Final Report. Participation of Latino/Hispanic Population in the Food Stamp Program in the South.

Similar documents
Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Demography and the Study of Southern American English Guy Bailey Universityof Texas at San Antonio

The New U.S. Demographics

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Children of Immigrants

HEALTH CARE EXPERIENCES

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

Characteristics of People. The Latino population has more people under the age of 18 and fewer elderly people than the non-hispanic White population.

If you have questions, please or call

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

MEMPHIS POVERTY FACT SHEET

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

LATINOS IN AMERICA: A Demographic Profile

Refugee Resettlement in Small Cities Reports

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

Growth in the Foreign-Born Workforce and Employment of the Native Born

LATINOS IN CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, NEW YORK, FLORIDA AND NEW JERSEY

The Impact of Ebbing Immigration in Los Angeles: New Insights from an Established Gateway

Nebraska s Foreign-Born and Hispanic/Latino Population

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

Immigration Goes Nationwide Recent dispersal has made immigrants and new minorities more visible

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

The foreign born are more geographically concentrated than the native population.

America s s Emerging Demography The role of minorities, college grads & the aging and younging of the population

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Alan Berube, Fellow

Extrapolated Versus Actual Rates of Violent Crime, California and the United States, from a 1992 Vantage Point

Demographic Changes, Health Disparities, and Tuberculosis

Now is the time to pay attention

THE NEW POOR. Regional Trends in Child Poverty Since Ayana Douglas-Hall Heather Koball

Prophetic City: Houston on the Cusp of a Changing America.

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey

America is facing an epidemic of the working hungry. Hunger Free America s analysis of federal data has determined:

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

Older Immigrants in the United States By Aaron Terrazas Migration Policy Institute

Household Income, Poverty, and Food-Stamp Use in Native-Born and Immigrant Households

Trends in Medicaid and CHIP Eligibility Over Time

Chapter 7. Migration

Paths to Citizenship: Data on the eligible-to-naturalize populations in the U.S.

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Robert Puentes, Fellow

The State of Senior Hunger in America

Incarcerated Women and Girls

Immigration Policy Brief August 2006

Food Stamp Receipt by Families with Non-Citizen Household Heads in Rural Texas Counties

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

How Have Hispanics Fared in the Jobless Recovery?

ANTI-POVERTY DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD STAMP PROGRAM BENEFITS: A PROFILE OF 1975 FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLAYS* Marilyn G. Kletke

2016 us election results

Integrating Latino Immigrants in New Rural Destinations. Movement to Rural Areas

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Authors: Mike Stavrianos Scott Cody Kimball Lewis

Demographic Change How the US is Coping with Aging, Immigration, and Other Challenges William H. Frey

The Great Immigration Turnaround

The Latino Electorate in 2010: More Voters, More Non-Voters

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

Megapolitan America. Luck Stone Corporation

EQUAL ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE FOR ALL MISSOURIANS

Summary Overview of Upcoming Joint Report Lining Up: Ensuring Equal Access to the Right to Vote

Key Facts on Health and Health Care by Race and Ethnicity

Who is Leaving the Food Stamp Program? An Analysis of Caseload Changes from 1994 to 1997

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

StateofWel-Being. Tennesee. State,City&CongresionalDistrictWel-BeingReport

Oregon and STEM+ Migration and Educational Attainment by Degree Type among Young Oregonians. Oregon Office of Economic Analysis

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

The County-Level View of Unauthorized Immigrants and Implications for Executive Action Implementation

Louisville: Immigration Rebirth Matt Ruther, Department of Urban and Public Affairs, University of Louisville

Hispanic Health Insurance Rates Differ between Established and New Hispanic Destinations

Hispanic Market Demographics

Selected National Demographic Trends

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

Chapter 1: The Demographics of McLennan County

Public and Subsidized Housing as a Platform for Becoming a United States Citizen

History of Immigration to Texas

The Changing Face of Texas:

Rural America At A Glance

POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE LATINO VOTE By NALEO Educational Fund

OVERVIEW. Demographic Trends. Challenges & Opportunities. Discussion

The State of Senior Hunger in America 2011: An Annual Report

Seattle Public Schools Enrollment and Immigration. Natasha M. Rivers, PhD. Table of Contents

Migration Information Source - Chinese Immigrants in the United States

Peruvians in the United States

May 14, Commission on the Status of Women: Needs Assessment.

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

The New Latino South: The Context and Consequences of Rapid Population Growth

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Brooklyn Community District 4: Bushwick,

Who Are These Unauthorized Immigrants and What Are We Going To Do About Them?

LOOKING FORWARD: DEMOGRAPHY, ECONOMY, & WORKFORCE FOR THE FUTURE

Racial Inequities in Montgomery County

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Bruce Katz, Director

MIGRATION & HEALTH: MEXICAN IMMIGRANT WOMEN IN THE U.S.

THE 2004 YOUTH VOTE MEDIA COVERAGE. Select Newspaper Reports and Commentary

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

An Equity Profile of the Southeast Florida Region. Summary. Foreword

Transcription:

Final Report Participation of Latino/Hispanic Population in the Food Stamp Program in the South. Safdar Muhammad 1 and Fisseha Tegegne Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research Tennessee State University Nashville, TN Project Final Report Submitted to Southern Rural Development Center Mississippi State University December 17, 2004 1 Corresponding PI, IAgER, Tennessee State University, Box 9610, 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd., Nashville, TN 37209-1561. Tel (615) 963-5824. Fax (615) 963-1557. Email: smuhammad@tnstate.edu 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hispanic population is growing rapidly in the U.S. generally and in the southern states particularly. This rapidly growing population is characterized by high poverty rates among children and elderly population compared to other races. The Hispanic population is less educated, characterized by low income, lack English language proficiency and has need for public assistance to support their families. The majority of the population is not aware of the FSP and their eligibility to participate in the program. In Tennessee, Hispanic participation and households are increasing rapidly especially in the metro counties. The increase in participation is about three times that of the total population. Participation of Hispanic children in the program was much higher than adults. Lack of English proficiency requires special effort and assistance to serve the growing Hispanic population. To accommodate this growing population, the food stamp program offices will need staff with Spanish language skills. Training programs for state and local officials will be helpful to better serve the Hispanic population. It is important to create trust and comfort among food stamp staff and Hispanics to enhance their participation. Specially designed outreach programs to target low income Hispanic families especially those with children will also help to increase participation. Outreach material should be available in Spanish language in effective and efficient way. The results showed that religious organizations can play important role in providing information about the program. Collaboration between the food stamp offices and local ethnic and religious organizations will help to increase participation of the eligible Hispanic population. Some of the collaboration activities can include training local people to organize workshops to test eligibility and provide information/ resources at public and private charity meetings. More staff with Spanish language skills and translated material will also enhance their participation. The other measures to increase participation will be food stamp application process should be less complicated, reduce waiting time and provide more friendly staff. It will be important for the food stamp program to be prepared to serve a rapid growing Hispanic population. 2

Title: Participation of Latino/Hispanic Population in the Food Stamp Program (FSP) in the South. INTRODUCTION: Latino/Hispanic population which is growing rapidly in the U.S. generally and the southern region particularly is characterized by high poverty rate and poor living conditions especially among those with children. According to the Census Bureau, the total Hispanic population in the U.S. was 39.9 millions in 2003, compared to 22.3 millions in 1990. The Hispanic population increased by 78.49% during 1990-2003. The Latino/Hispanic population also increased with significant rate (13.01%) in the short period of time, 2000-2003. The total Hispanic population in the southern states is shown in Table 1. The Hispanic population increased more in the south (97.45%) compared to U.S. (78.49%) during 1990-2003. The Hispanic population in the U.S. had traditionally been concentrated in specific areas of the country. But a study by Saenz et al., 2003 showed that percentage change in the Latino/ Hispanic in the southern region was ranked second after the western region during 1990-2000. The percentage change was 117.2% in the West and 102.6 percent in the South. Florida and Texas contribute a large Hispanic population (82%) in this region but other states showed significant increased in recent years. The rapid growing states in the south are North Carolina (508%), Arkansas (405%), Georgia (396%), Tennessee (345%) and South Carolina (274%) during 1990-2003. Majority of the Hispanic population lives in the larger metropolitan areas in Tennessee. According to Census data, Hispanic population in the Davidson and Shelby counties was 31,976 and 26,434 respectively. These two counties represent 40% of total Hispanic population in the state (146,000). The Census data showed that during 2000-03, Hispanic population 3

increased faster in the adjacent to metro counties (20.67%) compared to metro (17.57%) and non-metro counties (9.08%) in Tennessee. A report by the Census Bureau (2000) highlighted some of the key economic characteristics of the Hispanic population in the U.S. According to the report, Hispanic face high unemployment rate (6.8%), the majority live below the poverty level (22.8%), are less educated (43% with less than high school), have larger household size (30.6% with five or more people), and few (23.3%) have annual earning of $35,000 or more. Another study (Arnold et al. 2001) also provides information and characteristics of food stamp recipients in California. Some of the main findings of this report were that majority of food stamp recipients are children (66%), non-citizen (12%) and Hispanic (44%). The Latino/Hispanic group contributes a significant share to the total immigrant population in the U.S. According to the INS (2004), total immigrants admitted into the U.S. in 2003 were 705,827. The majority of these immigrants were from Mexico (16.4%). Two southern states, Florida and Texas, ranked in the top four primary destination states for legal immigrants behind California and New York. A study by Capps (2001) shows that children of immigrant families face more hardship in three basic needs areas of food, housing and healthcare compared to U.S. natives. The same study also suggests that one-fourth of all children born to immigrants live in poor families, compared to 16% for natives. Twenty-three percent of all poor children in the US are either first or second-generation immigrants. The immigration status of parents and restrictions introduced by the 1996 welfare reforms that targeted non-citizens also affects participation of eligible children who are US citizens in the welfare program (Fix and Zimmermann 1999). Recent restoration of food stamps 4

benefits to legal immigrants will allow more Hispanics to participate in the FSP and can have significant impact especially in the south. The economic conditions and standard of living of Hispanic families are much lower than non-hispanic families in the U.S. A large number of Hispanics are living below the poverty level, which is much higher than that of total U.S. population. The poverty rate among Hispanics was 22.5% compared to 12.5% for all U.S. population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2004). The poverty rate for Hispanic children (under 18 years) is 29.7%, this means that about one in three Hispanic child is living below the poverty level. The comparison of the poverty rate among Hispanic and total population is shown in Figure 1. The data indicate that poverty among Hispanic was always higher than total population during 1972 to 2003. The highest poverty rate was 15.2% for all population in 1983 but lowest poverty rate for Hispanic population was 21.4% in 2001 with the highest rate of 30.7% in 1994. Similarly, the lowest poverty rate for all population was 11.3% in 2000. The poverty rate was not only higher among the Hispanic population when compared with the total population and other races, but higher among children and other age group. The comparison between different races by age group is shown in Figure 3. The Hispanic population has higher poverty rate compared to other groups except the black population. The poverty rate was about 30% among Hispanic children and 20% among elderly population. The poverty among children was much higher than other age groups in all races. The Census Bureau uses a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. Lower household income and large family size will increase the possibility to live under poverty. The rapidly growing Hispanic population with high poverty rate especially among children indicates their need for accessing public assistance programs. This study 5

examines Latino/Hispanic current participation level in the food stamp program, identify barriers and suggest strategies that can enhance their participation in the program. OBJECTIVES: The goal of the proposed study is to acquire an understanding of the dynamics of the Latino/Hispanic population and their participation in the Food Stamp Program (FSP). The specific objectives are to: 1. Develop socio-economic and demographic profile of the Latino/Hispanic population in the south. 2. Examine and evaluate participation level of the Latino/Hispanic population in the FSP in Tennessee. 3. Identify factors and barriers/constraints that account for non-participation in the FSP by eligible Latino/Hispanic population. 4. Develop programs and strategies to enhance their participation in the FSP. Methodology: Tennessee State University collaborated with the State Department of Human Services and a Faith Based Organization serving the Latino/Hispanic population in Tennessee and Kentucky. State administrative data, several secondary sources and survey data are used to investigate the characteristics of the rapidly growing Hispanic population, changes overtime and assess their need for food assistance. A Questionnaire was developed and translated into Spanish language to collect primary data from the Hispanic population in Tennessee and Kentucky. Faith Based organization assisted to collect the data. Training of data enumerators was conducted in both states. The following information was collected using the survey: - Demographic and socio-economic characteristics 6

- Need for the food stamp - Constraints and barriers for not participating in the FSP by eligible persons - Characteristics of non-participating eligible children of ineligible parents - Suggestions to improve access to the program Participation of Latino/Hispanic Population in the Food Stamp Program: There were 14,870 food stamp participants in December 2003 in Tennessee. The total participation increased by 31.65% during Jan-Dec. 2003. The participation was 11,295 in the beginning of the year in the state. Majority of the participants are from two large metropolitan counties (Davidson and Shelby) in Tennessee. These two counties contribute about 41% of total participation in the state. These two counties also represent the same proportion of Hispanic population in the state. The remaining participation is also from other metro counties in the state. The data showed that participation of Hispanics in the FSP increased rapidly in the states, compared to the total population. The total participation increased by 11.12% during Jan-Dec, 2003 but it was 31.65% for the Hispanic population. The total change was much higher for Hispanic children (31.65%) compared to 20.29% for Hispanic adults. The percent change for the total population was 11.23% for children and 11.02% for adults respectively. The participation in FSP by Hispanics increased significantly in the metro counties, compared to adjacent and non-adjacent to metro counties. The Hispanic participation in the metro counties increased by 34.51%, adjacent to metro (24.16%) and non-adjacent to metro (10.33%) respectively. The participation increase was much higher for Hispanic children in metro counties when compared with the state average. 7

Similarly, total participation increased more in metro counties for the total population (12.21%) but much lower than the Hispanic population. Total households receiving food stamps also increased significantly for Hispanic compared to total population. The Hispanic households increased by 36.87% compared to only 11.81% for the total participation. The percent change in household participation in the FSP by type of county is shown in Table 3. Preliminary Survey Results: The data was analyzed by using 85 useable surveys from Hispanic respondents from Tennessee and Kentucky. Some of the demographic characteristics of respondents include 51% female, average household size (4.34), about 77% with high school or less education, 52% with less than $5,000 annual household income and 72% families and 53% children without any health insurance. The results showed that government assistance (20%) including food stamp was the main source to fulfill their food needs, followed by religious organization (17.6%) and friends (10.6). The vast majority of the Hispanic respondents indicated that they do not know about the FSP (22.4%) and if they are eligible for the program (23%). The participation of Hispanics in the FSP can be increased through outreach to this 46% of the respondents. The results also showed that 52% of the respondents were less or not comfortable when applying for food stamps. The degree of their discomfort was due to several factors including availability of staff with Spanish language skills, attitude of the staff conducting interview and overall efficient service provided by the food stamp office. 27.6% of respondent also indicated (27.6%) that they were told by person conducting interview that their U.S. born children are not eligible for food stamp because their parents are in this country illegally. The 8

average waiting time when applying for food stamp was 2.86 hours and 63% of the respondents indicated that the waiting time is long. The main sources of information about food stamps for the Hispanic population are: church/religious organizations (32.9%), followed by friends (31.8%) and radio/tv/news papers (7.1%). The respondents also indicated that providing information about the program will be well reached if radio/tv/news papers and religious organizations are used. 43.5% also suggested participation in the FSP can increase if number of staff with Spanish language skills is increased, followed by Spanish translated materials (20%) and more friendly staff in the food stamp office (11.8%). The results from this primary survey will help policy makers to design programs that can enhance participation of the Hispanic population in the FSP. 9

REFERENCEES Arnold, Autumn, G. Manalo-LeClair, A. Marinacci and S. Robinson. 2001. Understanding and Improving the Food Stamp Program in California. California Food Policy Advocates, San Francisco, CA. Capps, R. 2001. Hardship Among Children of immigrants: Finding from the 1999 National Survey of American Families. Washington D.C.: Number B-29 in series New Federalism: National Survey of American Families. Fix, M., W. Zimmermann. 1999. All Under One Roof: Mixed Families in an Era of Reform. Washington D.C. The Urban Institute. Immigration Studies Paper. Tennessee Department of Human Services. 2003. State of Tennessee. Office of Director of Food Stamp Policy, Nashville, TN. Therrien, Melissa and Roberto Ramirez. 2002. The Hispanic Population in the United States: March 2000, Current Population Report, p20-535, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Current Population Survey, Ethnic and Hispanic Statistics Branch, Population Division. Internet Release Date: March 6, 2001. U.S. Census Bureau. 2003. Population Estimates for Counties by Race and Hispanic Origin. Population Estimate Program, Population Division, Washington, DC http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/asrh/cc-est2003-race6.html U.S. Department of Commerce. Income, Poverty, and Health insurance Coverage in the United States: 2003. Current Population Reports. Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. August 2004. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2003 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Office of Immigration Statistics, September 2004. 10

Table 1. Total Hispanic population and percent change in the southern states 1990-2003. Percent Change 1990 2000 2003 2000-03 1990-03 AL 24,629 75,830 89,195 17.62 262.15 AR 19,876 86,866 100,378 15.55 405.02 FL 1,574,148 2,682,715 3,160,287 17.80 100.76 GA 108,933 435,227 541,123 24.33 396.75 KY 22,005 59,939 71,905 19.96 226.77 LA 93,067 107,738 117,260 8.84 26.00 MS 15,998 39,569 43,441 9.79 171.54 NC 76,745 378,963 466,704 23.15 508.12 OK 86,162 179,304 199,748 11.40 131.83 SC 30,500 95,076 114,217 20.13 274.48 TN 32,742 123,838 146,000 17.90 345.91 TX 4,339,874 6,669,666 7,556,869 13.30 74.13 VA 160,403 329,540 394,856 19.82 146.16 South 6,585,082 11,264,271 13,001,983 15.43 97.45 U.S. 22,354,059 35,305,818 39,898,889 13.01 78.49 Table 2. Distribution of Latino/Hispanic population by type of county in TN, 2000-03. Type of County 2000 % 2003 % Percent Change 2000-03 Metro 97,557 78.8 114,695 78.6 17.57 Adjacent to Metro 22,757 18.4 27,461 18.8 20.67 Not Adjacent to Metro 3,524 2.8 38,44 2.6 9.08 State 123,838 100 146,000 100 17.90 Table 3. Top five counties in Tennessee with Hispanic population, 2000-03 County 2000 2003 Percent Change 2000-03 Unemployment Rate (2003) Davidson 26,091 31,976 22.56 4.5 Shelby 23,364 26,434 13.14 6.4 Rutherford 5,065 6,981 37.83 4.4 Hamilton 5,481 6,049 10.36 4.1 Montgomery 6,960 5,829-16.25 4.7 State 123,838 146,000 17.90 5.8 11

Figure 1. Poverty level of Hispanic and all population in the U.S., 1972-2003. (poverty Level (%) 40 30 20 10 0 2003 2000 1996 1992 1988 1984 1980 1976 1972 All Hispanic Figure 2. Poverty level in the southern states, 3-year average 2000-2003. Poverty Level (%) 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 U.S. South VA GA FL KY SC OK NC TN AL TX LA MS AR 12

Figure 3. Poverty level by race and age groups in U.S., 2003. 40 Poverty Level (%) 30 20 10 0 All Races White Black Asian Hispanic All < 18 18-64 > 64 13

Table 4. Percent change of Hispanic and total population in the FSP by type of County, Jan-Dec. 2003. Type of County Latino/Hispanic Total Population Adults Children Total Adults Children Total Metro 21.28 38.71 34.51 12.32 12.09 12.21 Adjacent to Metro 19.21 25.70 24.16 8.54 8.96 8.71 Non-Adjacent to Metro 5.15 12.50 10.33 9.68 10.13 9.86 Total 20.29 35.28 31.65 11.02 11.23 11.12 Table 5. Percent change in Hispanic and total household participating in the FSP, Jan-Dec. 2003 Hispanic Total Metro 38.59 12.97 Adjacent to Metro 30.88 9.37 Non-Adjacent to Metro 28.00 10.41 Total 36.87 11.81 Table 6. Top five counties in Tennessee with Hispanic participation in the FSP and percent change between Jan-Dec. 2003 January December Percent Change Davidson 2,716 3,641 34.06 Shelby 1,771 2,395 35.23 Hamilton 499 622 24.65 Montgomery 486 596 22.63 Knox 383 584 52.48 State 11,295 14,870 31.65 14

Table 7. Some demographic characteristics of the respondents Characteristics % Gender Male 48.8 Female 51.2 Total number of people in household (No.) 4.34 Education < HS HS Annual household Income < $5,000 $5,000 -$25,000 Health Insurance Families with health insurance Children with health insurance 32.9 44.3 51.6 35.9 28.0 46.7 Table 8. Type of assistance received by Hispanic population to fulfill their food needs. Organizations % Government assistance (Food Stamps) etc. 20.0 Religious organizations 17.6 Friends 10.6 Relatives 9.4 Second harvest food bank 4.7 None 4.7 Non-profit organization/charities 3.5 15

Table 9. Reasons for not receiving food stamp Reasons % Don t know if I am eligible 23.5 Don t know about the Food Stamp Program 22.4 My eligibility run out 9.4 Don t know enough English to apply 5.9 Applied but denied 4.7 Application process is too complicated/difficult 3.5 Don t want to apply for Food Stamps 1.2 Table 10. Suggestions to improve food stamp services. Suggestion % Staff with Spanish language skills 43.5 Spanish translated materials 20.0 More friendly staff 11.8 Reduce time waiting 11.8 More staff 7.1 16