OVERNIGHT SENSATION GUERGIS EFFECT DISAPPEARS

Similar documents
CONSERVATIVES OPEN UP THEIR LEAD CANADIANS SAY THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN PARTY PLATFORMS THAN CANDIDATES OR

CANADIANS ENDORSE GOVERNMENT ACTION ON HAITI TORY VOTERS MORE SKEPTICAL ABOUT LOOSENING IMMIGRATION RULES

TORIES CLAW BACK SMALL LEAD DEFECTING UNIVERSITY EDUCATED VOTERS PROPEL GRITS INTO A MUCH MORE COMPETITIVE RACE

CONSERVATIVES PULLING AWAY FROM MORIBUND LIBERALS SOME NOTABLE CHANGES IN BROADER OUTLOOK

CANADIANS WANT MAJORITY GOVERNMENT

CONSERVATIVES EDGE INTO LEAD, LIBERALS SLUMP

TORIES ENJOY CLEAR BUT MODEST LEAD AS ELECTION LOOMS UNDERSTANDING WHERE VOTERS ARE COMING AND GOING

NOT SO FAST, MARK CARNEY

CANADIANS SUPPORT DECRIMINALIZATION OF MINOR POT

POTENTIAL TROUBLE BREWING FOR CONSERVATIVES AS CANADIANS ARE ACCEPTING THE COLVIN ACCOUNT BROAD DISSATISFACTION WITH FEDERAL TRANSPARENCY

LIBERALS RETAIN NARROW NATIONAL LEAD

Deadlock Broken, Liberals Surging: SENIORS MOVE BACK TO LIBERALS IN A BIG WAY

CONSERVATIVES SWING INTO LEAD IDEA OF COALITION GOVERNMENT REMAINS POPULAR EVERYWHERE OUTSIDE CONSERVATIVE

RACE NARROWING AGAIN: LIBERAL PARTY REBOUNDS, NOW TIED WITH CONSERVATIVES WHO ARE IN DANGER OF

ONTARIO PCS ENJOY CLEAR LEAD: ONTARIO LIBERALS IN 2 ND AND NDP WELL BACK IN 3 RD

POSITION AS UNHAPPINESS WITH DIRECTION OF COUNTRY OUTSTRIPS HAPPINESS

NDP FADING AT CRITICAL POINT IN OTHERWISE UNCLEAR ONTARIO POLITICAL LANDSCAPE WYNNE SHOWING SURPRISING RESILIENCE IN FACE OF CURRENT CHALLENGES

POLITICAL LANDSCAPE REMAINS DEADLOCKED: TAX PROPOSALS NOT HURTING GOVERNMENT, MAY WELL HELP

LANDSCAPE FROZEN AS WE ENTER ELECTION YEAR

CONSERVATIVES SLIDE SLIGHTLY: IS THE TERROR CARD LOSING FORCE?

EKOS PREDICTS PC MAJORITY: ORDERED POPULISM PLANTS A FLAG IN CANADA

ATTITUDES TO IMMIGRATION AND VISIBLE MINORITIES A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

LIBERALS PADDING LEAD IN ADVANCE OF DEBATES

THE RETURN OF IDEOLOGY? A STARKLY DIVIDED CANADA

EKOS/CBC Poll. The Federal Landscape and Liberal Leadership. January 19 th, 2003

LIBERALS WIDEN LEAD ON EVE OF THRONE SPEECH

IT IS NECK AND NECK AS WE HEAD INTO ELECTION YEAR

Military intervention vs. humanitarian aid

WISE CROWDS AND THE FUTURE

Attack of the Clones? Eerie Similarities with 04 Despite Volatility.

POLL EMBARGOED UNTIL 14TH NOVEMBER 2018, 6 AM EST. Canada - National UltraPoll 14th November 2018

Martin vs. Chrétien: Spectacle, Sympathy & Resilience

POLITICAL LANDSCAPE TURNING BLEAK FOR STEPHEN HARPER S CONSERVATIVES

Press Release. The Canadian Political Scene

NANOS. Liberals 35, Conservatives 34, NDP 20, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 33, NDP 19, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

At a glance. Ottawa: (613) x 237

SHIFTING POLITICAL PROSPECTS FOR STEPHEN HARPER: SHOULD HE STAY OR SHOULD HE GO?

NANOS. Liberals 38, Conservatives 35, NDP 17, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 35, Conservatives 33, NDP 22, Green 5 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 33, NDP 20, Green 5 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Gap between Liberals and Conservatives narrows to seven points in Nanos tracking

NANOS. Liberals 38, Conservatives 34, NDP 17, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 40, Conservatives 31, NDP 17, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 35, NDP 18, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Federal Liberals score highest on Nanos Party Power Index Trudeau and Harper trending up on qualities of a good leader (Released 08/27/2014)

Harper numerically surpasses Trudeau in weekly Nanos tracking for first time since early June (Released 07/16/2014)

STEPHEN HARPER PLUMBING RECORD LOWS ON TRUST, DIRECTION, AND APPROVAL FAR MORE CANADIANS BELIEVE DUFFY THAN HARPER

NANOS. Liberals 42, Conservatives 29, NDP 19, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

THE TRUST DEFICIT: WHAT DOES IT MEAN? BY FRANK GRAVES

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Liberals 41, Conservatives 31, NDP 15, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NDP maintains strong lead

Harper numerically surpasses Trudeau in preferred PM on Nanos tracking for first time in four months (Released 11/12/2014)

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Conservatives 35, Liberals 34, NDP 16, Green 8, People s 1 in latest Nanos federal tracking

MODEST LISTING IN WYNNE S SHIP SEEMS TO HAVE CORRECTED ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY SEEMS CHARTED FOR WIN

The 2011 Federal Election: Lessons Learned for Public Opinion Researchers

AN OVERVIEW OF THE CAMPAIGN AND A REASONED GUESS

Update on the Federal Political Landscape

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Liberals 39 Conservatives 28, NDP 20, Green 6, People s 1 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Liberals open up lead, Conservatives lag

Ideas powered by world-class data

Lessons from the 2015 Canadian Federal Election The Magic Wand that Wasn t: Banning the Niqab from Citizenship Ceremonies

A survey of 1,005 Canadians Conducted on February 23, 2011 Released: February 24,

A survey of 1,361 Canadians Conducted from December 3 to 6, 2010 Released: December 7,

EKOS 25 th Anniversary Poll. November 12,

PCs Lead in Ontario FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. MEDIA INQUIRIES: Lorne Bozinoff, President

Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels

Energy Politics: China, Nexen, and CNOOC

Poll Results: Electoral Reform & Political Cooperation

Supreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50%

General Election Opinion Poll. November 2017

NDP on track for majority government

NDP leads in first post-writ poll

Liberals With Half the Vote

Opposition to Syrian Airstrikes Surges

Canadians Divided on Assuming Non-Combat Role in Afghanistan

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2015, On Immigration Policy, Wider Partisan Divide Over Border Fence Than Path to Legal Status

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY FEBRUARY 17 at 6:00 a.m. ET

For Voters It s Still the Economy

CONSERVATIVES DOMINATE ENGLISH CANADA; DOGFIGHT IN QUEBEC

Wildrose Heading for a Bare Majority

PCs with solid lead on provincial Liberals

Politics: big yellow flag

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

GOP Seen as Principled, But Out of Touch and Too Extreme

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S., But Concerns Persist

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Divided over Increased Deportation of Unauthorized Immigrants

Historical unit prices - Super - Australian Shares

Still, the vast majority of Canadians 65% now say that they believe the Conservatives will win, regardless of their own voting intentions.

7 May Questions 1-16 released separately

Supreme Court Approval Rating Drops to 25-Year Low

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

the Poor and the Middle Class

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Growing Support for Campaign Against ISIS - and Possible Use of U.S.

One Term Wonder? The Chances for a Second Trudeau Government

The Essential Report. 30 August 2016 ESSENTIALMEDIA.COM.AU

NDP Leads Going Into the Final Week, but the Gap is Narrowing

President Election Poll

Transcription:

www.ekospolitics.ca OVERNIGHT SENSATION GUERGIS EFFECT DISAPPEARS [Ottawa April 22, 2010] - If the Liberals were briefly vaulted into a virtual tie with the Conservatives on the strength of public outrage over the Guergis affair, they have been restored to their previous position in a short week. We continue to see the virtually unprecedented situation of an electorate which has, for 16 consecutive polls, failed to anoint any party with more than 33 points. And while the Conservatives may take some comfort at a little new breathing space, at 32 points, they are far short of where they were when they were in the last election. For all of the short term excitement this affair produced, it may well serve nothing other than to reinforce increasing voter disillusionment that there is no clear choice to lead the country in the coming years. HIGHLIGHTS National federal vote intention: 31.7% CPC 27.1% LPC 16.3% NDP 12.6% Green 9.5% BQ 2.7% other Direction of government: 46.6% wrong direction 41.4% right direction 12.0% don t know/no response Please note that the methodology is provided at the end o f this document. Page 1

Top Line Results: Federal vote intention 50 40 30 31.7 27.1 20 10 0 16.3 12.6 9.5 2.7 CPC LPC NDP GP BQ 50 Weekly tracking of federal vote intention 40 30 20 10 0 2008 Oct- Nov- Dec- 08 Election 08 08 Results Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- 10 Feb- Mar- Apr- 10 10 10 Line 6 Note: The data on federal vote intention are based on decided voters only. Our survey also finds that 13.6% of Canadians are undecided/ineligible to vote. Copyright 2010. No reproduction without permission BASE: Decided voters; most recent data point April 14 April 20 (n=18) Page 2

Direction of government Q. All things considered, would you say the Government of Canada is moving in the right direction or the wrong direction? 60 Wrong direction Right direction 50 40 30 20 May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Copyright 2010. No reproduction without permission BASE: Canadians; most recent data point April 14 April 20 (n=half sample) Page 3

Detailed Tables: National Federal Vote Intention Margin of NATIONALLY 31.7% 27.1% 16.3% 12.6% 9.5% 2.7% 18 2.3 REGION British Columbia 34.7% 21.6% 28.1% 13.3% 0.0% 2.3% 277 5.9 Alberta 56.4% 16.7% 10.5% 11.8% 0.0% 4.7% 196 7.0 Saskatchewan/Manitoba 43.8% 23.2% 18.2% 11.8% 0.0% 2.9% 159 7.8 Ontario 33.1% 34.6% 17.0% 13.1% 0.0% 2.3% 610 4.0 Quebec 13.8% 22.7% 9.8% 12.0% 38.4% 3.4% 424 4.8 Atlantic Canada 34.7% 32.1% 20.0% 13.2% 0.0% 0.0% 143 8.2 Male 35.4% 27.1% 12.1% 12.6% 9.3% 3.6% 903 3.3 Female 28.1% 27.2% 20.4% 12.7% 9.8% 1.8% 906 3.3 <25 17.8% 24.3% 22.8% 21.7% 9.0% 4.4% 157 7.8 25-44 29.9% 25.5% 17.3% 13.7% 10.4% 3.2% 539 4.2 45-64 33.9% 27.6% 15.4% 10.9% 10.4% 1.7% 731 3.6 65+ 39.3% 31.0% 12.1% 8.6% 6.4% 2.7% 382 5.0 High school or less 31.1% 22.2% 16.8% 12.3% 13.7% 3.8% 510 4.3 College or CEGEP 35.6% 22.8% 17.5% 14.0% 7.7% 2.3% 603 4.0 University or higher 28.8% 34.5% 14.8% 11.7% 8.0% 2.2% 696 3.7 METROPOLITAN CANADA Vancouver 36.2% 28.0% 27.4% 7.5% 0.0% 1.0% 94 10.1 Calgary 47.2% 19.4% 15.2% 18.2% 0.0% 0.0% 55 13.2 Toronto 30.6% 40.8% 14.3% 12.3% 0.0% 2.0% 192 7.1 Ottawa 41.7% 27.8% 10.4% 18.4% 0.0% 1.7% 108 9.4 Montreal 15.6% 21.8% 13.9% 13.6% 32.4% 2.6% 192 7.1 Page 4

Federal Vote Intention British Columbia OVERALL 34.7% 21.6% 28.1% 13.3% 2.3% 277 5.9 Male 41.9% 20.9% 18.9% 15.3% 3.0% 150 8.0 Female 26.2% 21.8% 38.9% 11.9% 1.3% 127 8.7 <25 25.0% 18.3% 29.4% 27.3% 0.0% 23 20.4 25-44 32.6% 19.0% 29.7% 16.9% 1.9% 86 10.6 45-64 34.2% 20.1% 33.1% 10.9% 1.7% 106 9.5 65+ 41.9% 30.0% 18.8% 4.6% 4.7% 62 12.5 High school or less 34.6% 12.7% 40.4% 8.4% 4.0% 59 12.8 College or CEGEP 35.8% 17.8% 29.5% 14.5% 2.4% 115 9.1 University or higher 31.9% 30.3% 21.5% 15.6% 0.8% 103 9.7 Federal Vote Intention Alberta OVERALL 56.4% 16.7% 10.5% 11.8% 4.7% 196 7.0 Male 54.9% 18.4% 11.3% 9.6% 5.9% 120 9.0 Female 56.1% 14.4% 11.0% 15.6% 2.9% 76 11.2 <25 37.6% 17.9% 22.1% 14.6% 7.8% 19 22.5 25-44 52.9% 18.9% 15.7% 9.7% 2.7% 53 13.5 45-64 63.6% 15.6% 5.0% 11.5% 4.3% 92 10.2 65+ 55.3% 12.6% 8.1% 18.4% 5.6% 32 17.3 High school or less 60.5% 11.4% 12.1% 6.4% 9.6% 64 12.3 College or CEGEP 68.6% 10.7% 5.2% 13.8% 1.7% 56 13.1 University or higher 41.8% 24.9% 14.6% 17.0% 1.7% 76 11.2 Page 5

Federal Vote Intention Saskatchewan/Manitoba OVERALL 43.8% 23.2% 18.2% 11.8% 2.9% 159 7.8 Male 40.1% 24.1% 20.2% 12.8% 2.8% 90 10.3 Female 43.8% 22.5% 17.7% 11.9% 4.1% 69 11.8 <25 21.4% 34.8% 11.2% 26.9% 5.6% 13 27.2 25-44 36.9% 18.2% 21.0% 16.3% 7.6% 41 15.3 45-64 45.3% 29.9% 19.2% 5.5% 0.0% 64 12.3 65+ 60.9% 12.0% 19.7% 7.4% 0.0% 41 15.3 High school or less 45.6% 22.9% 16.0% 15.5% 0.0% 51 13.7 College or CEGEP 49.0% 13.8% 28.3% 5.7% 3.1% 50 13.9 University or higher 32.7% 32.0% 13.0% 15.7% 6.5% 58 12.9 Federal Vote Intention Ontario OVERALL 33.1% 34.6% 17.0% 13.1% 2.3% 610 4.0 Male 39.4% 33.9% 10.6% 13.8% 2.4% 288 5.8 Female 27.4% 35.1% 22.7% 12.6% 2.2% 322 5.5 <25 19.5% 29.3% 30.6% 18.5% 2.0% 50 13.9 25-44 32.4% 31.5% 18.7% 13.7% 3.8% 180 7.3 45-64 34.0% 37.9% 14.5% 12.3% 1.3% 247 6.2 65+ 41.3% 36.9% 9.5% 10.7% 1.6% 133 8.5 High school or less 33.1% 32.0% 16.7% 16.0% 2.2% 137 8.4 College or CEGEP 37.4% 30.4% 18.1% 11.8% 2.3% 193 7.1 University or higher 30.4% 38.8% 15.8% 12.6% 2.4% 280 5.9 Page 6

Federal Vote Intention Quebec Margin of OVERALL 13.8% 22.7% 9.8% 12.0% 38.4% 3.4% 424 4.8 Male 15.2% 22.7% 7.4% 9.7% 39.9% 5.2% 192 7.1 Female 13.1% 22.9% 11.8% 13.0% 37.7% 1.5% 232 6.4 <25 3.9% 20.7% 10.0% 25.0% 30.9% 9.5% 40 15.5 25-44 15.0% 24.1% 9.3% 11.3% 37.3% 3.0% 143 8.2 45-64 15.2% 17.0% 10.2% 10.2% 45.7% 1.8% 168 7.6 65+ 16.2% 33.6% 8.6% 5.9% 32.0% 3.7% 73 11.5 High school or less 10.9% 20.8% 8.4% 10.6% 44.4% 4.9% 148 8.1 College or CEGEP 17.7% 19.8% 8.4% 18.7% 32.4% 3.1% 135 8.4 University or higher 14.1% 28.0% 12.2% 4.8% 38.9% 1.9% 141 8.3 Federal Vote Intention Atlantic Canada OVERALL 34.7% 32.1% 20.0% 13.2% 0.0% 143 8.2 Male 27.0% 36.8% 18.6% 17.6% 0.0% 63 12.4 Female 40.2% 26.7% 21.9% 11.2% 0.0% 80 11.0 <25 18.3% 26.3% 32.7% 22.7% 0.0% 12 28.3 25-44 37.6% 27.3% 15.1% 20.0% 0.0% 36 16.3 45-64 33.3% 35.8% 21.8% 9.1% 0.0% 54 13.3 65+ 37.6% 36.3% 18.5% 7.6% 0.0% 41 15.3 High school or less 36.5% 20.8% 26.5% 16.1% 0.0% 51 13.7 College or CEGEP 36.9% 24.8% 24.6% 13.7% 0.0% 54 13.3 University or higher 25.0% 56.4% 5.6% 13.0% 0.0% 38 15.9 Page 7

Direction of Government Q. All things considered, would you say the Government of Canada is moving in the right direction or the wrong direction? Right Direction Wrong Direction DK/NR Margin of NATIONALLY 41.4% 46.6% 12.0% 1061 3.0 REGION British Columbia 40.9% 48.0% 11.1% 162 7.7 Alberta 59.1% 31.1% 9.7% 119 9.0 Saskatchewan/Manitoba 45.3% 40.4% 14.3% 98 9.9 Ontario 45.0% 42.0% 13.1% 353 5.2 Quebec 26.1% 63.3% 10.7% 234 6.4 Atlantic Canada 43.4% 42.8% 13.8% 95 10.1 Male 46.0% 45.0% 9.0% 505 4.4 Female 37.3% 48.0% 14.7% 556 4.2 <25 29.0% 55.6% 15.4% 97 10.0 25-44 41.6% 50.4% 8.0% 307 5.6 45-64 44.7% 43.7% 11.6% 418 4.8 65+ 42.6% 39.2% 18.1% 239 6.3 High school or less 41.4% 45.6% 12.9% 323 5.5 College or CEGEP 42.6% 44.8% 12.6% 349 5.3 University or higher 40.3% 49.0% 10.7% 389 5.0 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Conservative Party of Canada 81.0% 11.4% 7.6% 324 5.4 Liberal Party of Canada 28.5% 58.7% 12.8% 237 6.4 NDP 28.0% 63.7% 8.2% 153 7.9 Green Party 22.1% 63.3% 14.5% 116 9.1 Bloc Quebecois 7.0% 82.9% 10.1% 76 11.2 Undecided 21.4% 64.8% 13.9% 25 19.6 Page 8

Methodology: EKOS weekly tracking polls are conducted using Interactive Voice Recognition (IVR) technology, which allows respondents to enter their preferences by punching the keypad on their phone, rather than telling them to an operator. In an effort to reduce the coverage bias of landline only RDD, we created a dual land-line/cell phone RDD sampling frame for this research. As a result, we are able to reach those with both a landline and cell phone, as well as cell phone only households and landline only households. This dual frame yields a near perfect unweighted distribution on age group and gender, something almost never seen with traditional landline RDD sample or interviewer-administered surveys. The field dates for this survey are April 14 April 20, 2010. 1 In total, a random sample of 2,084 Canadians aged 18 and over responded to the survey (including a sub-sample of 1,8 decided voters). The margin of error associated with the total sample is +/-2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Please note that the margin of error increases when the results are sub-divided (i.e., error margins for sub-groups such as region, sex, age, education). All the data have been statistically weighted to ensure the samples composition reflects that of the actual population of Canada according to Census data. 1 Please note that these dates are not inclusive of the weekends, as we do not survey on Saturday or Sunday. Page 9