Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Similar documents
2016 us election results

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

If you have questions, please or call

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

State Complaint Information

The Electoral College And

National Latino Peace Officers Association

Background Information on Redistricting

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

America s Deficient Bridges: A State-by-State Comparison

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

American Government. Workbook

Components of Population Change by State

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

American Dental Association

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Who Runs the States?

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

Table A1. Medicare Advantage Enrollment by State and Plan Type, 2014

Mathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University

Department of Justice

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Revised December 10, 2007

Voters and the Affordable Care Act in the 2014 Election

Franklin D. Roosevelt. Pertaining to the. Campaign of 1928

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.

2015 ANNUAL OUTCOME GOAL PLAN (WITH FY 2014 OUTCOMES) Prepared in compliance with Government Performance and Results Act

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE

Overview. Strategic Imperatives. Our Organization. Finance and Budget. Path to Victory

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

Endnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

Election Notice. Notice of SFAB Election and Ballots. October 20, Ballot Due Date: November 20, Executive Summary.

Transcription:

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead November 2018 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1

Yes, it was all about Trump. SLIDE 2

A midterm record said their vote was a message of support or opposition to President Trump. Midterm Elections: Sending a Message Trump 2018 68% Obama 2010 63% Bush 2006 55% Obama 2014 49% Bush 2002 45% Clinton 1994 38% Clinton 1998 37% Source: Public Opinion Strategies Post-Election Surveys. SLIDE 3

A high percentage of voters were either sending a message to support or oppose President Trump. President/Year Midterm Elections: Sending a Message Supporting President Opposing President Net Difference Obama 2010 23% 40% -17% Bush 2006 19% 36% -17% Obama 2014 17% 32% -15% Trump 2018 31% 37% -6% Clinton 1994 17% 21% -4% Clinton 1998 20% 17% +3% Bush 2002 29% 16% +13% Source: Public Opinion Strategies Post-Election Surveys. SLIDE 4

This was a fairly traditional midterm: Presidents with a job approval rating below 49% lose an average of 39 seats. This is coincidentally the number of seats Republicans have currently lost in 2018. Trump s Job Approval 44%* First time in history that four successive presidents have lost control of Congress. Job Approval Over 60% Average Change +1 Seat 49%-59% -21 Seats Under 49% -39 Seats *RCP Average on Election Day November 6, 2018. Source: Gallup using final Presidential Approval and mid-term election results from 1962-2014. SLIDE 5

Intensity and turnout at a historic level. SLIDE 6

Interest in this election was almost at a presidential level. Interest in the Election Midterm Years Date Percent 9-10 November 2018 70% Mid-October 2018 65% Mid-October 2014 50% Mid-October 2010 61% Presidential Years Date Percent 9-10 Mid-October 2016 72% Mid-October 2012 77% Mid-October 2008 87% Mid-October 2004 82% Mid-October 2006 61% SLIDE 7

Record early voting has so far meant one thing: not cannibalizing election day voters, but instead record turnout. Percent Who Voted Early Midterm Years 2018 42% 2014 34% 2010 27% 2006 23% 2002 20% Presidential Years 2016 40% 2012 36% 2008 31% 2004 24% 2000 16% Source: Public Opinion Strategies Post-Election Surveys. SLIDE 8

Election turnout is estimated to be the highest percentage of eligible voters since 1914! U.S. Voter Turnout as % of Eligible Voters Date U.S. Voter Turnout 2018 49.2% 2014 36.7% 2010 41.0% Average 1970s-2000s 40.3% 1966 48.7 1914 50.1 Source: US Election Project, 11/15 update with an estimated voter projection of 115,897,500 ballots. SLIDE 9

It was a whack-amole election for Republicans at the congressional level. SLIDE 10

There were too many Republican open congressional seats and too many seats in play to keep a majority. Year GOP Lean or Toss Up Seats DEM Lean or Toss Up Seats President s Party Seats Lost September 2018 70 4-39* November 2014 12 27-13 November 2010 7 93-63 November 2006 55 7-30 Source: Cook Political Report. *Source: Axios, as of November 19, 2018. SLIDE 11

The green wave was an accelerant for the Democrats and is reshaping our politics. SLIDE 12

Record Spending in a Midterm Election Republicans Democrats Net Difference Candidates Raised $612M $923M +311M Parties Raised $147M $250M +103M Total Spending by Outside Groups 2018 $1.17B* 2014 $566.1M Source: Open Secrets (money), as of November 8, 2018. OpenSecrets (FEC) excluding Party Committee independent units. *Red = projected number. SLIDE 13

In the third quarter, 51 incumbent House Republicans were outraised at least 2-to-1, while 71 were outspent by their challenger. Only five Democratic House incumbents were outraised. Source: Politico; October 17, 2018. SLIDE 14

Waves (generally) are not because you win big it s because you win by a very small amount in many places. SLIDE 15

Republicans lost 39 House seats while only losing the actual vote in swing seats by one percentage point. 2018 Midterm Election Popular Vote:* Republican Votes Democrat Votes Net Difference Total U.S. Vote 45% 53% +8% Cook Political Report Swing Districts (18%) 49% 50% +1% *Vote as of November 19, 2018. Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. SLIDE 16

SLIDE 17

There was an all-time record 234 women running for Congress, 182 Democratic women and 52 Republican women. There will be 90 new Members in the House of Representatives; 35 of them are Democratic women. There is only one new Republican female House Member. Source: Roll Call. Note: 4 House races have not been called as of November 19, 2018. SLIDE 18

If Republican incumbent Mia Love wins in UT-4, the party will have 14 female House Members next year versus 90 so far for the Democrats. Source: NBC News; November 20, 2018. SLIDE 19

Gender: a new alltime record split between men and women in voting for Congress; a net 23 point difference. SLIDE 20

Women voted Democrat for Congress by a record margin and by a record gap compared to men. Exit Poll Congressional Preference by Key Sub-Groups 2006 Margins 2008 Margins 2014 Margins 2016 Margins 2018 Margins Men +3% +6% +16% +12% +4% Women +12% +14% +4% +10% +19% This is a net 23 point difference by gender. Source: CNN U.S. House National Exit Polls. SLIDE 21

Republicans only broke even among white women. Exit Poll Congressional Preference by Key Sub-Groups 2006 Margins 2008 Margins 2014 Margins 2016 Margins 2018 Margins White Men +9% +11% +31% +32% +21% White Women +1% +6% +14% +12% -0- Source: CNN U.S. House National Exit Polls. SLIDE 22

White college educated women have moved decisively towards the Democratic party. SLIDE 23

Exit Polls by White Women/Education Year Republican Democrat White Women College+ Net Difference 2018 39% 59% +20% 2016 49% 49% -0- White Women Less Than College 2018 56% 42% +14% 2016 63% 35% +28% SLIDE 24

Education is the new cultural divide. SLIDE 25

2016 Presidential: Education was the Cultural Divide States Where More Voters Have Advanced Degrees Go DEM, Fewer GOP State % Advanced degree Rank District of Columbia 28.00% Massachusetts 16.40% 1 Maryland 16.00% 2 Connecticut 15.50% 3 Virginia 14.10% 4 New York 14.00% 5 Vermont 13.30% 6 New Jersey 12.90% 7 Colorado 12.70% 8 Illinois 11.70% 9 Rhode Island 11.70% 10 Delaware 11.40% 11 New Hampshire 11.20% 12 Washington 11.10% 13 California 10.70% 14 Oregon 10.40% 15 New Mexico 10.40% 16 Minnesota 10.30% 17 United States Average 10.30% -- Kansas 10.20% 18 Pennsylvania 10.20% 19 Hawaii 9.90% 21 Georgia 9.90% 21 Maine 9.60% 23 Missouri 9.50% 24 Michigan 9.40% 25 State % Advanced degree Rank Arizona 9.30% 26 Utah 9.10% 27 Alaska 9.00% 28 Florida 9.00% 28 Nebraska 8.80% 30 North Carolina 8.80% 31 Ohio 8.80% 32 Texas 8.50% 33 Kentucky 8.50% 33 Wisconsin 8.40% 35 South Carolina 8.40% 35 Montana 8.30% 37 Indiana 8.10% 38 Wyoming 7.90% 39 Tennessee 7.90% 39 Alabama 7.70% 40 Nevada 7.60% 41 Idaho 7.50% 42 Iowa 7.40% 43 Oklahoma 7.40% 43 South Dakota 7.30% 45 Mississippi 7.10% 46 Louisiana 6.90% 47 North Dakota 6.70% 48 West Virginia 6.70% 48 Arkansas 6.10% 50 SLIDE 26

Republicans lost all white college voters by eight points. Exit Polls by White/Education Year Republican Democrat Net Difference Whites College+ 2018 45% 53% +8% 2016 54% 44% +10% 2014 57% 41% +16% 2010 58% 39% +19% Whites Less Than College 2018 61% 37% +24% 2016 66% 31% +35% 2014 64% 34% +30% 2010 63% 33% +30% SLIDE 27

Parties Share of House Seats Won by Lowest Quartile Educational Attainment 1998 vs. 2018 D+12% R+18% 44% 56% 59% 41% 1998 2018 Republican Seats Democratic Seats Republican Seats Democratic Seats Note: reflects results as of 4pm on November 7. Source: WSJ SLIDE 28

Parties Share of House Seats Won by Highest Quartile Educational Attainment 1998 vs. 2018 D+1% D+62% 81% 49% 50% 19% 1998 2018 Republican Seats Democratic Seats Republican Seats Democratic Seats Note: reflects results as of 4pm on November 7. Source: WSJ SLIDE 29

The composition of the Republican party has shifted significantly over the decade to non-college whites. Self-Described Republicans by Ethnicity/Education 2010 Merge 2012 Merge 2014 Merge 2016 Merge 2018 Merge Total Republican Non-College Whites 50% 48% 49% 56% 59% Total Republican College+ Whites 40% 40% 38% 33% 29% Republican Non-Whites 10% 12% 13% 11% 12% SLIDE 30

The new educational divide is a key factor in moving the suburbs away from Republicans. SLIDE 31

Exit Polls of Suburban Voters Year Republican Democrat Net Difference 2018 49% 49% -0-2016 53% 45% +8% 2014 55% 43% +12% 2012 51% 47% +4% 2010 55% 42% +13% SLIDE 32

Democrats Dominate Urban and Now Suburban Districts Democrats Winning Percentage by House District Type URBAN SUBURBAN RURAL 98.8% 70.1% 19% GOP Has So Far Lost 21 / 25 Districts Won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 AZ-2 CA-10 CA-21 CA-25 CA-39 CA-45 CA-48 CA-49 CO-6 FL-26 FL-27 IL-6 KS-3 MN-3 NJ-7 NY-24 PA-1 PA-5 PA-6 PA-7 TX-7 TX-23 TX-32 VA-10 WA-8 Source: David Montgomery, City Lab, races called as of November 19, 2018. SLIDE 33

The Issue Agenda SLIDE 34

A plurality of Democratic TV advertising was on the topic of health care. Percentage of House/Senate Campaign Advertisements Mentioning January September 30, 2018 Ranked by Democrat Campaign Mentions Health care 36% 12% Jobs-Unemployment 10% 10% Taxes 9% 18% Health care: Medicare 9% 3% Budget/Government Spending 8% 10% Social Issues 8% 8% Corruption 8% 7% Energy/Environment 7% 3% Immigration 3% 14% Pro-Trump 2% 14% SLIDE 35

On an open-ended question, health care went from barely on the table during the last midterm to the most important issue of 2018. 2014 2018 23% Economy/Jobs 10% Education 23% Health Care 18% Economy/Jobs 9% Government Dysfunction/Getting Country Moving on Right Track 15% Immigration/Illegal Immigration 8% Immigration/Illegal Immigration 10% Taxes 6% President Obama s Health Care Reform Law Negative 9% Education 6% Foreign Policy/National Defense 5% Taxes 7% Moral Values 5% Environment 4% 4% Cutting Government Waste/ Controlling Government Spending President Obama s Health Care Reform Law Positive 4% Need More Gun Control 4% Pro-Life/Abortion 4% Moral Values 3% Need More Protection for Gun Rights Source: Public Opinion Strategies Post-Election Surveys. SLIDE 36

When given eight issues to choose from, health care rises to the top as the deciding vote factor for Congress. Ranked by First Choice First Choice Combined Choice Health care 24% 37% The economy and jobs 17% 28% Changing how things work in Washington 17% 30% Immigration 14% 33% Abortion 5% 12% Taxes 5% 13% Guns 4% 16% Foreign policy and terrorism 3% 11% Source: Public Opinion Strategies Post-Election Survey. SLIDE 37

Democrats dominated health care voters, Republicans won immigration, the economy/jobs, and taxes. Congressional Ballot by Most Important Issue Republican Democratic Net Diff. Overall 46% 53% D+7% Health Care (36%) 17% 83% D+66% Immigration (32%) 64% 36% R+28% Changing DC (29%) 36% 62% D+26% Economy/Jobs (27%) 68% 31% R+37% Guns (15%) 38% 61% D+23% Taxes (13%) 58% 41% R+17% Abortion (11%) 53% 47% R+6% Foreign Policy (10%) 44% 52% D+8% Source: Public Opinion Strategies Post-Election Survey. SLIDE 38

A Look Ahead to 2020 SLIDE 39

New look progressives did not break through in 2018... this has consequences as one thinks about the 2020 election. SLIDE 40

2018 Key Races Featuring Democratic Progressives Republican Candidate State Democratic Candidate Florida (R+0.4)* Georgia (R+1.4)* Arizona (R+14.2)* Texas (R+2.6)* LOST LOST LOST LOST *As of November 19, 2018. SLIDE 41

The Industrial Midwest is Up For Grabs As Goes the Rust Belt? The Road to 2020 Runs Through BOTH PARTIES LIKELY TO PUSH POLICIES POPULAR IN THESE STATES IA IA MI OH PA WI MI OH PA WI GOV. 2016 GOV. 2018 SENATE 2019-20 WH 2012 WH 2016 GOP GOP GOP DEM GOP GOP DEM GOP DEM DEM 2 R 2 D 1D / 1R 1D / 1R 1D / 1R DEM DEM DEM DEM DEM GOP GOP GOP GOP GOP SLIDE 42

Questions? SLIDE 43

Bill McInturff bill@pos.org Office: (703) 836-7655 SLIDE 44