned in one year ONE-YEAR RE-ARRAIGNMENT, RECONVICTION, AND INCARCERATION RATES FOR FY2014 CWOF DISPOSITIONS AND FY2013 PROBATION SENTENCES INCARCERATED 5% FY2014 CWOF dispositions N = 30,363* CONVICTED 9% RE-ARRAIGNED 25% DID NOT RETURN 75% 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 INCARCERATED 15% FY2013 Probation sentences N = 15,079* RECONVICTED 15% RE-ARRAIGNED 35% DID NOT RETURN 65% 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 *First disposition or sentence of the year selected; FY2013 was the latest year of sentencing data available. CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 CWOF, 2013 sentencing, CORI, Parole SPIRIT HOC, and DOC data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 38

A larger portion of sentences to probation were for a person or property offense than CWOF dispositions, which were more often a motor vehicle or OUI offense OFFENSE DISTRIBUTIONS OF FY2014 CWOF DISPOSITIONS AND FY2013 PROBATION SENTENCES CWOF N = 31,943 PROBATION SENTENCE N = 16,075 50% 45% 43% 40% 35% 34% 30% 25% 23% 24% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 19% 18% 13% 11% 6% 7% 1% 1% Person Property Drug MV/OUI Other Weapon CSG Justice Center analysis of 2014 CWOF and 2013 sentencing data. Council of State Governments Justice Center 39

Thank You Cassondra Warney, Policy Analyst cwarney@csg.org To receive monthly updates about all states engaged with justice reinvestment initiatives as well as other CSG Justice Center programs, sign up at: csgjusticecenter.org/subscribe This material was prepared for the State of Massachusetts. The presentation was developed by members of The Council of State Governments Justice Center staff. Because presentations are not subject to the same rigorous review process as other printed materials, the statements made reflect the views of the authors, and should not be considered the official position of the Justice Center, the members of The Council of State Governments, or the funding agency supporting the work.