REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN ROMANIA S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Similar documents
Gross domestic product

Key words: regional development, economic cohesion, economic.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying the FOURTH REPORT ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COHESION

CURRENT COORDINATES OF ROMANIAN VULNERABLE GROUPS IN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT *

Ilze JUREVIČA Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Regional Policy Department

MACRO-REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN ROMANIA

Regional Discrepancies in the European Union

ANALYSIS OF POPULATION TRENDS IN ROMANIA. CASE STUDY - ANALYSIS OF THE RURAL POPULATION IN THE SUBURBAN AREAS OF TIMIȘOARA MUNICIPALITY

Part 1 Cohesion, competitiveness, employment and growth Situation and trends

POVERTY MAP IN ROMANIA

Regional inequality and the impact of EU integration processes. Martin Heidenreich

THE DYNAMICS OF THE ROMANIAN UNIVERSITIES GRADUATES NUMBER IN THE PERIOD

The Outlook for EU Migration

RURAL DEVELOPMENT A BASIC CONDITION FOR NARROWING REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN ROMANIA 1. Anca Dachin Academy of Economic Studies of Bucharest

E u r o E c o n o m i c a Issue 2(28)/2011 ISSN: Social and economic cohesion in Romania: an overview. Alina Nuță 1, Doiniţa Ariton 2

EUROBAROMETER 62 PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Current Difficulties of Regional Harmonization in Romania

in focus Statistics Re gional GDP in t he EU, t he Cr oat ia in 2003 Contents ECONOMY AND FINANCE 17/2006 Author Andreas KRÜGER

GDP per inhabitant (in PPS), in % of EU-27= NUTS 2. <= 50% 50 - <= 75% 75 - <= 100% <= 125% > 125% Data not available

Extended Findings. Finland. ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer. Question 1: Most Contacted

Fertility rate and employment rate: how do they interact to each other?

Improving the measurement of the regional and urban dimension of well-being

Romania's position in the online database of the European Commission on gender balance in decision-making positions in public administration

ROMANIAN LABOUR MARKET VULNERABLE PERSONS AND VULNERABILITIES*

GDP - AN INDICATOR OF PROSPERITY OR A MISLEADING ONE? CRIVEANU MARIA MAGDALENA, PHD STUDENT, UNIVERSITATEA DIN CRAIOVA, ROMANIA

ΝEET: YOUTH NOT IN EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION, TRAINING

LANDMARKS ON THE EVOLUTION OF E-COMMERCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

ANALYSIS OF LABOR MIGRATION IN ROMANIA

Regional Focus. Metropolitan regions in the EU By Lewis Dijkstra. n 01/ Introduction. 2. Is population shifting to metros?

FOREIGN TRADE AND FDI AS MAIN FACTORS OF GROWTH IN THE EU 1

Territorial indicators for policy purposes: NUTS regions and beyond

EUROBAROMETRER 63.4 PUBLIC OPINION IN EUROPEAN UNION. Standard Eurobarometer / Autumn / Spring TNS Opinion & Social

Real Convergence of Central and Eastern Europe Economic and Monetary Union

Migrant population of the UK

BUILDING RESILIENT REGIONS FOR STRONGER ECONOMIES OECD

Integration of data from different sources: Unemployment

European Union Passport

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

EUROBAROMETRER 66 PUBLIC OPINION IN EUROPEAN UNION

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN RESOURCES IN ROMANIA

Migration and the European Job Market Rapporto Europa 2016

Factual summary Online public consultation on "Modernising and Simplifying the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)"

A comparative analysis of poverty and social inclusion indicators at European level

CONSIDERATIONS ON THE RURAL POPULATION AS A RESOURCE OF LABOR FORCE IN ROMANIA

EUROPEAN UNION UNEMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION

EuCham Charts. October Youth unemployment rates in Europe. Rank Country Unemployment rate (%)

Citizens awareness and perceptions of EU regional policy

Introduction: The State of Europe s Population, 2003

Employment Trends and Particularities in the Republic of Moldova and the European Union

In 2012, million persons were employed in the EU

NEGOTIATIONS ON ACCESSION BY BULGARIA AND ROMANIA TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

German regions lead European R&D

Curing Europe s Growing Pains: Which Reforms?

Revista Economică 69:5 (2017)

Context Indicator 17: Population density

THE RECENT TREND OF ROMANIA S INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN GOODS

Income inequality the overall (EU) perspective and the case of Swedish agriculture. Martin Nordin

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2015

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN AUGUST 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MARCH 2016

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN MAY 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2017

An analysis of the construction sectors in Romanian development regions

Options for Romanian and Bulgarian migrants in 2014

Macrostabilization of the Migration Phenomenon

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN SEPTEMBER 2015

INTERNAL SECURITY. Publication: November 2011

Objective Indicator 27: Farmers with other gainful activity

MANAGING BUSINESS IN EUROPE. SPECIFIC ISSUES IN THE EASTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN DECEMBER 2016

THE NOWADAYS CRISIS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCES OF EU COUNTRIES

EUROPEAN ECONOMY VS THE TRAP OF THE EUROPE 2020 STRATEGY

THE EFFECTS OF LABOUR FORCE MIGRATION IN ROMANIA TO THE COMUNITY COUNTRIES-REALITIES AND PERSPECTIVES-

DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHANGES CHARACTERIZING THE RURAL POPULATION IN ROMANIA

in an emigration-immigration country -

Migration, Mobility and Integration in the European Labour Market. Lorenzo Corsini

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES IN THE PERIOD OF

3.1. Importance of rural areas

Location Effects, Economic Geography and Regional Policy

"Migration, Labor Markets and the Economic Integration of Migrants in Western Europe"

Assessing the impact of the UK s withdrawal from the EU on regions and cities in EU27

Early job insecurity in Europe The impact of the economic crisis

Regional disparities of unemployment in the European Union and in Romania

Recent demographic trends

LABOR FORCE INTERNATIONALIZATION. UNEMPLOYMENT AND EMIGRATION IN BACAU AND VASLUI COUNTIES OF ROMANIA

1.1. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC FRAMEWORK Population Economic development and productive sectors

AMWAY GLOBAL. Encouraging WOMEN to be entrepreneurs Eliminating the fear of failure. A Survey of Amway Europe, March 2014

Economics of European Integration Lecture # 6 Migration and Growth

Commonalities and Differences in Labour Market Developments and Constraints in Different EU Regions

* * * * * * States. The data have been made, but the current administration divisionsfor the member

Labour mobility within the EU - The impact of enlargement and the functioning. of the transitional arrangements

Measuring Social Inclusion

EUROPEANS ATTITUDES TOWARDS SECURITY

The global and regional policy context: Implications for Cyprus

After the crisis: what new lessons for euro adoption?

CHANGES OF PRIVATE CONSUMPTION PATTERNS IN ROMANIA AND THE EU: EVIDENCE BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER THE CRISIS

SOCIAL ECONOMY. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS IN EIGHT MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Transcription:

1 2 REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN ROMANIA S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Elena Claudia SÎRBULESCU U.S.A.M.V.B. TIMIŞOARA, FACULTATEA DE MANAGEMENT AGRICOL TIMIŞOARA ABSTRACT Overall economic development problems in all Romania s s resemble those of European s with a lower development level, in which structural policies are being applied. Romania s structure per development s provides a more homogenous image as far as development levels are concerned than district structure, smoothening differences between districts. KEY WORDS: al disparities, economic development, al developement Regional development policy is a relatively new concept for Romania. In 1998, the country was structured in 8 s of development (grouping the 42 existing districts). These Regions represent territorial units large enough to constitute the ground for elaborating and implementing al development strategies, allowing the efficient use of financial and human resources. Regional development asked for the implementation of a statistic system for the monitoring of al differences without precedent in Romania, which still is subjected to improvement and redefining. Statistic data show that Romania is in full transition as it has a relatively low level of al disparities compared to other member states or candidate states, but these grew rapidly and particularly between Bucharest and the rest of the country. Inter-al disparities in absolute terms are relatively small compared to the European Union. In relative terms, they have reached levels comparable with those in Germany and Holland (as shown in Table 1). We should emphasise that there are still major disparities with s where mainly agricultural districts coexist with more developed ones. This phenomenon turned worse because of the impact of economic restructuring in certain areas with mono-industrial towns whose population was affected by unemployment as a result of liquidating unprofitable state enterprises. Other factors with an impact on al development usually include border s and the Danube s on

the border with Moldavia and Ukraine and less developed s along the Danube. TABLE 1. INTER-REGIONAL DISPARITIES BETWEEN THE E.U. AND CENTRAL AND EASTERN- EUROPEAN CANDIDATE NATIONS ACCORDING TO THE REGIONAL IRR IN 2000 Nr. Country Regions with maximum GDP Relative GDP Regions with minimum GDP Relative GDP Maximum ratio 1 Great Britain Inner London 246.3 Mersyside 71.6 3.43 2 Belgium Brussels 223.1 Hainaut 71.8 3.11 3 France Ile de-france 154.1 Reunion 50.9 3.02 4 Germany Hamburg 183.4 Dessau 63.2 2.9 5 The Czech Rep. Prague 121.6 Sredni Cechy 48.5 2.51 6 Hungary Kozep Magyaroszag 72.4 Eszak Alfold 32.5 2.23 7 Italy Lombardia 136.1 Calabria 61.9 2.22 8 Spain Madrid 108.1 Extemadura 50.3 2.15 9 Austria Viena 150.6 Burgenland 70.9 2.12 10 Poland Mazowieckie 55 Lubelskie 27.6 1.99 11 Portugal Lisabona 101.1 Acores 52.2 1.94 12 Romania Bucuresti Ilfov 35.3 Nord-est 19.1 1.85 13 Finland Uusima 137.2 Ita-suomi 74.9 1.83 14 Holland Utrecht 143.4 Flevoland 81.3 1.76 15 Greece Sterea Ellada 81.5 Ipeiros 47.3 1.72 16 Bulgaria Yugozapaden 34 Severozapaden 22.2 1.53 17 Sweden Stockholm 133.9 Vastsverige 89.9 1.49 Source: CE 2002, First report about social and economic cohesion, and another calculus Economic increase followed the western-eastern direction, as proximity with western markets had an enhancing effect. though statistic data show some variations in time due to local factors, one can see how economic increase had a significant geographical component, under developed areas concentrating on the border with Moldavia and south, along the Danube. Underdevelopment appears as strictly correlated with unemployment and with the preponderance of rural activities, as well as with the inability of attracting direct foreign investments. Table 2 shows an analysis of al development, summarising the main economic variables. The Northern-Eastern is affected both by its dependence on agriculture and its proximity with the borders of the Moldavian Republic and of Ukraine. The same goes for the Southern, as it is dependent on agriculture and hindered in its fluent trade over the border by the Danube. The Western and Central s have the advantage of their position closer to western markets and of their lower dependence on the primary sector. Until now, they have the most benefited from foreign investments. Between 1997-2001, population occupied in agriculture increased in all s, with significant increases Northern-Eastern and Northern-Western s (Figure 1). 286

The population occupied in industry and construction shows massive decreases in all s. In the case of industry, to note the Southern and the Southern-Eastern (-131,700, and -83,400 persons, respectively), and construction the Southern-Western and the Southern s (-20,000, and -15,100 persons, respectively). TABLE 2. INDICES CONCERNING REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN ROMANIA (NATIONAL MEAN = 100) PIB ISD IMM Rural Unemployment Region / inhabitant / inhabitant / inhabitant population 1998 2000 1998 2001 1998 2001 1998 2001 1998 2001 Northeast 79.8 70.0 133.7 120.5 15.3 14.9 68.7 68.3 123.9 124.7 Southeast 100.1 88.9 112.5 111.4 42.7 74.6 102.5 101.5 94.7 95.4 South 85.8 81.5 97.1 101.1 65.5 69.9 78.1 74.4 129.0 128.6 Southwest 90.0 83.8 104.8 118.2 11.9 34.1 92.3 85.0 120.8 120.3 West 100.9 102.6 101.9 108.0 99.1 98.6 86.7 95.9 83.8 82.4 Northwest 95.5 93.0 84.6 77.3 5.8 55.6 107.1 107.8 104.9 104.2 Centre 105.9 107.1 98.1 97.7 87.7 57.8 99.2 102.7 87.1 87.7 Bucharest 206. 162.2 Ilfov 8 47.1 53.4 598.3 503.5 195.3 197.1 24.8 23.8 Source: Statistical Yearbook of Romania, 2002 The service sector shows different trends from one to another. In the Western and Southern-Eastern there are decreases of population occupied in this sector (-55,600, and -40,800 persons respectively). Less dramatic decreases were Southern (-21,100 persons), Southern-Western (-15,500 persons), and Northern-Eastern (-12,600 persons). As a positive phenomenon, to note the significant increase of population occupied service sector Northern- Western and Bucharest-Ilfov s (+22,400, and +46,500 persons, respectively). The good position of the Bucharest-Ilfov from the point of view of population occupied in industry and services is due to the rapid growth of industrial and business sectors, to the relatively high rate of academic education, a factor that supports the increase of services and the size of investments Tele-communication sector by the company Romtelecom. As for unemployment at a national level, the highest rate is Northern-Eastern, while the Northern-Western and Western s show the lowest rates (6.5% and 7%, respectively). Unemployment is low Bucharest-Ilfov (3.4%) due to the rapid increase of financial banking services and to the development of Tele-communications, through massive investments by Romtelecom, which created new jobs, particularly for highly skilled people, whose share is higher in this (Figure 2). 287

Thousands persons 60 40 20 0-20 38,9-12,8-13,0 14,6 8,8-13,6-16,1-21,1 21,6-15,5-20,0 5,7-5,6-13,9 29,1 3,0 22,4-5,1 14,2 2,7-14,4 46,5 1,2-11,3-22,0-40 -60-80 -100-41,9-53,1-43,2-40,8-83,4-91,5-45,7-59,3-72,6-55,6-42,4-70,3-77,2-66,0-120 -113,7-140 1. Northeast 2. Southeast 3. South 4.Southwest 5. West 6. Northwest 7. Centre 8.Buchatest Developement s Total economy Agriculture Industry Construction Services FIGURE 1. POPULATION OCCUPIED PER REGIONS DIFFERENCES BETWEEN 1997-2001. SOURCE: STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF ROMANIA, 2002 % 12 10 8 6 4 8,3 10,1 9,9 9,1 9,3 7,0 6,5 9,1 3,4 2 0 Total Northeast Southeast South Southwest economy West Northwest Centre Bucharest Development s FIGURE 2. UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IN 2003. SOURCE: NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS - STATISTICAL YEARBOOK OF ROMANIA, 2002 This economic development differentiated at the levels of Romania s s associated with fiscal policy mechanisms led to the intensification of underdevelopment and accentuation of disparities.. as one can see in Tables 3 and 4, the number of Romanian enjoying running water and sewage systems have not significantly increased these last years. On the contrary, there are small and medium size towns with difficulties in the supply of basic service public facilities, which represents an impediment in attracting investment strategies. 288

TABLE 3. EVOLUTION OF NUMBER OF LOCALITIES ENJOYING DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS Number of enjoying drinking water supply systems Region 1998 1999 2000 in the 2001 Northeast 310 12,52 324 13,08 344 13,89 357 14,41 Southeast 520 34,95 536 36,02 568 38,17 572 38,44 South 448 21,61 454 21,90 454 21,90 475 22,91 Southwest 293 13,87 299 14,16 299 14,16 286 13,54 West 260 18,96 281 20,50 269 19,62 278 20,28 Northwest 736 39,61 729 39,24 731 39,34 743 39,99 Centre 313 16,71 343 18,31 342 18,26 359 19,17 Bucharest 31 29,52 31 29,52 22 20,95 22 20,95 Romania 2.911 21,79 2.997 22,44 3.029 22,68 3.092 23,15 Source: Statistical Yearbook of Romania (1999-2002) TABLE 4. EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC SEWERAGE SYSTEMS PER REGIONS Number of enjoying drinking water supply systems Region 1998 1999 in the 2000 in the Northeast 104 4.20 110 4.44 128 5.17 131 Southeast 75 5.04 79 5.31 83 5.58 86 South 95 4.58 95 4.58 93 4.49 94 Southwest 54 2.56 56 2.65 56 2.65 53 West 73 5.32 74 5.40 80 5.84 80 Northwest 108 5.81 106 5.71 106 5.71 108 Centre 104 5.55 110 5.87 108 5.77 111 Bucharest 23 21.90 24 22.85 20 19.05 19 Romania 636 4.76 654 4.90 674 5.05 682 Source: Statistical Yearbook of Romania (1999-2002) TABLE 5. THE SHARE OF REGIONAL IRR OF THE NATIONAL IRR Development s 1995 1996 1997 1998 Total 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 Northeast 13,3 13,4 13,0 12,9 Southeast 12,8 13,2 13,2 13,1 South 14,7 14,2 13,9 13,3 Southwest 10,3 9,6 10,1 9,6 West 10,0 9,7 10,4 9,6 Northwest 11,9 11,8 11,7 12,0 Centre 12,6 13,2 13,3 12,7 Bucharest 14,2 14,6 14,4 16,6 Source: National Institute for Statistics - Statistical Yearbook of Romania, 2000 Comparing the number of with water supply systems (357) with those enjoying sewerage systems (131), we can see Northern- Eastern a great discrepancy sense that more than half of them have no sewerage systems, which leads to pollution. Between 1995-1998, development s have contributed relatively evenly to the constitution of the IRR (Table 5), with no major differences. 2001 289

The lowest contributions were those of the Southern-Western and Western s, due mainly to the low levels of added value both in industry (the Western ranking last and the Southern-Western ranking penultimate every year) and in agriculture. Just opposite is the Bucharest- Ilfov, which particularly high added value values engendered by the non-agricultural sectors (mainly services). Figure 3 shows the evolution of IRR/capita size between 1995-1998, for every. They show that on one hand there are some steady differences between s and, in relative terms, these differences have increased lately. In absolute values, the level of IRR/capita of Romania is low, which makes differences between al levels less relevant. Low levels of the al IRR associate with the predominance of rural areas. Thus, the s with the lowest IRR are those s with the highest share of rural population as the latter is occupied mainly in agriculture an activity with a much lower productivity than other activities. The s with the lowest IRR/capita are (in a decreasing order, in 1998): the Southern-Eastern, the Northern-Western, and the Northern-Eastern s. Though Romania has a dense urban net that could represent the potential for economic increase at a al level there are few economic relations between these urban centres and the surrounding areas as the development of the two was not conceived in an integrated way. Likewise, the transportation system at an urban level is not perfectly adapted to the hardening of relations and contacts among districts. As a result, nobody can say that there is a al labour market, which explains why a shock on the labour market in a mono-industrial town often led to migration toward rural areas same district to start subsistence farm activity or to Bucharest with no migration toward urban centres at the same al level. Recently, there have appeared local systems of labour markets as a consequence of increased specialisation in manufacturing production. However, not taking into account the consequences of need for specialisation it is necessary to monitor in order to assess the consequences on al development. In all s of Romania there are districts with industrial restructuring problems but in many districts they combine with rural underdevelopment problems both resulting in unemployment and poverty. As a consequence, there are in each problems engendered by declining industries, but also problems specific to territories with dramatic back-draw in economic and social developments. Comparative analysis of the s on the ground of indices shows two particularly important conclusions for the shaping of al policy in Romania: though each has certain particular features and though there are differences between s, there are no major discrepancies between development levels of the s; all s have to face a type of problem or another, which is obvious over almost the whole. 290

180,0 160,0 140,0 120,0 100,0 80,0 60,0 40,0 20,0 0,0 1995 1996 1997 1998 National mean Northeast Southeast South Southwest West Northwest Centre Bucharest- Ilfov FIGURE 3. EVOLUTION OF NATIONAL IRR/CAPITA COMPARED TO THE NATIONAL MEAN. SOURCE: NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STATISTICS BIBLIOGRAPHY [1.] Otiman, P. I. Restructurarea agriculturii şi dezvoltarea rurală a României, în vederea aderării la Uniunea Europeană un punct de vedere, Editura Agroprint, Timişoara, 2000; [2.] Otiman, P. I. Dezvoltarea rurală în România, Editura Agroprint, Timişoara, 1997; [3.] Otiman, P.I. Economie rurală, Editura Agroprint, Timişoara, 1999; [4.] Mateoc - Sîrb, Nicoleta Dezvoltare rurală şi ală în România, Editura Agroprint, Timişoara, 2002; [5.] Ţigan, Eugenia Dezvoltarea integrată a spaţiului rural, Editura Eurostampa, Timişoara, 2003; [6.] Vincze, Maria Dezvoltarea ală şi rurală, Idei şi practici, Editura Presa Universitară Clujană, 2000; [7.] * * * Anuarul Statistic al României, 1990 2002; [8.] * * * Raportul Naţional al Dezvoltării Umane, Academia României, 2000; [9.] * * * Planul Naţional de Dezvoltare al Romăniei 2002 2005, Guvernul României, 2002. 291