Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Similar documents
Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 181 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendants hereby move for a stay of all case deadlines in the abovecaptioned. 1. At the end of the day on December 21, 2018, the appropriations act

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 138 Filed 10/01/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RJL Document 28 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

Case: Document: 484 Page: 1 08/06/

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ), ) ) Defendant. )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 357 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 7:16-cv O Document 125 Filed 12/17/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 2937

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Case 1:14-cv ESH Document 39 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 49 Filed: 08/21/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1179 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 19-cv HSG 8

Case4:08-cv JSW Document320 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 3

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 84 Filed: 12/04/18 1 of 8. PageID #: 1038 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 3:05-cv Document 22 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

* IN THE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AFFIDAVIT OF N. TUCKER MENEELY

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

Case 1:11-cv BJR Document 72 Filed 07/05/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 11 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:10-cv FJS Document 24 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. CASE NO. 4:08-cv RH-WCS

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case 1:18-cv JGK Document 26 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 7:16-cv O Document 121 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 2919

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 121 Filed: 10/01/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1626. No. - IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

CASE NO.:12-CV-1984 OF EVIDENCE RELATED TO OBAMA S BIRTH. Plaintiff, Montgomery Blair Sibley ( Sibley ), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11), moves this

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

PlainSite. Legal Document

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FAMILY COURT Domestic Relations Branch

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv SLB Document 14 Filed 03/22/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 48 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 17

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL. BAR NO. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, ALEX M. AZAR, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., and, Defendants, THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR, JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE, et al., Defendant-Intervenors OAKLAND DIVISION Case No.: :-cv--hsg DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS DUE TO LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE MOTION FOR STAY OR IN ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE Case No.: :-cv-

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 0 The United States of America hereby moves for a stay of proceedings in the above-captioned case or in the alternative for an extension of the deadline to respond to the second amended complaint.. At the end of the day on December, 0, the appropriations act that had been funding the Department of Justice expired and appropriations to the Department lapsed. The Department does not know when funding will be restored by Congress.. Absent an appropriation, Department of Justice attorneys are prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances, including emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property. U.S.C... Undersigned counsel for the Department of Justice therefore requests a stay of proceedings until Congress has restored appropriations to the Department.. If this motion for a stay is granted, undersigned counsel will notify the Court as soon as Congress has appropriated funds for the Department. The Government requests that, at that point, all current deadlines for the parties be extended commensurate with the duration of the lapse in appropriations.. Opposing counsel state that they oppose the motion to stay the case. Counsel for intervenors did not have an opportunity to provide their position on the stay in the short time afforded for Government counsel to prepare and file the motion in light of the lapse of appropriations.. In the alternative, the Government seeks an extension of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the second amended complaint, from January, 0 until February, 0.. An extension is appropriate to enable the Government to account for the Court s resolution of the pending preliminary injunction motion, and to account for the undersigned s other work obligations, which at this point include a trial in early February as well as three significant briefs due in the first half of February.. Counsel for plaintiffs does not oppose the requested extension of the answer deadline. Counsel for the intervening defendants consent to the request. Therefore, although we greatly regret any disruption caused to the Court and the other litigants, the Government hereby moves for a stay of proceedings in this case until Department of MOTION FOR STAY OR IN ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE Case No.: :-cv-

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0 Filed // Page of Justice attorneys are permitted to resume their usual civil litigation functions. In the alternative, the Government seeks an extension of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the second amended complaint, from January, 0 until February, 0. 0 0 Dated: December, 0 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Justin M. Sandberg JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL Bar No. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 MOTION FOR STAY OR IN ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE Case No.: :-cv-

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0- Filed // Page of 0 JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL. BAR NO. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, ALEX M. AZAR, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., and, Defendants, THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR, JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE, et al., Defendant-Intervenors OAKLAND DIVISION Case No.: :-cv--hsg DECLARATION OF JUSTIN SANDBERG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS DUE TO LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE DECL. OF JUSTIN SANDBERG IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR STAY OR IN ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE Case No.: :-cv-

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0- Filed // Page of 0 I, Justin Sandberg, declare as follows:. I am a with the. I am an attorney of record in the above-captioned matter.. I have personal knowledge of all facts stated in this declaration, and if called to testify, I could and would testify competently thereto.. I contacted counsel for plaintiffs and intervening defendants regarding this motion. Counsel for plaintiffs, Ms. Boergers, stated that plaintiffs opposed the motion to stay but not to extend the answer deadline. Counsel for intervening defendants, Ms. Verm and Mr. Connelly, did not have an opportunity to provide a position on the motion to stay, but consented to the extension of time to answer. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on December, 0. /s/ Justin M. Sandberg JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL Bar No. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 0 DECL. OF JUSTIN SANDBERG IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR STAY OR IN ALTERNATIVE FOR EXTENSION OF ANSWER DEADLINE Case No.: :-cv-

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0- Filed // Page of 0 JUSTIN M. SANDBERG, IL. BAR NO. 00 L Street NW Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, ALEX M. AZAR, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., and, Defendants, THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR, JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE, et al., Defendant-Intervenors OAKLAND DIVISION Case No.: :-cv--hsg [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having considered the Government s motion to stay proceedings in this case in Case No.: :-cv-

Case :-cv-0-hsg Document 0- Filed // Page of light of the lapse in appropriations, hereby GRANTS the motion and STAYS the case until appropriations have been restored to the U.S. Department of Justice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this day of, 0. 0 0 Dated: Case No.: :-cv- HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE