Polling and Politics. Josh Clinton Abby and Jon Winkelried Chair Vanderbilt University

Similar documents
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2016 ELECTION

1. A Republican edge in terms of self-described interest in the election. 2. Lower levels of self-described interest among younger and Latino

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

Red Oak Strategic Presidential Poll

Why We Need a Better Approach

By David Lauter. 1 of 5 12/12/2016 9:39 AM

Google Consumer Surveys Presidential Poll Fielded 8/18-8/19

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

Obama s Support is Broadly Based; McCain Now -10 on the Economy

Changes in Party Identification among U.S. Adult Catholics in CARA Polls, % 48% 39% 41% 38% 30% 37% 31%

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

FAU Poll: Hispanics backing Clinton in Key Battleground States of Ohio, Colorado Nevada, North Carolina and Florida.

Battleground 2016: new game. June 30, 2016

Illustrating voter behavior and sentiments of registered Muslim voters in the swing states of Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

American Dental Association

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19 AT 4 PM

Who Votes Without Identification? Using Affidavits from Michigan to Learn About the Potential Impact of Strict Photo Voter Identification Laws

Bias Correction by Sub-population Weighting for the 2016 United States Presidential Election

Trump, Populism and the Economy

Subject: Pinellas County Congressional Election Survey

Clinton Lead Cut to 8% in Michigan (Clinton 49% - Trump 41%- Johnson 3% - Stein 1%)

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Survey of Likely General Election Voters Missouri Statewide

From Straw Polls to Scientific Sampling: The Evolution of Opinion Polling

The Path to 270 In 2016, Revisited

Clinton Maintains 3% Lead in Michigan (Clinton 47% - Trump 44% - Johnson 4% - Stein 1%)

Doubts About China, Concerns About Jobs POST-SEATTLE SUPPORT FOR WTO

PENNSYLVANIA: CD01 INCUMBENT POPULAR, BUT RACE IS CLOSE

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

Thinking back to the Presidential Election in 2016, do you recall if you supported ROTATE FIRST TWO, or someone else?

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back. November 27, 2018

Consolidating Democrats The strategy that gives a governing majority

Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice

Clinton Lead Cut in Half from August (Clinton 47% - Trump 42% in 2-way and Clinton 45% - Trump 39% in 4-way)

Healthcare and the 2012 Election. October 17 th, 2012

Obama vs. Romney: Is It the Economy, Stupid?

Emerson College Poll: Iowa Leaning For Trump 44% to 41%. Grassley, Coasting to a Blowout, Likely to Retain Senate Seat.

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? May 09 60% 30 9 Democrats 84% 11 6

Ipsos Poll conducted for Reuters, May 5-9, 2011 NOTE: all results shown are percentages unless otherwise labeled.

AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

TWELVE DAYS TO GO: BARACK OBAMA MAINTAINS DOUBLE-DIGIT LEAD October 19-22, 2008

Gingrich, Romney Most Heard About Candidates Primary Fight and Obama Speech Top News Interest

VIRGINIA: GOP TRAILING IN CD10

THE 2008 ELECTION: 1 DAY TO GO October 31 November 2, 2008

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

The Morning Call / Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion. Pennsylvania 2012: An Election Preview

Survey Overview. Survey date = September 29 October 1, Sample Size = 780 likely voters. Margin of Error = ± 3.51% Confidence level = 95%

Romney Leads in Confidence on Recovery But Obama Escapes Most Economic Blame

Heading into the Conventions: A Tied Race July 8-12, 2016

FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, JULY 20 AT 6 AM

The Presidential Election. Paul Beck, The Ohio State University Lifelong Learning Institute December 7, 2016

FOR RELEASE: NOVEMBER

OHIO: TIGHT RACE FOR PREZ; PORTMAN WIDENS SENATE LEAD

I. Chapter Overview. Roots of Public Opinion Research. A. Learning Objectives

PENNSYLVANIA: DEMOCRATS LEAD FOR BOTH PRESIDENT AND SENATE

NABPAC 2016 Biennial Post Election Conference

Red Shift. The Domestic Policy Program. October 2010

THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION CONTESTS May 18-23, 2007

October 29, 2016 Media Contact: Prof. Spencer Kimball Emerson College Polling Advisor

Before the Storm: The Presidential Race October 25-28, 2012

Polling Young Voters, Volume VIII

Latino Decisions / America's Voice June State Latino Battleground Survey

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

McClatchy-Marist Poll National Survey January 2011

NextGen Climate ran the largest independent young

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

*Embargoed Until Monday, Nov. 7 th at 7am EST* The 2016 Election: A Lead for Clinton with One Day to Go November 2-6, 2016

Ipsos Poll Conducted for Reuters Daily Election Tracking:

Americans fear the financial crisis has far-reaching effects for the whole nation and are more pessimistic about the economy than ever.

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

BREAKING THE GLASS CEILING: A WOMAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE May 30 - June 2, 2008

Survey Instrument. Florida

Campaign 16. A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016

Multi-Mode Political Surveys

Who Really Voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012?

FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14 AT 4 PM

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE AND THE DEBATES October 3-5, 2008

Ipsos Poll Conducted for Reuters State-Level Election Tracking:

Exposing Media Election Myths

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Approval, Favorability and State of the Economy

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

CHAPTER 11 PUBLIC OPINION AND POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION. Narrative Lecture Outline

Clinton Leads by 13% in Michigan before Last Debate (Clinton 51% - Trump 38%- Johnson 6% - Stein 2%)

The Republican Race: Trump Remains on Top He ll Get Things Done February 12-16, 2016

A Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy

JEWISH VOTERS AND THE 2008 ELECTION CBS News Exit Poll Analysis June, 2008

To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on

2016 us election results

Electoral College Reform: Evaluation and Policy Recommendations

University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll Topline Results Oct. 31, 2012 October 2012 poll of Iowa respondents

Swing Voters Criticize Bush on Economy, Support Him on Iraq THREE-IN-TEN VOTERS OPEN TO PERSUASION

1. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? Republicans 28% Democrats 84% 10 6

POLL: CLINTON MAINTAINS BIG LEAD OVER TRUMP IN BAY STATE. As early voting nears, Democrat holds 32-point advantage in presidential race

Public Opinion and Political Socialization. Chapter 7

Latinos and the Mid- term Election

February 23, 2012 Anzalone Liszt Research National Polling Summary

Transcription:

Polling and Politics Josh Clinton Abby and Jon Winkelried Chair Vanderbilt University

(Too much) Focus on the campaign News coverage much more focused on horserace than policy

3

4

5

Tell me again how you and your friends still have jobs?

Why are surveys important? Surveys are especially useful for dealing with issues of democratic representation. Participation is a mechanism for representation, a means by which the governing officials are informed of the preferences and needs of the public and are induced to respond to those preferences and needs. Sidney Verba Harvard University

What is Survey Research?

Early Survey Research Magazine from the early 1900s that conducted presidential election polls Surveyed subscribers Millions responded to each poll Accurately predicted the 1920, 1924, 1928, & 1932 Presidential Elections

1936 Presidential Election Alfred Langdon Governor of Kansas Republican Presidential Candidate Franklin Roosevelt President of the United States Democrat Presidential Candidate

1936 Presidential Election Literary Digest Election Forecast Langdon Roosevelt Literary Digest surveyed over 2 millions Americans Forecasted Langdon would win with 57.1% of the popular vote and 370 to 161 of the Electoral College Vote

1936 Presidential Election Actual 1936 Election Outcome Langdon Roosevelt Literary Digest : Langdon: 57% Roosevelt: 43% Actual Election Result: Langdon: 39% Roosevelt: 61%

Who got the 1936 Election right? Was able to accurately forecast the outcome of the 1936 election within 1% of the actual result Instead of over 2 million voters, Gallup interviewed approximately 50,000 Why? Survey Sampling George Gallup

Main findings Did polls fail in 2016? There are two storylines to the performance of polls in the 2016 general election National polls did well, historically quite accurate State-level polls had historically bad year; Some large errors in the Upper Midwest

National General Election Polls Performance Polls included in the analysis: Final field dates falling within 13 days of Election Day (Oct. 26th or later) if field period began by Oct. 16th. Only the final poll from each firm 23 final national polls of the 39 total during that period 23 polling organizations/sponsor combinations

Absolute Error Measuring Error Absolute value of ((the margin (%Clinton-%Trump) in the poll) minus (the margin (%Clinton-%Trump) in certified vote)) Poll: Clinton 46% - Trump 42%. 4 percentage points Vote: Clinton 48.2% - Trump 46.1%. 2.1 percentage points ABS(4 2.1) = 1.9

How did the national polls do? Average absolute error of 2.2 percentage points Average signed error of 1.3 percentage points Among the best performances since 1936

National Poll Errors Over The Years

STATE General Election Polls Performance Polls included in the analysis: Final field dates falling within 13 days of Election Day (Oct. 26th or later) if field period began by Oct. 16th ALL polls from each firm within that period 423 final state polls 81 polling organizations/sponsor combinations Same error calculations as national polls

How did the state polls do? Average absolute error of 5.1 percentage points Average signed error of 3.0 percentage points The poorest performance at the state level compared to the last four elections (2000-2012)

State Poll Errors Over The Years

Main findings What caused under-estimation of support for Trump? Evidence of late change in vote preferences Two historically unpopular candidates. Many voter liked neither. Late change concentrated in key states, not national % Voters who decided in final week Vote choice among Vote choice among voters deciding in final voters deciding week earlier Trump Clinton Trump Clinton Estimated Trump gain from late deciders Election (%Trump- %Clinton) Florida 11% 55% 38% 48% 49% 2.0% 1.2% Michigan 13% 50% 39% 48% 48% 1.4% 0.2% Pennsylvania 15% 54% 37% 50% 48% 2.3% 1.2% Wisconsin 14% 59% 30% 47% 49% 4.3% 0.8% National 13% 45% 42% 46% 49% 0.8% -2.1% Note Analysis from Aaron Blake (2016) using NEP exit poll data.

Because of Comey? 23

Sources of Error in Surveys When building instruments and administering surveys, there are many potential sources of error and bias Administration Based: Sampling Bias Interviewer Effects Respondent and Societal Based: Social Desirability Contextual Effects Instrument Based: Question Order Effects Question Wording Response Options

Survey Sampling Survey Sampling: Process of selecting elements from a target population (e.g. voters) to conduct a survey

Contemporary Sampling Bias: Land Lines & Cell Phones Why might these trends be a problem for phone surveys?

Main findings What caused under-estimation of support for Trump? Most state-level polls did not adjust for overrepresentation of college graduates, which was correlated with Clinton support

Main findings What caused under-estimation of support for Trump? Most state-level polls did not adjust for overrepresentation of college graduates, which was correlated with Clinton support Democratic Margin in 2012 Democratic Margin in 2016 30% 50% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% H.S. or less Some college College graduate US WI PA MI 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% H.S. or less Some college College graduate Postgraduate Postgraduate US WI PA MI -30% -30% Source: NEP national Exit Poll 2012, 2016

Main findings What caused under-estimation of support for Trump? Most state-level polls did not adjust for overrepresentation of college graduates, which was correlated with Clinton support Share of Pollsters That Adjusted on Education in Weighting Type of Poll Share of polls that weighted for education Number of final polls Michigan polls 18% 11 Wisconsin polls 27% 11 North Carolina polls 29% 14 Florida polls 31% 16 Pennsylvania polls 33% 18 Ohio polls 36% 11 National polls 52% 21 Note: Weighting information was missing for 23 polls, which were all imputed as not weighting on education, based on information among similar polls that did disclose their weighting variables.

Effects of Weighting on Education 30

Percent Change in Turnout (2012 to 2016) Who Votes? Change in turnout (2012 to 2016) by county nationwide by vote share for Barack Obama in 2012 10% 8% 6% 7.5% 6.6% 7.5% 6.4% 6.6% 4.9% 4.5% 5.5% 4% 2% 0% <35% 35-40% 40-45% 45-50% 50-54% 55-59% 60-65% 65%+ County-level Vote for Obama in 2012 Source County-level vote data come from uselectionatlas.org

County-level change in turnout in Michigan Counties Where Obama's 2012 Vote Percentage Was. Percent Change 2012 Composition 2016 Composition <35% 8.5% 2.9% 3.1% 35-40% 6.4% 5.2% 5.5% 40-45% 3.9% 10.2% 10.4% 45-50% 3.4% 19.1% 19.3% 50-54% 2.8% 27.6% 27.8% 55-59% 1.0% 7.0% 6.9% 60-65% -0.3% 7.0% 6.8% 65%+ -2.3% 21.0% 20.2% 100.0% 100.0% Source County-level vote data come from uselectionatlas.org

How Clinton s margin in swing states would have differed under 2012 turnout rates (Fraga, McElwee, Rhodes & Schaffner, 2017)

107k 34

Sources of Error in Surveys When building instruments and administering surveys, there are many potential sources of error and bias Administration Based: Sampling Bias Interviewer Effects Respondent and Societal Based: Social Desirability Contextual Effects Instrument Based: Question Order Effects Question Wording Response Options

Interviewer Effects Interviewer Effect: Any effect on data gathered from interviewing people that is caused by the behavior or characteristics of Proposed the interviewer national apology for slavery Black Interviewer Non-black interviewer Favor 41% 33% Oppose 51% 59% Don t know 8% 8% Source: May 1998 Pew Research Center Survey

Context Effects: Godfather s Pizza Herman Cain 2012 Republican Presidential Candidate

Godfather s Pizza

Who Won World War II?

Question Wording Another example from the 2012 Debates ROMNEY: What things would I cut from spending? Well, first of all, I will eliminate all programs by this test, if they don't pass it: Is the program so critical it's worth borrowing money from China to pay for it? And if not, I'll get rid of it. Obamacare's on my list. I apologize, Mr. President. I use that term with all respect, by the way. OBAMA: I like it. ROMNEY: Good. OK, good. So I'll get rid of that.

Opinion of Affordable Care Act or Obamacare? Among TN Registered Voters Source: May 2013 Vanderbilt Poll

Moving forward The factors that best explain polling errors in 2016 are fixable Weight to correct education imbalance (if not already doing so) Field closer to election day and/or remind people of the possibility of late change Do not necessarily assume the prior election is the best turnout model for current one but, there is little to stop this from happening again Many state polls are under-budgeted, and that will likely continue Many of these questions are unknowable who is going to vote in 2018?

Florida Democratic Primary 43

Closer to Home

Questions?