FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLED^^SSSmi^

Similar documents
USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015. DISTRICT OF COWMBAaijh 1

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED. No and Consolidated Cases

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVEHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR REVIEW

\{."--, Under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), Section 706 of

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF URAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Customer Name: IDT America, Corp. (IDT)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

Case: 1:17-md DAP Doc #: 19 Filed: 12/21/17 1 of 5. PageID #: 148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. In re: Petition for rate increase by Gulf ) Docket No EI Power Company ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

In the Supreme Court of the United States REPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONER THE NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

No BB UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT BLACK WARRIOR RIVERKEEPER, INC, Respondent-Appellee, CHEROKEE MINING, LLC,

In The Dupreme ourt of tl e ignite Dtateg PETITIONERS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Customer Name: Neutral Tandem

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case crm Document 3284 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, LLC

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

mew Doc 913 Filed 07/14/17 Entered 07/14/17 17:16:19 Main Document Pg 1 of 16

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-49 ADAM W. MASON, Petitioner, vs. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Case 3:17-mc G Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

HERNANDO-PASCO, HOSPICE, INC.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, CITY OF LARGO, ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

Case 4:17-cv JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF. THE STANDING COMMITTEE on the Unlicensed Practice of Law of The

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2016

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STAFF S PRELIMINARY LIST OF ISSUES AND POSITIONS TENTATIVE LIST OF ISSUES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

15-20-CV FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ALLCO FINANCE LIMITED Plaintiff-Appellant

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

American Electric Power Company v. Connecticut, 131 S. Ct (2011). Talasi Brooks ABSTRACT

TY CLEVENGER 21 Bennett Avenue #62 New York, New York 10033

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

*west 1 CO > % as *<\S. State of West Virginia Office of the Attorney General. Attorney General. December 14, 2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

ORAL ARGUMENT REMOVED FROM CALENDAR No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

Transcription:

UNITEB 8WE8G9URT-QF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF colllmiftrasbjo STATES COURT OF APPEALS xtmmr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLED^^SSSmi^ OCT id 3 ZOlD ALAB4H@(5gt\^gO:OMPANY, GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, GULF POWER COMPANY, AND MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY, Petitioners, CaBeNo.l5-ia71 v. united states environmental protectionagency and gina McCarthy, administrator, Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act ("CAA"), 42 U.S.C 7607(b)(1), and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15(a), Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, GulfPower Company, and Mississippi Power Company (collectively, "Petitioners") hereby petition this Court to review the final action of the Respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency in promulgating the final rule entitled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Electric Generating Units, published in the Federal Register at 80 Fed. Reg. (om>^on October 33, 2015 ("Final Rule"). This petition for

review is timely filed within 60 days of the date of publication in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1). Date: October X5, 2015 Respectfully submitted KARL R. MOOR Southern Company Services, Inc. 42 Inverness Center Parkway BINB231 Birmingham, AL 35242 Tel: (205) 992-6371 krmoor@southernco.com FOR ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, GULF POWER COMPANY, AND MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY C. GRADY MOORE, III STEVEN G. MCKINNEY Balch & Bingham LLP 1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 1500 Birmingham, AL 35303-4642 Tel: (205)251-8100 Fax: (205)488-5704 gmoore@balch.com smckinney@balch.com FOR ALABAMA POWER COMPANY MARGARET CLAIBORNE CAMPBELL ANGELA J. LEVIN Troutman Sanders LLP 600 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 5200 Atlanta, GA 30308-2216 Tel: (404)885-3000 margaret.campbell@troutmansanders.com angela.levin@troutmansanders.com TERESE T. WYLY BEN H. STONE Balch & Bingham LLP 1310 Twenty Fifth Avenue Gulfport, MS 39501-1931 Tel: (228)214-0413 twyly@balch.com bstone@balch.com FOR GEORGIA POWER COMPANY FOR MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

JEFFREY A. STONE Beggs & Lane, RLLP 501 Commendencia Street Pensacola, FL 32502 Tel: (850)432-2451 JAS@beggslane.com ROBERT A. MANNING GARY V. PERKO Hopping Green & Sams, P.A 119 S. Monroe Street, Suite 300 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Tel: (850)222-7500 robertm@hgslaw.com garyp@hgslaw.com FOR GULF POWER COMPANY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Rule 15(c) ofthe Federal Rules ofappellate Procedure, I hereby certify that I have this day caused the foregoing Petition for Review by Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, GulfPower Company, and Mississippi Power Company to be served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on October ot2), 2015, upon the following: Loretta E. Lynch Attorney General John C. Cruden Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division RFK DOJ Building, Room 2143 The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator Mail Code 1101A Avi S. Garbow General Counsel Mail Code 2310A Dated: QcAokec ^3,2015 Counsel

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLlT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT OCT 23W1$ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVED FILED OCT 23Z015 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, GULF POWER COMPANY, AND MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY, Petitioners, CLERK Case No. 15^1371 v. united states environmental protectionagency and gina McCarthy, administrator, Respondents. RULE 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, and the D.C. Circuit Rule 26.1, Petitioners, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company, certify as follows. Each Petitioner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is a publiclyheld corporation. Other than Southern Company, no publicly-held company owns 10% or more of any of Petitioners' stock. No publicly-held company holds 10% or more of Southern Company's stock. Southern Company stock is traded publicly on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "SO.

Through its subsidiaries, Southern Company is a leading U.S. producer of electricity, generating and delivering electricity to over four million customers in the southeastern United States. Southern Company subsidiaries include four vertically integrated electric utilities Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company. These subsidiaries, each a Petitioner here, operate coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear, and hydroelectric generating capacity. Dated: October 3 3, 2015 Respect: C. GRADY MGOR, III Balch & Bingham LLP 1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 1500 Birmingham, AL 35303-4642 Tel: (205)226-8718 Fax: (205)488-5704 gmoore@balch.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Rule 15(c) ofthe Federal Rules ofappellate Procedure, I hereby certify that I have this day caused the foregoing Rule 26.1 Certificate of Corporate Disclosure by Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company to be served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on October <D3, 2015, upon the following: Loretta E. Lynch Attorney General John C. Cruden Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division RFK DOJ Building, Room 2143 The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator Mail Code 1101A Avi S. Garbow General Counsel Mail Code 2310A Dated: Oc*dW 2 3,2015 Counserfbr Petitioners