IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv RCL Document 65 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM & ORDER

U.S. District Court. District of Columbia

Transcript of Bryan Michael Pagliano

U.S. District Court. District of Columbia

Case 1:14-cv ABJ Document 13 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 90 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv RCL Document 12 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv TNM Document 52 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv CKK Document 8 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv RJL Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 13 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 14 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv RDM Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 12-1 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 19 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:16-cv-Of''l67-RDM Document 1 Filed 05/2?' 1 6 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 87 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv RBW Document 12-1 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv KBJ Document 15 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 15 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 26 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv RCL Document 16 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case 1:10-cv RMC Document 50 Filed 01/23/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MEMORANDUM OPINION. The 2016 presidential election may have come and gone, but Plaintiffs Judicial Watch

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv ESH Document 39 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv RC Document 56 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 80 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 89 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv PD Document Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv JMF Document 379 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 31 Filed 08/02/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F Doc No. C Date: 11101/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS. Civil No Judge Susan G. Braden

Case 3:18-cv EDL Document 39 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Case 1:17-cv RCL Document 11-7 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

1. 1 am Executive Assistant to Ira Magaziner, Senior Advisor to the President for Policy Development.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

Case 2:03-cv DGC Document 141 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 32

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No (JDB/JMF) MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PARTIES JOINT RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER OF APRIL 28 TH, 2005

Case 1:10-cv RMU Document 25 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 27, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, Mary Ann

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv KBJ Document 17 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Practices for Part 3

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 2:16-cv WOB-JGW Doc #: 112 Filed: 10/27/16 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1626

JUN Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request No Fee Waiver Denial

Case 1:16-cv TSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

MEMORANDUM NB-2 03/05/15. Agenda Item: Regular Meeting: City Commission. Denise M. Kirkpatrick, City Clerk;&JJ::... February 20, 20 IS

Plaintiff, v. Collective Action Nicka & Associates, Inc.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv ER-KNF Document Filed 11/19/14 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

The Procedural Requirements

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 80

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, V. Defendant. Civil Action No. 14-cv-1242 (RCL PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN Pursuant to the Court's December 6, 2018 Order, Plaintiff's previously proposed discovery plans and the entire record herein, Plaintiff submits this proposed discovery plan: 1. The Court has ordered discovery into three distinct areas. Plaintiff has identified the discovery it intends to take on those issues. Although individuals may be listed more than once below, Plaintiff intends to call each witness once and address all relevant issues at that time. 2. Plaintiff intends to conduct the below depositions within 16 weeks of the Court's order on Plaintiff's discovery plan. 3. Plaintiff anticipates it will be necessary to depose former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills at the conclusion of the proposed 16 weeks. Plaintiff will update the Court at that time. 4. Plaintiff requests that the Court shorten the time period for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's interrogatories and document requests to 14 days to ensure Plaintiff has all relevant information prior to conducting any depositions. 5. Plaintiff is complying with the Court's order and submitting this proposed discovery plan. Plaintiff provided its initial draft to Defendant on December 12th but did not

receive Defendant's response until 9:30 pm on December 17th. Although the parties attempted to reach an agreement before the filing deadline, they could not do so. Plaintiff therefore has not had sufficient time to respond to Defendant's legal arguments opposing some of its proposed discovery. To the extent the Court needs additional information from Plaintiff, Plaintiff promptly will provide such information at the Court's request. 6. It may appear the parties are in agreement in principle regarding Plaintiff's document requests seeking unredacted records that are set forth below. Defendant, however, has informed Plaintiff that it has not had the opportunity to fully review the records and determine whether privileges exist and whether they will assert them. Because Plaintiff seeks the records in unredacted form, no agreement to produce the records has been reached. 7. Plaintiff intends to conduct the following discovery: A. Whether Secretary Clinton's use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA. Depositions: Eric Boswell (Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security. On March 6, 2009, Boswell wrote in an Information Memo to Cheryl Mills that he "cannot stress too strongly... that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving email, and exploiting calendars." A March 11, 2009 email states that, in a management meeting with the assistant secretaries, Secretary Clinton approached Boswell and mentioned that she had read the IM and that she "got it." Justin Cooper (Employee of President Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. Cooper created and managed the clintonemail.com server. His testimony to Congress also appears to contradict portions of the testimony provided by Huma Abedin in the case before Judge Sullivan. Clarence Finney (Deputy Director, Executive Secretariat Staff. During Secretary Clinton's tenure, Finney served as principal advisor and records management expert to the Executive Secretary on matters relating to the overall management and control of all correspondence and records for Secretary Clinton and the various Deputy Secretaries of State and Under Secretaries of State. Finney also is - 2 -

among the State Department officials in the emails discussing the processing of the CREW FOIA request and other requests concerning the former Secretary's email account. Heather Samuelson (Senior Advisor & White House Liaison during Secretary Clinton's tenure and assisted with the return of the emails from the clintonemail.com system. During Secretary Clinton's tenure, Samuelson initially worked as an assistant in the State Department's White House Liaison Office and was later promoted to serve as the head of that office. Until her tenure at the State Department ended in March 2013, Samuelson was tasked with tracking the FOIA request served by CREW for records regarding Secretary Clinton's email accounts. Samuelson subsequently served as one of Secretary Clinton's personal attorneys and, in 2014, reviewed Secretary Clinton's clintonemail.com email account to identify federal records. The records returned by Secretary Clinton in December 2014 were records identified by Samuelson. Jacob Sullivan (Secretary Clinton's senior advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff throughout her tenure. Interrogatories: The identities of all individuals referenced in the first paragraph on page four of the FBI Notes from the December 22, 2015 Interview of Bryan Pagliano. See Exhibit A. The names are redacted on the public version of the notes. B. Whether the State Department's intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith. Depositions: Clarence Finney. See above. John Hackett (Deputy Director, Office oflnformation Programs and Services. Gene Smilansky (Employee within the State Department's Office of the Legal Advisor. In this capacity, Smilansky was involved in the processing of FOIA requests pertaining to Secretary Clinton's email from 2012 through 2014, including the CREW FOIA request. Heather Samuelson. See above. Sheryl Walter (Director of Office of Information Programs and Services. In this capacity, Walter was involved in the processing of FOIA requests pertaining to Secretary Clinton's email in 2014, including the CREW FOIA request. - 3 -

Jonathon Wasser (Management Analyst, Executive Secretariat Staff. Wasser worked for Mr. Finney and was the State Department employee who actually conducted the searches for records in response to FOIA requests to the Office of the Secretary. The Office of Information Program Services analyst who was assigned this case once it entered litigation. The Office of Information Program Services official who informed the FBI that the State Department determined Secretary Clinton's emails were not agency records. See Exhibit B. 30(b(6 deposition(s of Defendant concerning: Document Requests: The processing of the CREW FOIA request; The processing of the FOIA request at issue in this case; The "discovery" of the Clinton email issue in Summer 2014 and response to same; and The November 12, 2014 letter and December 31, 2014 Joint Status Report in which Defendant represented that it produced "the non-exempt, responsive documents subject to the FOIA" and "[t]he parties believe it might be possible to either settle this case or to narrow the issues which must be presented to the Court for adjudication." Unredacted version of August 8, 2014 email exchange between Clarence Finney, Jonathon Wasser, James Bair, Andrew Keller, and Gene Smilansky. Unredacted version of May 1, 2013 email exchange between Gene Smilansky, Brett Gittleson, Sheryl Walters, and others. All records that concern or relate to the State Department's discovery, prior to February 2, 2015, that additional searches for records responsive to FOIA Request No. F-2014-08848 were [sic] necessary. In this regard, the State Department represented in a February 2, 2015 status report filed in litigation regarding FOIA Request No. F-2014-08848 that: In the course of preparing additional information to provide to Plaintiff for purposes of settlement discussions, Defendant has discovered that additional searches for documents potentially responsive to the FOIA [request] must be conducted. Any records, including communications, regarding this discovery referenced in - 4 -

the February 2, 2015 status report should be considered responsive. All records that concern, relate to, or identify the location(s or source(s of potentially responsive records that necessitated the "additional searches" referenced in the February 2, 2015 status report. Copies of the attached records with the Exemption 5 redactions removed, attached hereto as Exhibit C. The attached records were obtained by Plaintiff in an unrelated FOIA lawsuit against the State Department for records concerning the processing of a FOIA request submitted by CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington on December 6, 2012 seeking records concerning Secretary Clinton's email account. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep 't of State (RDM (D.D.C. (Case No. 16-574. Interrogatories: Identify by name the "Management Analyst" who performed the initial search of Office of the Secretary records on September 23, 2014. See Hackett Declaration at,i,i 14-16. Identify the date on which the "subset" of HR C's returned email were searched and the identity of the person who performed the search. See Hackett Declaration at,i 17. C. Whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch's request. Depositions: Justin Cooper. As the creator and manager of the clintonemail.com server, Cooper would know what emails still exist and where they would be located. Clarence Finney. See above. Monica Hanley. Monica Hanley (Staff member in the Office of the Secretary during Secretary Clinton's tenure. As a key assistant to Secretary Clinton, Hanley is likely to possess information about the identities of individuals with whom Secretary Clinton communicated by email. Lauren Jiloty. (Secretary Clinton's Special Assistant during her tenure. In her capacity as Special Assistant, Jiloty entered Secretary Clinton's contacts into the secretary's Blackberries, and accordingly, is very likely to possess information about the identities of individuals with whom Secretary Clinton communicated by email. - 5 -

E.W. Priestap (FBI Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Division. Priestap supervised Clinton email investigation. In this capacity, he would have firsthand knowledge of where the FBI sought to recover Secretary Clinton's emails, where they were recovered, and where recovery was not obtained. Susan Rice (former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations during Secretary Clinton's tenure. As the official who appeared in the media and presented the talking points, Rice would know with whom in the Office of the Secretary she communicated and where potentially responsive records may be located. Ben Rhodes (former Deputy National Security Advisor. As the author of the talking points, Rhodes would know with whom in the Office of the Secretary he communicated and where potentially responsive records may be located. Heather Samuelson. See above. Jacob Sullivan. Jonathon Wasser. See above. 30(b(6 deposition(s of Defendant concerning the processing of the FOIA request at issue in this case. 30(b (6 deposition(s regarding: Document Requests: The preparation of the talking points for Susan Rice's appearances on Sunday morning tv shows (9/16/12; The dissemination/ discussion about talking points in advance of Rice's appearances; The follow-up/wrap up of Rice's appearances; and What the State Department knew about the attack and when it knew it. All records that concern or relate to the State Department's policies, practices, procedures and/or actions ( or lack thereof to secure, inventory, and/or account for all records, including emails of Secretary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Jacob Sullivan and staff within the Office of the Secretary prior to their termination of employment with the State Department and afterwards All records that concern or relate to the processing offoia Request No. F-2014-08848, served on the State Department by Judicial Watch, Inc. on May 13, 2014. - 6 -

Any and all tasking, tracking, and reporting records for searches conducted in response to the request should be considered responsive. Forms DS-17 48 and any "search slips," "search tasker," and "search details," also should be considered responsive. All internal State Department communications that concern or relate to the processing of or search for records responsive to FOIA Request No. F-2014-08848, including any directions or guidance about how and where to conduct the searches, whether and how to search the emails of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, and any issues, problems, or questions regarding the searches and/or search results. Interrogatories: Identify the number of emails contained within State Department systems of records that were sent to or from or cc-ed or bcc-ed the clintonemail.com domain name for the time period from January 20, 2009 to February 2, 2013 for the following individuals: Alice Wells; Andrew Shapiro; Anne-Marie Slaughter; Caroline Adler; Cheryl Mills; Claire Coleman; Dan Schwerin; Huma Abedin; Jacob Sullivan; Joseph MacManus; Judith McHale; Lauren Jiloty; Lona Valmoro; Maria Sand; Melanne Verveer; Monica Hanley; Patrick Kennedy; Philippe Reines; Richard Verma; Robert Russo; Susan Rice; Victoria Nuland; Wendy Sherman; and William Burns. - 7 -

Dated: December 19, 2018 Respectfully submitted, JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Isl James F. Peterson James F. Peterson (D.C. Bar 450171 Ramona R. Cotca (D.C. Bar No. 501159 Attorneys for Plaintiff - 8 -