Case 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62

Similar documents
Case 2:15-cr JLL Document 5 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 27. U.S. Department of Justice. United Slates Attorney District ofpieu Jersey

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

Case 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6

LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Case: 5:16-cr KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

000002

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:15-cr FFM Document 38 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:114

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:16-cr GMS Document 6 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 20

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:09-cr R Document 25 Filed 12/10/2009 Page 1 of 24

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, No

Model Annotated Corporate Plea Agreement Last Updated 12/20/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [XXXXXXX] DISTRICT OF [XXXXXXXXX] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 6:06-cr DCR Doc #: 25 Filed: 10/20/06 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 75 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LONDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Re: Uníted States u. Carmelinda Marotta, a.h,a. Linda Mørotta

Case 8:12-cr JLS Document 87 Filed 09/14/17 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:288

Case 2:06-cr DDP Document 92 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 8. United States District Court Central District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOLTTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cr PKC Document 5 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: CR 313 (PKC)

u.s. Department of Justice

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

On March 27, 2008, Scott Shields ("Shields" or. pleaded guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Fraudulently Obtain

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

United States District Court

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

Transcription:

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageD: 62 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District ofnew Jersey 970 Broad Street, 7hfloor 973-645-2700 Newark, New Jersey 07102 June 24, 2014 Marc E. Kasowitz, Esq. Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 Re: Plea Agreement with ADAM S. GOTTBETTER Dear Mr. Kasowitz: This letter sets forth the plea agreement between your client, ADAM S. GO V BETTER ( GOTTBETTER ), and the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (this Office ). Charge Conditioned on the understandings specified below, this Office will accept a guilty plea from GOTTBETTER to a one-count information, which charges GOTTBETTER with conspiring with others to commit securities fraud and mail fraud between in or about June 2012 and in or about November 2013, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371. f GOTTBETTER enters a guilty plea and is sentenced on this charge, and otherwise fully complies with all of the terms of this agreement, this Office will not initiate any further criminal charges against GOTTBETTER for his involvement in stock market manipulation schemes between in or about June 2011 and in or about November 2013, involving the publicly traded stock of the following companies: HBP Energy Corp. ( HBPE ), f/k/a Lido nternational Corp. ( LDO ); Rio Bravo Oil, nc. ( ROB ); Dynastar Holdings, nc. ( DYNA ); and Kentucky USA Energy, nc. ( KYUS ). However, in the event that a guilty plea in this matter is not entered for any reason or the judgment of conviction entered as a result of this guilty plea does not remain in full force and effect, GOTTBETTER agrees that any dismissed charges and any other charges that are not time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations on the

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 2 of 9 PageD: 63 date this agreement is signed by GOTTBETTER may be commenced against him, notwithstanding the expiration of the limitations period after GOVBETTER signs the agreement. Sentencing The violation of 18 U.S.C. 371 to which GOTTBETTER agrees to plead guilty carries a statutory maximum prison sentence of 5 years and a statutory maximum fine equal to the greatest of: (1) $250,000; or (2) twice the gross amount of any pecuniary gain that any persons derived from the offense; or (3) twice the gross amount of any pecuniary loss sustained by any victims of the offense. Fines imposed by the sentencing judge may be subject to the payment of interest. The sentence to be imposed upon GOTTBETTER is within the sole discretion of the sentencing judge, subject to the provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. 355 1-3742, and the sentencing judge s consideration of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The United States Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. The sentencing judge may impose any reasonable sentence up to and including the statutory maximum term of imprisonment and the maximum statutory fine. This Office cannot and does not make any representation or promise as to what guideline range may be found by the sentencing judge, or as to what sentence GO TBETTER ultimately will receive. Further, in addition to imposing any other penalty on GOTTBETTER, the sentencing judge: (1) will order GOTTBETTER to pay an assessment of $100 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3013, which assessment must be paid by the date of sentencing; (2) may order GOTT3ETTER to pay restitution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3663 et seq.; (3) may order GOTTBETTER, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3555, to give notice to any victims of his offense; and (4) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3583, may require GOTTBE fl ER to serve a term of supervised release of not more than three years, which will begin at the expiration of any term of imprisonment imposed. Should GOTTBETTER be placed on a term of supervised release and subsequently violate any of the conditions of supervised release before the expiration of its term, GOTTBETTER may be sentenced to not more than two years imprisonment in addition to any prison term previously imposed, regardless of the statutory maximum term of imprisonment set forth above and without credit for time previously served on post-release supervision, and may be sentenced to an additional term of supervised release. Rights of This Office Regarding Sentencing -2-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 3 of 9 PageD: 64 Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, this Office reserves its right to take any position with respect to the appropriate sentence to be imposed on GOTTBETTER by the sentencing judge, to correct any misstatements relating to the sentencing proceedings, and to provide the sentencing judge and the United States Probation Office all law and information relevant to sentencing, favorable or otherwise. n addition, this Office may inform the sentencing judge and the United States Probation Office of: (1) this agreement; and (2) the full nature and extent of GO Vl BETTER s activities and relevant conduct with respect to this case. mmigration Consequences GOTTBETTER understands that, if he is not a citizen of the United States, his guilty plea to the charged offense may result in his being subject to immigration proceedings and removed from the United States by making him deportable, excludable, or inadmissible, or ending his naturalization. GOTTBETTER understands that the immigration consequences of this plea will be imposed in a separate proceeding before the immigration authorities. GOTTBETTER wants and agrees to plead guilty to the charged offense regardless of any immigration consequences of this plea, even if this plea will cause his removal from the United States. GOTTBETTER understands that he is bound by his guilty plea regardless of any immigration consequences of the plea. Accordingly, GOTTBETTER waives any and all challenges to his guilty plea and to his sentence based on any immigration consequences, and agrees not to seek to withdraw his guilty plea, or to file a direct appeal or any kind of collateral attack challenging his guilty plea, conviction, or sentence, based on any immigration consequences of his guilty plea. Stipulations This Office and GOTTBETTER agree to stipulate at sentencing to the statements set forth in the attached Schedule A, which is hereby made a part of this plea agreement. This agreement to stipulate, however, cannot and does not bind the sentencing judge, who may make independent factual findings and may reject any or all of the stipulations entered into by the parties. To the extent that the parties do not stipulate to a particular fact or legal conclusion, each reserves the right to argue the existence of and the effect of any such fact or conclusion upon the sentence. Moreover, this agreement to stipulate on the part of this Office is based on the information and evidence that this Office possesses as of the date of this agreement. Thus, if this Office obtains or receives additional evidence or information prior to sentencing that it determines to be credible and to be materially in conflict with any stipulation in the attached Schedule stipulation. A A, this Office shall not be bound by any such determination that any stipulation is not binding shall not release either this Office or GOTBETTER from any other portion of this -3-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 4 of 9 PageD: 65 agreement, including any other stipulation. f the sentencing court rejects a stipulation, both parties reserve the right to argue on appeal or at postsentencing proceedings that the sentencing court was within its discretion and authority to do so. These stipulations do not restrict the Government s right to respond to questions from the Court and to correct misinformation that has been provided to the Court. Waiver of Appeal and Post-Sentencing Rights As set forth in Schedule A, this Office and GOTTBETTER waive certain rights to file an appeal, collateral attack, writ, or motion after sentencing, including but not limited to an appeal under 18 U.S.C. under 28 U.S.C. 2255. 3742 or a motion Forfeiture GOTTBET ER agrees that as part of his acceptance of responsibility and 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2461(c), he will consent to the entry of a forfeiture money judgment ( Forfeiture Money Judgment ) in the amount of $344,966.55. GOT1 BETTER further agrees to forfeit all of his right, title and interest in any and all specific property traceable to the commission of the offense to which he agrees to plead guilty, with the proceeds from the sale of such property to be applied to the Forfeiture Money Judgment in partial satisfaction thereof. Payment of the Forfeiture Money Judgment shall be made by certified or bank check payable to the United States Marshals Service, with the criminal docket number noted on the face of the check. GOTTBET1 ER shall cause said check to be hand-delivered to the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Unit, United States Attorney s Office, District of New Jersey, 970 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102. GOTTBETTER further agrees to consent to the entry of orders of forfeiture consistent with this agreement and the Forfeiture Money Judgment to be imposed by the Court and waives the requirements of Rules 32.2 and 43(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment. GOTTBETTER waives any and all constitutional, statutory and other challenges to any forfeiture carried out in accordance with this plea agreement on any grounds, including that the forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine or punishment under the Eighth Amendment. f the amount of the Forfeiture Money Judgment is determined prior to the GOTTBETTER s sentencing, GOTTBE l ER consents to the entry of a Consent Judgment of Forfeiture that will be final as to the Forfeiture Money Judgment prior to GOTTBETTER s sentencing, pursuant to -4-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 5 of 9 PageD: 66 Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, GOTTBETTER understands that the forfeiture is part of the sentence that may be imposed in this case and waives any failure by the court to advise him of this pursuant to Rule 1 1(b)(1)(J) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure at the guilty plea proceeding. GOTTBETTER further understands that any forfeiture of the GOTTBETTER s assets shall not be treated as satisfaction of any fine, restitution, cost of imprisonment, or any other penalty the Court may impose upon the GOTTBETTER in addition to forfeiture; however, this Office agrees to recommend to the Attorney General that any forfeited money or property be remitted or restored to eligible victims of the offense, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853(i) (incorporated by 28 U.S.C. 2461(c)), 28 C.F.R. Pt. 9, and other applicable law, it being understood that this Office has authority only to recommend such relief and that the final decision of whether to grant relief rests with the Department of Justice, which will make its decision in accordance with applicable law. Other Provisions This agreement is limited to the United States Attorney s Office for the District of New Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local authorities. However, this Office will bring this agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices, if requested to do so. This agreement was reached without regard to any civil or administrative matters that may be pending or commenced in the future against GOTTBETTER. This agreement does not prohibit the United States, any agency thereof (including the nternal Revenue Service or the Securities and Exchange Commission), or any third party from initiating or prosecuting any civil or administrative proceeding against GOTTBETTER. -5-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 6 of 9 PageD: 67 No Other Promises This agreement constitutes the plea agreement between GOTTBETTER and this Office and supersedes any previous agreements between them. No additional promises, agreements, or conditions have been made or will be made unless set forth in writing and signed by the parties. Very truly yours, PAUL J. FSHMAN United States Attorney By: NCHOLARPPO JENNY KRAMER Assistant U.S. Attorneys APPROVED: GURBR S. GREWAL Chief, Economic Crimes Unit -6-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 7 of 9 PageD: 68 have received this letter from my attorney, MARC E. KASOWTZ, Esq. have read it. My attorney and have discussed it and all of its provisions, including those addressing the charge, sentencing, waiver, forfeiture, and immigration consequences. understand this letter fully. hereby accept its terms and conditions and acknowledge that it constitutes the plea agreement between the parties. understand that no additional promises, agreements, or conditions have been made or will be made unless set forth in writing and signed by the parties. want to plead guilty pursuant to this plea agreement. AGREED AND ACCEPTED: k ADAM S. GOTTBETTER Date L4k have discussed with my client this plea agreement and all of its provisions, including those addressing the charge, sentencing, waiver, forfeiture, and immigration consequences. My client understands this plea agreement fully and wants to plead guilty pursuant to it. MARC E. KASOWT, SQ. Date:(/)9-7-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 8 of 9 PageD: 69 Plea Agreement With ADAM S. GOTTBET ER Schedule A 1. This Office and ADAM S. GOTTBETTER ( GOTTBETTER ) recognize that the United States Sentencing Guidelines are not binding upon the Court. This Office and GOTTBETTER nevertheless agree to the stipulations set forth herein, and agree that the Court should sentence GOTTBETTER within the Guidelines range that results from the total Guidelines offense level set forth below. This Office and GOTTBET1 ER further agree that neither party will argue for the imposition of a sentence outside the Guidelines range that results from the agreed total Guidelines offense level. 2. The version of the United States Sentencing Guidelines effective November 1, 2013, applies in this case. The applicable guideline is U.S,S.G. 2B1.l(a)(2). This guideline carries a Base Offense Level of 6. 3. GOTTBETTER s gain from the criminal conduct is more than $200,000 but less than $400,000, which results in a 12-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. 281.1(b)(1)(G) and Application Note 3(B). 4. Specific Offense Characteristic 2B1.1(b)(10)(C) applies, because the offense involved sophisticated means. This results in an increase of 2 levels. 5. GOTTBETTER abused a position of trust or used a special skill in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the relevant criminal activity, pursuant to U.S.S.G. 3B1.3. This results in an increase of 2 levels. 6. As of the date of this letter, GOTTBE ] ER has clearly demonstrated a recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for the offense charged. Therefore, a downward adjustment of 2 levels for acceptance of responsibility is appropriate if GOTTBE rl ER s acceptance of responsibility continues through the date of sentencing. U.S.S.G. 3E1.1(a). 7. As of the date of this letter, GOTTBETTER has assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution of his own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of his intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the government to avoid preparing for trial and permitting the government and the court to allocate their resources efficiently. f GOTTBETTER enters a plea pursuant to this agreement and qualifies for a 2-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. 3E1. 1(a), and if in addition GO V BETTER s offense level under the Guidelines prior to the operation of -8-

Case 2:14-cr-00467-JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 9 of 9 PageD: 70 3E1. 1(a) is 16 or greater, GOTTBETTER will be entitled to a further 1-level reduction in his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. 3E1.1(b). 8. n accordance with the above, the parties agree that the total Guidelines offense level applicable to GOTT3ETTER is 19 (the agreed total Guidelines offense level ). 9. The parties agree not to seek or argue for any upward or downward departure, adjustment or variance not set forth herein. The parties further agree that a sentence within the Guidelines range that results from the agreed total Guidelines offense level of 19 is reasonable. 10. GOT-rBETTER knows that he has and, except as noted below in this paragraph, voluntarily waives, the right to file any appeal, any collateral attack, or any other writ or motion, including but not limited to an appeal under 18 U.S.C. 3742 or a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255, which challenges the sentence imposed by the sentencing court if that sentence falls within or below the Guidelines range that results from the agreed total Guidelines offense level of 19. This Office will not file any appeal, motion, or writ which challenges the sentence imposed by the sentencing court if that sentence falls within or above the Guidelines range that results from the agreed total Guidelines offense level of 19. The parties reserve any right they may have under 18 U.S.C. 3742 to appeal the sentencing court s determination of the criminal history category. The provisions of this paragraph are binding on the parties even if the Court employs a Guidelines analysis different from that stipulated to herein. Furthermore, if the sentencing court accepts a stipulation, both parties waive the right to file an appeal, collateral attack, writ, or motion claiming that the sentencing court erred in doing so. 11. Both parties reserve the right to oppose or move to dismiss any appeal, collateral attack, writ, or motion barred by the preceding paragraph and to file or to oppose any appeal, collateral attack, writ, or motion not barred by the preceding paragraph. -9-

USA v. GOTTBETTER General nformation Court Federal Nature of Suit Docket Number United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Criminal 2:14-cr-00467 2015 The Bureau of National Affairs, nc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service // PAGE 10