New Laws: Probate, Mental Health, and Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse

Similar documents
Superior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective October 25, 2010

Superior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective June 27, 2012

Superior Courts of California

Superior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective January 1, 2012

Superior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective January 1, 2016

Superior Court of California

Superior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective January 1, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Volume V Probate, Guardianship, and Mental Health

Superior Court of California Santa Cruz Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective October 10, 2015

Superior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective July 1, 2018

Superior Court of California County of El Dorado Civil Fee Schedule 1 & Select Criminal/Traffic Fees Effective January 1, 2013 Code Section(s)

Superior Court of California County of El Dorado Civil Fee Schedule 1 & Select Criminal/Traffic Fees Effective January 1, 2014 Code Section(s)

Superior Court of California County of Stanislaus

Superior Court of California County of El Dorado Statewide Civil Fee Schedule 1 Effective October 10, 2015

Superior Court of California County of Monterey STATEWIDE CIVIL FEE 1 AND LOCAL FEE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2016

APPENDIX F APPX. F-1

Superior Courts of California

Superior Court of California County of Monterey STATEWIDE CIVIL FEE 1 AND LOCAL FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 5, 2012

2013 VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY SESSION

Guardianship/Conservatorship Changes in SB 806

Superior Court of California County of Orange

GUARDIANSHIP OF AN ADULT IN MASSACHUSETTS. Prepared by the Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee December 2015

PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS, PART ONE Initiation of Guardianships and Conservatorships

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles CIVIL FEE SCHEDULE Effective October 10, 2015

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles CIVIL FEE SCHEDULE Effective August 1, 2009

Guardianship and Conservatorship in Iowa Issues in Substitute Decision Making

Getting the Full Report on Proposed Conservators

Laura s Law (AB 1421) A Functional Outline

[Insert Catchy Title Here]

Top Ten Things to Do Now Changes Texas probate and estate planning lawyers should make on September 1, 2011

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE. Chapter 11. Conservatorships

Disability and Guardianship Project Disability and Abuse Project

SENATE BILL By Hensley BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES

ProDoc Texas Herald August 2007 Legislative Updates and Other Changes

WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE SECTION

Local Rules effective January 1, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

STATE ADULT GUARDIANSHIP LEGISLATION: DIRECTIONS OF REFORM Commission on Law and Aging American Bar Association

REPORT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON 2005 SB 240, PROPOSED BALLOON AMENDMENT VERSION

CHAPTER 411 DIVISION 26 GUARDIANSHIPS AND CONSERVATORSHIPS

Probate Proceedings Why Can t They All Just Get Along?

TABLE OF CONTENTS June 2016 Click here for up to date Massachusetts Probate Delridge.net Click here for Home & More Delridge.

Chapter XXI. WILLS AND PROBATE (Volume 14) CONDENSED OUTLINE

4/26/2012 MUPC AND REAL ESTATE. Boston Bar Association April 26, Zachary P. Allen, Esq. David Marshall Datz, P.C.

(2) Definitions. As used in this part 5, unless the context otherwise requires:

Guardianship and Conservatorship

WRITTEN BY. Terry W. Briggs Missouri Protection & Advocacy Services 925 South Country Club Drive Updated August 2005

Title 18-A: PROBATE CODE

Criminal and Credit Background Checks for Guardians

NC General Statutes - Chapter 30 Article 4 1

Missouri Revised Statutes

The changes will affect three populations of youth differently depending upon their status on the day the bill was enacted on Oct.

CHAPTER 36 (CORRECTED COPY)

Powers of Attorney. by John S. Kitchen, JD, LLM johnkitchenlawoffices.com. A. General Powers of Attorney

There Are Viable Alternatives to Court-Run Legal Services Programs

Page 1 Unofficial Compilation of ORS Title 12 Probate Law 2017 Edition

CHAPTER Council Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1237

NC General Statutes - Chapter 122C Article 5 1

Regional Center Conservatorship Assessments

ARIZONA STATE SENATE Fifty-Third Legislature, First Regular Session

Voluntary Admissions

NC General Statutes - Chapter 30 1

March 16, 2016 PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL COURT RULES

Texas Pattern Jury Charges Family & Probate (2016 Ed.) List of Charges

Beverly Hills Bar Association Trusts & Estates Section. Case Summaries for May and June of 2018

NC General Statutes - Chapter 34 1

OVERVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF THE COOK COUNTY PUBLIC GUARDIAN

S SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. December 20, 2012, Filed

BarEssays.com Model Answer

Burnett County Circuit Court Rules

Understanding the differences between guardianship and power of attorney. Mike Weeks, CELA

First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary

Report of the Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Section

Estate Planning Highlights of the 2017 Texas Legislature Prof. Gerry W. Beyer

Probate & Family Law What a Family Lawyer Can Learn from the Texas Estates Code

Sec Scope. This chapter applies to disclaimers of any interest in or power over property, whenever created.

Superior Court ofcalifornia, County of Los Angeles CIVIL FEE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2009

ISSUES FACING TRUSTEES UNDER THE MUPC AND MUTC BOSTON BAR ASSOCIATION NOVEMBER 18, 2011 Jennifer Locke Goodwin Procter LLP APPLICABILITY OF MUPC, MUTC

Role of Clinical Evaluation Professionals in Adult Guardianship Proceedings: Survey of State Statutes

Civil Mental Health Proceedings: Understanding the Process

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, MICHAEL PETRAMALA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR

Dr. Gerry W. Beyer Governor Preston E. Smith Regents Professor of Law Texas Tech University School of Law

I. Introductory summary

Emergency Detention Orders and Art Mental Assessments

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Superior Court of El Dorado County. Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan

Laws Relating to Mental Health

NC General Statutes - Chapter 35A 1

Modification and Termination of Guardianship Orders

So, You re Thinking of Filing A Lawsuit? San Mateo County Superior Court

COMMENTS TO SB 5196 (Ch. 42, Laws of 1999) COMMENTS TO THE TRUST AND ESTATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ACT. January 28, 1999

ADULT GUARDIANSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE

SIMPLE" WILLS. by: Daniel T. Balfour Beale, Balfour, Davidson, & Etherington, P.C. Richmond & Robert L. Freed Robert L. Freed, P.C.

Art Mental Assessments and Emergency Detention Orders

Guide to Guardianship

MENTAL HEALTH WARRANTS & THE ART MAGISTRATION

Colorado Supreme Court

Amendments to the Oregon Probate Code. Report of the Probate Modernization Work Group LC 61. Prepared by:

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California

Transcription:

New Laws: Probate, Mental Health, and Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse December 7, 2018 Presentation for the California Court Association Monica Scheetz Senior Legal Research Attorney Probate Department Orange County Superior Court

AB 1290 Lawyer-client privilege: holder of the privilege Affected Statute: Evidence Code 953 If a guardian or conservator appears to have a conflict of interest with the ward or conservatee, then the guardian/conservator does not hold the attorney-client privilege on the ward or conservatee s behalf. 2

AB 1739 Nonprobate transfers: revocable transfer on death deeds Affected Statute: Probate Code 5626 A Revocable Transfer on Death Deed is valid and effective even if the Common Questions section attached to the form has not been recorded. Urgency legislation operative as of 7/9/18. 3

AB 1960 Estates and trusts: kindred: definition Affected Statute: Probate Code 21110 The spouse of a transferor is not considered kindred and is therefore excluded from the definition of transferee for purposes of the anti-lapse statute. 4

AB 2090 Guardianships: special immigrant juvenile status Affected Statute: Probate Code 1510.1 The parent of a proposed adult ward is authorized to file a guardianship petition in connection with special immigrant juvenile status ( SIJS ) proceedings. 5

AB 2113 Estates and trusts: guardianships Affected Statute: Probate Code 1600 A guardianship of the estate terminates on the death of the ward, subject to certain applicable statutes and other laws mandating that the guardian continue to have specified powers and responsibilities, such as conserving the estate and paying unpaid expenses. Companion bill to AB 2236 (conservatorship). 6

AB 2236 Conservatorships Affected Statute: Probate Code 1860 Adds a clause clarifying that the termination of a conservatorship of the estate by death or court order is subject to certain applicable statutes and other laws mandating that the conservator continue to have specified powers and responsibilities, such as conserving the estate and paying unpaid expenses. Companion bill to AB 2113 (guardianship). 7

AB 2426 Trustee: power to terminate trust Affected Statute: Probate Code 15408 Increases the size of a trust that can be terminated by the trustee without court approval (from $40,000 to $50,000). 8

AB 2642 Guardianship: special immigrant juveniles Affected Statute: Probate Code 2104.1 Authorizes foreign charitable corporations to be appointed as guardians of minors in connection with a SIJS petition if the corporation meets the same specifics required for domestic corporations, is properly licensed by the state, and is contracted by a federal office to provide care and custody for the minor. Provides legislative findings and declarations relative to special immigrant juveniles. Sunsets on January 1, 2022 unless a later-enacted statute repeals the sunset. 9

SB 909 Uniform Trust Decanting Act Affected Statutes: Probate Code 19501-19505, 19507-19527, and 19529-19530 (new Part 9 of Division 9 28 new statutes) Authorizes fiduciaries of irrevocable trusts to distribute the property of a first trust to one or more second trusts or to modify the terms of the first trust without the consent of beneficiaries or court approval, subject to certain exceptions. Contains notice requirements specifying the length of notice, the persons entitled to notice, and the contents of the notice. Contains procedures for notice to incompetent persons (e.g., minors and other beneficiaries lacking capacity). 10

SB 909 Uniform Trust Decanting Act (cont d) On application of any interested party, it authorizes the court to approve an exercise of the decanting power or to take other actions (as set forth in Section 19509). Requires a fiduciary exercising the decanting power to act in accordance with his or her fiduciary duties and in accordance with the purposes of the first trust. Restricts beneficiary changes and increases in fiduciary compensation. Does not apply to a trust held solely for charitable purposes. 11

SB 931 Conservatorships: custody status Affected Statutes: W&I Code 5352 & 5352.5 The professional person in charge of providing mental health treatment at a county jail can recommend LPS conservatorship for an inmate without the inmate being an inpatient of a mental health facility if the appropriate person has determined that the inmate is gravely disabled and that future examination on an inpatient basis is not necessary for a determination that the inmate is gravely disabled. Specifies that a person s custody status shall not be the sole reason for not scheduling an investigation by the conservatorship investigator. 12

SB 1045 Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance use disorders Affected Statutes: W&I Code Ch. 6.2, Art. 7 ( 5555 et seq.) and Div. 5, Pt. 1, Ch. 5 ( 5450 et seq.) Pilot project establishing a new type of conservatorship for mental illness or substance use. Specific to the County of Los Angeles, the County of San Diego, and the City and County of San Francisco. If the board of supervisors for each of the aforementioned areas authorizes the application of the provisions subject to certain requirements, the bill permits the appointment of a conservator for a person who is incapable of caring for the person s own health and well-being due to a serious mental illness or substance use disorder in order to provide the least restrictive and most clinically appropriate alternative needed for the protection of the person. 13

SB 1045 Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance use disorders (cont d) Requires the following court findings: that the behavioral health director of the county (or, in San Francisco s case, the city and county) has previously attempted by petition to obtain a court order authorizing assisted outpatient treatment pursuant to Laura s Law for the person for whom conservatorship is sought, that the petition was denied or that the assisted outpatient treatment was insufficient to treat the person s mental illness, and that assisted outpatient treatment would be insufficient to treat the person in the instant matter in lieu of a conservatorship. 14

SB 1045 Conservatorship: serious mental illness and substance use disorders (cont d) Prohibits this type of conservatorship from being established if an LPS or probate conservatorship or guardianship already exists. Conservatorship automatically terminates one year after the appointment of the conservator but is subject to one-year renewals. The bill allows the Judicial Council to adopt rules, forms, and standards necessary to implement these new conservatorships. Requires each participating county to establish a working group of specified stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness of the program Requires a preliminary report and a final report to the Legislature no later than January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2023, respectively. Sunsets January 1, 2024, unless a later-enacted statute repeals the sunset. 15

SB 1089 California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System Affected Statute: Family Code 6380 Clarifies that any protective orders that are required to be entered into the California Law Enforcement and Telecommunications System ( CLETS ) under Family Code 6380 are, in fact, required to be entered into CLETS. Impacts elder abuse and dependent adult abuse restraining orders because Family Code 6380(b) is incorporated into W & I Code 15657.03(p)(3). 16

SB 1436 Natural parent and child relationship: establishment Affected Statute: Probate Code 6453 For intestate rights: clarifies that clear and convincing evidence of natural parentage may include genetic DNA evidence acquired during the parent s lifetime. Revises statutory language from paternity-oriented terms to gender-neutral terms. 17

Thanks for Joining Us! For questions, comments, or discussion feel free to email mscheetz@occourts.org 18