UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION,

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION ) STUDIES, ) 1629 K Street, NW, Suite 600, ) Washington, DC 20

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 22

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2014 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:18-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9

Case3:15-cv JD Document22 Filed04/22/15 Page1 of 26

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1of6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv-Of''l67-RDM Document 1 Filed 05/2?' 1 6 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:14-cv RLW Document 1 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 6 COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 5:18-cv Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv JKB Document 1 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Rules and Regulations

Case: 2:18-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/06/18 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Immigration Law's Catch-22: The Case for Removing the Three and Ten-Year Bars

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT. Plaintiff, National Wildlife Federation ( NWF ), alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

~ 14 ~ 15 VOICE OF SAN DIEGO, Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 10 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Provisional Waiver Gaining Ground With Frustrated Immigrant As the Last Option

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Overview of FOIA Litigation. ASAP National Training Conference. ASAP National Training Conference. Presented by Brent Evitt

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:19-cv SK Document 1 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 11

Immigration Update: Temporary Protected Status

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO HARDSHIP AND THE MANUAL. This chapter includes:

Security ( DHS ) officials including ICE officers in field offices, detention facilities and

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 10

United States Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No.

Case 3:07-cv JSW Document 1 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:08-cv CW-DBP Document 7 Filed 11/11/08 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

Case: 3:15-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/18/14 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Introduction. 1. In an effort to give native Americans greater control over their own affairs,

Transcription:

Stacy Tolchin (CA SBN #1) Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin S. Spring St., Suite 00A Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: (1) -0 Facsimile: (1) - Email: Stacy@Tolchinimmigration.com Meredith R. Brown (CA SBN #) Law Office of Meredith R. Brown 01 Broadview Drive Glendale, CA Telephone: () 1- Facsimile: () 1-0 Email: mbvisa@sbcglobal.net 1 1 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 0 1 Hugo Benjamin OSORIO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant. Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Under the Freedom of Information Act

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff Hugo Benjamin OSORIO hereby files this action under the Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ), U.S.C., for injunctive and other appropriate relief seeking the disclosure and release of agency records improperly withheld by Defendant UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This Court has jurisdiction under the FOIA pursuant to U.S.C. (a)()(b), U.S.C. (federal question), U.S.C. 01- (authority to issue declaratory judgment when jurisdiction already exists).. Venue is properly with this Court pursuant to U.S.C. 1(e) (general venue) because this is a civil action in which Defendant is the United States of America; because Plaintiff resides in this judicial district; and there is no real property involved in this action. PARTIES. Plaintiff Hugo BENJAMIN OSORIO is a native and citizen of Mexico, who has been married to his United States Citizen wife since 00. Plaintiff resides with his wife and his stepdaughter, age, in Tustin, California.. Defendant, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) is an agency of Department of Homeland Security, within the Executive Branch of the government of the United States. CBP is an agency within the meaning of U.S.C. (f)(1). CBP has in its possession, custody, and control of records to which Plaintiff seeks access. 1

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS. Plaintiff Hugo BENJAMIN OSORIO is a native and citizen of Mexico, who has been married to his United States Citizen wife since 00.. Plaintiff intends to file for residency based on his marriage to his United States citizen wife, and the hardship that she faces if he is not permitted to remain in the United States. See U.S.C. 1(a)()(B)(v). Petitioner s wife is a cancer survivor and continues to be subject to a host of medical issues. In addition her ten year old United States citizen daughter, Petitioner s stepdaughter, suffers from epilepsy and requires constant monitoring and treatment.. Petitioner originally entered the United States in. In approximately, he was arrested by criminal authorities and was transferred to the Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1 Upon information and belief, no criminal charges were brought against him.. Petitioner recalls that he was given voluntary departure by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and was physically removed from the United States. Approximately three days later, he attempted to return to the United States and was detained and fingerprinted by officials at the border. He was returned to Mexico but was not provided with any paperwork from immigration officials. Approximately three days later, he returned to the United States and has not departed since that time. years. 1. Petitioner has resided continuously in the United States for at least. Based on his 00 marriage to his United States citizen wife, The Immigration and Naturalization Service ceased to exist on March 1, 00 and its functions were transferred to the Department of Homeland Security. See Homeland Security Act of 00, Pub.L. No. -, Stat 1 (Nov., 00).

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Petitioner is eligible to apply for lawful permanent residence. U.S.C. 1(b)()(A)(i). Because he entered the United States without authorization, he must depart the United States and obtain the visa through consular processing with the United States Department of State. However, once he departs the United States for the consular processing appointment, he will trigger a ten year unlawful presence bar because he has been unlawfully present in the United States for more than one year. See U.S.C. 1(a)()(B)(i)(II). 1. A waiver of that ten year unlawful presence bar is available if Petitioner can demonstrate that the denial of admission would cause extreme hardship to a United States or lawful permanent resident parent, spouse, or child, including a step-child. U.S.C. 1(a)()(B)(v). Petitioner s United States citizen spouse is a survivor of stomach and colon cancer, and still suffers from significant medical issues. His ten year old U.S. Citizen stepdaughter suffers from epilepsy, and must undergo treatment and constant monitoring. Under legal precedent defining extreme hardship, he has an outstanding claim to the waiver of the ten year unlawful presence bar. See Matter of Cervantes, I&N Dec. 0, - (BIA ). 1. A new administrative policy allows individuals who are married to United States citizens to file the extreme hardship unlawful presence waiver in the United States, so that they do not have to depart to their country of origin for the consular processing appointment until the waiver has been adjudicated. See Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate Relatives, Fed. Reg. -01 (Jan.. 01). However, that special waiver, called the Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver," is not available if the noncitizen is inadmissible under

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 any other ground, beyond the unlawful presence ground at INA 1(a)()(B)(i)(II). Fed. Reg. -01. 1. On June, 01, Plaintiff filed a request with Defendant CBP electronically, requesting any and all records under his name. Defendant CBP issued a confirmation receipt electronically, assigning the receipt number CBP- 01-00. 1. Petitioner filed this request in order to obtain any records from the incident at the border when he attempted to return to the United States in approximately. He requires this information in order to determine if he is eligible for the Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver, since that waiver is not available if Petitioner is inadmissible on any other ground beyond unlawful presence, U.S.C. 1(a)()(B)(i)(II). 1. Five months have elapsed since Plaintiff s FOIA request to Defendant CBP.. Plaintiff has not received any response from Defendant CBP beyond the initial receipt acknowledging his request. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT ONE (Violation of FOIA, U.S.C. ). Plaintiff incorporates the allegations in the paragraphs above as though fully set forth here.. Defendant has unlawfully withheld records requested by Plaintiff pursuant to U.S.C.. 0. The FOIA statute requires that a response to a request be issued within 0 days, excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays. U.S.C.

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 (a)()(a)(i). Plaintiff s request to Defendant CBP has been pending for five months without a response. 1. Defendant has violated FOIA by failing to produce any and all nonexempt records responsive to Plaintiffs FOIA request within the twenty (0) day time period set forth in U.S.C. (a)()(a)(i). PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court grant the following relief: (1) Order Defendant to conduct a search of any and all responsive records to Plaintiff s FOIA request and demonstrate that it employed search methods reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of records responsive to Plaintiff s FOIA request; () Order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all nonexempt records responsive to Plaintiff s FOIA request and a Vaughn index of any responsive records withheld under claim of exemption; () Enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold any and all nonexempt records responsive to Plaintiff s FOIA request; () Award costs and reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred under this action under U.S.C. (a)()(e); and () Grant such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. // //

1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Dated: November, 01 Respectfully submitted, Stacy Tolchin Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin S. Spring St., Suite 00A Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: (1) -0 Facsimile: (1) - Email: Stacy@Tolchinimmigration.com Meredith R. Brown Law Office of Meredith R. Brown 01 Broadview Drive Glendale, CA Telephone: () 1- Facsimile: () 1-0 Email: mbvisa@sbcglobal.net Counsel for Plaintiff By: s/stacy Tolchin Stacy Tolchin