Christian List. 177 Mission Impossible, DPhil-thesis, University of Oxford BIBLIOGRAPHY

Similar documents
The Social Choice Theory: Can it be considered a Complete Political Theory?

JERRY S. KELLY Distinguished Professor of Economics

David Donaldson. Curriculum Vitae. December 8, Name: David John Donaldson. Address: 4408 West 15 th Avenue Vancouver BC V6R 3B2 Canada

Debating Deliberative Democracy

Any non-welfarist method of policy assessment violates the Pareto principle: A comment

Brown University Economics 2160 Risk, Uncertainty and Information Fall 2008 Professor: Roberto Serrano. General References

Principles of Distributive Justice

Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Response to Aldred

Ph.D. in Philosophy, University of Cambridge. Degree awarded December, 1976.

Obscenity and Community Standards: A Social Choice Approach

Bibliography. Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover Downloaded from Elgar Online at 04/08/ :15:39PM via free access

S E N, A M A R T Y A K.

Curriculum Vitae. Research Interests: Microeconomic theory, individual and social choice theory, welfare economics bargaining theory

Lecture 12: Topics in Voting Theory

Deliberation and Agreement Christian List 1

Vote budgets and Dodgson s method of marks

On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods I: The Nonobviousness of Majority Rule

Princeton University Press

On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods II: Alternatives to Majority Rule. November 2008 RWP08-065

When Two Worlds Collide: Rational Choice Insights into Deliberative Democratic Theory A Q investigation into framing and team-reasoning

Safe Votes, Sincere Votes, and Strategizing

CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON

HANDBOOK OF SOCIAL CHOICE AND VOTING Jac C. Heckelman and Nicholas R. Miller, editors.

On Sen s Liberal Paradox and its Reception within Political Theory and Welfare Economics

Computational Social Choice: Spring 2007

On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods II: Alternatives to Majority Rule

HARVARD JOHN M. OLIN CENTER FOR LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS

Journal of Theoretical Politics. A welfarist critique of social choice theory. Journal: Journal of Theoretical Politics

On the Philosophy of Group Decision Methods I: The Non-Obviousness of Majority Rule. November 2008 RWP08-064

Philosophy 267 Fall, 2010 Professor Richard Arneson Introductory Handout revised 11/09 Texts: Course requirements: Week 1. September 28.

GVPT Spring 1994 FORMAL THEORIES OF POLITICS II Tydings 0102 or WH 1127; Weds 2:30-6:15pm

Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity?

WELFARE ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY, 2ND EDITION

Democratic Rules in Context

AGGREGATION OF PREFERENCES AND THE STRUCTURE OF DECISIVE SETS. Donald J. Brown. October 2016 COWLES FOUNDATION DISCUSSION PAPER NO.

encyclopedia of social theory

BA 513/STA 234: Ph.D. Seminar on Choice Theory Professor Robert Nau Spring Semester 2008

DOWNLOAD PDF EFFECTIVITY FUNCTIONS IN SOCIAL CHOICE

Social Choice Theory Christian List

Democratic Theory 1 Trevor Latimer Office Hours: TBA Contact Info: Goals & Objectives. Office Hours. Midterm Course Evaluation

The Veil of Ignorance in Rawlsian Theory

DEGREES IN HIGHER EDUCATION M.A.,

A New Proposal on Special Majority Voting 1 Christian List

JOHN CHARLES HARSANYI. by John A. Weymark. Working Paper No. 06-W07. March 2006 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY NASHVILLE, TN 37235

Social Welfare, Individual Well-being and Opportunity Sets

The Arrow Impossibility Theorem: Where Do We Go From Here?

The Process of Electing a President

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

A New Method of the Single Transferable Vote and its Axiomatic Justification

Game-Theoretic Remarks on Gibbard's Libertarian Social Choice Functions

A defense of the ex-post evaluation of risk

Economic philosophy of Amartya Sen Social choice as public reasoning and the capability approach. Reiko Gotoh

Capabilities vs. Opportunities for Well-being. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia

Voting System: elections

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

Topics on the Border of Economics and Computation December 18, Lecture 8

Social Choice Theory. Denis Bouyssou CNRS LAMSADE

From Participation to Deliberation

[UPDATED DECEMBER 2015] University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Sesquicentenary Fellow in Government and International Relations,

The Myth of the Condorcet Winner

A Conditional Defense of Plurality Rule: Generalizing May s Theorem in a Restricted Informational Environment 1

Deliberation on Long-term Care for Senior Citizens:

[UPDATED JULY 2017] University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Sesquicentenary Fellow in Government and International Relations,

Chapter 4: Voting and Social Choice.

Learning Democratic Communication through Deliberative Polling

Complementarity of Resource and Capability: Economic. Philosophical Discussions about Distribution Rule in Global

Karen Long Jusko. 25 February, 2018

MATHEMATICAL MODELS: RATIONAL CHOICE THEORIES OF POLITICS & SOCIETY

A Framework for the Quantitative Evaluation of Voting Rules

The Borda count in n-dimensional issue space*

Keywords and Phrases: Sen s Theorem, externalities, paradoxes, Prisoner s Dilemma, game theory

CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A

Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence

Social choice theory

This is a post-print version of the following article: Journal information: hamburg review of social sciences (hrss), Vol. 4, Issue 3 (May 2010)

STEVEN WALL. Associate Professor. Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut (2008 to 2010)

c 2014 by Anna V. Popova. All rights reserved.

KEITH DOUGHERTY. Office Department of Political Science updated 1/1/17 University of Georgia (706)

Democratic Legitimacy

GENEVIEVE ROUSSELIERE

List of Figures. 5.1 Saari Triangle of the 33-Voter Profile 52

Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

Equality, Efficiency, and the Priority of the Worse Off. Peter Vallentyne. Economics and Philosophy 16 (2000): 1-19

Trump, Condorcet and Borda: Voting paradoxes in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries

The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended Reasons, Rightness and Equal Political Autonomy

William Riker s Liberalism Against Populism. CMSS seminar, Tuesday 15 October

Cynthia Farrar, James S. Fishkin, Donald P. Green, Christian List,

Karen Long Jusko. September 12, 2018

SHAPLEY VALUE 1. Sergiu Hart 2

Economic Analysis, Moral. Philosophy, and Public Policy. Third Edition. Edited by. DANIEL HAUSMAN Universitär of Wisconsin-Madison

History of Social Choice and Welfare Economics

Justice as fairness The social contract

(10/06) Thomas Marschak. Education:

1.6 Arrow s Impossibility Theorem

Introduction to Theory of Voting. Chapter 2 of Computational Social Choice by William Zwicker

Assessing Alternative Voting Procedures

Karen Long Jusko. Encina Hall West, Room 441, 616 Serra St., Stanford CA (650)

Democracy Political Science 200B Winter Quarter 2005

Arrow s Impossibility Theorem on Social Choice Systems

On Equality, Social Choice Theory, and Normative Economics

Transcription:

177 BIBLIOGRAPHY Anscombe, G. E. M. (1976) "On Frustration of the Majority by Fulfillment of the Majority's Will," Analysis 36(4), 161-168. Arrow, K. (1951/1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley. d'aspremont, C. (1985) "Axioms for social welfare orderings," in Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D., and Sonnenschein, H. (eds.) Social Goals and Social Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19-76. d'aspremont, C., and Gevers, L. (1977) "Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice," Review of Economic Studies 44, 199-209. Batra, R., and Pattanaik, P. K. (1972) "Transitive Multi-Stage Majority Decisions with Quasi- Transitive Individual Preferences," Econometrica 40(6), 1121-1135. Black, D. (1948) "On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making," Journal of Political Economy 56, 23-34. Black, D. (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Blackorby, C., and Donaldson, D. (1982) "Ratio-Scale and Translation-Scale Full Interpersonal Comparability without Domain Restrictions: Admissible Social-Evaluation Functions," International Economic Review 23(2), 249-268. Blackorby, C., and Donaldson, D. (1987) "Welfare Ratios and Distributionally Sensitive Cost- Benefit Analysis," Journal of Public Economics 34, 265-290. Blair, D. H. (1988) "The Primary-Goods Indexation Problem in Rawls's 'Theory of Justice'," Theory and Decision 24, 239-252. Bossert, W., and Weymark, J. (1996), "Utility in social choice," forthcoming in Barberà, S., Hammond, P. J., and Seidel, C. (eds.) Handbook of Utility Theory, Volume 2, Boston: Kluwer. Brennan, G. (2000), "Collective Coherence and Belief," International Review of Law and Economics, forthcoming. Budge, I., Robertson, D. and Hearl, D. (eds.) (1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapman, B. (1998) "More Easily Done than Said: Rules, Reason and Rational Social Choice," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18, 293-329. Davidson, D. (1974) "Belief and the Basis of Meaning," Synthese 27, 309-323. Davidson, D. (1986) "Judging interpersonal interests", in Elster, J., and Hylland, A. (eds.) Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

178 Dryzek, J., and List, C. (2000) "Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation", Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, September 2000. Elster, J. (1986) "The Market and the Forum," in Elster, J., and Hylland, A. (eds.) Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fishburn, P. C. (1971) "The Theory of Representative Majority Decision," Econometrica 39(2), 273-284. Fishkin, J. S. (1997) The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven/London: Yale University Press. Fishkin, J. S., and Luskin, R. C. (1999) "Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue," in McCombs, M., and Reynolds, A. (eds.) The Poll With a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence E. Erlbaum Associates. Gehrlein, W. (1983) "Condorcet s Paradox," Theory and Decision 15, 161-197. Gehrlein, W. (2000) "Social Homogeneity and Condorcet Winners: A Weak Connection," paper presented at the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society, Charleston, South Carolina, March 2000. Gevers, L. (1979) "On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings," Econometrica 47, 75-89. Gibbard, A. (1973) "Manipulability of Voting Schemes: A General Result," Econometrica 41, 587-601. Gibbard, A. (1979) "Disparate Goods and Rawls' Difference Principle: A Social Choice Theoretic Treatment," Theory and Decision 11, 267-288. Gibbard, A., Hylland, A., and Weymark, J. (1987) "Arrow's theorem with a fixed feasible alternative," Social Choice and Welfare 4, 105-115. Gibson, R. (1986) "Translation, Physics, and Facts of the Matter," in Hahn, L. E., and Schilpp, P. A. (eds.) The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court. Guha, A. S. (1972) "Neutrality, Monotonicity, and the Right of Veto," Econometrica 40, 821-826. Hammond, P. J. (1976) "Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle," Econometrica 44, 793-804. Harsanyi, J. (1955) "Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility," Journal of Political Economy 63, 309-321. Hausman, D. (1995) "The Impossibility of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons," Mind 104, 473-490.

179 Inada, K. (1964) "A Note on the Simple Majority Decision Rule," Econometrica 32, 525-531. Jevons, S. (1911) The Theory of Political Economy (4th ed.), London: Macmillan. Kelly, J. S. (1989) "The Ostrogorski Paradox," Social Choice and Welfare 6, 71-76. Kelsey, D. (1987) "The role of information in social welfare judgements," Oxford Economic Papers 39, 301-317. Khmelnitskaya, A. B. (1999) "Social Welfare Orderings for Different Subgroup Utility Scales," Discussion Paper #198, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Khmelnitskaya, A. B., and Weymark J. A. (2000) "Social choice with independent subgroup utility scales," Social Choice and Welfare 17, 739-748. Kornhauser, L. A., and Sager, L. G. (1986) "Unpacking the Court," Yale Law Journal 82. Kornhauser, L. A., and Sager, L. G. (1993) "The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts," California Law Review 81, 1-59. Laakso, M., and Taagepera, R. (1979) "'Effective' Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe," Comparative Political Studies 12(1), 3-27. List, C. (1998) Measurability, Comparability and Social Choice, MPhil-thesis, University of Oxford. List, C. (1999) "Craig's Theorem and the Empirical Underdetermination Thesis Reassessed," Disputatio 7, 28-39. List, C., and Goodin, R. E. (2001) "Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem," Journal of Political Philosophy, forthcoming. List, C., McLean, I., Fishkin, J., and Luskin, R. (2000) "Can Deliberation Induce Greater Preference Structuration? Evidence from Deliberative Opinion Polls", Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, September 2000. List, C., and Pettit, P. (2000) "The Aggregation of Reason: An Impossibility Result and Its Implications," ANU Working Papers in Social and Political Theory, Australian National University, Canberra. Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., McAllister, I., Higley, J., and Ryan, P. (2000) "Information Effects in Referendum Voting: Evidence from the Australian Deliberative Poll," paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Consortium for Political Research, Copenhagen, April 2000. Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., Plane, D. L. (1999) "Deliberative Polling and Policy Outcomes: Electric Utility Issues in Texas," paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 1999. Mackie, Gerry (2000) The Coherence of Democracy, unpublished manuscript, St. John's College,

180 Oxford. Maskin, E. (1978) "A Theorem on Utilitarianism," Review of Economic Studies 45, 93-96. McLean, I. (2001) "Rikerian Heresthetic: An Application to Two Constitutional Moments in British Political History," paper presented at the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Antonio, TX, March 2001. Miller, D. (1992) "Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice," Political Studies 40 (special issue), 54-67. Miller, N. (2000) "The Geometry of Voting Cycles: Theoretical Developments," paper presented at the Workshop on Mathematical Models of Individual and Public Choice, Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, July 2000. Mueller, D. (1989) Public Choice II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Naumova, N. (1998) "Nash social welfare orderings with lexicographic comparisons," unpublished manuscript, St. Petersburg State University. von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Niemi, R. G. (1969) "Majority Decision-Making with Partial Unidimensionality," American Political Science Review 63, 488-497. Niemi, R. G., and Wright, J. R. (1987) "Voting Cycles and the Structure of Individual Preferences," Social Choice and Welfare 4 (3), 173-183. Nussbaum, M. (1992) "Human Functionings and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism," Political Theory 20, 202-246. Pettit, P. (2001) "Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma," Philosophical Issues 11. Plott, C. R. (1978) "Rawls's theory of justice: An Impossibility result," in Gottinger, H. W., and Leinfellner, W. (eds.): Decision Theory and Social Ethics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 201-214. Plott, C. R., Little, J. T., and Parks, R. P. (1975) "Individual choice when objects have 'ordinal' values," Review of Economic Studies 42, 403-413. Quine, W. V. (1960) Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Quine, W. V. (1970) "On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation," Journal of Philosophy 67, 178-183. Rae, D. W., and Taylor, M. (1970) The Analysis of Political Cleavages, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1982) "Social Unity and Primary Goods," in Sen, A. K., and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

181 Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press. Riker, W. H. (1982) Liberalism Against Populism, San Franscisco: W. H. Freeman. Robbins, L. (1932) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan. Roberts, K. W. S. (1980a) "Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory," Review of Economic Studies 47(2), 421-439. Roberts, K. W. S. (1980b) "Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels," Review of Economic Studies, 47, 409-420 Roberts, K. W. S. (1995) "Valued Opinions or Opinionated Values: The Double Aggregation Problem, in Basu, K., Pattanaik, P. K.,and Suzumura, K. (eds.) Choice, Welfare and Development: A Festschrift in Honour of Amartya Sen, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141-165. Roemer, J. E. (1996) Theories of Distributive Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Saari, D. G. (1998) "Connecting and resolving Sen's and Arrow's theorems," Social Choice and Welfare 15, 239-261. Satterthwaite, M. (1975) "Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions," Journal of Economic Theory 10, 187-217. Sen, A. K. (1966) "A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions," Econometrica 34, 1966, 491-499, reprinted in Sen, A. K. (1982) Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford: Blackwell. Sen, A. K. (1970/1979) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Franscisco: Holden-Day (1970), Amsterdam: North Holland (1979). Sen, A. K. (1980/81) "Plural utility," Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, 193-215. Sen, A. K. (1982) Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Sen, A. K. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Sen, A. K. (1987) The Standard of Living, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sen, A. K. (1991) "On Indexing Primary Goods and Capabilities," mimeographed, Harvard University. Sen, A. K. (1992) Inequality Reexamined, Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press. Sen, A. K. (1997) On Economic Inequality (expanded ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

182 Sunstein, C. R. (2000) "The Law of Group Polarization," paper presented at the conference Deliberating about Deliberative Democracy, University of Texas at Austin, February 2000. Taagepera, R., and Grofman, B. (1981) "Effective Size and Number of Components," Sociological Methods & Research 10 (1), 63-81. Tangian, A. S. (2000) "Unlikelihood of Condorcet's paradox in a large society," Social Choice and Welfare 17, 337-365. Tsui, K.-Y., and Weymark, J. A. (1997) "Social welfare orderings for ratio-scale measurable utilities," Economic Theory 10, 241-256. Tullock, G., and Campbell, C. D. (1970) "Computer Simulation of a Small Voting System," Economics Journal 80, 97-104. Tungodden, B. (1998) "Social Choices with Independent Norm Levels," Discussion Paper No. 2/98, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Waldner, I. (1972) "The Empirical Meaningfulness of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons," Journal of Philosophy 69, 87-103. Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice, New York: Basic Books. Ward, B. (1965) "Majority Voting and Alternative Forms of Public Enterprises," in Margolis, J. (ed.) The Public Economy of Urban Communities, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. Yanovskaya, E. B. (1998) "Nash social choice orderings," unpublished manuscript, St. Petersburg Institute of Economics and Mathematics.