UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS FOURTH MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 13-CR GAO v. ) ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 13-CR GAO v. ) ) ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 359 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

Docket No In The United States Court of Appeals For The First Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Appellee DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 1492 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 11 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, ) Defendant )

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 418 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Crim. No GAO v. ) ) ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

Case 1:13-mj MBB Document 15 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION TO STAY JURY SELECTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION TO STAY JURY SELECTION AND TRIAL

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 717 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 981 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

10 BEFORE THE HONORABLE MARIANNE B. BOWLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 INITIAL APPEARANCE April 22,

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 648 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 1580 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 257 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2040 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 297 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:08-cr JLA Document 10 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. SOUTHERN DISTRICT 05-S-2396 to State of New Hampshire. James B. Hobbs. Opinion and Order

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 1518 Filed 09/08/15 Page 1 of 31 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENT S PROPOSED GUILT-PHASE PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS

Case 2:16-cr GMN-PAL Document 3031 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 577 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO.

Motion for Written Pre-Voir Dire Juror Questionnaire

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:09-cr BMC-RLM Document 189 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 2176 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 295 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS REDACTED. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 295 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC TH DCA CASE NO. 4D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 535 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI

The State s brief in response to the Cafaro defendants motion to enlarge time, previously filed under seal, shall be unsealed. The Cafaro defendants

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P.16(d)(1)

1. Rice and Chau are residents of Cook County, Illinois, and respectively the

REDACTED. 02/26/2015 Minute Order (No Print) Event ID: E-Filed: N COURTROOM 202 MONITOR THIS MORNING WAS XXX AND THIS AFTERNOON WAS XXX /CMR

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 547 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:14-cv ADB Document 395 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 117 Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1987

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CASE NO

A execution of this Order.

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 304 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 6635

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

REDACTED. 4/03/2015 Filing Other Event ID: E-Filed: N DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-7 SEALED ENVELOPE #197 /LKO

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

SP00-3 Sealed Records Procedures Appellate and Trial Court Rules Standards for sealing. Proposal applies to civil and criminal proceedings

CASE NO: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

REDACTED. 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE.

Case 1:05-cr RBW Document 260 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 1 of 7 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 192 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1711

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 127 Filed 07/18/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:12-cv RWZ Document 47 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:05-cv WGY Document 1651 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C17 LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE GLENDA SANDERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Doc 19 Filed 06/01/16 Entered 06/01/16 14:19:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY COURT OF APPEALS WPSD TV, THE PADUCAH SUN, AND THE MARSHALL COUNTY TRIBUNE-COURIER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JURISDICTION

Case 1:09-cr BMC Document 24 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 568

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

The American Court System BASIC JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS. Jurisdiction

Case 1:18-mc LMB-JFA Document 13 Filed 01/25/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 91

Case 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 2277 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 43

- 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. No. 13-CR Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mona K.

Case Doc 51 Filed 05/30/17 Entered 05/30/17 13:41:52 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Supreme Court of the United States

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 25 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cr GAO Document 276 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. 1:12-CV FDS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Transcription:

Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1038 Filed 02/15/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. 13-10200-GAO DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY Defendant, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, by and through counsel, respectfully requests leave to file a Reply to the government s Opposition [DE 1036] to his Motion for Leave to Reference and/or Quote Certain Materials in Public Filings [DE 1032]. The proposed reply, attached hereto, will assist the Court in adjudicating the motion by responding to matters raised in the government s Opposition and by narrowing and focusing issues in dispute. Respectfully submitted, DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV by his attorneys /s/ William W. Fick Judy Clarke, Esq. (CA Bar # 76071 CLARKE & RICE, APC 1010 Second Avenue, Suite 1800 San Diego, CA 92101 (619 308-8484 JUDYCLARKE@JCSRLAW.NET David I. Bruck, Esq. 220 Sydney Lewis Hall Lexington, VA 24450 (540 460-8188 BRUCKD@WLU.EDU 1

Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1038 Filed 02/15/15 Page 2 of 2 Miriam Conrad, Esq. (BBO # 550223 Timothy Watkins, Esq. (BBO # 567992 William Fick, Esq. (BBO # 650562 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE 51 Sleeper Street, 5th Floor (617 223-8061 MIRIAM_CONRAD@FD.ORG TIMOTHY_WATKINS@FD.ORG WILLIAM_FICK@FD.ORG Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on February 15, 2015. /s/ William W. Fick 2

Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1038-1 Filed 02/15/15 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. 13-10200-GAO DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV REPLY TO GOVERNMENT S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REFERENCE AND/OR QUOTE CERTAIN MATERIALS IN PUBLIC FILINGS Defendant, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, by and through counsel, respectfully submits this Reply to the government s Opposition ( Opp. [DE 1036] to his Motion for Leave to Reference and/or Quote Certain Materials in Public Filings [DE 1032]. Most of the government s Opposition attacks a straw man: the prospect of unsealing and publicly disclosing complete juror questionnaires and voir dire transcripts. See, e.g., Opp. at 3 (arguing that providing access to full unredacted transcripts of the voir dire of individual jurors might well reveal other information such as health issues and criminal records; and arguing that unfettered public access to the great wealth of personal information that is provided in the questionnaires might allow observes to piece together identities. But that is not what that the defendant has requested. Rather, defense counsel simply seek leave, in court filings and arguments, to 1. refer to or quote relevant information from the questionnaires that does not include any identifying information, most of which has already been described and/or quoted in public voir dire, and 1

Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1038-1 Filed 02/15/15 Page 2 of 4 2. to refer to or quote from transcripts of voir dire proceedings which were conducted in public and already have been extensively described and quoted in news coverage. The vast bulk of the information is thus already public, and to the extent a discrete relevant piece of analogous questionnaire information did not happen to be mentioned in public voir dire, there is no logical reason to preclude it from becoming public. Such information, which is integral to the parties court pleadings, is not only presumptively subject to a right of public access but is critical to public understanding in this case of the parties arguments and the decisions of both this Court and the Court of Appeals about whether a change of venue is required to assure a fair trial by an impartial jury. The practice of public quotation and reference to documents that, themselves, remain under seal is not unusual. For example, in the Court of Appeals, Pre-Sentence Reports ( PSRs in criminal cases are filed under seal, precisely because they contain a wealth of sensitive personal information. However, parties commonly refer to and quote, in their publicly filed briefs, portions of PSRs that are relevant to the legal issues being litigated, and the Court of Appeals commonly refers to and quotes PSRs in published decisions. The defendant essentially proposes to treat the juror questionnaires and voir dire transcripts in similar fashion here. With regard to the arguments and rulings on motions to excuse for cause, the government s concerns about possible influence on other jurors are speculative and remote in light of the Court s emphatic and repeated orders to the prospective jurors to avoid news coverage. 2

Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1038-1 Filed 02/15/15 Page 3 of 4 With regard to the number of jurors qualified on a given day, the defendant seeks this relief principally so that he may seek unsealing in the Court of Appeals of his Second Petition for Mandamus, which noted the number of jurors qualified as of the date of filing. To the extent the Court revealed the total as of February 13, it is difficult to conceive any harm that might result from the unsealing of other court papers that mention the total as of the date of filing. Respectfully submitted, DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV by his attorneys /s/ William W. Fick Judy Clarke, Esq. (CA Bar # 76071 CLARKE & RICE, APC 1010 Second Avenue, Suite 1800 San Diego, CA 92101 (619 308-8484 JUDYCLARKE@JCSRLAW.NET David I. Bruck, Esq. 220 Sydney Lewis Hall Lexington, VA 24450 (540 460-8188 BRUCKD@WLU.EDU Miriam Conrad, Esq. (BBO # 550223 Timothy Watkins, Esq. (BBO # 567992 William Fick, Esq. (BBO # 650562 FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE 51 Sleeper Street, 5th Floor (617 223-8061 MIRIAM_CONRAD@FD.ORG TIMOTHY_WATKINS@FD.ORG WILLIAM_FICK@FD.ORG 3

Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1038-1 Filed 02/15/15 Page 4 of 4 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants on February 15, 2015. /s/ William W. Fick 4