J2s\~",~ov<j", Through. versus. & ORS. ... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER %

Similar documents
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI UTV SOFTWARE COMMUNICATIONS. versus. Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. THEPIRATEBAY.ORG AND ORS... Defendants Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BENNETT, COLEMAN & COMPANY. MR. AJAY KUMAR & ORS... Defendants Through None

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI M/S. KALPAMRIT AYURVED PVT. Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN O R D E R %

F-39 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 19 th December, 2017

versus CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 638/2014. versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. CS (OS) No.284/2012. Date of order:

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 221/2017 & I.A.A 12707/2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 23 rd April, 2018 J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: versus M/S R.S. SALES CORPORATION & ANR

versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R IA No of 2011 (by Defendant u/o VII R. 10 & 11 CPC)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus P.V. KANAKARAJ TRADING AS. Through None. % Date of Decision : 05 th December, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathanl Senior Advocate, Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Senior Advocate with. Ms. versus. LOGY & ORS Through: STICE G.P.

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. Versus. Through : Ex-parte HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

Through Mr. Atul Nigam, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus

CS(COMM) 49/2017 Page 1 of 7

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

KING POINT ENTERPRISES CO LTD Through: Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No.13139/2011 in CS(OS) 1163/2011 Date of Decision : July 05, 2012

#25 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 30 th May, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN J U D G M E N T

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 12 th December, 2017 J U D G M E N T

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 4 th January, versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: C.S. (COMM) 334/2016, IA No. 4525/2016 & 6625/2016

#1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. MR RAJBIR ORS... Defendant Through: Ex Parte

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, Date of Judgment :

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Nirmaljit Singh Narula vs Indijobs At Hubpages.Com & Ors on 30 March, 2012

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 64/2018 & I.A. 927/2015. Versus GRASIM ELECTRICALS AND. Through Ex parte

F-19 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Ishanki Gupta, Advocate. versus.

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 06 th November, 2017 J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CS (OS) No of Versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : JUSTICE MS.VANDANA KASREKAR WRIT PETITION NO.10703/2017

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 728/2018. versus CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(COMM) 1468/2016 & I.A.No.1532/2017. versus. % Date of Decision: 02 nd November, 2017

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. + I.A. Nos /2007 & 5651/2009 in CS(OS) No. 829/2002

26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Through: None. % Date of Decision: 22 nd August, 2017 J U D G M E N T

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : OCTOBER 12, versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P GARG, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Date of Judgment : R.S.A.No. 459/2006 & CM No /2006 (for stay)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

Case 2:14-cv MMM-AGR Document 17 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:467 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FAO (OS) No.48/2004. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on : Judgment delivered on :

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus

Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advocates for R-1 and 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on : 18 th December, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI. Vs. Respondent: Sandeep Gullah

18 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(COMM)695/2017 & I.A.No.11854/2017. versus. % Date of Decision: 10 th May, 2018 J U D G M E N T

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 35/2017. Through Mr. Raunaq Kamath, Advocate. versus

$~O-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: CS(COMM) 99/2016. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

F-26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(COMM) 148/2017 & I.As. 3483/2015 AND 12144/2015 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment delivered on: CS(OS) 2248/2011

III (2014) CLT 5B (CN) (AP) ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. YARLAGUNTA BHASKAR RAO & ORS. Petitioners versus BOMMAJI DANAM & ORS.

KPP Suit (L) No. 967 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. Through: Ms. Safia Said, Advocate. versus. Through:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 20 th May, Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Reserve: Date of Order: March 20, 2008

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 458/2015. versus. Through: None.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: 24 th April, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 08 th October, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: IA.No. 238/2006 (u/o 7 R 11 CPC) in CS(OS) 1420/2005

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. MANAS CHANDRA & ANR... Defendants Through: None

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + I.A. No.23086/2012 in CS(OS) No.3534/2012 ABBOTT HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: RSA No.55/2009 & CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(OS) No. 684/2004 % 8 th December, versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 12 th March, 2018 Pronounced on: 12 th April, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: TRADE MARKS ACT, Judgment delivered on :3rd September, 2012

K.S.Gita vs Vision Time India Pvt. Ltd on 16 February, all appeals

1. Issue notice. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Defendant No.1;

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Judgment: RSA No.53/2011 & CM. Nos /2011. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO No. 347/2017. % 23 rd August, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 13 th August, 2018 J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA. G.A. No of 2001 and C.S. No. 356 of Decided On:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 29 th October, 2015

Through : Mr.Atul Bhuchhar, Advocate with Mr.Manoj Nagar, Advocate. I.A.No.2351/2013 (u/s 45 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment delivered on: CS(OS) 2318/2006

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. Reserved on : 20 th July, 2017 % Date of Decision: 31 st July, 2017 J U D G M E N T

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Decided on: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

$~J *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + IA 16973/2013 in CC 50/2013 in CS(OS) 626/2012. versus

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 156/2014. versus

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT. Judgment Pronounced on: CS(OS) No. 1958/2006 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED (L&T)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

On 18 th May 2011, the Plaintiffs applied for provisional injunction orders. and successfully obtained the orders on 3 rd June 2011.

Bar & Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Delivered on:

168 FILM PROJECT 2017 OFFICIAL ENTRY AGREEMENT [Updated April 8, 2017] Team # Film Type. Entrant Name. Address: Apt/Suite

Transcription:

* $~34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 123012015 MULTI SCREEN MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED... Plaintiff Through Mr.Abhishek Malhotra and Mr. Debashish Mukherjee, Advocates. versus WWW.VlMEO.COM & ORS Through Nemo.... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER % 01.05.2015 I.A.No.923112015 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of. I.A.No.9230/2015 (exemption) Subject to the undertaking of the plaintiff that he will file original documents within four weeks from today exemption is allowed. Application disposed of. CS(OS) 1230/2015 & I.A.No.9229/2015 (u/o XXVI R. 9 CPC) Plaint be registered as a suit. Let summons ofthe suit and notice of the pending applications be issued to the defendants on the plaintifftaking necessary steps by CS(OS) 123012015 Page 10/5 J2s\~",~ov<j", 1 S. '~

way ofordinary process, speed post as also courier. Written statement and reply be filed within four weeks from the date of service with advance copy to the plaintiff who may file replication/rejoinder before next date. I.A.No.9229/2015 (u/o XXXIX R. 1& 2 epe) The present has been filed by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant from communicating or making available or distributing, or duplicating, or displaying, or releasing, or showing, or uploading, or downloading or exhibiting, or playing or defraying the movie "Piku Motion Se Hi Emotion" which is scheduled to be released on 08.5.2015. Defendant no.1 to 13 are websites engaged in the business of uploading pirated and un-licensed content. There is apprehension that they may communicate unlicensed copy of the said film which will result in losses to the plaintiff as also to the Government of revenue collected through taxes. Defendant nos.14 to 17 are internet service provider (hereinafter referred to as "ISP") engaged in the business of basic telephony, mobile service and broadband network all over the world. These defendants provide a medium to access World Wide Web (www) and telecommunications services through wired and wireless telephony to their respective customers. These defendants are functioning as vessels for others to use their services to infringe copyright work such as the aforenoted film. CS(OS) 1230/2015 Page 2 of5 ()1\,w,Jc-iA ~\ 1-<::-1

Defendant no.28 is the department of telecommunications, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. It has been made a party for the limited purpose for enabling compliance of the orders passed by this Court. Defendant nos.29 to 35 and 36 to 75 are multi system operators and cable operators that are governed by the Cable Network Regulation Act, 1995 and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Act, 1997. The plaintiff submits that these multi system operators and/or cable operators all over the country are engaged in unauthorized and unlicensed reproduction and broadcast on their local channels and there is likelihood that the aforesaid film is likely to be exhibited by them. The said defendants are not licensed by the plaintiffto distribute and broadcast the aforenoted film. Defendant nos.76 to 100 are all the presently unknown person who the plaintiff apprehends will infringe the copyright of the plaintiff in the upcoming cinematograph film "Piku- Motion Se Hi Emotion". The plaintiff seeks proactive protective orders from this Court qua these defendants as well. This would be consistent with the International "John Doe" practice and India's TIPS obligation to effectively enforce all Intellectual Property Rights, including rights, such as in the present case. Submission is that this film was completed on 21.3.2015, the music of the said film was launched on 01.4.2015 and trailer of the film was distributed by the plaintiff on various platforms on 25.3.2015. These strong apprehensions that the acts ofthe defendants CS(OS) 123012015 Page 30/5 63;t\C,~~4-c,\~ IS:

would amount to unlicensed and illegal exploitation of the film and also interfere with and disrupt the established industry practice thereby causing immense losses to producers such as the plaintiff. Further submission is that in the past also there have been violation ofcopy right ofmovies and similar orders commonly known as a "John Doe" order has been obtained. The averments in the plaint and the documentary evidence have been perused. A prima facie case is made out in favour of the plaintiff. Irreparable loss will be suffered by him in case ad interim ex parte injunction is not granted in his favour. Balance ofconvenience is also in favour ofthe plaintiff. Accordingly, till next of hearing the defendants, their partners, proprietors, directors, shareholders, nominees, servants, representatives, franchisees, agents and other known and unknown parties, are restrained from communicating or making available or distributing or duplicating, or displaying, or releasing, or showing, or uploading, or downloading or exhibiting, or playing, and/or defraying the movie "Piku-Motion Se Hi Emotion" in any manner without a proper license from the plaintiff or in any other manner which would violate/infringe the plaintiffs copyright in the said cinematograph film "Piku-Motion Se Hi Emotion" through different mediums like CD, DVD, Blu-ray, VCD, cable TV, DTH, Internet, MMS, Tapes, Conditional Access System or in any other like manner. Defendant nos. 14 to 27 are further directed to block access to CS(OS) 123012015 Page 4 0/5 G'o1/\(",(\+c1Jl,~ H~-

the unlicensed content of the infringing web sites upon the plaintiff giving notice of the infringing activity to the said IPSs and the IPS will react within the next 24 hours. days. Compliance of Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC be effected in four For completion of service Registrar on 14.8.2015. and pleadings list before Joint Order dasti under signatures ofthe Court Master. MAYOl,2015 ncin ej(- INDERMEET KAUR, J CS(OS) 123012015 Page S 0/5, I I. rjwj-.itc0,~ \ c;-i~