~/

Similar documents
Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 4D RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ROMAN PINO, Petitioner. BANK OF NEW YORK, ETC., ET AL. Respondent.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SCU- H0) On Discretionary Review From. The Fourth District Court of Appeal (4D10-674) JACQUELINE HARVEY,

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

Filing # E-Filed 06/14/ :33:44 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Nos.: 5D CA W HOWARD BROWNING, Petitioner, vs. LYNN ANNE POIRIER,

Filing # E-Filed 03/11/ :10:57 PM

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2011

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: L.T. Case No. 3D CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC. Petitioner, NAKIA RAWLS, et al. Respondents.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Third DCA Case Nos. 3D / 3D L.T. Case No CA 15

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC , SC & SC PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM A DECISION OF THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC., Petitioner, IRWIN POTASH, ET AL., Respondents.

THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. Case No. SC RINKER MATERIALS CORP., L.T. No. 3D10-488

CASE NO. 1D Brian and Cynthia Poag appeal a final judgment reestablishing a lost note in

SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-59 L.T. CASE NUMBERS: 4D ; CA005626XXXXMD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

Filing # E-Filed 01/22/ :54:09 PM

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO FRANK AVELLINO S NOTICE OF PRODUCTION TO NON-PARTY UNDER RULE 1.351

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHRISTINE BAUER and THOMAS BAUER, Petitioners, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA S. CT. CASE NO. SC

CASE NO. and. Appellants,

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. FT. LAUDERDALE ROTARY FOUNDATION #1090 Petitioner, CASE NO DOR FOF

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.

CASE NO. Appellant, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR RASC 2005KS10, et al. Appellees. REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

CASE NO. 1D Douglas L. Smith of Burke, Blue, Hutchison, Walters & Smith, P.A., Panama City; Michael R. Reiter, Lynn Haven, for Appellant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC12-75

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC L.T. NOs: 4D , 4D THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Filing # E-Filed 09/24/ :52:23 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: 2013-CA-5265-O

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THREE-YEAR CYCLE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., DCA Case No. 5D Case No.:

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

RESPONSE BY T3 FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC TO PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. RED REEF, INC 4 th DCA Case Number: 4DO D L.T. Case No.: CL (AF) Plaintiff/Petitioner

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D Lower Tribunal Case No.: CA-01

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D DOCTOR DIABETIC SUPPLY, INC., Appellant / Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO.: 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 68,458

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LT CASE NOS. 4D & JEAN W. PHADAEL, Appellant,

RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Defendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal No. 1D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.

CASE NO. SC THEODORE SPERA, STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE No LAURA M. WATSON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Lower Tribunal No.: 4D RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC FIRST DISTRICT CASE NO. 1D L.T. CASE NO CA WENDY HABEGGER, Petitioner, vs.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA -;~J...,." ~.-c '\ \_~-) ",) ROMANPINO, Case No.: SCll_~7c\. r-:> " \ Petitioner, L.T. No.: 4DI0-37S Cir. Ct. No.: 502008 CA vs. 031691 XXXX MB \ " \ THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FIKIA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC. AL TERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006 OC8, MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-0C8, MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION L,;' Respondent. ----------------------------~/ Petitioner ROMAN PINO, pursuant to Rule 9.330, Fla. R. App. P. hereby moves this Court for clarification and correction of its order dated February 7, 2013 (the Order). PINO has identified what appear to be two scrivener's errors in the Order, both of which have the potential to cause widespread confusion in pending and future mortgage foreclosure actions. In a good faith effort to provide the Court with a "helpful and...important part of our appellate quality control system," Elliott v. Elliott, 648 So.2d 135, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)(Anstead, J., specially concurring), PINO asks the court to correct these two errors and issue a corrected opinion. 1 1 PINO is aware that the BANK has served on the Clerk of this Court a letter requesting that the Court correct these same two issues. See Letter from counsel 1015 N. STATE RD. 7, SUITE C, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411' TELEPHONE (561) 729-0530

First, on page 5 of the Order in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, the court refers to the "letter" when it appears from the context and the underlying record that it intended to refer to the "latter." Op. at 5. The full sentence reads: "Pino claimed the letter was crucial to establishing BNY Mellon as a real party in interest..." Op. at 5 (emphasis added). But there was no letter referred to in the record; PINO actually relied on the assignment referenced by the Court in the prior sentence. To avoid confusion, PINO respectfully requests that the Court change the word "letter" to "assignment" so that PINO's argument below and to this Court is accurately reported to future litigants. Second, on page 35, the Court states that "rule 1.11 O(b) requires attorney verification of foreclosure complaints...", but the rule makes no mention of attorneys verifying complaints. Op. at 35 (emphasis added). PINO submits that the word "attorney" should be stricken from the opinion and replaced with "plaintiff." Rule 1.110. This Court amended Rule 1.110 in 2010 to require plaintiffs to verify foreclosure complaints at the behest of the Task Force on Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules ofcivil Procedure, 44 So. 3d 555,555 (Fla. 2010). In so doing, this Court explained that one of "primary purposes of this amendment" was "to provide incentive for the plaintiff to for Bank of New York Mellon dated February 15, 2013. However, because this Court's rules do not make any provision for requesting a correction via letter, PINO's counsel felt compelled to file this motion pursuant to Rule 9.330 (a), Fla. R. App, P. 2 1015 N. STATE RD. 7, SUITEC, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL33411 TELEPHONE (561) 729-0530

appropriately investigate and verify its ownership ofthe note or right to enforce the note and ensure that the allegations in the complaint are accurate." Id. at 556 (emphasis added). Thus, it is the plaintiff who is required to verify the complaint. There is no mention in the rule or its enacting opinion that an attorney could make the required verification. The scope and application of the foreclosure verification rule is an issue that is currently wending its way through the Florida Courts of Appeals. See, e.g., Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Pelt, 84 So.3d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding trial court erred in requiring verification that the facts are "true" instead of following the language of Rule 1.110(b)); BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P. v. Stentz, 91 So. 3d 235, 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)(same); Becker v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 88 So. 3d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), reh 'g denied (June 5, 2012)(verification required by Rule 1.110(b) may be attached to a separate page of the complaint). However, no Court of Appeal has ruled in a reported decision on the issue of whether an attorney can verify a mortgage foreclosure complaint on behalf of a plaintiff, and that issue was not presented in the instant matter, either. Because the issues of attorney verification was not briefed or otherwise presented to this Court, the Court should not inadvertently reach beyond the issues presented to it in this case and state that attorneys may verify foreclosure complaints pursuant to Rule 1.11 O(b). See Art. V, 3(b), Fla. Const. (describing jurisdiction of the 3 1015 N. STATE RD. 7, SUITEC, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411 TELEPHONE (561) 729-0530

Florida Supreme Court). Leaving the word "attorney" in that sentence has the potential to cause a great deal of litigation, and may well thwart this Court's intentions in enacting the rule to begin with. WHERF ORE, PINO respectfully requests that this Court GRANT this narrow motion for reconsideration and amend its Order as follows, with omissions indicated by strikethrough and additions in bold: At page 5: "Pino claimed the lettef assignment was crucial to establishing BNY Mellon as a real party in interest to this foreclosure action." At page 35: "As amended in 2010, rule 1.110(b) requires attemey plaintiff verification of foreclosure complaints..." Dated: February 21,2013. ICE APPELLATE Counsel for Petitioner 1015 N. State Road 7, Suite C Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411 Telephone: (561) 729-0530 Designated Email for Service: service@ice1egal.com service 1 @icelegal.com service2@icelegal.com THOMAS ERSKINE ICE Florida Bar No. 052655 4 1015 N. STATE RD. 7, SUITE C, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411' TELEPHONE (56!) 729-0530

CASE NO. 2D 11-4643 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served this February 21, 2013 to all parties on the attached service list. Service was by email to all parties not exempt from Rule 2.516 Fla. R. Jud. Admin. at the indicated email addressontheservicelist.andbyu.s.mail to any other parties. ICE APPELLATE Counsel for Petitioner 1015 N. State Road 7, Suite C Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411 Telephone: (561) 729-0530 Designated Email for Service: service@icelegal.com service l@icelegal.com service2@icelegal.com ~By: ~ THOMAS ERSKINE ICE Florida Bar No. 052655 5 1015 N. STATE RD. 7, SUITE C, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411 TELEPHONE (561) 729-0530

SERVICE LIST Bruce S. Rogow, Esq. Tara A. Campion, Esq. BRUCE S. ROGOW, P.A. 500 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 1930 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: (954) 767-8909 Facsimile: (954) 764-1530 brogow@rogowlaw.com tcampion@rogowlaw.com Counsel for Respondent, BNY Mellon William P. Heller, Esq. AKERMAN SENTERFITT Las Olas Centre II, Suite 1600 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 463-2700 Facsimile: (954) 463-2224 william.heller@akerman.com Counsel for Respondent, BNY Mellon Mitchell W. Berger, Esq. Fred o. Goldberg, Esq. Elaine Johnson James, Esq. BERGER SINGERMAN LLP 350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 525-9900 Facsimile: (954) 523-2872 mberger@bergersingerman.com fgoldberg@bergersingerman.com ejames@bergersingerman.com Counselfor Amici Curiae The Mortgage Bankers Association and The Florida Bankers Association Katherine E. Giddings, Esq. Nancy M. Wallace, Esq. AKERMAN SENTERFITT 16 East College Avenue, Suite 1200 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Telephone: (850) 224-9634 Facsimile: (850) 222-0103 katherine.giddings@akerman.com nancy. wallace@akerman.com Counsel for Respondent, BNYMellon Kenneth Bradley Bell Clark Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse 125 West Romana St., Suite 800 Pensacola, FL 32502 Telephone: (850) 434-9200 Facsimile: (850) 432-7390 kenbell@cphlaw.com Counselfor Amici Curiae Florida Land title Association and American Land Title Association Craig Lynd, Esq. Robert Horst, Esq. Curtis Wilson, Esq. KAUFMAN, ENGLETT, AND L YND, PLLC 111 N. Magnolia Ave., Suite 1600 Orlando, FL 32801 Telephone: (407) 513-1900 Facsimile: (407) 591-3731 craiglynd@kelattomeys.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae Kaufman, Engleft, and Lynd, PLLC 6 1015 N. STATE RD. 7, SUITE C, ROYAL PALM BEACH, FL 33411 TELEPHONE (561) 729-0530