MEDIA COVERAGE PRESS COVERAGE-DAY 2 Two-Day International Conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers 12 December 2018

Similar documents
Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers

THE SILK ROAD ECONOMIC BELT

Fifth Floor, E. T. Complex, Sir Agha Khan Road, Sector F-5/1, Islamabad, Pakistan. Tel: /50

Report In-House Meeting

INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES

TOPICS (India's Foreign Policy)

Report - In-House Meeting with Egyptian Media Delegation

Possibility of Bay of Bengal (BoB) & BIMSTEC

Report- In-House Meeting with Mr. Didier Chaudet Editing Director of CAPE (Center for the Analysis of Foreign Affairs)"

International Relations GS SCORE. Indian Foreign Relations development under PM Modi

Prospects of Pak-Russia Bilateral Relations

Report Seminar. Pakistan, Central Asia and CPEC: A Vision for Improved Connectivity. November 13, 2018

MEDIA COVERAGE. Pakistan-Austria Roundtable Afghanistan and Regional Security 28 March 2019 NATIONAL ONLINE NEWSPAPERS

New Ambience in China-India Talks: A Straw in the Wind?

Two Day International Conference Kashmir Dispute: Past, Present and Future. February 27 28, 2018

CHINA S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE * Security implications and ways forward for the European Union richard ghiasy

SAARC and its Significance for Regional Cooperation

Important Document 4. The Pakistani side described friendship with China as the cornerstone of its foreign policy. Pakistan is committed to one-china

China Pakistan Economic Corridor The Geo Strategic Dimension and Challenges. Majid Mahmood

BUTTRESSING US-INDIA ECONOMIC RELATIONS INDIA S EMERGING ROLE IN THE INDO-PACIFIC REGION

Report- Seminar Solving the Kashmir Dispute: Exercise of the Right to Self- Determination

BIMSTEC: Relevance and Challenges Amitendu Palit, Rahul Choudhury and Silvia Tieri

Security and Governance in the Indian Ocean 1

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE NINTH ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM SECURITY POLICY CONFERENCE PHNOM PENH, CAMBODIA, 25 MAY 2012

Japan s Position as a Maritime Nation

Actualising East: India in a Multipolar Asia 1. Dhruva Jaishankar 2

Concept Note for North-East Asia Development Cooperation Forum 2017:

The new Great Game in Central Asia: Challenges and Opportunities for Pakistan

Press Coverage. Major Powers Interests in Indian Ocean: Challenges and Options for Pakistan

Session # 20 (30 October 2018) MONTHLY UPDATE CPEC. Islamabad s Informal CHINA STUDY CIRCLE. Twentieth Session CPEC-BCIM Updates by Shahzad Qasim

BY THE END OF THIS VIDEO YOU WILL KNOW ABOUT

Pakistan s Policy Objectives in the Indian Ocean Region

US NSA s visit to South Asia implications for India

BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE CHINA PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDOR (CPEC) Abdul Qadir Memon Consul General of Pakistan Hong Kong SAR

Engaging Regional Players in Afghanistan Threats and Opportunities

Report Public Talk INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES

SAFTA South Asian Free Trade Area

NO. 4. From Emerging Market to Emerging Power: Rethinking Sweden s India Policy. Henrik Chetan Aspengren. Key points

The Aspiration for Asia-Europe Connectivity. Fu Ying. At Singapore-China Business Forum. Singapore, 27 July 2015

Debating India s Maritime Security and Regional Strategy toward China

Modi Visits United States

Honourable Minister of State for External Affairs, General VK Singh, Director of USI, LT Gen PK Singh, Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,

Asian Security Challenges

Report- Book Launch 88 Days to Kandahar A CIA Diary

Report In-House Meeting

Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences (2015), Volume 6 No3,

12 Reconnecting India and Central Asia

B. A. Political Science

Pakistan and India Accession to SCO: Future Prospects and Challenges

Breakfast in Amritsar, lunch in Lahore, dinner in Kabul * Simbal Khan **

PART 1 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

CPEC: Analyzing External Challenges. January 2018

Strengthening Transport Connectivity in Southern and Central Asia

The Role of India in Promoting Regional Cooperation in South Asia

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) should be supported by people to people contacts

The Role of China and Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Kashmir Dispute

ISAS Insights. The Strategic Significance of the Modi-Putin Summit in Saint Petersburg. P S Suryanarayana 1

THE FIRST ENLARGEMENT OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

DEFENSE SECURITY VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1. September 2018

Look East and Look West Policy. Written by Civil Services Times Magazine Monday, 12 December :34

ISTANBUL SECURITY CONFERENCE 2017 New Security Ecosystem and Multilateral Cost

Be Happy, Share & Help Each Other!!! Study-IQ education

Triangular formations in Asia Genesis, strategies, value added and limitations

VISION IAS

Reinvigorating Pakistan's 'Look Africa' Policy

Vice President & Dean Ding Yuan:

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT OF THE 14 TH ASEAN-INDIA SUMMIT 8 September 2016, Vientiane, Lao PDR Turning Vision into Reality for a Dynamic ASEAN Community

The United States & South Asia: New Possibilities. It is an honor to appear before the Senate Foreign

The Influence of "The Belt and Road Initiative" on the Economic Development of Northeast Asia

Russia in a Changing World: Continued Priorities and New Opportunities

Is There a Role for the BRICS in Asian Affairs?

Pakistan-India Relations

Indo-U.S.-Japan Trilateral Cooperation in Indian Ocean

Reset in Pakistan-India Relations

Intra-Kashmir CBMs: Current Status and Future Prospects

JAPAN-RUSSIA-US TRILATERAL CONFERENCE ON THE SECURITY CHALLENGES IN NORTHEAST ASIA

Executive Summary. Facilitating Connectivity in the Bay of Bengal Region. April 11, Dhaka, Bangladesh

January 04, 1956 Abstract of Conversation between Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai and Pakistani Ambassador to China Sultanuddin Ahmad

Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2005

India and Japan: Indispensable Partners for an Asian Century

National Security Strategy for Pakistan. Report. December 01, 2011 THE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, ISLAMABAD

One Belt, One Road (OBOR) and The Asian Infrastructural Investment Bank (AIIB)

IN THIS NEWSLETTER VISIT TO NAGOYA

Keynote Speech. at Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) Forum on Belt and Road Cooperation and Asia Business Conference

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue: An Alignment of Policies for Common Benefit Ambassador Anil Wadhwa Vivekananda International Foundation

SINO-INDIAN COOPERATION IN THEIR BORDER AREAS: RATIONALE, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 28 November Jabin T. Jacob

The Face-Off in Doklam: Interpreting India-China Relations

ICS-Sponsored Special Panel India s Policy towards China in the Changing Global Context as part of the AAS in Asia conference

The New Silk Road A stock-taking and possible implications for Russia and Europe

Afghanistan & Regional Integration

Letter dated 20 July 1999 from the Permanent Representative of Uzbekistan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

VISIONIAS

India and Myanmar: Prospects of Maritime Reciprocity

Media Briefing by External Affairs Minister at the end of 14th SAARC Summit

Third Regional Economic Cooperation Conference on Afghanistan. (Islamabad, May 2009) (Islamabad Declaration)

A Theoretical Framework for Peace and Cooperation between "Land Powers" and "Sea Powers" -Towards Geostrategic Research of the East Asian Community

The Belt and Road Initiative

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS VIENNA

Chinese Views of Post-2014 Afghanistan

Fifth Generation Intifada in Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK)

Transcription:

MEDIA COVERAGE PRESS COVERAGE-DAY 2 Two-Day International Conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers 12 December 2018 INTERNATIONAL 1. Two-Day International Conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers December 12, 2018 Editor Islamabad: Apart from the traditional security threats, the South Asian countries face multiple common challenges in the realm of non-traditional security. It is imperative that regional cooperation be sought to address such collective concerns like rising poverty, food insecurity, water shortages, illicit trafficking, poor human development indices etc., in the domain of social sector and human resource development. Pakistan should, therefore, focus on strengthening its economy through structural reforms and robust trade regimes. Bilateral transit trade agreements and SAARC s agenda should be promoted so that regional trade volume could be enhanced. Emphasis should be placed on diplomatic means, political dialogues and negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels to amicably settle inter-state disputes. Pakistan s recent peace overtures towards both Afghanistan and India are unfortunately not being reciprocated. The existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding issues of critical nature. Global powers should play a proactive role in bridging the divide between disputants by facilitating political engagements between South Asian countries.

China s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offers a vision of common economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Rather than attempting to sink this economic initiative in controversy, it should be seen as a means for mutual economic prosperity and development. Pakistan and the US must rationalise their expectations from each other in terms of their objectives in the region and common concerns. The US and Pakistan must move from transactional to principle based relationship. These were some of the policy recommendations put forward by speakers from Pakistan, China, Russia and the US speaking on the final day of the international conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute, here in Islamabad today. In his keynote speech, Chief Guest H.E. Mr Sardar Masood Khan, President Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJ&K) urged Pakistan not to change, abandon nor alter its stance on Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), and called on the government to develop a holistic and clear national security paradigm and national security strategy which is shared with all stakeholders. Sharing the situation in IOK, he said that India had abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution; and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants was being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that till the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. President Khan also emphasised that CPEC has helped bring the Kashmir dispute back on the world stage given India s hostility to the project. However, CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute or panacea for Pakistan s internal economic development. Start thinking of CPEC in terms of CPEC-Plus wherein social sector development, especially Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) about provision of quality education is prioritised, he commended. He also emphasised leveraging the strength of Pakistan s diaspora in the Middle East, Europe and US which now has considerable political traction, in order to reap huge dividends for the country on critical political and economic issues. Earlier in the day, discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of the US, Mr Harrison Akins, Research Fellow, University of Tennessee s Howard H. Baker Jr., Center for Public Policy, US, while earlier, Pakistan-US pragmatic relationship rose and fell according to the saliency of American security interests in the region, now voices within policy debates are the politically appointed Trump loyalists without the input from foreign policy professionals, diminishing the effect of the foreign service bureaucracy to serve as a check on the actions of the presidency. Without the input of foreign policy professionals, it appears that the Trump administration has difficulty in fully understanding the foreign policy implications of his actions,

such as connecting his bullying rhetoric and policies toward Pakistan with his increase of troop presence in Afghanistan, with the strong relationship with Pakistan a key part of any Afghan strategy of the United States. Mr Akins also explained that foreign policy under the Trump administration is not shielded from the vicissitudes and demands of domestic politics. Foreign policy has become another battleground for Trump s electoral politics with his actions reflecting what s best for his administration rather than achieving the strategic interests of the US, he concluded. Dr Liu Zongyi, Research Fellow from the Institute for World Economic Studies and Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIR), China was of the view that even though the BRI has stimulated South Asian regional connectivity, India has adopted opposing, delaying and hedging measures towards different parts of the BRI. India opposes CPEC and delays BCIM and puts forward BBIN and BIMSTEC, has raised Project Mausam, Cotton Route, Spice Route, or Sagar Mala projects, and upgraded the Look East policy to Act East policy, to hedge the 21st Century MSR, he said. According to Dr Zongyi, India has been giving precedence of geopolitics over geoeconomic cooperation. Indian hedging strategy toward the BRI has very strong military and strategic implications. They want to use socalled values, norms, international law, rules and standards to contain BRI. Indian and Western mass media has waged a war on BRI, he stressed. Discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of Russia, Mr Leonid Savin, Founder and Chief Editor of Journal of Eurasian Affairs, Russia, argued that since Pakistan has taken a position of sovereignty and denied its critics in Washington, it has aroused considerable interest from Russia as an emergent power. This window of opportunity can be favourably used by two parties. In light of the irresponsible behaviour of the US (and their satellites) on the world stage, the implementation of joint Russian-Pakistani projects, including military cooperation, will help strengthen security in Eurasia in the interests of all participants, he opined. Mr Savin pointed out that there is great interest on the part of Moscow in intellectual cooperation. Russia needs semantic filling of this concept that is not possible without the active participation of the outside scientific and expert community of South Asian countries. Dr Maria Sultan, Director General, South Asian Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI), Pakistan opined that all trends indicate that the Indian Ocean will not only become the centre of economic development, but also a region of great power rivalry along with other extra regional actors desire to dominate the region s maritime sea routes as economic interests will dominate the security projections for this region, making IOR the most securitized ocean in the world. Dr Sultan highlighted that the Gwadar Port, with 400 mnt current capacity and potential to reach 800 mnt, will make Pakistan one of the world s most critical interconnecting maritime routes in the world opening up a whole new world of opportunities and progress for the country and region. In the session From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics chaired by Ambassador (R) Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, Director General, Institute for Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI), Pakistan, Dr Huma Baqai, Associate Dean, Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, Institute of Business Administration, Pakistan discussed that the winds of emerging global trends are in flux, swaying more eastwards than before. Relative wealth and economic power continues to shift favourably from the West

towards the East, she said. However, she was of the opinion that geopolitics will continue to remain in South Asia and other parts of the world with its core ingredients space, territory, territoriality, and power. Commercialisation can do wonders if connected with geopolitics of the region as a whole, factoring in China s mutual respect and win-win cooperation paradigm, she recommended. Outlining his views about moving from conflict management to conflict resolution for India and Pakistan, Dr Naeem Ahmed, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, University of Karachi, Pakistan urged that conflict resolution is vital because continued brinksmanship may lead to full-fledged war between India and Pakistan due to the changing nature of the Kashmiri movement after the death of Burhan Wani; and the growing menace of terrorism. In her paper on Sino-US geo-political competition and implications for Pakistan, Dr Sarwat Rauf, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Pakistan urged that internally, Pakistan should focus on its economic development, especially industrial development. Externally, Pakistan should continue to strengthen its relations with China, and find solutions of the existing irritants in relations with Iran and Afghanistan since mistrust is hindering the region s progress. Concluding the two day conference, Brig (R) Mohammad Mehboob Qadir, Acting President, IPRI thanked the President AJK H.E. Sardar Masood Khan, speakers from various countries, participants and the media for an interactive and productive event. < http://kashmirwatch.com/two-day-international-conference-conflict-and-cooperation-in-southasia-role-of-major-powers/>

NATIONAL PRINT NEWSPAPERS 1. Realm of non-traditional security: South Asian countries face multiple common challenges PR December 13, 2018 ISLAMABAD: Apart from the traditional security threats, the South Asian countries face multiple common challenges in the realm of non-traditional security and it is imperative that regional cooperation be sought to address such collective concerns like rising poverty, food insecurity, water shortages, illicit trafficking, poor human development indices etc., in the domain of social sector and human resource development, said speakers from Pakistan, China, Russia and the US speaking on the final day of the international conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute on Wednesday. Pakistan should, therefore, focus on strengthening its economy through structural reforms and robust trade regimes, they said, adding that bilateral transit trade agreements and SAARC s agenda should be promoted so that regional trade volume could be enhanced. Emphasis should be placed on diplomatic means, political dialogues and negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels to amicably settle inter-state disputes, they emphasised. Pakistan s recent peace overtures towards both Afghanistan and India are unfortunately not being reciprocated, they lamented, adding that the existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding issues of critical nature. Global powers should play a proactive role in bridging the divide between disputants by facilitating political engagements between South Asian countries, they underscored, adding that China s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offers a vision of common economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Rather than attempting to sink this economic initiative in controversy, it should be seen as a means for mutual economic prosperity and development, they recommended. They also called for Pakistan and the US to rationalise their expectations from each other in terms of their objectives in the region and common concerns. The US and Pakistan must move from transactional to principle-based relationship. In his speech, Sardar Masood Khan, President Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJ&K), urged Pakistan not to change, abandon nor alter its stance on Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), and called on the government to develop a holistic and clear national security paradigm and national

security strategy which is shared with all stakeholders. Sharing the situation in IOK, he said that India had abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution; and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants was being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that till the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. President Khan also emphasised that CPEC has helped bring the Kashmir dispute back on the world stage given India s hostility to the project. However, CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute or panacea for Pakistan s internal economic development. Start thinking of CPEC in terms of CPEC-Plus wherein social sector development, especially Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) about provision of quality education is prioritised, he commended. He also emphasised leveraging the strength of Pakistan s diaspora in the Middle East, Europe and the US which now has considerable political traction, in order to reap huge dividends for the country on critical political and economic issues. Earlier in the day, discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of the US, Mr Harrison Akins, Research Fellow, University of Tennessee s Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy, US, said while earlier, Pakistan-US pragmatic relationship rose and fell according to the saliency of American security interests in the region, now voices within policy debates are the politically appointed Trump loyalists without the input from foreign policy professionals, diminishing the effect of the foreign service bureaucracy to serve as a check on the actions of the presidency. Without the input of foreign policy professionals, it appears that the Trump administration has difficulty in fully understanding the foreign policy implications of his actions, such as connecting his bullying rhetoric and policies toward Pakistan with his increase of troop presence in Afghanistan, with the strong relationship with Pakistan a key part of any Afghan strategy of the United States. Akins also explained that foreign policy under the Trump administration is not shielded from the vicissitudes and demands of domestic politics. Foreign policy has become another battleground for Trump s electoral politics with his actions reflecting what s best for his administration rather than achieving the strategic interests of the US, he concluded. Dr Liu Zongyi, Research Fellow from the Institute for World Economic Studies and Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIR), China, was of the view that even though the BRI has stimulated South Asian regional connectivity, India has adopted opposing, delaying and hedging measures towards different parts of the BRI. India opposes CPEC and delays BCIM and puts forward BBIN and BIMSTEC, has raised Project Mausam, Cotton Route, Spice Route, or Sagar Mala projects, and upgraded the Look East policy to Act East policy, to hedge the 21st Century MSR, he said. According to Dr Zongyi, India has been giving precedence of geopolitics over geoeconomic cooperation. Indian hedging strategy toward the BRI has very strong military and strategic implications. They want to use so-called values, norms, international law, rules and standards to contain BRI. Indian and Western mass media has waged a war on BRI, he stressed. Discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of Russia, Mr Leonid Savin, Founder and Chief Editor of Journal of Eurasian Affairs, Russia, argued that since Pakistan has taken a position of sovereignty and denied its critics in Washington, it has aroused considerable interest from Russia as an emergent power.

This window of opportunity can be favourably used by two parties. In light of the irresponsible behaviour of the US (and their satellites) on the world stage, the implementation of joint Russian-Pakistani projects, including military cooperation, will help strengthen security in Eurasia in the interests of all participants, he opined. Mr Savin pointed out that there is great interest on the part of Moscow in intellectual cooperation. Russia needs semantic filling of this concept that is not possible without the active participation of the outside scientific and expert community of South Asian countries. Dr Maria Sultan, Director General, South Asian Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI), Pakistan opined that all trends indicate that the Indian Ocean will not only become the centre of economic development, but also a region of great power rivalry along with other extra regional actors desire to dominate the region s maritime sea routes as economic interests will dominate the security projections for this region, making IOR the most securitized ocean in the world. Dr Sultan highlighted that the Gwadar Port, with 400 mnt current capacity and potential to reach 800 mnt, will make Pakistan one of the world s most critical interconnecting maritime routes in the world opening up a whole new world of opportunities and progress for the country and region. <https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/405197-realm-of-non-traditional-security-south-asiancountries-face-multiple-common-challenges>

2. Regional coop stressed between South Asian countries December 13, 2018 BRI offers vision of economic development Staff Report Apart from the traditional security threats, the South Asian countries face multiple common challenges in the realm of non-traditional security and it is imperative that regional cooperation be sought to address such collective concerns like rising poverty, food insecurity, water shortages, illicit trafficking, poor human development indices etc., in the domain of social sector and human resource development, said speakers from Pakistan, China, Russia and the US speaking on the final day of the international conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute, here in Islamabad on Wednesday. Pakistan should, therefore, focus on strengthening its economy through structural reforms and robust trade regimes, they said, adding that bilateral transit trade agreements and SAARC s agenda should be promoted so that regional trade volume could be enhanced. Emphasis should be placed on diplomatic means, political dialogues and negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels to amicably settle inter-state disputes, they emphasised. Pakistan s recent peace overtures towards both Afghanistan and India are unfortunately not being reciprocated, they lamented, adding that the existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding issues of critical nature. Global powers should play a proactive role in bridging the divide between disputants by facilitating political engagements between South Asian countries, they underscored, adding that China s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offers a vision of common economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Rather than attempting to sink this economic initiative in controversy, it

should be seen as a means for mutual economic prosperity and development, they recommended. They also called for Pakistan and the US to rationalise their expectations from each other in terms of their objectives in the region and common concerns. The US and Pakistan must move from transactional to principle based relationship. In his speech, Sardar Masood Khan, President Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJ&K) urged Pakistan not to change, abandon nor alter its stance on Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), and called on the government to develop a holistic and clear national security paradigm and national security strategy which is shared with all stakeholders. Sharing the situation in IOK, he said that India had abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution; and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants was being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that till the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. President Khan also emphasised that CPEC has helped bring the Kashmir dispute back on the world stage given India s hostility to the project. However, CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute or panacea for Pakistan s internal economic development. Start thinking of CPEC in terms of CPEC-Plus wherein social sector development, especially Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) about provision of quality education is prioritised, he commended. He also emphasised leveraging the strength of Pakistan s diaspora in the Middle East, Europe and US which now has considerable political traction, in order to reap huge dividends for the country on critical political and economic issues. Dr Liu Zongyi, Research Fellow from the Institute for World Economic Studies and Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIR), China was of the view that even though the BRI has stimulated South Asian regional connectivity. < https://pakobserver.net/regional-coop-stressed-between-south-asian-countries/>

3. BRI offers common economic development for entire region: speakers BY MIAN ABRAR, (LAST UPDATED DECEMBER 12, 2018) Regional cooperation necessary to face common challenges in South Asia ISLAMABAD: Speakers at a conference unanimously said on Wednesday that China s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offers a vision of common economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Apart from the traditional security threats, the South Asian countries face multiple common challenges in the realm of non-traditional security and it is imperative that regional cooperation be sought to address such collective concerns like rising poverty, food insecurity, water shortages, illicit trafficking, poor human development indices, etc. in the domain of social sector and human resource development, said speakers from Pakistan, China, Russia and the US on the final day of the international conference titled Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers, organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI) on Wednesday. Pakistan should, therefore, focus on strengthening its economy through structural reforms and robust trade regimes, they said, adding that bilateral transit trade agreements and SAARC s agenda should be promoted so that regional trade volume could be enhanced. Emphasis should be placed on diplomatic means, political dialogues and negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels to amicably settle inter-state disputes, they emphasised. Pakistan s recent peace overtures towards both Afghanistan and India are unfortunately not being reciprocated, they lamented, adding that the existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding

issues of critical nature. Global powers should play a proactive role in bridging the divide between disputants by facilitating political engagements between South Asian countries, they underscored, adding that BRI offers a vision of common economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Rather than attempting to sink this economic initiative in controversy, it should be seen as a means for mutual economic prosperity and development, they recommended. They also called for Pakistan and the US to rationalise their expectations from each other in terms of their objectives in the region and common concerns. The US and Pakistan must move from transactional to a principle-based relationship, they insisted. In his speech, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) President Sardar Masood Khan urged Pakistan not to change, abandon nor alter its stance on Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK) and called on the government to develop a holistic and clear national security paradigm and national security strategy which is shared with all stakeholders. Sharing the situation in IOK, he said that India had abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants was being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that till the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. President Khan also emphasised that CPEC has helped bring the Kashmir dispute back on the world stage given India s hostility to the project. However, he said, CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute or panacea for Pakistan s internal economic development. Start thinking of CPEC in terms of CPEC-Plus wherein social sector development, especially Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) about the provision of quality education is prioritized, he said. He also emphasised leveraging the strength of Pakistan s diaspora in the Middle East, Europe and US which now has considerable political traction, in order to reap huge dividends for the country on critical political and economic issues. Discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of the US, University of Tennessee s Howard H Baker Jr Centre for Public Policy Research Fellow Harrison Akins said that earlier Pakistan- US pragmatic relationship rose and fell according to the saliency of American security interests in the region but now voices within policy debates are the politically appointed Trump loyalists without the input from foreign policy professionals, diminishing the effect of the foreign service bureaucracy to serve as a check on the actions of the presidency. Research Fellow Dr Liu Zongyi from the Institute for World Economic Studies and Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIR), China, was of the view that even though the BRI has stimulated South Asian regional connectivity, India has adopted opposing, delaying and hedging measures towards different parts of the BRI. Discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of Russia, Leonid Savin, founder and chief editor of Journal of Eurasian Affairs, Russia, argued that since Pakistan has taken a position of sovereignty and denied its critics in Washington, it has aroused considerable interest from Russia as an emergent power. South Asian Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI) Director General Dr Maria Sultan said that all trends indicate that the Indian Ocean will not only become the centre of economic development, but also a region of great power rivalry along with other extra-regional actors desiring to

dominate the region s maritime sea routes as economic interests to dominate the security projections for this region. Concluding the two-day conference, IPRI Acting President Brig (r) Mohammad Mehboob Qadir thanked AJK President Sardar Masood Khan, speakers from various countries, participants and the media for an interactive and productive event. <https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/12/12/bri-offers-common-economic-development-forentire-region-speakers/>

4. South Asian countries faced with poverty, food insecurity, water shortage * Scholars say existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding issues of critical nature Staff Report DECEMBER 13, 2018 ISLAMABAD: Apart from traditional security threats, South Asian countries face multiple common challenges in the realm of non-traditional security and it is imperative that regional cooperation be sought to address such collective concerns like rising poverty, food insecurity, water shortages, illicit trafficking, poor human development indices etc, in the domain of social sector and human resource development, speakers from Pakistan, China, Russia and the United States speaking on the final day of the international conference Conflict & Cooperation in South Asia Role of Major Powers organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute on Wednesday. Pakistan should, therefore, focus on strengthening its economy through structural reforms and robust trade regimes, they said, adding that bilateral transit trade agreements and South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation s agenda should be promoted so that regional trade volume could be enhanced. Emphasis should be placed on diplomatic means, political dialogues and negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels to amicably settle inter-state disputes, they emphasised. Pakistan s recent peace overtures towards both Afghanistan and India are unfortunately not being reciprocated, they lamented, adding that the existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding issues of critical nature. Global powers should play a proactive role in bridging the divide between disputants by facilitating political engagements between South Asian countries, they underscored, adding that China s Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) offers a vision of common

economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Rather than attempting to sink this economic initiative in controversy, it should be seen as a means for mutual economic prosperity and development, they recommended. They also called for Pakistan and the US to rationalise their expectations from each other in terms of their objectives in the region and common concerns. The US and Pakistan must move from transactional to principle based relationship. In his speech, Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) President Sardar Masood Khan urged Pakistan not to change, abandon nor alter its stance on Indian-Held Kashmir (IHK) and called on the government to develop a holistic policy and clear national security paradigm and national security strategy which is shared with all stakeholders. Sharing the situation in IHK, he said that India had abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants was being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that until the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. AJK President Sardar Masood Khan also emphasised that the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has helped bring the Kashmir dispute back on world stage given India s hostility to the project. However, CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute or panacea for Pakistan s internal economic development. Start thinking of CPEC in terms of CPEC-Plus wherein social sector development, especially Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals about provision of quality education is prioritised, he commended. He also emphasised leveraging the strength of Pakistan s diaspora in the Middle East, Europe and US which now has considerable political traction, in order to reap huge dividends for the country on critical political and economic issues. Shanghai Institute for International Studies Asia Pacific Centre s Dr Liu Zongyi was of the opinion that even though the BRI has stimulated South Asian regional connectivity, India has adopted opposing, delaying and hedging measures towards different parts of the BRI. India opposes CPEC and delays the Bangladesh China India Myanmar (BCIM) Forum for Regional Cooperation and puts forward the Bangladesh Bhutan India Nepal, Initiative and Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation has raised Project Mausam, Cotton Route, Spice Route, or Sagar Mala projects and upgraded the Look East policy to Act East policy, to hedge the 21st Century MSR, he said. According to Dr Liu Zongyi, India has been giving precedence of geopolitics over geo-economic cooperation. Indian hedging strategy towards the BRI has very strong military and strategic implications. They want to use so-called values, norms, international law, rules and standards to contain BRI. Indian and Western mass media has waged a war on BRI, he stressed. Discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of Russia, Journal of Eurasian Affairs Chief Editor & Founder Leonid Savin argued that since Pakistan has taken a position of sovereignty and denied its critics in Washington, it has aroused considerable interest from Russia as an emergent power. Published in Daily Times, December 13th 2018. <https://dailytimes.com.pk/332985/south-asian-countries-faced-with-poverty-food-insecuritywater-shortage/>

1. NEWS AGENCY

<https://bit.ly/2rdglyv>

2. Two-Day International Conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers Posted By: Sabah News on: December 12, 2018 In: National Islamabad, 12 December (SABAH): Apart from the traditional security threats, the South Asian countries face multiple common challenges in the realm of non-traditional security. It is imperative that regional cooperation be sought to address such collective concerns like rising poverty, food insecurity, water shortages, illicit trafficking, poor human development indices etc., in the domain of social sector and human resource development. Pakistan should, therefore, focus on strengthening its economy through structural reforms and robust trade regimes. Bilateral transit trade agreements and SAARC s agenda should be promoted so that regional trade volume could be enhanced. Emphasis should be placed on diplomatic means, political dialogues and negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels to amicably settle inter-state disputes. Pakistan s recent peace overtures towards both Afghanistan and India are unfortunately not being reciprocated. The existing political and security paradigm demands that countries must resume dialogue and open communication channels regarding issues of critical nature. Global powers should play a

proactive role in bridging the divide between disputants by facilitating political engagements between South Asian countries. China s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offers a vision of common economic development for the entire South Asian region, which may eventually lead to common security architecture. Rather than attempting to sink this economic initiative in controversy, it should be seen as a means for mutual economic prosperity and development. Pakistan and the US must rationalise their expectations from each other in terms of their objectives in the region and common concerns. The US and Pakistan must move from transactional to principle based relationship. These were some of the policy recommendations put forward by speakers from Pakistan, China, Russia and the US speaking on the final day of the international conference Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute, here in Islamabad today. In his keynote speech, Chief Guest H.E. Mr Sardar Masood Khan, President Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJ&K) urged Pakistan not to change, abandon nor alter its stance on Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK), and called on the government to develop a holistic and clear national security paradigm and national security strategy which is shared with all stakeholders. Sharing the situation in IOK, he said that India had abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution; and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants was being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that till the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. President Khan also emphasised that CPEC has helped bring the Kashmir dispute back on the world stage given India s hostility to the project. However, CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute or panacea for Pakistan s internal economic development. Start thinking of CPEC in terms of CPEC-Plus wherein social sector development, especially Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) about provision of quality education is prioritised, he commended. He also emphasised leveraging the strength of Pakistan s diaspora in the Middle East, Europe and US which now has considerable political traction, in order to reap huge dividends for the country on critical political and economic issues. Earlier in the day, discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of the US, Mr Harrison Akins, Research Fellow, University of Tennessee s Howard H. Baker Jr., Center for Public Policy, US, while earlier, Pakistan-US pragmatic relationship rose and fell according to the saliency of American security interests in the region, now voices within policy debates are the politically appointed Trump loyalists without the input from foreign policy professionals, diminishing the effect of the foreign service bureaucracy to serve as a check on the actions of the presidency. Without the input of foreign policy professionals, it appears that the Trump administration has difficulty in fully understanding the foreign policy implications of his actions, such as connecting his bullying rhetoric and policies toward Pakistan with his increase of troop presence in Afghanistan, with the strong relationship with Pakistan a key part of any Afghan strategy of the United States. Mr Akins also explained that foreign policy under the Trump administration is not shielded from the vicissitudes and demands of domestic politics. Foreign policy has become another battleground for Trump s electoral politics with his actions reflecting what s best for his administration rather than achieving the strategic interests of the US, he concluded.

Dr Liu Zongyi, Research Fellow from the Institute for World Economic Studies and Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIR), China was of the view that even though the BRI has stimulated South Asian regional connectivity, India has adopted opposing, delaying and hedging measures towards different parts of the BRI. India opposes CPEC and delays BCIM and puts forward BBIN and BIMSTEC, has raised Project Mausam, Cotton Route, Spice Route, or Sagar Mala projects, and upgraded the Look East policy to Act East policy, to hedge the 21st Century MSR, he said. According to Dr Zongyi, India has been giving precedence of geopolitics over geoeconomic cooperation. Indian hedging strategy toward the BRI has very strong military and strategic implications. They want to use so-called values, norms, international law, rules and standards to contain BRI. Indian and Western mass media has waged a war on BRI, he stressed. Discussing geopolitics of South Asia and interests of Russia, Mr Leonid Savin, Founder and Chief Editor of Journal of Eurasian Affairs, Russia, argued that since Pakistan has taken a position of sovereignty and denied its critics in Washington, it has aroused considerable interest from Russia as an emergent power. This window of opportunity can be favourably used by two parties. In light of the irresponsible behaviour of the US (and their satellites) on the world stage, the implementation of joint Russian-Pakistani projects, including military cooperation, will help strengthen security in Eurasia in the interests of all participants, he opined. Mr Savin pointed out that there is great interest on the part of Moscow in intellectual cooperation. Russia needs semantic filling of this concept that is not possible without the active participation of the outside scientific and expert community of South Asian countries. Dr Maria Sultan, Director General, South Asian Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI), Pakistan opined that all trends indicate that the Indian Ocean will not only become the centre of economic development, but also a region of great power rivalry along with other extra regional actors desire to dominate the region s maritime sea routes as economic interests will dominate the security projections for this region, making IOR the most securitized ocean in the world. Dr Sultan highlighted that the Gwadar Port, with 400 mnt current capacity and potential to reach 800 mnt, will make Pakistan one of the world s most critical interconnecting maritime routes in the world opening up a whole new world of opportunities and progress for the country and region. In the session From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics chaired by Ambassador (R) Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, Director General, Institute for Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI), Pakistan, Dr Huma Baqai, Associate Dean, Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, Institute of Business Administration, Pakistan discussed that the winds of emerging global trends are in flux, swaying more eastwards than before. Relative wealth and economic power continues to shift favourably from the West towards the East, she said. However, she was of the opinion that geopolitics will continue to remain in South Asia and other parts of the world with its core ingredients space, territory, territoriality, and power. Commercialisation can do wonders if connected with geopolitics of the region as a whole, factoring in China s mutual respect and win-win cooperation paradigm, she recommended. Outlining his views about moving from conflict management to conflict resolution for India and Pakistan, Dr Naeem Ahmed, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations,

University of Karachi, Pakistan urged that conflict resolution is vital because continued brinksmanship may lead to full-fledged war between India and Pakistan due to the changing nature of the Kashmiri movement after the death of Burhan Wani; and the growing menace of terrorism. In her paper on Sino-US geo-political competition and implications for Pakistan, Dr Sarwat Rauf, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Pakistan urged that internally, Pakistan should focus on its economic development, especially industrial development. Externally, Pakistan should continue to strengthen its relations with China, and find solutions of the existing irritants in relations with Iran and Afghanistan since mistrust is hindering the region s progress. Concluding the two day conference, Brig (R) Mohammad Mehboob Qadir, Acting President, IPRI thanked the President AJK H.E. Sardar Masood Khan, speakers from various countries, participants and the media for an interactive and productive event. <http://www.sabahnews.net/140605>

3. CPEC should be treated as catalyst for Pak's internal economic development: Masood December 12, 2018 Azad Jammu and Kashmir President Sardar Masood Khan says China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has brought Kashmir dispute back on the world stage given India's hostility to the project. He was addressing International Conference on "Conflict and Cooperation in South Asia: Role of Major Powers" in Islamabad on Wednesday. The AJK President said CPEC should be treated as a catalyst and not as a substitute for Pakistan's internal economic development. Sharing the situation in occupied Kashmir, Sardar Masood Khan said India has abandoned all principles of proportionality and precaution and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants is being flagrantly violated. He cautioned that till the general elections in India, no peace overtures are likely to be considered. <http://www.radio.gov.pk/12-12-2018/cpec-should-be-treated-as-catalyst-for-paks-internaleconomic-development-masood>