Summary of the U.S. Census Bureau s 2018 State-Level Population Estimate for Massachusetts

Similar documents
Summary of the U.S. Census Bureau s 2015 State-Level Population Estimate for Massachusetts

Components of Population Change by State

Summary of the U.S. Census Bureau s 2015 County-Level Population and Component Estimates for Massachusetts

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

National Population Growth Declines as Domestic Migration Flows Rise

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

Summary of the U.S. Census Bureau s 2016 County-Level Population and Component Estimates for Massachusetts

Growth in the Foreign-Born Workforce and Employment of the Native Born

New data from the Census Bureau show that the nation s immigrant population (legal and illegal), also

2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

Immigration Policy Brief August 2006

Chapter 7. Migration

Department of Justice

MIGRATION STATISTICS AND BRAIN DRAIN/GAIN

Oklahoma, Maine, Migration and Right to Work : A Confused and Misleading Analysis. By the Bureau of Labor Education, University of Maine (Spring 2012)

The Changing Face of Labor,

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

American Government. Workbook

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

At yearend 2014, an estimated 6,851,000

People Come and People Go

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

State Complaint Information

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

In the 1960 Census of the United States, a

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

PRESENT TRENDS IN POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

PRESS RELEASE. POLIDATA Political Data Analysis

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

Intake 1 Total Requests Received 4

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

Fiscal Year (September 30, 2018) Requests by Intake and Case Status Intake 1 Case Review 6 Period

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

The Impact of Ebbing Immigration in Los Angeles: New Insights from an Established Gateway

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

STATE OF ENERGY REPORT. An in-depth industry analysis by the Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association

o Yes o No o Under 18 o o o o o o o o 85 or older BLW YouGov spec

ARTICLE I ESTABLISHMENT NAME

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

U.S. Sentencing Commission Preliminary Crack Retroactivity Data Report Fair Sentencing Act

BYLAWS. Mission Providing visionary leadership in nursing education to improve the health and wellbeing of our communities.

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

THE EFFECT OF EARLY VOTING AND THE LENGTH OF EARLY VOTING ON VOTER TURNOUT

U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.

Eligibility for Membership. Membership shall be open to individuals and agencies interested in the goals and objectives of the Organization.

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

THE NEW POOR. Regional Trends in Child Poverty Since Ayana Douglas-Hall Heather Koball

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

ATTACHMENT 16. Source and Accuracy Statement for the November 2008 CPS Microdata File on Voting and Registration

TFigure 1. Indiana Population Change in the 1990s: A Graphic View

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

2015 ANNUAL OUTCOME GOAL PLAN (WITH FY 2014 OUTCOMES) Prepared in compliance with Government Performance and Results Act

How Utah Ranks. Utah Education Association Research Bulletin

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 7, Executive Summary. Suggested Routing

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

Population Growth in Lackawanna & Luzerne Counties

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

Revised December 10, 2007

Expiring Unemployment Insurance Provisions

VOLUME 36 ISSUE 1 JANUARY 2018

CONSTITUTION of the ASSOCIATION OF STATE CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS. ARTICLE I Name

3Demographic Drivers. The State of the Nation s Housing 2007

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

GUIDING PRINCIPLES THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ELECTRICITY POLICY (NCEP)

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

Countries Of The World: The United States

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2014 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

Backgrounder. Immigrants in the United States, 2007 A Profile of America s Foreign-Born Population. Center for Immigration Studies November 2007

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

Floor Amendment Procedures

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Bulletin. Probation and Parole in the United States, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Revised 7/2/08

Election Notice. Notice of SFAB Election and Ballots. October 20, Ballot Due Date: November 20, Executive Summary.

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

National Latino Peace Officers Association

America s s Emerging Demography The role of minorities, college grads & the aging and younging of the population

Subcommittee on Design Operating Guidelines

Transcription:

Summary of the U.S. Census Bureau s 2018 State-Level Population Estimate for Massachusetts Prepared by: Population Estimates Program For Release December 19, 2018 On December 19, 2018, the U.S. Census Bureau released population and components-of-change estimates for the nation, states, and Puerto Rico for July 1, 2018. According to the new release, the Massachusetts population increased by an estimated 38,903 persons from July 1, 2017 to July 1, 2018 to a new total of 6,902,149, making it the 15 th most populous state in the U.S. again this year. This 0.57% annual increase puts Massachusetts growth at approximately 8 times that of the Northeast average of 0.07% and ranks it as the fastest growing state in the Northeast this year, in both numeric and percentage change. At the national level, Massachusetts ranked 16 th for annual population change this year, and ranked 22nd in terms of annual percentage growth in the 2017 to 2018 period, up from 24 th last year. Since the last Census in April of 2010, the Massachusetts population has increased by 354,359 persons cumulatively, or 5.4%, compared to a 1.4% cumulative increase for the Northeast region and a 6.0% cumulative increase for the U.S. as a whole. Table 1 below shows both the numeric and percentage growth and rankings for the United States, U.S. regions, and the Northeast states including Massachusetts for the periods April 1, 2010, July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2018. Table 1. Annual and Cumulative Estimates of Resident Population Change for the United States, Regions, and Northeast States and Rankings: July 1, 2017 to July 1, 2018 and April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 Population Estimate Population Annual Change Population Cumulative Change 2010-2018 (as of July 1) Ranking July 1,2017 to July 1, 2018 Percent Percent Geographic Area April 1, Change Rank Change Cumulative Rank Change April 1, 2010 July 1, Change Change 2017 2018 2010 2017 to 2017-2018 Change 2010-2018 Base 2018 2017 to 2010- Base 2018 Number Percent 2010-2018 2018 2018 Number Percent United States 308,758,105 325,147,121 327,167,434 (X) (X) 2,020,313 0.6% (X) (X) 18,409,329 6.0% (X) (X) Northeast 55,318,430 56,072,676 56,111,079 4 4 38,403 0.1% 4 4 792,649 1.4% 4 4 Midwest 66,929,743 68,156,035 68,308,744 3 3 152,709 0.2% 3 3 1,379,001 2.1% 3 3 South 114,563,045 123,598,424 124,753,948 1 1 1,155,524 0.9% 1 1 10,190,903 8.9% 1 1 West 71,946,887 77,319,986 77,993,663 2 2 673,677 0.9% 2 2 6,046,776 8.4% 2 2 Connecticut 3,574,147 3,573,880 3,572,665 29 29-1,215 0.0% 44 43-1,482 0.0% 49 49 Maine 1,328,369 1,335,063 1,338,404 41 42 3,341 0.3% 38 35 10,035 0.8% 46 45 Massachusetts 6,547,790 6,863,246 6,902,149 14 15 38,903 0.6% 16 22 354,359 5.4% 14 23 New Hampshire 1,316,464 1,349,767 1,356,458 42 41 6,691 0.5% 36 23 39,994 3.0% 41 31 New Jersey 8,791,962 8,888,543 8,908,520 11 11 19,977 0.2% 21 36 116,558 1.3% 27 40 New York 19,378,124 19,590,719 19,542,209 3 4-48,510-0.2% 51 47 164,085 0.8% 21 43 Pennsylvania 12,702,873 12,790,447 12,807,060 6 5 16,613 0.1% 25 39 104,187 0.8% 31 44 Rhode Island 1,052,957 1,056,486 1,057,315 43 44 829 0.1% 41 41 4,358 0.4% 47 47 Vermont 625,744 624,525 626,299 49 50 1,774 0.3% 40 32 555 0.1% 48 48. Source data: Cumulative Estimates of Resident Population Change for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico and Region and State Rankings: July 1, 2017 to July 1, 2018 and April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 and (NST-EST2018-02 and NST-EST2018-03), U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Release date December 19, 2018. Rankings include District of Columbia but not the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 1

Regional Comparisons Massachusetts cumulative population increase of 5.4% since 2010 is somewhat behind the national 6.0% increase, though its single year percentage of 0.57% is getting closer to the U.S. average of 0.62%. Massachusetts also continues to increase in population at a much faster rate than the Northeast and Midwest regions on average, which grew by just 0.07% and 0.22%, respectively, from 2017 to 2018. The Southern and Western regions meanwhile continue to lead the U.S. in terms of percentage growth, at 0.93% and 0.87%, respectively, over the last year (Figure 1). 1.4% Figure 1. Annual Percent Change in Population 2010-2018 for the United States, Regions, and Massachusetts 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% United States Northeast Midwest South West Massachusetts 0.0% 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 The map below (Figure 2) clearly demonstrates that Massachusetts stands apart from the rest of the Northeastern and Midwestern states in terms of overall percentage growth since 2010, and even surpasses some states in the South and West. The single-year percent change map (Figure 3) for the most recent 2017-2018 period puts Massachusetts ahead of all other Northeast States. 2

Figure 2. Cumulative Percent Population Change April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 by U.S. State. Source: Cumulative Estimates of the Resident Population Change for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 (NST-EST2018-02). U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Release Date: December 19, 2019. 3

Figure 3. Annual Percent Population Change July 1, 2017 to July 1, 2018 by U.S. State. Source: Cumulative Estimates of the Resident Population Change for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 (NST-EST2018-02). U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Release Date: December 19, 2018. Long Term Trend Massachusetts has been growing twice as fast this decade compared to last. From 2001 to 2004, Massachusetts growth rates, along with the Northeast rates, were actually declining, and only turned around after 2005, due in part to a reversal of domestic out-migration. Starting in 2007, the Massachusetts annual growth rate overtook the Northeast rate, at 0.5% for Massachusetts compared to 0.3% for the Northeast for that year, and the state s annual percentage growth has remained above the Northeast average since that time. 4

Figure 4: Massachusetts Annual % Growth Over Previous Year 2001-2018 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% -0.2% -0.4% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 United States Northeast Massachusetts. Source data: ST-EST00INT-01 and NST-EST2018-01. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Release dates: September 2011 and December 2018. In the last decade, from Census 2000 to Census 2010, the average growth for Massachusetts was about 0.3% per year, with an average population increase of just 19,852 per year. Since the 2010 Census, Massachusetts has increased its population by an average of 42,953 persons per year, or 0.7%, per year. From 2000 to 2010, Massachusetts population increased by 198,516 or 3.1% total. Since Census 2010, Massachusetts population has already increased by 354,359, or 5.4% cumulatively. Components of Change The U.S. Census Bureau produces revised population estimates each year by adding updated components of change to the Census 2010 base. These components include both the number of births and deaths, which together constitute the natural increase. They also include net domestic migration (migration to and from other states within the U.S.) and net international migration (migration to and from other countries) which sum to the total net migration. A fifth component, the group quarters population, is factored into the estimates base for the previous year, but is not broken out as a separate number in the Bureau s published release. According to the U.S. Census estimates, from July 1, 2017 to July 1, 2018 Massachusetts experienced 70,297 births and 58,506 deaths, for a net natural increase of 11,791. At the same time, Massachusetts experienced a net outflow of 25,755 persons to other states in the U.S. and a net inflow of 53,013 persons from other countries, for total net migration of 27,258 persons. Figure 5 displays the extent to which a higher number of births offsets the number of deaths and how positive international migration offsets negative net domestic migration to sum to positive population change in Massachusetts during this period. 5

Components of Change: Trends 2000-2018 Massachusetts has long experienced, to varying degrees, component patterns similar to those seen above. Figure 6 below shows the trends in these components from 2000 through 2018. 100,000 Figure 6: Massachusetts Estimated Components of Change 2000-2018 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 - (20,000) (40,000) (60,000) (80,000) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Births Deaths Natural Increase International Domestic Total. Source Data: ST-2000-7; CO-EST2010-ALLDATA; and NST-EST2018-ALLDATA, U.S. Census Bureau Population Division. 6

A greater number of births over deaths and positive international migration offsetting negative domestic migration have all contributed to an overall population increase this decade and last. Domestic out-migration from Massachusetts peaked in the middle of the last decade with an estimated net outflow of 55,077 persons leaving Massachusetts for other parts of the United States in 2005. This outflow was reduced significantly in 2007 (by 37%) and again in 2008 (by 63%), and then finally reversed to a positive in-flow in 2009, with an estimated 6,843 net persons moving into Massachusetts from other U.S. states. In the years since 2010, domestic migration reverted to a negative value again, but the outflow has been moderate compared to the peak outflow over the last decade. Births and deaths throughout the 2000-2018 period have been much less variable from year to year than migration, with births showing a slight overall decline through the years and deaths continuing at about the same level over the course of the time series. International immigration into Massachusetts increasingly offsets net domestic outmigration (people moving from Massachusetts to other U.S. states.) and now offsets domestic outmigration by 2 to 1. This past year Massachusetts experienced the highest level of net international immigration since at least 2000, with an estimated net inflow of 53,013 international immigrants. Both now and historically, this positive international immigration offsets the population loss due to domestic outmigration from Massachusetts to other states. Currently twice as many people come into the state via net international immigration as leave the state via net domestic outmigration (Figure 2). Components of Change: Regional and State Comparisons An examination of the components-of-change data begins to answer the question of why some states or regions are racing ahead in growth while others lag behind. In 2017 to 2018, Massachusetts, was the fastest growing state in the Northeast Region. The estimated components data suggest that, while Massachusetts shows a reasonable rate of natural increase compared to other northeastern states, its total positive migration specifically the large number of international in-migrants offsetting a relatively small number of domestic outmigrants explains why the state leads the region in growth, as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2. Estimated Components of Change for the United States, U.S. Regions, and Northeast States, 2018 Geography Births Vital Events Deaths Natural Increase International Domestic Total Net United States 3,855,500 2,814,013 1,041,487 978,826-978,826 Northeast Region 609,336 506,909 102,427 229,700 (292,928) (63,228) Midwest Region 804,431 621,030 183,401 127,583 (157,048) (29,465) South Region 1,499,838 1,109,152 390,686 418,418 345,132 763,550 West Region 941,895 576,922 364,973 203,125 104,844 307,969 Connecticut 35,048 31,312 3,736 16,494 (21,509) (5,015) Maine 12,438 14,079 (1,641) 570 4,469 5,039 Massachusetts 70,297 58,506 11,791 53,013 (25,755) 27,258 New Hampshire 12,149 11,935 214 2,606 3,928 6,534 New Jersey 100,226 76,370 23,856 46,660 (50,591) (3,931) New York 227,099 165,728 61,371 70,375 (180,306) (109,931) 7

Pennsylvania 135,905 133,562 2,343 35,377 (20,463) 14,914 Rhode Island 10,575 9,830 745 2,755 (2,639) 116 Vermont 5,599 5,587 12 1,850 (62) 1,788. Source U.S. Census Bureau Population Division NST_EST2018_ALLDATA. Release Date December 19, 2018. Regional and State Comparisons of Components-of-Change Rates Another way to compare this data over different geographies is to first convert it to a rate so that larger and smaller geographies can be evaluated together. Table 3 below shows the rate, per 1,000 persons, of each change component for the United States, U.S. Regions, and the Northeast States, including Massachusetts. Table 3. Estimated Components of Change Rates for the United States, U.S. Regions, and Northeast States, 2018 Vital Events Geography Births Deaths Natural Increase International Domestic Total Net United States 11.8 8.6 3.2 3.0 0.0 3.0 Northeast Region 10.9 9.0 1.8 4.1 (5.2) (1.1) Midwest Region 11.8 9.1 2.7 1.9 (2.3) (0.4) South Region 12.1 8.9 3.1 3.4 2.8 6.1 West Region 12.1 7.4 4.7 2.6 1.4 4.0 Connecticut 9.8 8.8 1.0 4.6 (6.0) (1.4) Maine 9.3 10.5 (1.2) 0.4 3.3 3.8 Massachusetts 10.2 8.5 1.7 7.7 (3.7) 4.0 New Hampshire 9.0 8.8 0.2 1.9 2.9 4.8 New Jersey 11.3 8.6 2.7 5.2 (5.7) (0.4) New York 11.6 8.5 3.1 3.6 (9.2) (5.6) Pennsylvania 10.6 10.4 0.2 2.8 (1.6) 1.2 Rhode Island 10.0 9.3 0.7 2.6 (2.5) 0.1 Vermont 9.0 8.9 0.0 3.0 (0.1) 2.9. Source U.S. Census Bureau Population Division NST_EST2018_ALLDATA. Release Date December 19, 2018. Rates per 1,000 average population. These estimated component rates indicate that Massachusetts births are occurring at a lower rate (10.2 per 1,000 average population) than in the United States as a whole (11.8) and each U.S. region on average (Table 3). Deaths in Massachusetts are also occurring at a lower rate (8.5) than other regions of the U.S. except the West (7.4), but are almost on par with the U.S. average of 8.6. Taken together, these vital events lead to a natural increase rate (1.7) that is below that of the U.S. as a whole (3.2) and all of its regions, though very close to the Northeast average of 1.8. Note that all other states in the Northeast except for New Jersey and New York show even smaller rates of natural increase, as this region of the U.S. tends to be older than the greater U.S. 8

Within the migration component, we see that the Northeast and Midwest regions experience net domestic outmigration (-5.2 and -2.3 per 1,000 population, respectively) while the Southern and Western regions have positive domestic migration (2.8 and 1.4). The domestic migration rate of -3.7 in Massachusetts is less than the Northeast regional average of -5.2, but still indicates net domestic outmigration to Southern and Western states. On the other hand, the international migration rate of 7.7 for Massachusetts is more than double that of the U.S. as a whole (3.0) and exceeds all U.S. regional averages and all other Northeast states. According to the latest Census estimates, only Florida ranks higher than Massachusetts in its rate of annual net international immigration per 1,000 population. (Table 4). In terms of numbers of net immigrants, Massachusetts ranked 5 th (Table 5). As a result, Massachusetts total migration, including domestic and international, nets to a positive rate of 4.0 in-migrants per 1,000 population - higher than both the Northeast and Midwest regional averages and now on par with the Western Region average (Table 3). Table 4. States With Highest Net International Immigration Rates, 2018 Table 5. States With the Highest Net International Immigration, 2018 State Rate of Net International Immigration Ranking State Net International Immigrants Ranking Florida 8.3 1 Florida 175,670 1 Massachusetts 7.7 2 California 117,797 2 New Jersey 5.2 3 Texas 104,976 3 District of Columbia 5.1 4 New York 70,375 4 Connecticut 4.6 5 Massachusetts 53,013 5 South Dakota 4.2 6 New Jersey 46,660 6 Washington 4.1 7 Pennsylvania 35,377 7 Maryland 3.7 8 Virginia 31,641 8 Virginia 3.7 9 Illinois 30,735 9 Texas 3.7 10 Washington 30,557 10 New York 3.6 11 Maryland 22,575 11 North Dakota 3.4 12 Georgia 21,786 12 Alaska 3.3 13 Michigan 21,415 13 California 3.0 14 Ohio 20,514 14 Vermont 3.0 15 North Carolina 20,035 15. Source U.S. Census Bureau Population Division NST_EST2018_ALLDATA. Release Date December 19, 2018. Rates per 1,000 average population. State rankings include District of Columbia.. Source U.S. Census Bureau Population Division NST_EST2018_ALLDATA. Release Date December 19, 2018. Figure 7 demonstrates the magnitude of each of the components of population change, graphing component rates by U.S. region. Births represent the component with the greatest influence on population change, and are more heavily weighted to the West and South. Deaths are the second most influential component and are most prominent in the Midwest and Northeast. International migration is heavily weighted to the Northeast, while domestic migration adds to the West and especially to the South, with losses in the Midwest and Northeast. 9

Additional Information and estimates data can be found on the U.S. Census Bureau s website at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.html Additional Massachusetts summaries of U.S. Census Bureau releases can be accessed at http://www.donahue.umassp.edu/business-groups/economic-public-policy-research/massachusettspopulation-estimates-program/population-estimates-by-massachusetts-geography Summary prepared by: Susan Strate, Senior Manager, Population Estimates Program Meghan Flanagan, Senior Research Analyst Ken Lefebvre, Research Analyst 10