SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Similar documents
DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO. Defendants. 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on January 23,2008, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 72 of the

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

DAVID GENTRY, JAMES PARKER, MARK MID LAM, JAMES BASS, and CALGUNS SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

i J ;o COURT JOZ I1 F F FREJ 0 C 98ADEPUTY RO1CECGO SJK. cm SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. SECOND APPELLATE DISTRlCT, DIVISION TWO. Petitioners and Appellants, Respondent and Appellee,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

RIiD 51 PX. Fairfax, Virginia (703) [CONVENIENCE OF DEFENDANTS EMPLOYEES AS WITNESSES]

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

Case 2:15-cr SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 61 Page ID #:2023

In the Supreme Court of the State of California

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Case 5:08-cv RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff,

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON IMPACT OF CITY'S AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE AT ISSUE IN PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Judge CASE. Civil Action PETITION FOR RELIEF IN DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California tel fax

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

)

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petition for Relief Packet

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

Request for Publication

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

a. Name of person served:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants. General of the State of California, hereby alleges as follows:

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Transcription:

EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California 2 CHRISTOPHER E. KRUEGER Senior Assistant Attorney General 3 STEPHEN P. ACQUISTO Supervising Deputy Attorney General 4 MARK R. BECKINGTON, State Bar No. 6009 Deputy Attorney General 5 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 6 Telephone: (213) 897-96 Fax: (213) 897-71 7 E-mail: Mark.Beckington@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO 13 EDWARD W. HUNT, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Fresno County, and in his 14 personal capacity as a citizen and taxpayer, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. Case No. 01CECG03182 DEFENDANTS' EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION AND EXPERT WITNESS DECLARA TION [Cal. Civ. Proc., 34.260] 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 18 Defendants. 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 Pursuant to Code of Civil Procydure section 34.260, Defendants State of California, et. 23 ai., hereby designate the persons whose oral or deposition testimony in the fonn of an expert 24 opinion Defendants expect to offer in evidence at the trial in this action. 25 The name and address of each person whose expeli opinion is expected to be offered in 26 evidence at trial are: 27 1. Ignatius Chinn, Special Agent Supervisor, Bureau of Firearms, California Department of 28 Justice, clo Mark R. Beckington, Deputy Attorney General, California Depmiment of Justice, 1 \ J

1 300 S. Spring St., Los Angeles, CA 90013. 2 2. Cris Abad, Special Agent Supervisor, Bureau offireans, Califomia Department of 3 Justice, c/o Mark R. Beckington, Deputy Attomey General, California Department of Justice, 4 300 S. Spring St., Los Angeles, CA 90013. 5 Defendants reserve the right to call any experts designated by Plaintiffs as may be necessary 6 at the time of trial. Defendants fmiher reserve the right to call any additional expeli witness as 7 may be required to rebut or refute testimony or any other evidence given on behalf of any other 8 paiiy or to testify conceming evidence developed or discovered between this date and the date of 9 tria1. Dated: January 17, 08 13 14 15 16 17 18 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attomey General of the Stat~ of Califomia CHRISTOPHER E. KRUEGER Senior Assistant Attomey General ST;;HEN P. ACQUIS;rO f! ;D::lpu/tz~r:- drk R. BECKINGTON Deputy Attomey General Attomeys for Defendants Ii 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 DECLARATION OF MARK R. BECKINGTON 2 I, Mark R. Beckington, declare as follows: 3 1. I am an attomey duly licensed to practice before all courts of the State of Califomia and 4 am a Deputy Attorney General with the Office of the Attorney General, Califomia Department of 5 Justice, counsel ofrecord for the Defendants herein. I make this declaration as required by Code 6 of Civil Procedure section 34.260. 7 2. In the Expeli Witness Designation, Defendants list Ignatius Chinn and Cris Abad as 8 expeli witnesses whose testimony Defendants intend to offer at trial, either orally or by 9 deposition testimony. 3. I am infonned and believe that Mr. ChilU1 and Mr. Abad are Special Agent Supervisors employed by the Depmiment of Justice, Bureau offireanns, and have expertise and knowledge conceming the identification of assault weapons under the California Assault Weapons Control 13 Act, Penal Code section 275, et. seq. 14 4. The testimony of Mr. Chinn and Mr. Abad is expected to include testimony conceming 15 the Assault Weapons Control Act, flash suppressors, and "pennanently altered" feeding devices. 16 5. Mr. Chinn and Mr. Abad have agreed to testify at trial in this action. 17 6. I am infonned and believe that Mr. ChilU1 and Mr. Abad will be sufficiently familiar with 18 the pending action to submit to a meaningful oral deposition of the testimony that will be offered at trial, including any opinion and its basis. \ \ \ \ 21 \ \ \ \ 22 \ \ \ \ 23 \\\\ 24 \ \ \ \ 25 \ \ \ \ 26 \ \ \ \ 27 \\\\ 28 \ \ \ \,., J

7. As employees of the State of Califomia, Mr. Chinn and Mr. Abad do not presently charge 2.an hourly or daily fee for providing deposition testimony and for consulting with the Defendants' 3 attomeys. This representation does not apply to any payments.or reimbursement required by 4 statute for depositions or testimony by state employees and peace officers. 5 I declare under penalty of peljury under the laws of the State of Califomia that the foregoing 6 is true and correct. 7 8 9 f/lw&/ /1 j, 1 Executed on January 17,08, at Los Angeles,./<lalifomi/1 /1 // ;1 /1. r f 7! / fa VL Jil/'0 A MARK R. BECKINGTON V 13 S0214978.wpd SA01CV1744 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL Case Name: Hunt, et al. v. State of California, et al. No.: 01CECG03182 I declare: I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On Janumy 17, 08, I served the attached DEFENDANTS' EXPERT WITNESS INFORMATION AND EXPERT WITNESS DECLARATION by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the internal mail collection system at the Office ofthe Attorney General at 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702, Los Angeles, CA 90013, addressed as follows: DonB. Kates Opposing Counsel BENENSON & KATES 22608 NOlih East 269 th Avenue Battleground, W A 98604 Telephone: (360) 666-2688 Facsimile: C.D. Michel Esq. Trutanich Michel, LLP TUYET T. TRAN BRUCE E. BARTRAM 180 E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 0 Long Beach, CA 90802 Telephone: (562) 216-4444 Facsimile: (562) 216-4445 Stephen P. Halbrook Law Offices of Stephen P. Halbrook 560 Main Street, Suite 404 Fairfax, VA 230 Telephone: (703) 352-7276 Facsimile: (703) 359-0938 I declare under penalty of peljuly under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on January 17,08, at Los Angeles, California. Betty Rodriguez Declarant I Signature ~ 502 I 5429.wpd