EU Coalition Explorer

Similar documents
EU Coalition Explorer

EU Coalition Explorer

EU Coalition Explorer

Extended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted

European Parliament Flash Eurobarometer FIRST RESULTS Focus on EE19 Lead Candidate Process and EP Media Recall

HB010: Year of the survey

September 2012 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.6% EU27 at 10.6%

Convergence: a narrative for Europe. 12 June 2018

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court. Dr. Leonard Werner-Jones

Alternative views of the role of wages: contours of a European Minimum Wage

Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.4%

I m in the Dublin procedure what does this mean?

Looking Through the Crystal Ball: For Growth and Productivity, Can Central Europe be of Service?

What does the Tourism Demand Surveys tell about long distance travel? Linda Christensen Otto Anker Nielsen

Favoriser la mobilité des jeunes au sein de l'union européenne

Early job insecurity in Europe The impact of the economic crisis

Flash Eurobarometer 431. Summary. Electoral Rights

I have asked for asylum in the EU which country will handle my claim?

EU, December Without Prejudice

Special Eurobarometer 461. Report. Designing Europe s future:

A. The image of the European Union B. The image of the European Parliament... 10

Special Eurobarometer 455

Table on the ratification process of amendment of art. 136 TFEU, ESM Treaty and Fiscal Compact 1 Foreword

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /12 COPEN 97 EJN 32 EUROJUST 39

EUROPEAN YOUTH: PARTICIPATION IN DEMOCRATIC LIFE

Consumer Barometer Study 2017

INTERNAL SECURITY. Publication: November 2011

Report on women and men in leadership positions and Gender equality strategy mid-term review

The European Emergency Number 112. Analytical report

The Rights of the Child. Analytical report

Special Eurobarometer 464b. Report

Flash Eurobarometer 431. Report. Electoral Rights

UPDATE. MiFID II PREPARED

Migration Survey Results. Response period: September 2015

Geographical mobility in the context of EU enlargement

Special Eurobarometer 467. Report. Future of Europe. Social issues

Special Eurobarometer 440. Report. Europeans, Agriculture and the CAP

ID number. ID number. IR No

Data Protection in the European Union. Data controllers perceptions. Analytical Report

Flash Eurobarometer 430. Summary. European Union Citizenship

Standard Eurobarometer 89 Spring Report. European citizenship

ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE EU AND BEYOND

Acquisition of citizenship in the European Union

The Rights of the Child. Analytical report

The "Value" of Europe in the World of Global Value Chains. Signe Ratso Director DG Trade, European Commission

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION

After the crisis: what new lessons for euro adoption?

Firearms in the European Union

Territorial Evidence for a European Urban Agenda

The catching up process in CESEE countries

Notes on the Application Form for a Declaration of Invalidity of a European Union Trade Mark

Europeans attitudes towards climate change

Standard Eurobarometer 89 Spring Report. Europeans and the future of Europe

Managing the refugee crisis

EU DEVELOPMENT AID AND THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS

"Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2018"

EUROPEANS ATTITUDES TOWARDS SECURITY

Special Eurobarometer 470. Summary. Corruption

Malta-Valletta: Provision of interim services for EASO 2017/S Contract award notice. Results of the procurement procedure.

EUROBAROMETER The European Union today and tomorrow. Fieldwork: October - November 2008 Publication: June 2010

Could revising the posted workers directive improve social conditions?

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 April 2018 (OR. en)

Quarterly Asylum Report

Flash Eurobarometer 354. Entrepreneurship COUNTRY REPORT GREECE

EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE EU AND BEYOND

ERGP REPORT ON CORE INDICATORS FOR MONITORING THE EUROPEAN POSTAL MARKET

Malta-Valletta: Provision of interim services for EASO 2017/S Contract award notice. Results of the procurement procedure.

ECI campaign run by a loosely-coordinated network of active volunteers

A TOOLKIT FOR GENDER EQUALITY IN PRACTICE. 100 initiatives by social partners and in the workplace across Europe

11500/14 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

SIS II 2014 Statistics. October 2015 (revision of the version published in March 2015)

in focus Statistics How mobile are highly qualified human resources in science and technology? Contents SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 75/2007

Directorate General for Communication Direction C - Relations avec les citoyens PUBLIC OPINION MONITORING UNIT 27 March 2009

Intergenerational solidarity and gender unbalances in aging societies. Chiara Saraceno

Special Eurobarometer 469. Report

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Tables "State of play" and "Declarations" Accompanying the document

Labour market integration of low skilled migrants in Europe: Economic impact. Gudrun Biffl

Strategic engagement for gender equality

Statistics on intra-eu labour mobility 2015 Annual Report

Forecasting skill supply and demand in Europe: Migration

Special Eurobarometer 428 GENDER EQUALITY SUMMARY

Special Eurobarometer 474. Summary. Europeans perceptions of the Schengen Area

Posted workers in the EU: is a directive revision needed?

Convergence in the EU: What role for industrial relations? Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead and Rosalia Vazquez, International Labour Office

Standard Eurobarometer 88 Autumn Report. Media use in the European Union

WOMEN IN DECISION-MAKING POSITIONS

Special Eurobarometer 471. Summary

EU Gender equality policies and Member States contributions

Migration as an Adjustment Mechanism in a Crisis-Stricken Europe

This document is available on the English-language website of the Banque de France

14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

The European emergency number 112

Young people and science. Analytical report

CITIZENS AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF EU REGIONAL POLICY

Official Journal of the European Union L 256/5

European Migration Network EMN Annual Report on Immigration and Asylum 2014

Standard Eurobarometer 89 Spring Public opinion in the European Union

GDPR Implementation. State of play in the Member States on 20 February Information provided by national authorities

Transcription:

Coalition Explorer Results of the 28 Survey on coalition building in the European Union an initiative of Results for ECFR May 2017 Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Findings Coalition Potential Ranks 1 to 14 Ranks 15 to 28 Country Findings AT BE BG HR CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE EL HU IE IT LV LT LU MT NL PL PT RO SK SI ES SE Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal Preferences ranks overall #22 at Preferences #21 #23 #20 Partners #22 #12 #19 #19 Q1 Most Contacted Q2 Shared Interests Q3 Most Responsive ranks overall #18 at Partners Q10 Foreign and Development Policy Q11 Security and Defense Policy Q12 Economic and Social Policy Q13 Fiscal Policy 3 for LV 1. 2. 3. RO SE 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 3 for LV 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. HR PL RO 1. EE LT 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. DE HU ranks #11 at More Europe #11 Q14 Deeper Integration 3 for LV 1. 2. 3. BG CZ EL Q16 Expert View Level of Decision-Making Q17 Public View 48 22 19 2 LV Networks Voting for 8 for LV 52 19 15 8 Hungary All member states Legally bound core Coalition of states Only national level LV 50 14 14 22 35 17 25 22 LV Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Most contacted Votes for Q1 In your view or experience, which other governments would your own government generally contact first and/or most on matters? (select up to five) Of 1352 394 respondents, received 11 (0.8) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 1 Visegrád 4 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 25 17 3 3 1 Czech Rep. 1 Preferences Overview Most Contacted Shared Interests Most Responsive Most Disappointing Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Shared Interests Votes for Q2 In your view or experience, which other member states generally share many of your own s interests and preferences on policies? (select up to five) Of 1594 406 respondents, received 21 (1.3) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 2 Visegrád 4 1 Affluent 7 1 Big 6 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 23 20 7 5 4 1 Preferences Overview Most Contacted Shared Interests Most Responsive Most Disappointing Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Most Responsive Votes for Q3 In your view or experience, which other governments or member states have shown to be most responsive or are easiest to work with? (select up to five) Of 1201 342 respondents, received 19 (1.6) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 2 Affluent 7 2 Visegrád 4 1 Big 6 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 17 15 11 9 4 2 Czech Rep. 2 Netherlands 1 Denmark 1 Germany 1 Hungary Preferences Overview Most Contacted Shared Interests Most Responsive Most Disappointing Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Most Disappointing Votes for Q4 In your view or experience, which other governments or member states have disappointed your own government? (select up to five) Of 1123 326 respondents, received 7 (0.6) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 1 Big 6 1 Founding 6 1 Southern 7 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 4 3 3 2 Portugal 1 Preferences Overview Most Contacted Shared Interests Most Responsive Most Disappointing Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Big Six Overall Policy Ranking by Q5 Based on your view or experience, please rank the six large member states according to their overall influence on policy over the past five years. (first rank being the most influential) Big Six Founding Six Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Southern Seven Visegrád Four Netherlands Portugal First Rank Second Rank Third Rank Germany France Fourth Rank Fifth Rank Sixth Rank Influence Overview Big Six Overall Policy Big Six Fiscal Policy Big Six Foreign and Security Policy Other Countries Number of respondents: 4. Size of rectangles corresponds with respondents respective rankings. Countries with equal values are sorted from A-Z. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Big Six Fiscal Policy Ranking by Q6 Please rank the six large member states according to their influence on fiscal policy over the past five years. (first rank being the most influential) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four First Rank Second Rank Third Rank Germany France France Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal Fourth Rank Fifth Rank Sixth Rank Germany Influence Overview Big Six Overall Policy Big Six Fiscal Policy Big Six Foreign and Security Policy Other Countries Germany Number of respondents: 4. Size of rectangles corresponds with respondents respective rankings. Countries with equal values are sorted from A-Z. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Big Six Foreign and Security Policy Ranking by Q7 Please rank the six large member states according to their influence on foreign, security and defence policy over the past five years. (first rank being the most influential) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four First Rank Second Rank Third Rank Germany France Germany Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal Fourth Rank Fifth Rank Sixth Rank Germany Influence Overview Big Six Overall Policy Big Six Fiscal Policy Big Six Foreign and Security Policy Other Countries Number of respondents: 4. Size of rectangles corresponds with respondents respective rankings. Countries with equal values are sorted from A-Z. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Ranking by First Rank Netherlands Q8 Based on your view or experience, please rank the list of affluent seven member states according to their overall influence on policy over the past five years. (first rank being the most influential) Big Six Founding Six Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Southern Seven Visegrád Four Netherlands Portugal Second Rank Third Rank Fourth Rank Netherlands Denmark Fifth Rank Sixth Rank Seventh Rank Denmark Denmark Influence Overview Big Six Overall Policy Big Six Fiscal Policy Big Six Foreign and Security Policy Other Countries Number of respondents: 4. Size of rectangles corresponds with respondents respective rankings. Countries with equal values are sorted from A-Z. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Foreign and Development Policy Votes for Q10 Which other member states would your government see as essential partners in Foreign and Development Policy? Of 1756 285 respondents, received 28 (1.6) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 3 Visegrád 4 2 Affluent 7 1 Big 6 1 Founding 6 1 Southern 7 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 9 6 5 4 2 2 2 Czech Rep. 2 Denmark 2 2 Hungary 1 1 Netherlands 1 Partners Overview Foreign and Development Policy Security and Defense Policy Economic and Social Policy Fiscal Policy Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Security and Defense Policy Votes for Q11 Which other member states would your government see as essential partners in Security and Defense Policy? Of 1662 285 respondents, received 50 (3) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 4 Visegrád 4 3 Affluent 7 3 Big 6 2 Founding 6 2 Southern 7 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 10 7 6 6 6 5 Denmark 5 4 4 Germany 4 Hungary 4 3 Netherlands 2 Czech Rep. 2 Portugal 2 1 Partners Overview Foreign and Development Policy Security and Defense Policy Economic and Social Policy Fiscal Policy Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Economic and Social Policy Votes for Q12 Which other member states would your government see as essential partners in Economic and Social Policy? Of 1567 279 respondents, received 33 (2.1) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 4 Visegrád 4 2 Big 6 2 Southern 7 1 Affluent 7 1 Founding 6 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 10 10 7 5 4 4 3 Hungary 3 2 Czech Rep. 2 1 Germany 1 Netherlands Partners Overview Foreign and Development Policy Security and Defense Policy Economic and Social Policy Fiscal Policy Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Fiscal Policy Votes for Q13 Which other member states would your government see as essential partners in Fiscal Policy? Of 1203 279 respondents, received 20 (1.7) Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four 2 Big 6 2 Visegrád 4 1 Founding 6 1 Southern 7 Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal 17 4 3 Germany 3 Hungary 2 2 2 1 Netherlands Partners Overview Foreign and Development Policy Security and Defense Policy Economic and Social Policy Fiscal Policy Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Commitment to Deeper Integration Votes for Q14 In your opinion, which member states are committed to deeper integration or more Europe? Of 2046 348 respondents, received 46 (2.2) Big Six Founding Six Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Southern Seven Visegrád Four Netherlands Portugal Overview Commitment to Deeper Integration Importance of Coalitions Preferred Actor Level Preferred Actor Level (Public View) 2 Affluent 7 2 Founding 6 2 Visegrád 4 1 Big 6 1 Southern 7 13 6 5 5 Czech Rep. 5 4 3 Denmark 3 Germany 3 Hungary 3 3 Netherlands 2 2 2 Portugal 2 2 2 1 1 France 1 1 1 Rounded results. 0 shares not shown. Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Preferred Actor Level Votes by Q16 What actor level would your prefer for the following list of policy projects? All member states: 48 of votes Legally bound core of member states: 22 of votes Coalition of member states: 19 of votes Only national level: 2 of votes Countries Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four Integrated foreign and security policy Common defense structures Common border police and coast guard Common policy in justice & home affairs Common immigration and asylum policy Common development assistance p. Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal Common Russia policy Better governance for the eurozone Common Ukraine policy Fully completed single market Common Syria policy Common social policy Common MENA policy Common energy policy Common China policy Single climate policy Overview Commitment to Deeper Integration Importance of Coalitions Preferred Actor Level Preferred Actor Level (Public View) Number of respondents: 4. Share of Don t know votes shown by open circles Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners

Preferred Actor Level (Public View) Votes by Q17 What actor level would your prefer for the following list of policy projects? All member states: 35 of votes Legally bound core of member states: 17 of votes Coalition of member states: 25 of votes Only national level: 22 of votes Countries Big Six Founding Six Southern Seven Visegrád Four Integrated foreign and security policy Common defense structures Common border police and coast guard Common policy in justice & home affairs Common immigration and asylum policy Common development assistance p. Czech Rep. Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Portugal Common Russia policy Better governance for the eurozone Common Ukraine policy Fully completed single market Common Syria policy Common social policy Common MENA policy Common energy policy Common China policy Single climate policy Overview Commitment to Deeper Integration Importance of Coalitions Preferred Actor Level Preferred Actor Level (Public View) Number of respondents: 39 Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners