Spotlight on the Iranian Foreign Born

Similar documents
Migration Information Source - Chinese Immigrants in the United States

Migration Information Source - Spotlight on Refugees and Asylees in the United Sta...

Migration Policy Institute

African immigrants in the Washington region: a demographic overview

Migration Information Source - Indian Immigrants in the United States

Filipino. April in the United States in. are more. in Nearly half of. States. Immigrants in. more. Migration Policy Institute ?

Older Immigrants in the United States By Aaron Terrazas Migration Policy Institute

Annual Flow Report. of persons who became LPRs in the United States during 2007.

Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America

Indian Migration to the Global North in the Americas: The United States

THE DEMOGRAPHY OF MEXICO/U.S. MIGRATION

U.S. Immigration Policy

Prophetic City: Houston on the Cusp of a Changing America.

Salvadorans. imagine all the people. Salvadorans in Boston

Annual Flow Report. U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents: Office of Immigration Statistics POLICY DIRECTORATE

Recent Trends in Immigration Enforcement

Analysis of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of African Immigrants in USA

Language Needs and Abilities in the Nation s Capital, 2007

nemmats 9tl t9-i1 (,T4 CALIFORNIANS NEGRO uw~mi'mof nons Of co DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Ernest B. Webb,,Director

Annual Flow Report. of persons who became LPRs in the United States during 2008.

Where U.S. Immigrants Were Born 1960

The New Metropolitan Geography of U.S. Immigration

Annual Flow Report. U.S. Legal Permanent Residents: Office of Immigration Statistics POLICY DIRECTORATE

A Demographic Profile of Mexican Immigrants in the United States

FUTURE OF GROWTH IN SAN DIEGO: THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR INCLUSION PRODUCED BY

GROWTH AMID DYSFUNCTION An Analysis of Trends in Housing, Migration, and Employment SOLD

Children of Immigrants

Cultural Frames: An Analytical Model

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2007: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

1996 Statistical Yearbook of the. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Immigration and the US Economy:

Astrid S. Rodríguez Fellow, Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies. Center for Latin American, Caribbean & Latino Studies

The Triennial Comprehensive Report on Immigration

County-by- County Data

The Inland Empire in Hans Johnson Joseph Hayes

Top Ten State Concentrations of the Mexican Immigrant Population in 2000

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Queens Community District 3: East Elmhurst, Jackson Heights, and North Corona,

The Immigration Population in the Washington, D.C. Region and the Service Needs of Central American Child and Family Migrants By Randy Capps

African Immigrants in Metropolitan Washington A Demographic Overview

Queensland s Labour Market Progress: A 2006 Census of Population and Housing Profile

The foreign born are more geographically concentrated than the native population.

The New U.S. Demographics

Legal Immigration to US Still Declining IMMIGRATION FACTS. Figure 1: Total Immigrant Admissions,

Brazilians. imagine all the people. Brazilians in Boston

Population Estimates

Salvadorans. in Boston

The New Geography of Immigration and Local Policy Responses

11.433J / J Real Estate Economics

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2011: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

CBRE CAPITAL MARKETS CBRE 2017 MULTIFAMILY CONFERENCE BEYOND THE CYCLE

CRS Report for Congress

Peruvians in the United States

Overview of Boston s Population. Boston Redevelopment Authority Research Division Alvaro Lima, Director of Research September

Migration and the SDGs.

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Migration Patterns in New Gateways of Texas The Innerburbs

History of Immigration to Texas

Profile of Migration and Remittances: Montenegro

LATINO DATA PROJECT. Astrid S. Rodríguez Ph.D. Candidate, Educational Psychology. Center for Latin American, Caribbean, and Latino Studies

Institute for Public Policy and Economic Analysis

Population Outlook for the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Region

Immigrants are playing an increasingly

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for the Accounting Profession James H. Johnson, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Entrepreneurship & Strategy,

CLACLS. Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 5:

WILLIAMSON STATE OF THE COUNTY Capital Area Council of Governments

Profile of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1997

Latinos in Massachusetts Selected Areas: Framingham

At Home in the Nation s Capital: Immigrant Trends in Metropolitan Washington

Disaggregating SDG indicators by migratory status. Haoyi Chen United Nations Statistics Division

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour January New Brunswick Analysis 2016 Census Topic: Immigration

Immigration and the U.S. Economy

Measuring International Migration- Related SDGs with U.S. Census Bureau Data

Latest Immigration Data

August 5, Dear President Obama:

The Changing Face of Texas:

Immigration Policy Brief August 2006

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

The EEO Tabulation: Measuring Diversity in the Workplace ACS Data Users Conference May 29, 2014

Business Data For Engaging in International Real Estate Transactions in California. National Association of REALTORS Research Division

Gone to Texas: Migration Vital to Growth in the Lone Star State. Pia Orrenius Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas June 27, 2018

In the Picture Resettled Refugees in Sweden

R.P ADM-9-03 OT:RR:RD:TC H RES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION 19 CFR PART 101

Business Data For Engaging in International Real Estate Transactions in Utah. National Association of REALTORS Research Division

Immigrants and the Hudson Valley Economy

SECTION 1. Demographic and Economic Profiles of California s Population

DREAM Act-Eligible Poised to Build on the Investments Made in Them

New Americans in Long Beach POPULATION GROWTH 3.3% 14.3 % Total population 481, % Immigrant population 128, % 26.1% 47.

The New Geography of Immigration and Local Policy Responses

The Brookings Institution

Collecting better census data on international migration: UN recommendations

Defining migratory status in the context of the 2030 Agenda

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Brooklyn Community District 4: Bushwick,

Nonimmigrant Admissions to the United States: Annual Flow Report

Policy Analysis Report

Webinar on Reducing Barriers to Citizenship: New Research and the Need for a Partial Fee Waiver. January 8, pm ET / 1pm PT

Fiscal Policy Institute. Working for a Better Life. A Profile of Immigrants in the New York State Economy

This analysis confirms other recent research showing a dramatic increase in the education level of newly

DOWNLOAD OR READ : U S IMMIGRATION A REFERENCE HANDBOOK CONTEMPORARY WORLD ISSUES PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Brockton and Abington

Immigration and the U.S. Economy

Transcription:

Spotlight on the Iranian Foreign Born By Shirin Hakimzadeh and David Dixon Migration Policy Institute June 1, 2006 While recent new s headlines focus on escalating tensions between Iran and the United States over Iran's nuclear energy program, less attention has been paid to the United States' Iranian-born population. This spotlight focuses on the Iranian foreign born in the United States, examining the population's size, grow th, and geographic distribution over the last three decades using data from the Census Bureau, the Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS), and the US Department of State (DOS). OIS and DOS data were used to measure migratory flows while the census was utilized for stock data. Note: All yearly data is for the government's fiscal year (October 1 through September 30). Click on the bullet points below for more information: Historical Background: The Iranian foreign born are a relatively new population whose m igration to the United States was concentrated around the years of the Islamic Revolution (1978-1979). Between 1980 and 1990, the number of foreign born from Iran in the United States increased by 74 percent. The number of Iranians granted lawful permanent residence peaked in 1990, with an estimated 24,977 Iranians admitted. From 1980 to 2004, more than one out of every four Iranian immigrants was a refugee or asylee. Statistical Overview of Iranian Foreign Born in the United States: There were about 280,000 Iranian born in the United States in 2000. Immigrants from Iran accounted for less than one percent of the total foreign-born population. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Iranian foreign born increased over 34 percent. Over half of all Iranian immigrants lived in the state of California in 2000. The metropolitan areas with the most Iranian immigrants were Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York City, and the Washington, DC-Baltimore metropolitan area. During 2005, 5,314 immigrant visas were issued to Iranians. In the last five years, the most commonly issued nonimmigrant visas for Iranian nationals have been the student (F), temporary worker (H), and foreign governm ent representative (G) visas. Socioeconomic Overview of Foreign-Born Iranians in the United States: Three in every five Iranian imm igrants were naturalized US citizens. Over 90 percent of the Iranian foreign born spoke a language other than English at home. The majority of the Iranian born had a bachelor's degree or higher. Nearly two-thirds of the Iranian foreign born participated in the labor force. More than half of the Iranian im migrant population were employed in management, professional, and related occupations. The self-employment rate of the Iranian foreign born was almost double the rate for the total foreign-born population. In 2000, the median income for Iranian-born males and females who were full-time, year-round workers was $52,333 and $36,422, respectively. Historical Background: The Iranian foreign born are a relatively migrationinformation.org/ /print.cfm?i 1/5

new population whose migration to the United States was concentrated around the years of the Islamic Revolution (1978-1979). Iranian immigration can be conceptualized as two back-to-back waves before and after the revolution. The first wave, which started in the mid-1950s and continued until the start of the revolution, primarily consisted of college students, who were studying abroad in order to meet the needs of the rapidly industrializing oilbased Iranian economy, and families closely associated with the monarchy of Mohammad Reza Shah. An estimated population of 34,000 left during this first phase. From the Islam ic Revolution of 1978-1979 to the present, a second wave of em igration, primarily exiles, political View Map (pdf) refugees, and asylum seekers, took place. Approximately 330,000 cam e to the United States during this period. The exiles were disproportionately members of religious and ethnic minorities, such as the Bahai'is, Jews, Armenians, and Assyrians. Also in the second wave were young men who fled military service and the Iran-Iraq war, followed by young wom en and families who came for educational and political reasons. Between 1980 and 1990, the number of foreign born from Iran in the United States increased by 74 percent. The foreign-born population from Iran increased from 121,505 in 1980 to 210,941 in 1990, representing an increase of 73.6 percent. The number of Iranians granted lawful permanent residence peaked in 1990, with an estimated 24,977 Iranians admitted. According to the Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS), from 1970 to 2004, 356,642 Iranian-born immigrants were admitted to the United States. The largest number entered in 1990 (see Figure 1). About 13 percent (47,977) entered between 1970 and 1980, while 43 percent (154,857) entered between 1981 and1990, and 32 percent (112,597) entered between 1991 and 2000. Just 41,211 immigrant visas were issued to the Iranian foreign born from 2001 through 2004. Figure 1. Iranian-Born Immigrants Admitted to the United States, 1970 to 2004 migrationinformation.org/ /print.cfm?i 2/5

Note: This figure includes both im migrants adm itted and those who adjusted their status after arrival. Therefore, the 1990 peak is partially a result of people who arrived in the 1980s but did not adjust until the early 1990s. Source: US Departm ent of Hom eland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, 1970-2004. From 1980 to 2004, more than one out of every four Iranian immigrants was a refugee or asylee. According to OIS, of the 319,075 Iranian imm igrants admitted between 1980 and 2004, 83,376 (26 percent) were refugees and asylees adjusting to permanent resident status. Statistical overview of Iranian foreign born in the United States: There were about 280,000 Iranian born in the United States in 2000. According to the US Census Bureau, there were approxim ately 283,225 foreign-born Iranians living in the United States in 2000. However, the Iranian-Am erican comm unity claim s the number is much larger than the Census Bureau figure suggests. Immigrants from Iran accounted for less than one percent of the total foreign-born population. Of the 31.1 million foreign born in the United States, only 0.91 percent were immigrants from Iran, according to the results of Census 2000. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Iranian foreign born increased over 34 percent. The Iranian population went up by 72,284 between 1990 and 2000, from 210,941 to 283,225. Over half of all Iranian immigrants lived in the state of California in 2000. While all 50 states received Iranian immigrants according to Census 2000, 55.9 percent (158,613) lived in California. The states with the next-largest Iranian im migrant populations were New York (17,323 or 6.1 percent), Texas (15,581 or 5.5 percent), Virginia (10,889 or 3.8 percent), and Maryland (9,733 or 3.4 percent). The metropolitan areas with the most Iranian immigrants were Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York City, and the Washington, DC-Baltimore metropolitan area. In 2000, 41 percent (114,712) of the Iranian foreign born resided in Los Angeles-Riverside- Orange County, 10 percent (27,112) in San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, eight percent (21,971) in New York City, and seven percent (19,726) in the Washington, DC-Baltim ore m etropolitan area. The next three largest destinations were San Diego (7,675), Dallas (6,376), and Houston (6,287), respectively. During 2005, 5,314 immigrant visas were issued to Iranians. According to the US Department of State, the majority (2,900) of immigrant visas for Iranians were granted through im mediate relative petitions. Another 1,808 visas were granted based on family preference, and the remainder included diversity immigrants, em ployment preference, and returning residents and armed forces special immigrants, respectively. In the last five years, the most commonly issued nonimmigrant visas for Iranian nationals have been the student (F), temporary worker (H), and foreign government representative (G) visas. Between 2000 and 2005, 20 percent of the 15,824 nonimmigrant visas issued to Iranian nationals were student visas (3,323), 21 percent were temporary worker visas (3,316), and 19 percent were visas issued to representatives of foreign governments (2,987) (see Figure 2). The next two most frequently issued nonimmigrant visas were the K, issued to fiancés of US citizens (18 percent or 2,786); and the J, issued to exchange visitors (12 percent or 1,900). Figure 2. Nonimmigrant Visas Issued to Iranian Nationals, 2000 to 2005 migrationinformation.org/ /print.cfm?i 3/5

Note: 1-Other includes A,O,P,T-N,TD,R,I,M,NATO, V, L, and E nonimm igrant visa categories. Data based on those who claimed Iranian nationality, not necessarily Iranian born. N=15,824 Source: US Departm ent of State, Report of the Visa Office, 2000-2005 Socioeconomic Overview of Foreign-Born Iranians in the United States: Three in every five Iranian immigrants were naturalized US citizens. According to Census 2000, 60.7 percent of Iranian imm igrants in the United States were naturalized citizens while 40.3 percent of the total foreign-born population was naturalized. Over 90 percent of the Iranian foreign born spoke a language other than English at home. Am ong the Iranian foreign born, 92.1 percent in 2000 spoke a language other than English at home, while 83.0 percent of the total foreign-born population spoke a language other than English. The majority of the Iranian born had a bachelor's degree or higher. According to Census 2000, 50.9 percent of Iranian imm igrants have attained a bachelor's degree or higher, compared to 24.0 percent among the total foreign-born population. Nearly two-thirds of the Iranian foreign born participated in the labor force. Iranian-born immigrants had a higher labor force participation rate (63.1 percent) compared with the total foreign-born population (60.6 percent). Among those in the civilian labor force, 4.7 percent of the foreign born from Iran were unemployed, while 6.8 percent of the foreign born were unemployed. More than half of the Iranian immigrant population were employed in management, professional, and related occupations. In 2000, the top three occupation categories for the Iranian foreign born were m anagement, professional and related occupations (51.8 percent); sales and office occupations (27.5 percent); and service occupations (9 percent). By contrast, 28.4 percent of the total foreign-born population were in management, professional and related occupations; 20 percent in service occupations; and 19.9 percent in sales and office occupations. The self-employment rate of the Iranian foreign born was almost double the rate for the total migrationinformation.org/ /print.cfm?i 4/5

foreign-born population. According to Census 2000, 11.6 percent of the Iranian born were self-em ployed workers in their own not-incorporated businesses, while 6.5 percent of the total foreign-born population were selfemployed. In 2000, the median income for Iranian-born males and females who were full-time, year-round workers was $52,333 and $36,422, respectively. For the total foreign-born population, the median earnings for male and female full-time workers was $30,288 and $25,260, respectively. Iranian-born males earned 42 percent more than the male foreign born overall, and Iranian-born females earned 31 percent m ore than the total female foreign-born population. Sources Census 2000, US Census Bureau US Department of Homeland Security, Office of Im migration Statistics, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, 1970-2004 US Department of State, Report of the Visa Office, 2000-2005 Copyright @ 2011 Migration Policy Institute. All rights reserved. MPI 1400 16th St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 ph: (001) 202-266-1940 fax: (001) 202-266-1900 source@migrationpolicy.org migrationinformation.org/ /print.cfm?i 5/5