CASE 0:13-cv JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) Civil Action

Similar documents
Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Courthouse News Service

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 5:17-cv BRO-FFM Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv HJW Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/28/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:16-cv CKJ Document 1 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Case 3:18-cv HZ Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants.

Case 1:14-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, Number:

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12cv26

Case 1:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2018 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WESTERN VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/21/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 652

)(

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

CJV-S-97-H13IYBSGGH FILED AUG J)

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA CASE NO CP-23- COUNTY OF GREENVILLE. Sylvia Lockaby, Plaintiff, vs.

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 0:12-cv RSR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2012 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Case 1:10-cv OWW-GSA Document 2 Filed 04/06/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

Case 1:18-cv RBK-AMD Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

P H I L L I P S DAYES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Case3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2017

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Plaintiff, Defendant. JEFF W. REISIG, District Attorney of Yolo County, by LARRY BARLLY, Supervising

CASE NO. C O M P L A I N T. Attorney, and sues the Defendants, JUSTIN BIEBER ( BIEBER } and HUGO HESNY

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 2:10-cv GLF-NMK Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/06/10 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6

New Orleans Workers Center for Racial Justice 217 N. Prieur St., New Orleans, LA Phone: (504) / Facsimile (504)

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case: 4:13-cv HEA Doc. #: 27 Filed: 12/02/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 128

Case 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction

Transcription:

CASE 0:13-cv-02336-JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ADIJAT EDWARDS, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil Action Case No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL YES NO _X COMPLAINT I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act related to the unlawful conversion of plaintiff s money and jewelry by officers of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency ( ICE and negligence on the part of ICE in providing supervision and policy to its officers regarding the property of detainees. On February 8, 2011 at the offices of ICE in Bloomington, Minnesota, and at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, the plaintiff, Ms. Edwards, was denied her property interest in money and jewelry. The conversion of her property by ICE officers and negligence on the part of ICE in failing to supervise its agents or institute policy are the cause of injury to plaintiff.

CASE 0:13-cv-02336-JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 5 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter to this Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1346(b of the Federal Tort Claim Act (FTCA. 3. On February 6, 2013 an Administrative Tort Claim was filed with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency. By a letter dated February 26, 2013, and mailed February 27, 2013, the claim was denied. This suit is timely. 4. Venue is properly with this district under 28 U.S.C. 1402(b as plaintiff resides in Savage, Minnesota, and the acts complained of occurred in Bloomington, Minnesota. III. PARTIES 5. Plaintiff Adijat Edwards, who is forty two (42 years old, is a resident of Savage, Minnesota. 6. Defendant United States of America is the appropriate defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act. IV. FACTS 7. Plaintiff Adijat Edwards landed in the United States from Nigeria on January 31, 2011 at the Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport. 8. United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP and ICE officers detained Ms. Edwards and held her in custody upon her arrival to the United States. 9. CBP and ICE officers separated Ms. Edwards from her possessions at the time of her detention. 10. The possessions taken from Ms. Edwards by CBP and ICE officers included jewelry valued at approximately $4,000.00. 2

CASE 0:13-cv-02336-JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 3 of 5 11. On the morning of February 8, 2011, an ICE officer, Ken (whose last name is believed to be Olson, whose cell phone number was (612 290-0691 as of 12/18/2012, took Ms. Edwards to the US Bank at Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport. 12. Officer Adam (Last Name Unknown accompanied ICE Officer Ken and Ms. Edwards to the bank. 13. At the bank, ICE Officer Ken requested that Ms. Edwards withdraw $1,200.00 in cash using her bank card. 14. ICE Officer Ken stated to Ms. Edwards that the $1,200.00 cash was necessary to purchase an airline ticket for her expedited removal from the United States. 15. ICE Officer Ken and Ms. Edwards then went to the Delta Airline ticket counter at the airport, and ICE Officer Ken asked to purchase a ticket for the expedited removal of Ms. Edwards. 16. The agent at the Delta Airline ticket counter advised ICE Officer Ken that no ticket was necessary for a person being removed from the United States by expedited removal. 17. ICE Officer Ken retained the $1,200.00 cash that he had stated would be used for Ms. Edwards airline ticket. 18. Ms. Edwards requested that her money be returned to her. 19. ICE Officer Ken told Ms. Edwards that her money would be returned to her at the time of her removal from the United States, or immediately before her removal. 20. Ms. Edwards was returned to the ICE offices in the Metro Office Park in Bloomington, Minnesota. 21. In the early afternoon of February 8, 2011, another Officer (possibly named Zanter of Vanter accompanied Ms. Edwards to the airport. 3

CASE 0:13-cv-02336-JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 4 of 5 22. Ms. Edwards asked the Officer accompanying her to the airport when the jewelry and $1,200.00 cash would be returned to her. 23. The officer accompanying Ms. Edwards to the airport stated that he did not know anything about her cash or jewelry. Edwards. 24. Neither the $1,200.00 nor the jewelry were or ever have been returned to Ms. V. CAUSES OF ACTION Count I Plaintiff v. Defendant United States of America Federal Tort Claims Act Conversion 25. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 24 as though fully set forth. 26. Plaintiff Adijat Edwards had a property interest in her cash and jewelry, and ICE Officers deprived her of that property interest. 26. ICE officers have the power to interrogate people and to make arrests under 8 U.S.C. 1357(a. 27. The actions of ICE Officers that deprived Ms. Edwards of her cash and jewelry and the officers subsequent refusal and failure to return the cash and jewelry constitute the tort of conversion under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 28. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, defendant United States of America is liable for these actions. Count II Plaintiff v. Defendant United States of America Federal Tort Claims Act Negligence 29. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 28 as though fully set forth. 4

CASE 0:13-cv-02336-JRT-JJK Document 1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 5 of 5 30. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency owed a duty to Plaintiff to protect, safeguard, and return property taken from Plaintiff; ICE breached its duty to Plaintiff, and as such, was a direct and proximate cause in bringing about Plaintiff s damages outlined above. 31. The actions of ICE as an agency and its individual officers named above constitute the tort of negligence under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 32. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, defendant United States of America is liable for these actions. Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests: A. Compensatory damages from Defendant; B. Reasonable attorneys fees and costs from Defendant; C. Such other and further relief as may be deemed appropriate. Richard L. Breitman MN Lic 0128508 Breitman Immigration Law Firm 2901 Metro Drive # 501 Bloomington MN 55425 (612 822-4724 (952 854-8519 (fax breitman@ix.netcom.com Counsel for Plaintiff Pro Bono Publicam 5