IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 EXHIBIT 8

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

C V CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

Case 2:17-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case No. upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which are

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

11? "76WiA, y01\v7-aikt ' DAVID DE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. -Civ- Case No. Defendants, ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Case No. Jury Trial Demanded

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

3. USAT is a provider of cashless, micro-transactions an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No:

8:11-cv LSC -TDT Doc # 8 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 23 - Page ID # 16

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

Case 2:16-cv RFB-GWF Document 4 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:18-cv CM Document 6 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:

--X. CASE No.: --X. Plaintiff John Gauquie ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all other persons

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Sec. 9 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Case 1:14-cv PGG Document 2 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROW ARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

CFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv MMA-JMA Document 1 Filed 09/09/14 Page 1 of 28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cv KPF Document 1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. Plaintiff, : :

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 358 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH I.

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

Ninth Circuit Establishes Pleading Requirements for Alleging Scheme Liability Under 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff vs. Civil Action File No. INTER REEF LTD. dba PROFITABLE SUNRISE, 113-CV-1104-TWT Defendant, MELLAND COMPANY S.R.O., COLOR SHOCK S.R.O., SOLUTIONS COMPANY S.R.O. and FORTUNA-K S.R.O. Relief Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT The Court having granted the Securities and Exchange Commission s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Inter Reef Ltd. dba Profitable Sunrise ( Defendant ) and Relief Defendants Melland Company S.R.O. ( Melland ), Color Shock S.R.O. ( Color Shock ), Solutions Company S.R.O. ( Solutions ), and Fortuna-K S.R.O. ( Fortuna-K ) (hereafter collectively Relief Defendants ), the

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 10 Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC or Commission ) and against the Defendant and Relief Defendants as follows I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act ) [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, 2

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 3 of 10 by directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person or (ii) disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or prospective investor, about (a) the use of investor funds; (b) the risk of the investment; and (c) the existence and/or nature of any profit-generating enterprise. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise (a) Defendant s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act ) [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)] in the 3

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 4 of 10 offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser, by directly or indirectly, (i) creating a false appearance or otherwise deceiving any person or (ii) disseminating false or misleading documents, materials, or information or making, either orally or in writing, any false or misleading statement in any communication with any investor or prospective investor, about (a) the use of investor funds; (b) the risk of the investment; and (c) the existence and/or nature of any profit-generating enterprise. 4

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 5 of 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise (a) Defendant s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of 5

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 6 of 10 sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77h]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise (a) Defendant s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Relief Defendants are liable, jointly and severally, for 6

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 7 of 10 disgorgement of all sums raised in the enterprise described in the Commission s Complaint, including, but not limited to, all amounts transmitted from the United States to accounts outside the United States, including to accounts held in the name of the Relief Defendants wherever those accounts are located, but specifically to accounts held in the following banks Raiffeisensbank, A.S. in the Czech Republic (including but limited to account number XXXXXXX6001 in the name of Relief Defendant Melland); Ceskolovenska Obchodni Bank, A.S. in the Czech Republic (including, but not limited to, account number XXXXXXX0500 in the name of Relief Defendant Solutions) Komercni Bank, A.S. in the Czech Republic (including, but not limited to, account number XXXXXXX0297 in the name of Relief Defendant Fortuna-K, and MKB Bank, ZRT in Hungary (including, but not limited to, account number XXXXXX0015 in the name of Relief Defendant Color Shock). together with prejudgment interest thereon. The Commission may move to amend this Final Judgment within 90 days to more precisely quantify the amount of 7

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 8 of 10 disgorgement and prejudgment interest. Defendants and Relief Defendants shall satisfy the disgorgement obligation by paying the ordered disgorgement to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. Defendants and Relief Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from bank accounts via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http//www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant and Relief Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank cashier s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; [Defendant s and/or Relief Defendant s name] as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant and Relief Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies 8

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 9 of 10 of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant and Relief Defendants relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant or Relief Defendants. The Commission shall hold the funds (collectively, the Fund ) and may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court s approval. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund. If the Commission staff determines that the Fund will not be distributed, the Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. The Commission may enforce the Court s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law) at any time after 14 days following entry of this Final Judgment. Defendant and Relief Defendants shall pay post judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961. 9

Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 10 of 10 V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. SO ORDERED this 16 th day of March, 2016. /s/thomas W. Thrash Thomas W. Thrash United States District Judge 10