From the Idea to a Patent

Similar documents
Utility Model Protection in Germany

European Patent Opposition Proceedings

Preliminary Injunction in Patent and Utility Model Cases

Trademark Protection in Europe

Securing evidence in patent cases by means of inspection

Design Protection in Europe

How patents work An introduction for law students

Designs. Germany Henning Hartwig BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb. A Global Guide

Are Patents merely Paper Tigers?

Patent litigation. Block 1. Module Priority. Essentials: Priority. Introduction

IP Report Patent Law. The right of priorities: Recent developments in EPO case law Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher

Frequently Asked Questions. Trade/service marks: What is a trade/service mark?

Patent Infringement Proceedings

TREATY SERIES 2008 Nº 4. Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

MALAYSIA IP HANDBOOK

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

The European patent system

Understanding and Utilization of the ISR and WOISA. Shunsuke YAMAMOTO Examination Standards Office Japan Patent Office

Utility Model Law I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

AUSTRIA Utility Model Law

DRAFT PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Jordanian Patent Office

Patent Law & Nanotechnology: An Examiner s Perspective. Eric Woods MiRC Technical Staff

11th Annual Patent Law Institute

Patent Law in Cambodia

PATENT LAW OF GEORGIA CHAPTER I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

Patenting Software-related Inventions according to the European Patent Convention

Examiners Report on Paper DII Examiners Report - Paper D Part II

THE ACTS ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT */**/***/****/*****/******/*******

Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions

Rksassociate Advocates & Legal Consultants ebook

Patentability what will a Patent Office allow? Darren Smyth 29 January 2010

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

The Consolidate Utility Models Act 1)

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

SWEDEN PATENTS ACT No.837 of 1967 in the version in force from July 1, 2014

CHAPTER 2 AUTHORS AND PATENT OWNERS Article 5. Author of the Invention, Utility Model, and Industrial Design Article 6.

PSMP. In contrast to a patent the duration of protection of a utility model is limited to ten years from the date of application.

THE PATENT LAW 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1. This Law shall regulate the legal protection of inventions by means of patents.

DRAFT. prepared by the International Bureau

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Chapter 1. General provisions. Article 1. Basic notions and definitions used in the present Law

Novelty. Japan Patent Office

ROMANIA Patent Law NO.64/1991 OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF ROMANIA, PART I, NO.613/19 AUGUST 2014 REPUBLICATION PATENT LAW NO.64/1991 1

Suzannah K. Sundby. canady + lortz LLP. David Read. Differences between US and EU Patent Laws that Could Cost You and Your Startup.

Selection Inventions the Inventive Step Requirement, other Patentability Criteria and Scope of Protection

PATENT ACT (UNOFFICIAL CLEAR TEXT) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Part II. Time limit for completing the International search. Application not searched

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

Guidelines for completing a Knowledge Development Box (KDB) Certificate Application

Intellectual Property Department Hong Kong, China. Contents

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Threats & Opportunities in Proceedings before the EPO with a brief update on the Unitary Patent

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FUND (STDF)

Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan

Utility Models Act. Passed RT I 1994, 25, 407 Entry into force

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

Act No. 435/2001 Coll. on Patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates and on Amendment of Some Acts as Amended (The Patent Act)

1. Inventions that are new, that involve an inventive step and that are susceptible of industrial application shall be patentable.

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

Germany. Stefan Abel and Pascal Böhner. Bardehle Pagenberg

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail. Part III Patentability

Utilization of Prior Art Evidence on TK: Opportunities and Possibilities in the International Patent System

Intellectual Property Primer. Tom Utley, PhD, CLP Licensing Officer Patent Agent

AZERBAIJAN Law on Patent Date of Text (Enacted): July 25, 1997 ENTRY INTO FORCE: August 2, 1997

Guide to WIPO Services

Procedure of Determining Novelty and Inventive Step

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

The European Patent Office An overview on the procedures before the EPO: up to grant, opposition and appeal

DECISION 486 Common Intellectual Property Regime (Non official translation)

INFORMATION FOR INVENTORS SEEKING PATENT PROTECTION

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

Information and Guidelines Concerning the Patent and Copyright Process at East Tennessee State University

Patent protection on Software. Software as an asset for technology transfer 29 September 2015

DENMARK Patents Regulations Order No. 25 of 18 January, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 February, 2013

THE PATENTABILITY OF COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED INVENTIONS. Consultation Paper by the Services of the Directorate General for the Internal Market

24 Criteria for the Recognition of Inventors and the Procedure to Settle Disputes about the Recognition of Inventors

PCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 154 PART V WRITTEN OPINION/INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION REPORT

Mateo Aboy, PhD (c) Mateo Aboy, PhD - Aboy & Associates, PC

Computer-implemented inventions under the EPC in the light of the Opinion of the EBA G 3/08

Practice for Patent Application

of Laws for Electronic Access SLOVAKIA Law on Inventions, Industrial Designs and Rationalization Proposals (No. 527 of November 27, 1990)*

US Bar EPO Liaison Council 29th Annual Meeting Munich, 18 October EPO practice issues

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

LUXEMBOURG Patent Law as amended by the law of May 24, 1998 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 21, 1998

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

RUSSIA Patent Law #3517-I of September 23, 1992, as amended by the federal law 22-FZ of February 7, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: March 11, 2003

Exclusions from patentability 15 Inventions contrary to public order or morality not patentable

COMPARATIVE STUDY REPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURE AND CLAIMS - 1 -

The Assertion of Patents in Germany. Dr. Roland Kehrwald Wildanger Kehrwald Graf v. Schwerin & Partner mbb

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

Transcription:

From the Idea to a Patent www.bardehle.com

Content 5 1. What is a patent? 5 2. When is an idea an invention? 5 2.1 Patentability 6 2.2 Novelty 7 2.3 Inventive Step 7 3. How can I apply for a patent? 8 4. How does the granting procedure work? 10 5. How can I protect my idea in other countries? 10 5.1 European Patent Application 11. 5.2 Patent applications in other countries 12 5.3 Strategic considerations 12 6. Summary 3

Introduction Anyone who has an innovative idea should consider filing a patent application to safeguard the rights to the idea. However, it is a long way from the idea to a patent. Not all ideas can be protected by a patent and the examination procedures at the Patent Offices are in many cases time-consuming and complex. This is where our Patent Attorneys will assist you. They check whether the idea is in general patentable, they will draft a patent application, and they will represent the inventor extensively in front of the Patent Offices to protect the idea in the best possible way. Furthermore, they assist the inventor when others infringe the patent and offer products or use methods falling within the scope of the patent. 4

The following pages will give inventors who were yet not involved with patents a first overview over the patent application proceedings. It will be explained what kind of protection is achievable with a patent, and the requirements which an idea has to fulfil to get a patent. Moreover, the examination procedure at a Patent Office and examples of strategies for patent protection abroad are explained. 2. When is an idea an invention? Basically, an idea needs to fulfil three requirements before a patent can be granted. The idea must be in a field in which patent protection is possible. In addition, the idea has to be new, as well as inventive, i.e. not-obvious. All of the three conditions will be explained below in more detail. 2.1 Patentability 1. What is a patent? 2. When is an idea an invention? 2.1 Patentability 1. What is a patent? A patent gives its owner the exclusive right to use the invention protected by the patent for a period of up to 20 years. In other words, the patent owner (within the territory of the state that has granted the patent) has a monopoly, which means the right to prevent others from commercially using the invention protected by the patent. This right can be economically very valuable, because the owner can limit who is using the patented item or the patented method. For example, the inventor can ensure that the patented idea can only be realised by using items or methods only offered by himself. The patent owner may also grant the right of use to others, however, this grant may be subject to licensing fees. Thereby, the inventor participates on the commercial success of another company based on the idea. Not all ideas can be protected by patents. Essentially, only those ideas are patentable that fall within a technical field. Moreover, the German Patent Law and the European Patent Convention explicitly exclude some areas from patent protection. This area includes, among other things, plant or animal varieties, as well as in essence biological processes for the production of plants or animals. Excluded are furthermore, methods for treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy and diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body. Further areas are excluded by the German Patent Law and the European Patent Convention, if the subject matter relates to the area as such. This includes discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods, aesthetic creations, schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, as well as programs for computers and representations of information. 5

2.2 Novelty 6 The wording as such does not generally exclude inventions in this area. For example, if an idea affects a scientific theory, which is applied technically in a certain machine or in a procedure, the idea can by all means be patentable. A similar problem also exists for programs used in data processing units. If the program is based on technical considerations or a technical problem is solved by the program, it is not any longer a program for data processing units as such and it falls in principle in a patentable area. The decision to determine whether the idea belongs to a patentable area can nowadays be very difficult, since methods and products become more and more dependent upon data processing. Because considerable economical advantages may be associated with the patent, it is worthwhile to have this question clarified by our Patent Attorneys. They can not only clarify whether the idea is in general patentable; they are also able to show alternatives on how the idea can be protected. 2.2 Novelty To gain protection by a patent the idea needs also to be novel. The novelty, required by the patent law, is an absolute novelty with regards to all publications made worldwide despite of their language and all disclosures made before the day of the patent application. That includes also publications and disclosures made by the inventor. In general, it is advisable to get an overview of the relevant state of the art before a patent application is filed. Such a patent search should be always conducted by a Patent Attorney. However, the inventor can also do a first search to get a first overview. By using the internet, it is often possible to gain information about the companies working in this area. Patent offices are mainly using published patent applications and patents to determine the patentability of an idea. Therefore, a search in patent databases might be useful. The German Patent and Trademark Office (http://depatisnet.dpma.de) and the European Patent Office (http://worldwide.espacenet.com) offer access to such databases free of charge. A search can be performed by typing in keywords to find documents which may already describe the idea or similar approaches. Afterwards the search results must be compared to the own idea. If none of the found documents shows all the features of the idea, the idea can be considered at least as novel with respect to the results of the search. In doubtful cases a Patent Attorneys should do the comparison. Based on the experience, the Patent Attorney is better able to asses if a remaining difference between the idea and the search result is relevant to the patent law and thus is able to determine, whether there is a possibility to get the patent granted.

2.3 Inventive Step However, the novelty of an idea on its own is not sufficient. The idea must also be inventive. This third and most difficult obstacle can only be solved, if it was not obvious at the day of the application to a person skilled in the relevant technical field to alter the current state of the art, such that the new idea would evolve. The Patent Offices have created various methods and criteria to assess this question. By using these methods and criteria, a Patent Attorney can determine if the new idea will be likely regarded as inventive by the Patent Office with regards to the publications found in the patent search. The drafting of the patent application should be left to a Patent Attorney. The patent application is the most important document for the protection of the idea. Based on this document, it is examined whether the idea is a patentable invention. Furthermore, the chosen wording in the patent application could determine whether the product or the method of a competitor falls within the scope of the patent. It is afterwards mostly not possible to correct mistakes made during the patent application. For example, if important aspects with regards to the patent law are neglected in the patent claims or in the description, it may enable the competitors to easily bypass the patent. Hence, the patent protection would loose its protecting effect. 2.3 Inventive Step 3. How can I apply for a patent? 3. How can I apply for a patent? In order to apply for a patent, it is necessary to submit a patent application. The patent application is a written document in which the idea is described. This document represents the status quo of the invention. Additional features can later on not be added. A patent application usually consists of three parts: the patent claims, the patent description, and one or more drawings. A patent claim defines in one sentence one or more features of the item or the method to be protected. Thus, the patent claim determines the extent of protection for the future patent. The patent description and the drawings illustrate in general as well as in detail the invention using one or more specific examples, like in a technical manual. During examination, the Patent Office may find further relevant documents for the patent application that were not known to the author of the patent application. This also needs to be taken into account while preparing the patent application, since it might be necessary to further specify the invention using additional features to distinguish the invention from the state of the art. These features need to be described in the filed original patent application either in the patent description, in the drawings, or in the patent claims. It is not possible to add further features once the patent application is submitted. 7

4. How does the granting procedure work? 4. How does the granting procedure work? After the patent application is filed, the relevant Patent Office will conduct a patent search and subsequently inform the applicant about the result. Based on this result, the applicant can decide if it is promising to further prosecute the patent application. For this, the applicant has to apply for examination of the application and has to pay a corresponding fee. After filing a request for examination, the examiner compares the content of the patent claims with the documents found in the search. If the examiner reaches the conclusion that the patent cannot (yet) be granted, the examiner will prepare a report in which the examiner explains and discusses the reasons why the patent application failed. The applicant has to reply to the report by either fixing the faults in the application, or by convincing the examiner through valid reasoning that the technical considerations and valuations of the examiner are inapplicable or the alleged faults are irrelevant with regards to the patent law. Depending on whether the application was submitted to the German Patent and Trademark Office or to the European Patent Office, certain particularities may arise. The German Patent and Trademark Office grants the applicant a time frame of seven years, beginning from the date of submitting the application, to request examination. The European Patent Office will not grant the applicant such a long time period for responding. The deadline for filing an examination request expires already six months after the publication date of the patent application together with the corresponding search report, i.e. approximately two years after the application was submitted. It may be necessary to limit the patent claims in a response to an office action. This is often necessary since at first it is tried to claim as much as possible of the invention. However, if the result of the patent search by the Patent Office is that something similar was already published, but the invention shows significant differences, it makes sense to narrow the patent claims so that the patent claims clearly express the differences. One should exercise restraint in doing that because it is important to limit the invention not more than necessary, since too many limitations might enable competitors to bypass the patent by just minor alterations. 8

The following diagrams illustrate the proceedings at the two Patent Offices: If the first, or one of the following responses succeeds to convince the examiner, a patent will be granted. Otherwise, the application will be rejected. Since the Patent Offices capacities are well taken up, it normally takes a couple of years until the patent gets granted or rejected. German Patent and Trade Mark Office: Application Date Search Report (optional) Publication of the Patent Application (after approx. 18 months) Examination Request 1 st Office Action 1 st Response Granting of Patent (?) within seven years European Patent Office: Application Date Search Report with a written Opinion Publication of the Patent Application (after approx. 18 months) Examination Request and 1 st Response Granting of Patent (?) 9

5. How can I protect my idea in other countries? 5.1 European Patent Application 5. How can I protect my idea in other countries? Depending on the economic significance of the invention, it might be useful to obtain patent protection outside of Germany too. A few examples are described in the following sections. 5.1 European Patent Application A European patent application may be submitted alternative or additional to a German patent application. In the interest of simplification, the Member States of the European Patent Organization gave the European Patent Office the right to examine patent applications effectively for all Member States. European Patent Office Member States of the European Patent Organization As a result, the decision of a patent examiner at the European Patent Office is binding for the Patent Offices in the Member States. Following a positive decision of the European Patent Office, the applicant can have his patent to come into force in every one of the Member States without having to go through an additional examination procedure. The requirement for that is the payment of a corresponding fee, and some Member States may also require a translation of the patent. Austria Germany Application Date Office Action Response Granting of Patent France Italy Great Britain Spain Switzerland/Liechtenstein 10

Protection in a plurality of European countries can be achieved by submitting a single patent application to the European Patent Office. The decision in which countries the patent is valid can be postponed until the positive decision of the European Patent Office to grant the patent. 5.2 Patent Applications in other countries The applicant must at the latest 12 months after filing the first patent application (e.g. in Germany or to the European Patent Office) file one or more applications in other countries (USA, Japan, China, Korea) to gain patent protection outside Europe. The Member States will examine the application, as being submitted on the day of submission of the first patent application, according to an international convention. As a result, the applicant is given the opportunity to take up to one year to consider in which countries the patent application should be filed. Further, this gives the applicant more time to consider the national requirements for the patent application, especially to translate the application into the respective official language. 5.2 Patent applications in other countries Application Date in Germany USA Japan 12 months China Korea 31 months Application Date 30 months PCT Application USA European Patent Application Priority 12 months China Japan 11

5.3 Strategic considerations 6. Summary The applicant can on top of the above 12 months delay the process to have time considering in which countries the application should be filed to 30 or 31 months, after the first filing day. This is possible with a so-called International Patent Application (PCT Application). Submitting the International Patent Application creates a patent application that is valid in all Member States. The requirement is that the application is transferred in time into national law, i.e. in most countries within 30 months, and in a few countries within 31 months. Therefore, national requirements must be fulfilled, e.g. the application must be available in the national official language. Before that, a national search report will be drawn up for the International Patent Application and if applied for, a preliminary examination conducted. However, the result of this examination does not have a binding character for national Patent Offices. But it helps the applicant to decide whether it makes sense to further prosecute the application in the various countries. 5.3 Strategic considerations The explained patent applications (at the German Patent and Trademark Office, at the European Patent Office, or internationally) can be combined in various ways to meet the needs of the applicant. A single inventor or a start-up company with limited financial resources and a degree of uncertainty about whether and how the invention can be used in the future should (in a first step) secure their rights through a German application. Within the following 12 months discussion with potential customers or investors should follow in order to decide whether and how the idea shall be further prosecuted. Depending on the decision, the applicant can, for example, file a further application with the European Patent Office or even an International Patent Application. If the applicant has at the time of filing already a good understanding of the market, it is for example possible to submit directly a European Patent Application and within the next 12 months further applications in relevant countries, e.g. the USA and China. 6. Summary Anyone who has an innovative idea can protect the idea effectively by means of a patent against plagiarizers in Germany as well as abroad. However, it is necessary that the underlying idea is in a patentable technical area and new, as well as inventive with regards to the state of the art. 12

2018 BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb, Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte is a partnership of patent attorneys and attorneys-at-law registered at Amtsgericht München, Partnership Registry No 1152. Our offices act legally independent from the other countries offices in each country and are not liable for those. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the publishers. Nothing in this publication constitutes legal advice. BARDEHLE PAGENBERG assumes no responsibility for information contained in this publication or on the website www.bardehle.com and disclaims all liability with respect to such information. 14 09/2018

Contact Munich Prinzregentenplatz 7 81675 München T +49.(0)89.928 05-0 F +49.(0)89.928 05-444 info@bardehle.de Duesseldorf Breite Straße 27 40213 Düsseldorf T +49.(0)211.478 13-0 F +49.(0)211.478 13-31 info@dus.bardehle.de Yusarn Audrey Singapore 24 Raffles Place #27-01 Clifford Centre Singapore 048621 T +65.63 58 28 65 F +65.63 58 28 64 enquiries@yusarn.com Paris SO Square Opéra 5 rue Boudreau 75009 Paris T +33.(0)1.53 05 15-00 F +33.(0)1.53 05 15-05 info@bardehle.fr Barcelona Avenida Diagonal 420, 1º1ª 08037 Barcelona T +34.93.4 57 61 94 F +34.93.4 57 62 05 info@bardehle.es 16 Verona Circonvallazione Raggio di Sole 9 37122 Verona T +39.(0)45.92 30 18 5 F +39.(0)45.92 30 18 6 verona@bardehle.eu www.bardehle.com