Republic of the Philippines REGIONAL TRIAL COURT National Capital Region Quezon City

Similar documents
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila

Republic of the Philippines Fifth Judicial Region REGIONAL TRIAL COURT Ligao City, Albay Branch COMPLAINT

International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA)

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,

SUPREME COURT SECOND DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Courthouse News Service

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES. SUPREME COURT Manila

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Chapter 15 Protection and redress for victims of crime and human rights violations

ihiiiini U.S. v. Corinth City JC-MS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY EX PARTE INJUNCTION. The Applicant, North Branford Citizens Against Bulk Propane Storage, has or will

)(

Estonia. Penal Code. Passed 6 June 2001, (RT 1 I 2001, 61, 364; consolidated text RT I 2002, 86, 504), entered into force 1 September 2002.

COMES NOW, the plaintiff and for (his) (her) cause of action, alleges and shows

EXTRADITION ACT Act 7 of 2017 NOT IN OPERATION ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017

A/HRC/32/L.5/Rev.1. General Assembly. ORAL REVISION 1 July. United Nations

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018

Me.- I IlOOlqq. Summons. YOU are hereby summoned to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your answer, or, if the.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION V. CIVIL ACTION NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

l\epttblic of tbe tlbilippineti

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

GRANDPARENT VISITATION FORM PACKET

Affidavit & Summons of Continuing Garnishment (Ga. Code Title 18, Amended 1981) Affidavit for Continuing Garnishment

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

Republic Act No Human Rights Victims Reparation and Recognition Act of 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA CASE NO CP-23- COUNTY OF GREENVILLE. Sylvia Lockaby, Plaintiff, vs.

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

Plaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE DIVISION

P E T I T I O N. Petitioner Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP), by counsel, to this Honorable

TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants.

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case5:02-cv JF Document3 Filed11/06/02 Page1 of 14

Filing # E-Filed 01/30/ :14:22 AM

2:15-cv MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/01/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, SIGNED ON DECEMBER 7, 2005, AT RIGA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

SECURING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENT BY DECEPTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

MOBar CLE Residential Landlord/Tenant Law Part 2 Page 1 B--1

Continuing human rights violations under a national policy

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION

Concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of Portugal*

Case 1:18-cv RBK-AMD Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ), ) ) Defendant. )

FLAG PRIMER ON THE WRIT OF AMPARO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 3:13-cv Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/22/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

MOBar CLE Residential Landlord/Tenant Law Part 2 Page 1

CHILDREN S RIGHTS - LEGAL RIGHTS

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Attorney for Plaintiffs A.C. a minor and C.C. a minor

3. The legal grounds upon which the Commission requests for provisional measures, including the following:

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x KEVIN FLEMING, Plaintiff,

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FOR:

11/9/2017 9:48 AM 17CV48960 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES. Case No.

/ Court: 055

Case: 4:13-cv HEA Doc. #: 27 Filed: 12/02/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 128

Transcription:

Republic of the Philippines REGIONAL TRIAL COURT National Capital Region Quezon City RAYMOND E. MANALO, Plaintiff, - versus - CIVIL CASE NO.: For: Damages, with Attorney s Fees (RET) LT. GEN. HERMOGENES C. ESPERON, (RET) MGEN. JOVITO PALPARAN JR., (RET) MGEN. JUANITO GOMEZ, T/MSGT. RIZAL HILARIO ALIAS ROLLY CASTILLO, M/SGT. ARMAN, DONALD ALLAN CAIGAS MICHAEL DELA CRUZ, MADNING DELA CRUZ, PUTI DELA CRUZ, PULA DELA CRUZ, RANDY MENDOZA, RUDY MENDOZA, PABLO CUNANAN, JUNIOR LINGGASA, AMANG RAMIREZ, MARTI ADREANO, KAPITAN, PJ, PARUNGAO, KAYAT, ALIAS BARANGAY CAPTAIN, HEPE NG BARANGAY TANOD SAPANG SAN MIGUEL BULACAN, AND JOHEN DOES, Defendants. X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / COMPLAINT Plaintiff, by counsel, respectfully states that: 1. Plaintiff is a Filipino citizen, of legal age, and a farmer with residence at Barangay Bohol na Manga, San Idelfonso, Bulcanan; 2. Defendants are for sure members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines with general headquarters at Camp Aguinaldo, EDSA, Quezon City where defendants can be served with summons and other court processes for defendants Hermogenes Esperon, Jovito Palparan, Jr., and Juanito Gomez who were the commanding generals of the 7 th Infantry Division, and can be served with summons at the Office of the Association

of Generals and Flag Officers (AGFO), Camp Aguinaldo, EDSA, Quezon City, except for MICHAEL DE LA CRUZ, MANDING DE LA CRUZ, JOSE DE LA CRUZ, PULA DE LA CRUZ, of Sitio Muzon, RANDY MENDOZA, RUDY MENDOZA, of Hulo, PABLO CUNANAN, JUNIOR LINGGASA of Luwasan, all of Bohol na Mangga, San Idelfonso, Bulacan where they can be served with summons and other court processes, MARTI ADRIANO, a certain KAPITAN; KONSEHAL PARUNGAO, AMANG RAMIREZ, a certain PJ, a certain KAYAT, the Barangay Captain in 2006 and the Barangay Tanod Chief in 2006 are all of Sapang, San Miguel, Bulacan where they can be served with summons and other court processes; 3. Defendants are public employees and/or officers while defendants Esperon, Palparan and Gomez was at the time of the incident a public officer and the commanding general of the 7 th Infantry Division, Fort Magsaysay,Laur, Nueva Ecija; 4. On February 14, 2006, defendants, by direct participation or as principals by induction through their orders and complicity, with other defendants with other unidentified men all armed with high power rifles abducted, kidnapped from his home at Bohol na Manga, Bulacan, detained, restrained plaintiff, RAYMUND E. MANALO of his liberty and was brought to different camps, detachments and a barangay hall in highly illegal and internationally condemned rendition of abductees; 5. Defendants, by direct participation or as principals by induction through their orders and complicity, tortured, mandhandled, cruelly and 2

inhumanely treated plaintiff with impunity and with depravity from February 14, 2006 up to August 13, 2007 or nearly a year and a half; 6. Defendants likewise forced plaintiff into involuntary servitude for nearly a year and a half; 7. Defendants likewise forced plaintiff to watch other people being tortured and killed during all the time he was abducted by defendants; 8. Plaintiff was detained illegally, without any charge, and without any lawful grounds under inhuman conditions, tortured, mentally and physically for ONE (1) year and 4 months until he escaped his captors in a daring escaped. 9. Within the same period above stated, the defendants also detained plaintiff incommunicado and without affording them the right to be heard by counsel or any member of their immediate families. 10. The defendants actuations of unlawfully depriving plaintiff of his liberty without lawful grounds and without charging him for any offense, searching his person, unlawfully detaining him incommunicado, and denying him visits by counsel or by members of their immediate family, and subjecting him to severe torture, humiliating torture and detaining him under inhuman conditions and subjecting him to further threats and torture or undue influence, intimidation and violence, with the view of eliciting from them admissions of guilt with respect to the crime of 3

rebellion, which constitute violations of rights and liberties of plaintiff, guaranteed and safeguarded by no less than the constitution and also constitute actionable torts in accordance with paragraph (4), (9) and first clause of paragraph (16) of Article 32 of the Civil Code. 10. Defendants acts, thus described, caused plaintiffs to suffer physical suffering, mental anguish, fright, serious anxiety, besmirched reputation, wounded feelings, moral shock, social humiliation and other similar injuries which though incapable of pecuniary estimation are the proximate result of the respondent s wrongful acts, in the amount of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS (P250,000). 11. Defendants should be taught a lesson entitling plaintiff exemplary damages in the amount of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (Ps. 100,000.00); 12. In view of the violations to the rights of herein plaintiffs and the injuries they incurred, plaintiffs were compelled to seek the assistance of counsel to institute the present suit of damages and a criminal complaint with the Office of the Ombudsman, thereby incurring at their expense, attorney s fees and the costs of the present litigation in the amount of FORTY FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (P45,000) and FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (P5,000), respectively. WHEREFORE, in accordance with paragraph (4), (9) and first clause of paragraph (16) of Article 32 of the Civil Code, plaintiffs respectfully 4

prays for judgment in their favor by ordering defendants to pay the amount of TWENTY FOUR THOUSAND PESOS (Ps. 24,000.00) as actual and compensatory damages, moral damages in the amount of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND PESOS (Ps. 177,000.00) AND attorney s fees and cost litigation in the total amount of FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND PESOS (Ps. 55,000.00). for. OTHER JUST AND EQUITABLE RELIEFS and remedies are prayed DONE. QUEZON CITY, PHILIPPINES. SEPTEMBER 12, 2008 REX J.M.A. FERNANDEZ PTR PTR 3613526, 1/10/08, Cebu Prov. IBP No. 01032 Lifetime Member Roll No. 37453 No. 1 Maaralin Street cor. Matatag Street, Brgy. Central, Quezon City Philippines Republic of the Philippines) Quezon City...) s.s. VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION RAYMOND E. MANALO, after having been sworn to in accordance with law, states and declares that he is the plaintiff in the above-entitled complaint, that he has caused the preparation of the above complaint and has read and knows the same; the allegations therein are true to his own personal knowledge, and he has not filed or commenced any action or proceeding involving the same issues nor is there any proceeding or action pending before the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals or in any tribunal or agency involving the same parties and issues, nonetheless, Plaintiff herein will file a criminal complaint with the Office of the Ombudsman against the defendants in the present complaint for damages, which criminal complaint pertains to the acts and omissions of defendants 5

amounting to violations of Article 124, and Article 296 of the Revised Penal Code and violations of the Republic Act No. 7438, paragraphs (a) and (b), Section 4 therein, but which complaint is of a different nature, being criminal, with the instant complaint for damages which is civil and involves different issues and prayers for relief; and in the event that Plaintiff would know that there is an action or proceeding involving the same issues and parties, he undertakes to notify this Honorable Court of the pendency of such action within five (5) days from knowledge thereof. RAYMOND E. MANALO SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this th day of SEPTEMBER 12, 2008, at Quezon City, Philippines by affiant showing his CTC No. 05409598, issued on 9/12/08 at Quezon City, Philippines. 6