PROJECT REPORT ON SUMMER INTERNSHIP TRAINING COURT FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR ( ).

Similar documents
Supreme Court. High Court. District Court and Additional District Judges. Subordinate Judge Class I. Subordinate Judge Class II

Salem Advocate Bar Association,... vs Union Of India on 25 October, 2002

Stay on Execution: When & How

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. + I.A. Nos /2007 & 5651/2009 in CS(OS) No. 829/2002

RESEARCH REPORT ON MIGRANT WORKERS IN HIGH-RISK INDUSTRY

Prem Chand Vijay Kumar vs Yashpal Singh And Anr on 2 May, J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No of 2004) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

Reserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010

THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE

BCI- DEC 2017 AIBE-XI ENGLISH -Set-B. 1. Cheque bouncing cases charged U/s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is trialed by

BCI- DEC 2017 AIBE-XI ENGLISH -Set-A. c) Extent of judicial intervention d) Awarding final decision. 1. Section 154 under IT Act is

BCI- DEC 2017 AIBE-XI ENGLISH -Set-C

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.378/2015 Date of Reserve: Date of Decision: versus

BCI- DEC 2017 AIBE-XI ENGLISH -Set-D. 7. The Minimum number of persons required to incorporate a Public Company is

Marion County Attorney s Office 214 E. Main Knoxville, IA (641) TO ALL BUSINESSES/PERSONS UTILIZING THE BAD CHECK PROCEDURE

LLB MODEL QUESTION PAPER 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: CRL.L.P. 233/2014

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF (Arising out of SLP (C) No.2798 of 2010)

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Crl. MC No.867/2012 & Crl.MAs /2012 Date of Decision:

LL. B. I Term. Paper LB : Elements of Indian Legal System PART A : UNDERSTANDING THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF THE INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM

LAW OF EVIDENCE (INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872)

All India Bar Examination Model Question Paper 1: Answers and Explanations

Trial Courts To Conduct Cheque Bouncing Cases Expeditiously

monitors human rights violations in Denmark, advises relevant state organs on these violations

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELALTE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No.

2008 RRASC Final Report: Justice Now Anuradha Hashemi. I started my internship at Justice Now without knowing much about the

BUILDING DEMOCRACY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY EVERYDAY DEMOCRACY A NEWSLETTER FROM THE CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

CONGRESSIONAL INTERNSHIPS

INDUSTRIAL COURT ACT

ODISHA JUDICIAL ACADEMY ANNUAL CALENDAR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 408 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.

SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY. This special power of attorney is executed on the day of Two thousand

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BETWEEN: HANSRAJ BHOJWANI CLAIMANTS NANDINI BHOJWANI JAGWISH PUNJABI VIJAY PUNJABI VINOD PUNJABI RAJ PUNJABI

Speech of Štefan Harabin, Prime minister and Minister of Justice of the Slovak Republic

2. Heard Sri Bhola Singh Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishad Murtza, learned Government Advocate.

The Nomocracy Pursuit of the Maritime Silk Road On Legal Guarantee of State s Marine Rights and Interests

Re: Supreme Court Guidelines in Cheque Bounce cases U/s 138 (NI Act)

SUPREME COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

American Government Jury Duty

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017

COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCES IN CRIMINAL TRIAL By : GODULESH SHARMA Metropolitan Magistrate Kanpur Compounding has been described in webester Dictionary.

Law Day 2016 Courtroom Vocabulary Grades 3-5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Duty allotted. Sl. Name & Designation of No. Employees 1 Sri Kamala Kanta Kar, Superintendent L-II

Subject:-Invitation to participate in 13 th Late Advocate D. T. Jaibhave Memorial National Moot- Trial & Judgment Writing Competition

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)


With best Compliments RSHRC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF The State of Andhra Pradesh. Versus J U D G M E N T

COMBATING CORRUPTION: CHALLENGES IN THE MALAWI LEGAL SYSTEM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No of 2015) Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER ARB P. 180/2003. Judgment delivered on: versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN AND. Ms. D. Christopher-Noel; Mr. R. Singh and Ms. G. Jackman instructed by Ms. F.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Negotiable Instruments Act. Judgement reserved on: January 07, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

UNIT 17 TORTS AND CONSUMER COMPENSATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No of 2014 with I.A. No. 175 of 2011 in Cr.Appeal (D.B.) No. 904 of 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) 2877 of 2003 & CM APPL No. 4883/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of decision: CRL.L.P. 598/2011, Crl. M.A.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

POLICY ON PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE

ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.5 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, MIN. OF LAW& ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FEROZEPUR. C.C. No. 137 of 2017

Gender and Militarism War Resisters International, New Profile, and the Coalition of Women for a Just Peace

PLAINTIFF INFORMATION STARTING YOUR ACTION

2005(1)JV ARTICLE 1 SCOPE OF ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INDIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.406 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.)NO.1994 OF 2018) VERSUS

versus Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Kumar. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. for R-2.

Hofstra Law Clinic Registration Meeting & Open House

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Legislative Brief The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 and Ordinance, 2013

COURT IN SESSION TEACHER PACK CONTEMPORARY COURTROOM WORKSHOP CYBERBULLYING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. IA Nos.1726/07, 1727/07 and CS (OS) No. 1196/2006

EXECUTIVE CABINET Student Government Association Texas A&M University. The Student Government Association. Mission. The Executive Cabinet.

Start each answer on a new page and double space your copy. Save your work at regular intervals throughout the examination.

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PROSECUTIONS UGANDA S EXPERIENCE A PAPER PRESENTED BY MR. RICHARD BUTEERA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AT THE HELD ON

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 3710/2007. Date of decision: February 06, 2009.

Another Adventure in Illinois Law: Jury Summons Back in November, I received my first letter summoning me to be a juror. At that time, I had just

AIMS Study Abroad Report: Fall, 2015 Outgoing

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987

Effectively Communicating Your Position to Lawmakers

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL M.C. NO.3015 OF 2012 Decided on : 4th January, 2013

Response to the Legal Service Board. Call for evidence on the regulation of immigration advice and services

JUNIOR BAR POINT OF VIEW: THE FUTURE OF THE INDEPENDENT REFERRAL BAR A NORTHERN IRELAND PERSPECTIVE

Immigrant Entrepreneurship: Some Experience from the UK. Professor David Smallbone Small Business Research Centre Kingston University, London

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman. Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person. Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P. (C) 4497/2010 & CM No /2010 (for directions) & CM No.11352/2010 (for stay)

Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Petitioner in person.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 638/2009 & Crl.M.A.2384/09 (stay) Date of reserve:

Enduring Power of Attorney

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION :

AN OVERVIEW OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, Introduction

REGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate.

Transcription:

A PROJECT REPORT ON SUMMER INTERNSHIP TRAINING COURT FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR (2014-15).

TABLE OF CONTENTS Sr. No Subject Page No 1 Preface 3 2 Acknowledgement 4 3 Certificate 5 4 List of abbreviations 6 5 Brief about Courts visited 7 6 Brief reporting of the cases attended & observed during the Training 8 7 Experience during the Training 9

PREFACE This report is an outcome of the eight weeks summer internship Programme of Amity Law School for the students of First Year. The main constituents of the report are on cases observed at the trial courts during the internship, the research on related issues and the weekly report of my work. I have tried my best to do justice with my activities and put it in black and white with the same effort. Date: Name & Signature of Intern

ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would first of all like to thank Mr. Rajender Verma Advocate under whose guidance I have entered the practical world of the legal profession. He has been a guide, a mentor and has taught me all that I know about the practical aspects of civil law today. I am also grateful to Mr. Sanjay Sharma Advocate (Junior Advocate) during my internship. Also, I am thankful to Mr. Bineesh Kumar for making this internship both educational enlightening and enjoyable at the same time. And lastly, I would like to thank my parents, Mr. Vijay Tuteja for facilitating my internship under Mr. Rajender Verma Advocate.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IN CASE OF TRIAL COURT PLA Permanent Lok Adalat Sec. Sections CPC Civil Procedure Code, 1908 S.C Supreme Court No. Number u/s under section DCDRF District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum IPC Indian Penal Code CJM Chief Judicial Magistrate SDO Sub Divisional Officer WC Workmen Compensation

BRIEF ABOUT COURTS VISITED Before the internship my knowledge about Trial Court was minimal and when it comes to related procedures, I knew nothing at all. Now that my 8-week internship is over, I feel I have really learned a lot. Before Internship I think that the there is only one court only which is District Court. But actually the there is complex hierarchy of court in the District Courts. For consumer cases there is separate court which is known as District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum (DCDRF), for services cases like banking, transport etc, there is Permanent Lok Adalat, for criminal matters there is Magistrate Courts and Session Courts, for civil and all other disputes relating there is District Court. Despite the District and Session Judge there is Additional District and session judges according to the workload of the court. I have done my internship under the civil lawyer from that I visited mainly in Consumer Court, Permanant Lok Adalat and District Court. On the first day of the internship, I was asked to report to office at 8 am. After waiting for about two hours, a junior briefed me about the dos and don t s of the internship. I was told that during the course of the internship, I would be required to report to the court, in which the matter for the day would be scheduled, after which, we would have to report to the office and read up on the matters scheduled to take place on future dates. However, very few of the duties communicated to us, actually materialized during the internship as sir does not appreciate interns having access to the briefs, reading of which, by the way, was our last resort in order to find something constructive to do at the internship. It followed second day onwards involved the reaching the court as scheduled, and attending the court room proceedings. Post which, at times, I was asked to get true copies of the order passed previously, and bring it to office. The junior advocates were usually free for the day after 4-5pm. At the end of the first week, I was asked not to come to office at all and to leave for the day after a particular matter was over. Therefore, the main tasks at the internship involved reaching the court for a particular matter, and leave after it was done. I was not allowed any access to the briefs of the cases and therefore had no idea as to the facts or the contentions of the case when it came up for hearing. There is very limited interaction between me and my advocate and I was unable to talk with Sir throughout my internship due to his extremely busy schedule. If anything, this internship would help me comprehend a little of the courtroom proceedings and formalities. If lucky, I might get to witness Sir argue a case, most of which are quite high-profile. One thing that I really did enjoy during the internship was the company of Junior Advocates. They had come from outside my Hometown and together, we would usually go after office or order Chinese food from a nearby restaurant.

Brief reporting of the cases attended & observed during the internship This was the summary of the some of the cases of the Trial Court in which decision held that:- Court Case Issue Decision PLA CJM K.M.Rajni v. State Bank of India Omparkash v. Vijay Electronics In The Neeta Agarwal v. State of Court of Haryana Justice R.k. Bhankar PLA Haryana Gramin Bank v. Anupam Related to the non deposit of instalments of loan taken by the applicant. Related to dishonour of cheque s. 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. Whether the accused has committed crime under sec. 406 IPC. Related to the non deposit of loan instalment comes u/ s. 22 (c) Legal Services Authorities Act, 2002. DCDRF Rajender v. Raghu Hyundai Complain file under s. 11, 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for the insurance charges. SDO Haryana Gramin Bank v. Rakesh SDO Punjab National Bank v. Ramchander Related to non deposit of loan instalment u/s 8(1) Haryana Agricultural Credit Operation Act. Related to non deposit of Bank Loan The case will be decided on 20-05- 2014 The case is on for the written statement on 3-08-2014. Court Heard the matter about that and some delay on various legal issues. Ex parte evidence in the Court The Case is for appearance of the Respondent on 11-06- 2014 Court Summoned to Respondent Party Court held that Ramchander pay bank loan with interest. DCDRF Ramphal v. Cholamandlam Related to the Insurance Claim Court Decided Case for Argument on 1-07- 2014 DCDRF Rankishan v. Mahindra & Mahindra Related to finance of vehicle Court placed it for the written arguments on 6-07-2014 Apart from that cases I learned about the how to file a case, how to draft the plaint, written statement, affidavit, written arguments, Courts Applications etc. and also what documents are require when we are filing a case in the Court. Firstly the plaint comes after that documents related to them attached with it and VAKALATNAMA and TALVANA is required in the court.

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE Now that my 8-week internship is over, I feel I have really learned a lot. First of all, I became more familiar with the advocate. Secondly, I got acquainted with functions and responsibilities of the advocate and, of course, got highly involved in the daily life of our Division. I didn t just learn to do my daily tasks, but also learn about drafting, as well as its weaknesses and the need for improvement. On the other hand, I can t say that this internship was challenging and I had to put a lot of hard work. A few weeks after the beginning I started hoping for a wider variety of assignments to keep myself busy and motivated. What is more, I felt like my work did not matter that much and I could have put my potential to a better use, but that s just probably a matter of my ambitions. Despite the fact that this internship didn t keep me as much interested as I wished, I admit that there still is quite a lot to learn, for example, I would like to know more about the proceedings, what exactly renders them,drafting, as well as more about the arguments preparations. Another thing of great value would be to get more familiar with arranging the documents. First of all, I d to get involved in the work of Consumer Court cases issues. Secondly, of Permanent Lok Adalat cases in which I learn about the conciliation cases of services. I think being a part of such group of people would be a unique and promising experience. In review this internship has been an excellent and rewarding experience. I have been able to meet and network with so many advocates and people that I am sure will able to help me with opportunities in the future. One main thing I have learned through this internship is time management skills as well as self motivation. When I started did not think that I was able to going sit in an office for eight hours a day. Once I realized that what I had to do I organized my day and work so that I was not overlapping or wasting my time. I will continue to work hard and learn about the advocacy skills. I sincerely thanks to Amity Law School for giving me such a precious opportunity to discovering my talent and making me better at it. Biggest Lessons Law is a jealous mistress!