Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

)

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION


Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

2:04-cv HAB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~ NOV - FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS~i.~ SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 4:19-cv JSW Document 4-1 Filed 03/07/19 Page 2 of 30

Case 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Chapter 14: Alternative Dispute Resolution Internet Tip (textbook p. 686)

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 4:05-cv-01090-CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6 FILED 2005 May-27 AM 09:44 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERl'\l DISTRJCT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOnlENT OPPORTUNITY COi\IMIS5ION, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT TYSON FOODS, INC. JURY TRIAL PEMAND Defendant. NAT URE OF THE AcrlDN This is an action brought under Tille VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, to corre<:t unla"ful emplo)mem practices on the basis of sex. and to make whole Sheena Cranford. The Defendant discriminated against Shenna Cranford by subjecting her to a sexually hostile work environment, and constructively discharging her because of her sex, female. JURISDICTION ANP VENUE I. Jurisdiction of this Coun is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.c. 451, 1331. 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to 703, 706(1)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. as amended, 42 U.5.C. 2000e-5(1)( I) and (3), and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991,42 U.S.c. Se>:!ion 198 1A. 1

Case 4:05-cv-01090-CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 2 of 6 2. The unlal'oful employment practices alleged below were committed within the Jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Middle Division. PARTI['S 3. The Plaintiff. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission"), is an agency of the United States of America charged with the administration. interpretation and enforcement of Title VII and is expressly authorized to bring this action by 706(f)(1) of Title VII. 42 U.S.c. 2000e-5(f)(1). 4. Atall relevant times, the Defendant, Ty'>On Foods, Inc. (""Tyson" orthe "Employer") has been doing business in the State of Alabama and the city of Albertville, and has had at least fifteen (15) employees. 5. At all relevant times. the Defendant, Tyson has continuously been, and is now, an employer engaged in an industry affe<:ling commerce "ithin the meaning of 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII. 42 U.S.c. 2000e-{b), (g) and (h). STATEMENT Qf CLAl i'ols 6. More than thirty (30) da~'s prior to the institution of this lawsuit, on or about November 6. 2003. Sheena Cranford filed a Charge of Discrimination "ith Ihe Commission alleging violations of Tide VII by the Defendant. 7. The Defendant was given notice of the charge on or about November 6, 2003. The Defendant responded to the charge on or about December 15,2003. 2

Case 4:05-cv-01090-CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 3 of 6 8. On or about September IS, 2004. the Commission determined that there was reasonable cause to believe that Sheena Cranford was subjected to se)( ual harassment by Tyson and was constructively discharged by Tyson ~ause of her SC)(, female. 9. Between September IS and October 13. 2004. the Commission attempted 10 conciliate the charge. On October 13, 2004, the Commission notified Sheena Cranford and liie Employer liiat conciliation had been unsuccessful. All administrative prerequisites to liiis suit have been met. 10. Since on or about April 17, 2003, the Defendant has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Albertville facility in violation of 703(aXI) of Titlc VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000c 2(aXI). These practices include maintaining a sc)(ually hostile work environment. I I. On or about April 14, 2003, Sheena Cranford was hired by Tyson on its produclion line. During her employment Sheena Cranford "''as subjetted to unwelcome se)(ual conduct by her coworkers. because of her se)(. female. 12. Sheena Cranford complained to Tyson management personnel about the se)( ual harassment. 13. Defendam ignored these complaints and the situation was not corrected. 14. Defendant failed to take prompt and effective action in response to Sheena Cranford's complaims. IS. Defendant failed to exercise reasonable Cilre to prevent and correct promptly the harassing behavior. 16. The effect of the practices complained of above has been to deprive Sheena Cranford of equal employment opportunities and otherv.';sc adversely affected her status as an employee, because of her sex. female.

Case 4:05-cv-01090-CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 4 of 6 18. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were intemional. 19, The unlawful employment practices complained of above were done with malice and/or reekless indifference to the federally protected rights of Sheena Cranford. 20. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were so intolerable that a reasonable IJC'rson would have felt compelled to resign. PM YER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests thai this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunclion enjoining the Defendant. its officers, agents, soccessors, assigns and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in any employment practices which discriminate on the basis of sex. Il Order the Defendant to institute and cany oui policies, practices and programs which provide equal emplo>ment opportunities for all of its employees regardless of sex and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. C. Order the Defendant 10 make whole Sheena Cranford by providing, where appropriate. lmck pay with prejudgment interest. in amounts to be determined at trial. and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful emplo}mem practices, including but notlimiled to reinstatement. D, Order the Defendant to make whole Sheena Cranford, by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses. E. Order the Defendant to make whole Sheena Cranford by providing her with compensation for non pecuniary losses. including pain and suffering. emotional distress. humiliation, isolation, depression. loss of credit, and loss of enjoyment of life.

Case 4:05-cv-01090-CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 5 of 6 F. Order the Defendant to pay Sheena Cranford punitive damages for its malicious and/or reckless conduct. in an amount to be determined at trial. G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems nc(:essary and propel". H. Award the Commission its costs in this action. J URY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests ajury trial on all questions offact raised by the Complaint. Respectfully submil1ed. ERIC S. DREIBAND General Counsel JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel EQUAL EMPLOYMFJ\'T OPPORTIJNITY COMMISSION 1801 "L" Street, N.W. Washington. DC 20507 5

Case 4:05-cv-01090-CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 6 of 6 Supervisory Trial Attorney Alabama Slate Bar il) #ASB-6535-D67P c~ Senior Trial Anorney Colorado State Bar ID #21309 EQUAL E:-'1PLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 113022" Street South. Suite 2000 Binningham, Alabama 35205-2881 Telephone: (205) 212-2047 Facsimile: (20S) 212-2041 WAIVER OF SERVICE FORMS WILL BE SEl'rT WITH COMPLAIl\'T 6