Who has been publicly accused?

Similar documents
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Background Information on Redistricting

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

State Complaint Information

National Latino Peace Officers Association

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

2010 State Animal Protection Laws Rankings

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

The Electoral College And

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Judicial Selection in the States

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

Applications for Post Conviction Testing

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Congressional Redistricting Decisions, 2011

8. Public Information

Number of Bills Passed Per Issue

Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin

The Changing Face of Labor,

Testimony on Senate Bill 125

American Government. Workbook

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

Redistricting in Michigan

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

Committee Consideration of Bills

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

Results and Criteria of BGA/NFOIC survey

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

Department of Justice

TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY THURGOOD MARSHALL SCHOOL OF LAW LIBRARY LOCATION GUIDE July 2018

Swarthmore College Alumni Association Constitution and Bylaws. The name of this Association shall be Swarthmore College Alumni Association.

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

additional amount is paid purchase greater amount. coverage with option to State provides $30,000 State pays 15K policy; by legislator. S.P. O.P.

SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM

How Many Illegal Aliens Currently Live in the United States?

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

In the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004

DATA BREACH CLAIMS IN THE US: An Overview of First Party Breach Requirements

VOTING WHILE TRANS: PREPARING FOR THE NEW VOTER ID LAWS August 2012

MEMORANDUM SUMMARY NATIONAL OVERVIEW. Research Methodology:

Case 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATUS OF 2002 REED ACT DISTRIBUTION BY STATE

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth

Components of Population Change by State

Revised December 10, 2007

Before They Were States. Finding and Using Territorial Records by Jack Butler

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Transcription:

1

In the most exhaustive accounting of its kind to date, this study shows that a total of at least 138 government officials in both elected and appointed positions, have been publicly reported for sexual harassment, assault, misconduct, or violence against women since the 16 election. These include all allegations of sex-related misconduct reported in national, state, and local media. A large majority of these officials 14 of them, or 7 percent -- have left or been ousted from their positions. After this week s midterm election, 34, at most, will remain in office by January 19. One elected official s close race is pending a recount. #MeToo Takes off

3 As the #MeToo movement has made evident, sexual harassment and assault commonly go underreported. In fact, sexual assault is the most underreported violent crime in America, with 7% never reported to police. Even after the rise of #MeToo, among survey respondents who said they had experienced workplace harassment in the past year, 76 percent did not report it. Many victims fear retaliation or think that nothing will change, concerns that may be heightened when the perpetrator holds a position of power. This is no different for government officials who may use their title as a pass to harass, and whose misconduct is often tolerated to maintain the status quo. Those who do report officials are often forced to keep their claims secret, which can enable repeat offenders. However, #MeToo has spurred a series of spikes in public accusations of government officials. The number of allegations rose after October 17, when a New York Times report detailed Harvey Weinstein s sexual assaults and harassment of numerous women; the hashtag #MeToo gained momentum shortly after. The reporting has since dropped off, particularly in the wake of the Brett Kavanagh hearings. In that highly publicized case, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford faced death threats for speaking out against Kavanaugh, and despite her testimony, he was still confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The hearings seemed to confirm victims worst fears that not only would they face retaliation for reporting perpetrators, but that nothing would change as a result. Consequences Dr. Ford s experience does not necessarily reflect the broader picture, however. In fact, most of the accused officials in our findings have since fallen from power. Of the appointed officials, 3 have been fired or resigned. Two former officials running for elected office suspended their campaigns. Of the 111 elected officials reported, 7 are no longer in office. Forty-three either resigned or retired promptly without completing their terms, 4 were removed, 11 completed their terms, but decided not to run again, 1 lost their primary or another elected office, and committed suicide. Beyond losing political positions, some of these officials also face legal action, including 7 civil lawsuits and 1 criminal charges. This type of accountability is historically unprecedented. Nonetheless, of the 7 government officials accused of sexual misconduct who ran for office this week, 3 were reelected or elected to a new government position, 3 lost, and one is headed for a recount. These statistics are consistent with typical election trends, considering that an average of 9 percent of state legislators are reelected in any given election year. So for those who sought reelection, sexual misconduct allegations appeared to have little influence on outcomes. Instead, voters were focused on other political issues, such as health care, immigration, and the economy, and most were committed to voting along party lines.

4

Who has been publicly accused? Those accused in our findings include state legislators, members of U.S. Congress, and other elected and appointed officials. All but three are men. Some are habitual perpetrators, who have been accused by more than a dozen women. Most of the allegations pertain to behavior within the workplace, including unwanted kissing and groping, masturbating in front of others, sending sexually explicit photos, discussing sexual fantasies, sexual advances toward subordinates, and a range of threats and retaliation for non-compliance. Some of the reported misconduct has also occurred outside of official government responsibilities, including violent assaults, domestic violence, sexual misconduct with minors, rape, and sex trafficking. Many of these

6 claims have been settled by paying victims large settlements, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Others have prompted internal investigations into the toxic workplace culture that feeds this type of behavior. Some states have responded swiftly, while others continue to operate with little transparency or accountability, frustrating victims, advocates, and constituents. As shown above, there were no clear partisan trends in the accusations against government officials, as Republicans and Democrats shared a relatively even distribution of the allegations.

7 Reporting has also occurred across the country with no distinct regional trends. California appears to be a hot spot with 1 officials reported, but as the most populous state, this 9 percent of allegations is less than the state s 1 percent of the U.S. population. States with smaller populations such as Montana, North Dakota, and Delaware have no public allegations. Reports of misconduct were notably high compared to the overall population in Ohio, Kentucky, Alaska, and Washington DC. See the chart at the end of this report for exact figures.

8 Disrupting the power structure Although these reports are likely the mere tip of a longstanding and deeply immersed iceberg of sexual misconduct, they are yet another sign that #MeToo is slowly beginning to disrupt the power structure. For too long, government has been an institution where men have heightened status relative to women. Before Tuesday s election, 8 percent of members of the U.S. Congress were men and 7 percent of state legislators were men. In this environment, sex stereotyping remains rampant, breeding a problematic culture of sexual harassment and misconduct that has been largely protected by secrecy. As for the remainder of the submerged iceberg those many cases that continue to go unreported - this state of affairs can also be chipped away with broader cultural changes. This week was an excellent starting point, as women candidates made history: they not only ran in record numbers, but they won many races, putting their representation at a historic high. Congress will now have the highest number of female representatives in its history, and women won nine gubernatorial races, with some races still too close to call or headed for a recount. Two of the three accused officials that lost elections this week were replaced by women. While women are not immune to misconduct and/or complicity, with these types of changes, we may eventually reach a point where women are no longer seen as subordinate in the realm of politics. Legislative action needed Overall, it is encouraging that more people are speaking out against harassment and assault, and individuals in power are beginning to be held accountable. However, we also need to change our laws. The laws that our officials oversee fail to give adequate protections to many women who suffer sexual harassment or misconduct at the hands of less visible men. For example, harassment laws must be expanded to include those victims left unprotected by federal law such as domestic workers, temporary workers, independent contractors, farm workers, interns, and those working for small employers. The statute of limitations should also be extended to allow reporting over longer periods of time so victims have time to process, reflect, and decide how to move forward. Use of non-disclosure agreements that silence victims should be restricted, and mandatory arbitration agreements that prevent claimants from accessing a court of law should be banned. The only people who can change these laws are our government officials. Thus, it is critical that we elect policy makers who support legislation that advances gender equity, who respect women, and who lead by example. On the upside, in 18, 81 bills in support of gender equity and ending harassment were introduced in state legislatures across nearly all states, but more of these proposed bills need to be passed and adopted.

9 While it is important for #MeToo to advocate that guilty officials face consequences for their actions, the movement must also go beyond individual accountability. It should also spark cultural changes and make sure that those in office are taking the legislative steps necessary to achieve the broader pursuit of gender equity. Methodology Using LexisNexis, GoogleNews and NewspaperArchive, we performed a series of searches based on a series of key word phrases and indexed subject terms. These included, but were not limited to, words denoting general types of allegations, such as sexual harassment, sexual misconduct, sexual assault, inappropriate touching, and abuse, which were searched in association with positions such as government official, state senator, legislative bodies, local government, Congress, assemblymen, governor, congressman, and state representative. The search was limited to online and print newspapers and publications from the United States, and looked at reporting conducted from November 16-October 18. Individual behavior is identified, and others accused of enabling or hiding another individual s harassment or misconduct are also accounted for. In some circumstances the incident takes place in earlier years, but the accusation happened or was reported within the November 16-October 18 timeframe.

1 Public officials accused of sexual misconduct during the 16-18 election cycle State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arka nsas Calrfornia Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisia na Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan M innesota Mississippi Mi$$Ouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsy1vanie Rhode Island S outh Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming ~one elect;o11 is still pending recount as of 1118118. Number of Officials Accused 4 3 1 3 3 9 4 7 3 6 Number of Officials Who Will Be in Office as of Jan. 19 4 4 t GEORGETOWN LAW